| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
The problem is that their software team has problems updating the site software.
That's why any problems at the site that are software related can't be fixed, usually.
For example, all users are now newbies. The site software no longer recognizes how many reviews a user has written, to change their status from newbie to "whatever the term was for a higher level".
And for years, it now takes 1 year before you can do a re-review of a site, even though the rules say a site can be re-reviewed after 6 months.
I think the site software was written in a computer language that the current software team does not understand, so making changes to the software is difficult.
|
09-27-22 02:54pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 12-12-24
Glad to see you're back at the PU site.
Would like to see some reviews from you.
You've written some excellent reviews in the past, well worth reading.
Wishing you well.
As for mixing mixing Pinkerton and Pink Panther, they can both win prizes.
I remember a while back, some guy won a prize at the raffle, who shouldn't have won because he wasn't eligible, and the PU site let him keep the price anyway.
So they can do whatever they want.
I see from your avatar you're still looking good.
Note: I thought Pink Panther had written your previous post. So I'm not pushing for you to win a prize until the next raffle.
LOL.
|
09-14-22 07:14am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 12-12-24
After the raffle, if you haven't won a prize, I will start a thread that you should have won a prize in the current raffle.
Because so far, there are less entrants than the number of prizes to be handed out.
The regular PU staff probably missed reading our posts on this subject.
The PU police staff (self-appointed).
LOL.
|
09-14-22 06:48am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 12-12-24
I believe PinkPanther should have some raffle tickets because he posted a review of Tgirl Japan on 08-31-22.
LKLK
|
09-13-22 06:30am
|
Reply
30
|
Daddys Lil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
I sometimes wonder if anyone reads these reviews.
Years ago, the PU community was much more active, and often responded with comments to reviews.
A lot of PU members have disabled their memberships, or have moved on to other sites or other interests.
Which is a shame.
Because their comments and insights could be interesting or useful.
|
09-11-22 08:36pm
|
Reply
31
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Problem cleared up.
Don't know what caused it.
But I can now log in to the site.
Thanks for checking, Sir.
|
09-08-22 05:03am
|
Reply
32
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Review
Excellent review.
Covers an excellent site very nicely.
I always liked MPL Studios a lot, but haven't joined them for a long time, because there are too many other sites taking my time and money.
But I agree the MPL Studio models are almost uniformly gorgeous, and beautifully photographed.
Also agree that Metart is not as exciting as it used to be. But it still is the biggest softcore photosite on the internet, with a huge backlog of very attractive models.
But I agree that some Metart photographers like to twist their models into pretzels, so you can examine their pussies and anus more closely. Which doesn't appeal to me.
LOL.
I can't believe this is your first review. You've been a member since the dinosaurs were roaming.
|
09-05-22 06:03pm
|
Reply
33
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
DanielTheManiel's Review
Nice review of a site that was once great.
It still has plenty of videos and photo sets from years earlier that are worth downloading.
It's a shame the site no longer updates.
And who knows how long this site will still be around?
|
08-16-22 04:31pm
|
Reply
34
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
Bletch's Review
I appreciate your blunt style and talking points. Makes the review more appealing/interesting.
My own reviews tend to wander all over the place.
Old age creeping up on me.
LOL.
|
07-29-22 10:00am
|
Reply
35
|
Private School Jewel
(0)
|
Reply of
GoodNamesTaken's Comment
I'm not a current member of thisyearsmodel.com, but looking at the update page, I see a lot of old photosets shot years ago, with a current posting date.
Many of the current updates are not updates, but content that was posted at this site years ago, but the listed posting date has been changed to make it appear to be current updates.
So I would be very careful (or simply avoid) any long-term membership at this site.
And if you've been a member of thisyearsmodel before, you probably have downloaded much of the site contents.
Call it a scam, or misleading advertising.
The site has lots of cute models, in softcore photosets.
So if you haven't been a member before, it might be worth a one-month join.
But it's a shame when a site uses deceptive advertising for it's updates.
|
07-13-22 09:53pm
|
Reply
36
|
Amateur Creampies
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Excellent review.
Actually, one of the best reviews posted lately.
Complete overview, and lots of nice details.
Always happy to read your reviews, even if I wouldn't join some of the sites you review.
LOL. :)
|
07-04-22 12:32pm
|
Reply
37
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Good to hear from you, Sir.
Hope you're doing well.
I think that as Adult Time expands its offerings, it becomes even more of a bargain.
Adult Time is not perfect. I have problems navigating the site.
And when they take over another site, they can make changes.
For some reason, Adult Time likes to decrease the number of photos in a set.
And Adult Time doesn't offer the same choices of definition in streaming or downloading a photoset as in the original site.
But still, you're getting an increased amount of content included in an Adult Time membership.
Even if Adult Time thinks 35 is the magic number for a photoset.
But sometimes they do include more photos in a set, for some reason.
LOL.
|
07-02-22 10:33am
|
Reply
38
|
Kinky Family
(0)
|
Reply of
Meniss Limited's Reply
Thanks for the update.
