| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
All Gravure
(0)
|
Reply of
My 2 cents's Reply
Recently signed in... completely agree that beautyleg is a very high quality site - absolutely great :) Thanks for the hint! Maybe you know also a site where we can see a little more showing or even action of the same stunning girls? That would be fantastic...
|
02-01-16 03:28am
|
Reply
2
|
All Gravure
(0)
|
Reply of
Twotails's Review
Thank you for your valuable replies :) Next I'll try out beautylegs and report...
For allgravure.com I found a good way (win7): "Advanced renamer" does a perfect job! However, it's REALLY sucking that there are duplicate sets under different names and all the other s*** they're doing to make it difficult to enjoy! And resolution is very poor. So is mostly picture quality. THE ONE good thing to mention are the (sometimes) beautiful girls. But really, you're investing hours here to get what you search! It's VERY BAD! I'd love to pay 20 bucks more and spare 7 hours of my time...!!
They do EVERYthing to get you off what you're looking for.
Got about 30'000 pics in Lightroom now... booooaaah! 20% are double, 30% are junk, 60 hours of getting through... mayby 10'000 beautiful, 2'000 in an acceptable quality... WHY AM I DOING THIS? Too much time... It has to be the girls...
Video quality is also poor: NO HD, something like "500x340 pixel", maybe 700x450... not nice in the age of 4K...!! Shame!
Only good thing: SOME girls (find them...) are really stunning...
Down from 65 to 60 to send a signal to the masters of the page! Needs A LOT of work, but has potential..... btw: let panties down, please...!
|
12-16-15 10:51am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Only one at a time, always some break between memberships.
|
11-16-15 04:59am
|
Reply
4
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I find the end of Kim - "Do Me Darling" very glamorous, with that sort of kissing we're looking for - perfect :D
|
07-18-15 03:37pm
|
Reply
5
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Yes, it's plain vanilla and sugar and that's what makes it perfect for my taste :)
I don't mind if there are big known pornstars, as long as they are gorgeous. And boy, HOW gorgeous some of them are :D On X-Art I found some girls I didn't see on the other sites (e.g. Belle, Kim, Kaylee, Aubrey) and had a rare but joyful encounter with known ones.
Navigation is in fact not perfect. E.g. it's difficult to find a specific model or set, the search function doesn't really function!
This is not a big drawback for me, however. Adding the girl to favorites is a good workaround. Image quality and "model flawlessness" are ways more important to me.
|
07-18-15 02:53pm
|
Reply
6
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Jazz's Review
Absolutely agree, it's fantastic :D
|
07-17-15 08:31am
|
Reply
7
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thank you Pat, this is a really interesting link. I'm very new here and even quite new in pay porn.
I'll study the link and then further answer your message. Here it is middle of the night (almost morning).
|
07-28-14 05:27pm
|
Reply
8
|
Just Teens Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I'm now having a close look into TeenMegaWorld. Of course, I found some of the same models there (some are in many sites), but not one set is on both. So my supposition of exclusiveness is confirmed.
About quality I've written a comment in the TMW page. JustTeensPorn delivers the same video quality (throughout HD720) but ways better photo quality.
|
07-28-14 02:45am
|
Reply
9
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
1. I like if a site delivers state of the art quality photos and videos of the same set.
It means for newer content FullHD Videos and for Photos at least 10 Megapixel.
I wouldn't like videos being neglected! On the contrary: FullHD is not something new. At least for the last 8 years all original content is FullHD, I'm sure. So "high quality video" does not mean 1280x720. It meant that maybe 10 years ago.
But here you will hardly find any FullHD content. There is some in the 2014 updates, but not much. As already 4K is the new highend quality available, the on video specialised TeenMegaWorld still deliver only 1280x720 HD!
I already found some sites that do provide good quality photo sets along with the corresponding video sets: 18OnlyGirls/YoungLegalPorn (here also much FullHD) and ExclusiveTeenporn/JustTeensPorn.
3. I found a solution: including the added-date yields a name like "Juliya C_2012-10-01_WowOrgasms".
|
07-28-14 02:06am
|
Reply
10
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for your answer.
1. About ANY set :( Yeah, also just found one with 1667x2500, but most are even much below. But even THAT is very dissatisfying. I would expect something like 3500x5000. On all the other sites which I know that is more or less normal.
That's clearly not what I understand under "plus accompanying photo sets"!
These 500'000+ photos are rather useless for me.
3. Not renaming is the main problem. What name to give when you don't know the set name?
When I download set 1 of 3 of a model in a given site and give it a name, then come back in a week (or in a year), which was it that I downloaded already?
I don't mind about sounding names like "Sweet Teen", "Set 02" would already do the job.
|
07-27-14 10:35am
|
Reply
11
|
Just Teens Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Twotails's Review
Thank you both!
Following Pat's advice, I'm already exploring teenmegaworld.
The amount of content is overwhelming!
I will tell you about my experiences. So long...
|
07-26-14 01:28pm
|
