| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes, and add to that the fact that those of us who willingly pay to support these sites often have limitations (streaming-only for example) that people who use piracy sites don't have. It seems as if we're being punished.
|
02-05-17 02:48pm
|
Reply
702
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I’d guess that at least 80% of memberships I buy are rejoins. For a while last year all I did was cycle through a list of sites because there was nothing new that interested me. More recently I’ve looked at annual memberships and I’ll opt for those if it’s a good deal. On those rare occasions when a site offers a good TBP discount that also recurs at that same low price I’ll keep a membership going.
Regular sites include:
• Evil Angel (recurring
• Hookup Hotshot (annual)
• Amateur Allure (I used to pay an annual subscription but they doubled that so I’ll now rejoin a few times per year)
• Legal Porno (I add credits several times per year)
• Hard X (2-3x per year)
• Dark X (2-3x per year)
• Erotica X (2-3x per year)
• Tushy (recurring)
• Holed (annual)
• Lubed (annual)
• Jules Jordan (2-3 x per year)
• FTV Girls (1x per year)
• Burning Angel (1x per year)
• Teen Fidelity / Porn Fidelity (2-3x per year)
• Exploited College Girls (2-3x per year)
• New Sensations (2-3x per year)
• Desperate Pleasures (1x per year)
• Nubile Films (1x per year)
• Reality Kings (1x per year)
• Kink.com (2-3x per year, maybe more now that they offer ‘network access)
• X-Art (1x per year)
• Woodman Casting (1x per year)
• Wake Up n Fuck (1x per year)
(As an aside, I wish more sites gave the discounted price month after month rather than recurring at a much high rate. It seems to me that sites could make a lot more money with having more people stay longer at a lower price than they would in hoping a few people would forget to cancel and they got a smaller number of higher-priced subscriptions.)
|
02-05-17 06:04am
|
Reply
703
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Thanks for clarifying that.
|
02-03-17 01:44pm
|
Reply
704
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I think I joined Passion HD and was then offered a network upgrade for a fair price (for an annual membership) so I jumped at it. If they had (or I had seen) the lifetime membership I'd have probably opted for that since this is an amazing network. I was maybe a month or so into the membership when they added Holed, which I had previously joined as a stand-alone site. To say that I was pleased with that addition would be a wee bit of an understatement. Holed was my favourite new site of 2016 and remains in my list of top few favourites. Lubed is another great site.
My annual membership runs for another six or seven months but I'm going to make a note to myself to look to see if the lifetime membership is still available. Thanks for the tip.
|
01-30-17 03:39pm
|
Reply
705
|
Water Bondage
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
I didn't notice that you had posted a review of Water Bondage until just now. I had a membership there many years ago and really liked what they offered. I occasionally check in to see if they've started updating but obviously they haven't. I'm not aware of any other site quite like this.
And I'm with you - the new 'network' access that Kink is offering is a great value. This is still among the best BDSM networks available.
|
01-23-17 03:25pm
|
Reply
706
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
This is a tough call as this is my favourite body type and there are a lot of beautiful women that fall into this category in the business. I like all of the models listed in the question and I buy and download anything with them in it but I'd have to say that my 'it' girl now is Megan Rain.
|
01-14-17 05:23am
|
Reply
707
|
N/A
|
Reply of
machoman's Poll
I'm over 20TB now, not including backup. I'm a bit of a hoarder but I do cull my collection every few years and when I do I usually delete a few terabytes.
But with the new US government, maybe porn hoarding isn't such a bad idea...
|
01-13-17 02:21pm
|
Reply
708
|
Granddadz
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks for that info Amanda. That settles it - no joining for me.
|
01-12-17 03:20pm
|
Reply
709
|
Granddadz
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Reply
Yeah, I'm a little reluctant to be the test subject here...!
|
01-12-17 03:20pm
|
Reply
710
|
Box Truck Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Thanks for your kind words. Even without a discount this is a good value as it is innovative and updates regularly. It'd be great to see an America site or studio do this.
|
01-07-17 12:06pm
|
Reply
711
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm a big fan of this genre. I like the public element of it though admittedly it is often poorly shot due to space constraints.
|
01-07-17 11:29am
|
Reply
712
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I agree that this is a great fetish network. I wish some of the dormant sites would become active again. This network covers a broad range of fetishes.
|
01-04-17 05:40pm
|
Reply
713
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
I like the genres they cover but I find some of their scene setups to be repetitive. The scenes seem to follow a set pattern.
