| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
I still have not received your original response email as of this time. I did receive your latest email though. Chalk one up to the vaguaries of the internet. It has happened before (an email once took over a month to be delivered), and it was impossible for me to discern a delay in delivery for a lack of response. I apologize, and will certainly not hold you to your offer of a free month's membership, though I thank you.
As befits Murphy's Law, I will likely receive your original response any time now...
|
08-21-12 01:17am
|
Reply
177
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
I did not believe it was a con. It was a technical problem. That was why I wrote the help center and submitted a ticket as it requests. But I never received a reply. Nothing. This is the first time I have been contacted by your site's help center. I appreciate the offer of a free month, and will take you up on it, but you would have made a multi-month customer of me had you just replied to my ticket in the two days before the offer expired. I am just disappointed by the whole experience.
|
08-20-12 10:38pm
|
Reply
178
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
That's a terribly convoluted way to go about getting a discount. I applaud your tenacity. One would think you would simply follow the link that says "Join Here" as I did, but evidently not. I cannot test your method as the offer has expired. Thanks for the help.
|
08-15-12 08:51am
|
Reply
179
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for your suggestion, and I tried it, but it still did not bring up the 1/2 off offer. I am disappointed about not getting the offer, but more disappointed that no one bothered to respond to my email to customer service. It was polite and asked for them to help me get the 1/2 offer. If my email had been rude or vulgar, I could understand them not helping, but it was not. This was just bad customer service. I am very disappointed, especially as I have been a member several times and love their content.
|
08-14-12 11:46pm
|
Reply
180
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
kutloch's Reply
Thanks for the response kuloch. But I will remind you that not all progress is positive, but the changes you mention are welcome.
I welcome changes to W4B that make the site more easily accessible to all but stand by my initial comments. I recently had a membership to W4B, and didn't access the site for at least 20 days of my membership because I loathed the site design. Thanks to W4B for taking our comments seriously and making changes. I look forward to visiting your site again in the future to see the changes for myself.
|
06-06-19 05:58pm
|
Reply
181
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I got an update notice from W4B that their new site design was geared toward making use by tablets and phones the priority. I never use anything but a desktop to access porn, so don't care. I saw a way to access the old interface, but you have to log in to it separately and do so every time.
As to the "dig in and enjoy the experience" advice, I joined specifically to find a few models and their sets. Now I need to spend extra time looking for them. If I was just a casual member, I might accept their philosophy, but I want specific things, and their design is a major hindrance.
Thanks for the discussion, pinkpanther. You make some good points.
|
04-26-19 05:30pm
|
Reply
182
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
To each their own. I hate their site design. Point in case from last night--I wanted to search models, but there is no feature for it. I wanted to organize models alphabetically, but there is only one way to do it, by popularity. You literally have to scroll down one very long page to see the models, and point the mouse on the model to see their name (otherwise it's hidden). There's no way to search their site at all, not by model, not by content, no way at all. It annoyed me to no end.
|
04-24-19 12:44am
|
Reply
183
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Your excellent review made me give this site another look. I'm awed by the quality and eroticism of the site. Thanks.
|
09-22-18 11:23pm
|
Reply
184
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Good review rearadmiral, but one thing I'd like to note is that you say there are a wide range of model types. The majority of the models are Russian, with most others being Europeans and a fair number of latinas. There is a dearth of ebony models on the site.
Still WAH is in my opinion the premier hairy site on the internet.
|
01-22-21 11:14am
|
Reply
185
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I'm not sure if that's the reason my download speeds improved, but whatever the reason I'm really glad they're back to full speed. I noticed that they've got the same ownership as Adult Time as well (I have subs to both sites).
|
07-05-20 04:59pm
|
Reply
186
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
LOLZ. Very good.
|
05-30-19 02:58pm
|
Reply
187
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I started viewing porn in Playboy and Penthouse in the late 80s. Pretty much every woman had a bush then. It's what I associate with being a sexually mature woman, and I find a nice thick patch of pubic hair aesthetically pleasing as well as a joy to the touch.
|
09-15-18 05:40am
|
Reply
188
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the kind words. I try to do reviews when I can, and it's always nice when they're well received.
I was a member of Love Hairy previously, and thought about mentioning their site in my review. Like most Met Art sites, they have great content with beautiful models and great photography, but most of the models had very little pubic hair--just a little triangle--rather than a full hairy bush.
Thanks for the suggestion though. :)
|
09-15-18 03:55am
|
Reply
189
|
We Like To Suck
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I joined this site believing it would be an oral-only site. I was wrong, but not disappointed with the content. However, I do think the name is misleading.
|
03-29-20 05:23pm
|
