Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yes likewise I see myself as a collector. I've never illegally shared anything, and it's hard not to see these streaming/rental restrictions as attempts to restrict illegal activity. But the irony is that those intent on downloading the content to share still can do, albeit with a fair bit of techy effort. So the younger subscribers won't be stopped from ripping off the content the pornsites seek to protect, just the older generation will, being probably less tech savvy and more honest.
I think the pendulum will swing back due to simple economics. Like putting up your prices in a declining market, streaming only means squeezing harder the shrinking pool of customers you still have, who then shrink some more and must be squeezed harder still. This is not the business model of the Companies that conquered the world (Amazon, McDonalds etc) so I can confidently say they'll not pursue streaming-only for very long.
|
09-03-20 11:09am
|
Reply
2
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Traditional 'paid-for' porn has been fighting a losing battle with a growing sea of free stuff for years. I'm sure this has squeezed profits. Add to that a new global recession/depression that will shrink cash available for non-essentials like porn. Meanwhile, many younger people see all media (music/video) as free by right and will never pay anything, witness what Napster etc did to the music world.
It seems to me that porn is increasingly supported by an ageing population who once bought their VHS Videos or DVDs, and still now pay up for downloads. But we are being edged out by a younger generation with different attitudes. Against this, we have this new idea that those still buying porn (not torrent file sharing or password cracking) will put up with just 'renting' our porn and being left with nothing afterwards. Well, I expect to see that pendulum swing back towards downloading/owning, for those studios still around to repair their folly.
|
09-02-20 01:06pm
|
Reply
3
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi both, thanks for your comments. Yes it's weird that the previews all cut out the cumshot, i.e. the best bit. Sites do need to protect their content against those who'll never pay, but they also need to offer enough to draw the customer in. A mistake I hope they correct.
Signup also has a pre-checked membership of www.purecfnm.com, generally I hate pre-checks but this was only a few dollars for month one. It's a kind of light weight femdom thing, the guys get sexually exploited but far from in a proper BDSM way, I don't think these models (you're right in spotting some as professional) are in to anything too serious. There's a fun aspect you can sense in these two sites that makes them both refreshingly new/amateurish and not quite hard enough at the same time
|
10-27-18 12:07am
|
Reply
4
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Couldn't agree more with pat362. When the action finally starts, after 20 long minutes, I want the fly-on-the-wall camera angle to give way to something up close and detailed. Shoplyter have done this for the BJ scenes, which look good as the original reviewer rightly said. So why am I watching most of the penetration from far away?
Shoplyter need to remember that the best porn is closely filmed in HD. The mock spycam needs to vanish once the action finally starts. Take a look at gyno-x.com for how this should be filmed.
ENF/CMNF is a really underserved niche; strip/cavity search would be such a winner if Shoplyter could just make a few minor changes. The E is for embarrassed, and the undressing and searching needs to be made slow and intimate and detailed. Split/inset screen showing the model's face whilst her lower regions are examined (as in the slow anal penetration of Backroom Casting Couch) could transform this site from a frustrating letdown into something special.
|
06-24-18 01:14am
|
Reply
5
|
Haze Her
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Now Streaming Only?
Just joined this site, which as others have said hasn't been updated since about 2013, and found videos can only be watched in their 'JW Player' browser window. No way I can find to download anything.
This angers me as I never join streaming-only sites, especially tiny ones.
Anyone else found this?
|
06-23-18 08:35am
|
Reply
6
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for the suggestion, I've had a quick look and appears interesting if not huge. I'll let you know. Cheers.
|
03-01-18 10:35am
|
Reply
7
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi rearadmiral - yes rather odd to be threatened with legal action for telling the truth. Not sure that case would have got very far!
No, I correctly read you as liking petite models, and that's no problem. I wish I could too, as it's the way so many young girls want to be anyway. I just wish there were more sites capitalising on fuller figures without going for the outright huge. I'm open to suggestions.
Perhaps one of the better/more realistic I've stumbled accross has been Dirty Director, though I'd point out that it seems to have stopped updating due to the one-man pornstar/cameraman having had an accident, from which I can only hope he recovers and resumes filming.
Whilst perhaps rather too crude/raw for those seeking polished work, and having no shortage of simply huge women, it did also have quite a few fuller figure/girl nextdoor types, never seen before or since on camera, and enjoying what they did.
|
02-28-18 11:53am
|
Reply
8
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi rearadmiral - thanks for the positive comments and welcome!
As well as all the valuable information from frequent posters like yourself, I think this forum offers the chance for users to influence the pornsites themselves. This is very valuable. I'm guessing they probably do read what people take the time to write, I know some have replied here.
Otherwise, pornsites have only good or bad subscription figures to give them the broadest of directions on what works or doesn't. Feedback is, after all, the Breakfast of Kings.
I've seen some of your recommendations and sites I think you said you regularly join, so had guessed our tastes differ on model size. Strange, isn't it? The modern trend for slimmer girls, sometimes with almost boyish figures, just leaves me cold. Like I haven't got what I paid for.
Or maybe it's an age thing? Wasn't Marylyn Monroe's hourglass figure just the definition of sex? Has that really gone? The next stop after Slim in the porn world seems to be BBW, often meaning hugely fat, with little in between. It may also be that plump figures are more the 'girl nextdoor' look which we find subliminably attainable.
True MILFs can deliver this, but often even that word is used to cover a 30 year old model with a 20 year old's figure, hardly the point.
Perhaps I will start a thread in its own right sometime about this. As well as all seeking certain figures/features we find appealing, there is so much porn out there already that we all seek something different and more real.
|
02-27-18 11:20am
|
Reply
9
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I was aware of the other Team Skeet sites, but didn't really get around to trying them, perhaps because collecting all these 4Gb downloads took quite a bit of time! I can't say I noticed any speed issues however.
It is praiseworthy that this Company is persuing novel storylines; porn seems to have turned full circle and now we're back seeking the storylines which went out of fashion way back when. I guess when pretty well anything sexual has been done on some pornsite or other, we're left looking for some background situation/acting that injects a little spice again. But I just wish they'd used their bandwidth more creatively than here.
|
02-26-18 11:15am
|
|
