| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
I occasionally have to set the record straight when people say that I don't like breasts. I point out that I most definitely love breasts - I just prefer A and B cups. But, admittedly, on a scale of importance to me, breasts rank much lower than a nice bum.
Mmmm... AAA-cup...
|
04-08-17 08:37am
|
Reply
677
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Please don't write "AAA-cup" again. I drooled on my keyboard...
|
04-07-17 04:41am
|
Reply
678
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
someyoungguy's Reply
I did join and I like the site. I really like the exclusive stuff that you also mentioned liking.
|
04-05-17 03:51pm
|
Reply
679
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
LOL! I think you discovered why our recollections of Scan and Angels is different. You thought the models at Angels were better looking and that's the opposite from what I thought - but you note that the Scan models were "really skinny, young, small breasted..." Yup... that explains why I preferred that site!
Thanks for solving that mystery.
|
04-04-17 06:00pm
|
Reply
680
|
Sinful XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
someyoungguy's Review
I've been considering joining this site for a little while since I've developed an interest in sensual stuff. Your review was really helpful and I think on the strength of your recommendation I'll take the plunge and join.
|
04-03-17 10:09am
|
Reply
681
|
Girls Rimming
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review.
I'm a big fan of girl-on-girl and guy-on-girl rimming too. I like director/performers like Mike Adriano because he does a lot of rimming on the models.
For me the act of a woman rimming a man isn't really about the act itself as much as it's about the seeming submission. I like porn that has a D/s theme and girl-on-guy-rimming, at least in my brain, fits that bill.
|
04-03-17 06:38am
|
Reply
682
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Many years ago when I first joined ALS Scan I was a bit uncomfortable with how they classed the models between ALS Scan and ALS Angels, with ALS Angels models 'unworthy' of the main site. maybe I'm the only member who noticed that though.
What I really miss is their Caribbean trips. I still watch those occasionally as they're a lot of fun to see. I suspect that with the porn market these days those kinds of shoots are far to expensive. They also had some European public nudity stuff that was great too. I wish they'd have more of those too!
|
04-03-17 06:35am
|
Reply
683
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
You've written an interesting review of an interesting site. I've been a member here a few times myself and I share most of your opinions on the site. I haven't joined in a while mostly because the speculum use and vaginal fisting really aren't my thing.
I didn't know that they were affiliated with Met-Art these days. Thanks for pointing that out.
|
04-01-17 03:01pm
|
Reply
684
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Amen to that! LP is becoming a bit of a circus these days.
|
03-29-17 03:56pm
|
Reply
685
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Upgrade their servers again? That implies that they've done so in the past! With these speeds it is as if they have an old Atari as their server.
With LP, I'm willing to overlook their quirky ways because there isn't really anyone else like them out there. I even overlooked their requirement that your account had to be verified but at least they've dropped that now. As for pricing, it doesn't happen often, but there are some scenes that can hit near 8 tickets. I realize this is supply-and-demand, but the scenes with A-list American models tend to be priced the highest.
|
03-29-17 02:43pm
|
Reply
686
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You're right. I just ran a speed test and I got 311 Mbps, which is obviously quite different from 311MBps. I didn't know the difference until now. Thanks for pointing that out.
I just did a test and downloaded a scene from Evil Angel and IDM showed I was getting 40 MB/s. It took maybe 30 seconds to download a 1.68GB scene. I thought that maybe I was capped at downloads but I now see that if I'm getting 40MB/s that's probably much closer to my capacity than I thought.
Thanks for shedding some light on that for a non-tech guy.