Terrible situation in the Ukraine, as everyone is aware of.
Hoping that the conflict will be over as soon as possible.
That no more lives will be wasted, the suffering to end.
|
06-26-22 08:23am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 12-12-24
Also, avgazn86 submitted 2 reviews.
If you're going to eliminate reviews, can you drop everyone except me?
(Joke).
|
06-07-22 12:26pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 12-12-24
Pinkerton submitted 4 reviews.
So he should have 20 entries, plus extra entries for some reviews.
Somehow, you mis-counted one of his reviews.
|
06-07-22 12:13pm
|
Reply
41
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Welcome to the PU site.
Nice to see new faces around here.
LOL.
|
06-07-22 08:25am
|
Reply
42
|
Mylf
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Your review of the site was good to excellent. You gave a lot of nice details about the site, and your own ideas on what you liked/disliked.
They've changed the rules for the raffle recently.
First 2 prizes are $150 each.
Next 2 prizes are $100 each.
Next two prizes are $50 each.
So there will be 6 winners each raffle, instead of 3.
Which spreads the prizes out more.
So it's definitely worth writing a few reviews, to be in the running.
If you don't have the time to write detailed reviews like this one, even much simpler reviews would probably be given tickets, as long as you included a few pros, cons, and bottom line details.
But more complete reviews are definitely appreciated, if you have the time to write them.
|
05-31-22 09:29pm
|
Reply
43
|
Inserted
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
I wasn't disagreeing with what you said.
Or trying to argue with you.
Or accusing you.
It seems that when you write on the internet, people can sometimes interpret what you wrote in ways you did not mean.
I was just saying that when you're starting a new site, you're trying to make as much money as you can, to support the site.
The listed price is $20/month.
Which is less than the $30/month most sites charge.
I would not join such a small site.
That's just me.
But your idea of "site name + discounts" is a fine one.
I read that idea from you before, and I've tried it a few times.
But I'm getting really lazy in my old age, and I prefer to see them offering discounts immediately, without my clicking google too often.
Ha-ha.
I'm doing OK. Not great. As you get older, doing OK is a blessing.
Reading the news is a downturn. So much hate and bitterness in the world. I should try to ignore it.
Wishing you well.
That old song, "Mac Davis -- Stop And Smell The Roses", makes a lot of sense. Not a new idea, there was a poem in the 1700s or thereabouts about stopping to smell the roses.
So try to be grateful for what you have.
|
05-26-22 07:13am
|
Reply
44
|
Inserted
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
If you're new to porn and don't know how to check out a site before joining, you might join this site.
And then probably feel cheated or didn't get your money's worth.
Especially if you join for more than one month.
But I doubt many PU members would join this site.
At least, not until it's grown a lot.
It doesn't look like the site has false advertising.
It's a tiny site. Less than 20 videos.
They really need to combine with other sites to give members more content for their money.
|
05-25-22 08:46pm
|
Reply
45
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Excellent review.
Lots of nice details.
I found this one observation to be hilarious: "-there are too many US pornstars for my liking, who I find to invariably over-act when being fucked and slobbering when sucking cock, but that's just me being picky."
You really need to write more reviews, to raise the review standards.
LOL.
|
05-25-22 09:41am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 05-12-22
The new rules will hopefully encourage more members to write reviews.
And the prizes seem to be a fairer way of sharing the rewards.
So it looks like a nice improvement.
I'm hoping more members will start participating more actively.
|
05-13-22 05:51am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 05-12-22
A suggestion:
How are the prizes divided up?
$150 each to the first and second names drawn.
$100 each to the third and fourth names drawn.
$50 each to the fifth and sixth names drawn.
That would mean 6 people win prizes.
Your previous post would indicate that only 5 people win prizes, with the second place winner winning twice, for a total of $150+$100=$250.
|
05-12-22 08:30pm
|
Reply
48
|
Mylf
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Review
"Being that Mother’s Day was approaching, I thought what better way to celebrate moms than MILF porn."
Never thought of it that way.
But it's a great idea.
Now I know why teen porn is my favorite: I'm searching for the teen daughter I never had.
LOL.
|
05-08-22 03:08pm
|
Reply
49
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Check your email.
I sent you an email with discounted prices.
Also sent a separate email suggesting you check with Vendo (the listed biller) to make sure you're getting access to all 4 sites.
On the join page, the only site listed is Ultra Films.
But, technically, I am only a member of Wow Girls, with access to all 4 sites. That's the way it's set up by the Wow network. That what they told me, after I joined. The join details don't explain the difference, or even specifically what you are joining, as far as I remember.
|
04-02-22 07:49am
|
Reply
50
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
If you saved any of the $36/year links, and if they still work, send me one.
I'm always willing to save a few dollars.
LOL.
Maybe it's me, but if I find some videos that I really enjoy, I often think a site is worth joining, depending on the price.
There are some videos at New Sensations that I really like.
The video with Amber Moore at familyxxx.com is a keeper.
|
04-02-22 07:41am
|