If you're still a member there can you see if Brutal Pickups has updated recently please? I was a member there recently and the most recent update was May 2016. I like the public element of those scenes and would consider rejoining if they had new stuff.
|
01-03-17 04:57pm
|
Reply
714
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Yeah, I hadn't thought of Legal Porno. As you say, it is expensive but worth it. Evil Angel can come close but there is no substitute for LP stuff.
|
01-03-17 04:54pm
|
Reply
715
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
It depends on the criteria. If the award is open to any site then I'd probably choose Evil Angel. They crank out a lot of amazing porn and seem to have hit on a business model that works. And the site isn't pricey either so that helps.
But, if the criteria is a new site in 2016 then I'd have to vote for Holed. It's no coincidence that my favourite scene from 2016 also comes from there.
|
01-02-17 06:24am
|
Reply
716
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Cameron Diaz does it for me.
|
12-29-16 05:38am
|
Reply
717
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Femanon's Comment
Ah, our good friends at Centrobill strike again. I had the same problem a few months ago and a member here had posted an email address that actually works. This is too late now for you to cancel your trial membership but it if still recurs this should do it. The email is linked in this thread on the forum:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=4680
And don't feel bad about getting burned by not doing all the research that you should. It's happened to a lot of us...
|
12-27-16 05:28am
|
Reply
718
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I rarely listen to music at home so there is no need for me to invest in equipment. My wife and I have such different tastes in music that whatever each of us plays annoys the other. She prefers top-40 stuff and I have a broad range of preferred music styles from traditional bluegrass, through 'classic' country and into 70's rock. The only common theme in my music collection is that with rare exceptions not much is newer than the late 1970s.
|
12-27-16 05:23am
|
Reply
719
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
One thing that continues to impress me about PU is how civil everyone has remained, even with new members joining all the time. The bar was set high and has stayed that way. I can't imagine a more civil forum on any topic exists on the internet.
|
12-24-16 05:00am
|
Reply
720
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Having a counterpoint to mostly positive reviews is good though. PU is invaluable for that reason.
|
12-24-16 04:58am
|
Reply
721
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Part of me wants to strangle you for writing bad things about Tushy, but the bigger part of me has to admit that you’re right. Objectively, Tushy is a bit dull. They strive for a certain look in every scene and that includes the models they cast. While the scenes aren't formulaic they do stick within some narrow boundaries. And you’re right, ethnicity, age and body type are among those boundaries.
I think it’s great for anyone reading PU reviews to see that there is a counter-view to the glowing reviews that some of us wrote.
This is still a favourite site of mine and will likely remain so for a long time but I can appreciate and understand your counterpoints. I like the model types the select and I like how the scenes are shot and edited, even if they are a bit stilted. But the big thing I really like about the site is that the formula they use (probably it’s just a big wad of cash!) obviously appeals to models who don’t normally do anal scenes. One the big draws to this site for me is the first and rare anals that they shoot.
But your points are definitely valid and will add a lot of credibility to how PU members review the site. Even if you're wrong... :-)
|
12-21-16 02:55pm
|
Reply
722
|
Gangbang Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Not to mention that I need to write more reviews or you'll be taking over the #2 spot here soon! :-)
|
12-17-16 05:24am
|
Reply
723
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
Nothing other than online stuff. My collection has been entirely online stuff for probably close to a decade now. It's so much easier to manage and store that way.
|
12-17-16 04:59am
|
Reply
724
|
Gangbang Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
This sounds like a site I'd like and I wasn't aware it existed. Based on your review I think I might join.
|
12-17-16 04:58am
|
Reply
725
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
I agree with merc77.
|
12-09-16 09:29am
|