But... I get 40MB/s from Evil Angel and get less than 1/40th of that from Legal Porno. I'm still mad at them!
|
03-29-17 02:40pm
|
Reply
687
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I had something similar with Amateur Allure. I used to subscribe regularly and then took out an annual membership because it was a good deal. They've since increased their annual membership fee so it isn't a better deal. Now I'm back to joining every six months or so. I'd stay a member if they had a better offer.
|
03-27-17 03:05pm
|
Reply
688
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
I'm glad to see that this is likely resolved. I wish more webmasters were as customer-oriented as this person is.
|
03-25-17 06:06pm
|
Reply
689
|
Dungeon Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
Great review! Thanks for adding it. Kink always seems to be the Gold Standard for any BDSM niche and this site is no different. I'm really glad that they now offer one price for all-site access.
And others may not agree, but I appreciate you adding "anal in almost every scene" as a pro!
|
03-25-17 06:04pm
|
Reply
690
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Poll
Years ago I maintained a Videobox membership for more than five years running. That was when VB was competitive in that the resolutions offered were on par with what other sites offered. I cancelled as more and more updates were compilations or low-grade crap - and most of it available in lower resolutions than offered on other sites.
|
03-25-17 05:59pm
|
Reply
691
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
It really depends on the day for me, but most time I prefer sensual, slow and teasing. I've recently discovered edging and I quite like that too. I wish more sites featured it.
|
03-23-17 03:59am
|
Reply
692
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I have favourites that will always get the job done...
|
03-19-17 08:33am
|
Reply
693
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Review
Excellent review. Welcome to PornUsers. I think you'll find that this is a great community of friendly and mostly like-minded serious porn collectors. I look forward to reading more of your reviews in the future.
|
03-18-17 12:36pm
|
Reply
694
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm as anal about my porn collecting as I am about pron in general. I keep a list of all the active memberships I have and the past memberships I've had. That way, if I think of rejoining a site I can see when the last time was that I was a member there so I know when to start looking at uploaded videos that I haven't seen. One bit of data I track is the join date and then I also track a cancel date that I select as being five days before a renewal. Using this I have a quick and simple way to make sure nothing I don't want to renew gets renewed. Every few days I check the list to see if there is a membership I need to cancel.
See... I told you I was anal.
|
03-14-17 05:11pm
|
Reply
695
|
Extreme Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
tomtom1983's Comment
Ah, our good friends at centrobill are still up to their old tricks. If you search the forum here you'll find some tips on an email that actually works to cancel your membership but it still takes many days.
I absolutely refuse to join any site that uses centrobill as their biller and I'm sorry to hear that you got caught in their net.
|
03-12-17 09:10am
|
Reply
696
|
N/A
|
Reply of
merc77's Poll
First, I'm not surprised that as I write this the majority of responders selected $50. Because PU members tend to be more collectors and more likely to appreciate quality and uniqueness I think we're also willing to spend more to get that.
Second, a $50+ per month site has to offer something special and that usually means a rare niche.
|
02-23-17 04:15pm
|
Reply
697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
I have a couple of friends who are aware of my collection. Only one is aware that it is the size of the Library of Congress though.
|
02-21-17 04:59pm
|
Reply
698
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
You beat me to it! I came here to post this because if Evil Angel had one easily-fixed issue this would be it. And I don't mean to imply that they have bigger issues that need fixing, because they don't. This change makes a great site more user-friendly.
Full marks to EA for listening to their members.
|
02-16-17 09:31am
|
Reply
699
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
You wrote a very thorough and balanced review.
I was one of the PU members who scored ALS much higher, but I did that in 2012 and in 2012 I thought it deserved the 97 I gave it. I was most recently a member there in 2015 and while I will certainly join again I think I'd probably score it closer to where you did.
I like their playful nature but I'm not a big fan of the near-gynecological obsession with insertions. They certainly continue to hire models with the look and body-type that I prefer.
What I miss most about the first couple of times that I joined was that they stopped doing their annual Caribbean trip (likely too costly) and stopped with their European public nudity (maybe too risky?).
Thanks for posting your balanced review. I'm sure many readers will find it helpful.
|
02-16-17 09:30am
|
Reply
700
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
No data cap yet...
|
02-15-17 05:25pm
|
