Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Sent you the email with the link for reduced join prices.
Sent you a separate email, suggesting you contact Vendo to make sure you are getting access to all 4 sites, and not just one site.
|
04-02-22 07:33am
|
Reply
52
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Send me a short note to:
LAREN00 @ YAHOO.COM
The characters after LAREN are zeros, not the letter o.
I will send you an email, with the attached email that offers a low-priced sub to the 4 sites.
$9.95/month
or
$69.95/year
The email works for me.
You might have to clear cookies on your computer.
Or not.
But the email that has a hot link that opens a page at Ultra Films.
There's a hot link, upper right corner, "Join Now", that opens a new page with the low prices.
On the first page, it says the offer is for the 4 sites.
But on the join page, it only shows Ultra Films.
So you should contact the billing agent, to make sure you're getting all 4 sites.
The billing agent is Vendo.
Call them on the phone, or if there is live chat option.
I used them once, and they were helpful.
But the join page only shows Ultra Films.
So check, before you join.
You send me an email, I will have your email.
The PU email system is not reliable.
Messages I sent, or should have received, got lost.
|
03-31-22 07:48am
|
Reply
53
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Thanks for the compliment.
I sent you the link to join the 4 sites:
$9.95/month, or
$69.95/year.
Check your email. I used the PU internal email system.
If you don't get the email (sometimes the PU internal email system does not work), reply to this message here, and let me know.
I'll send you the link or email a different way.
On second thought, tell me whether you get the PU email or not.
And if you joined.
I think $69.95/year is a fine price for access.
You should have gotten a refund from the sites.
Other people I spoke with said they got all 4 sites.
|
03-30-22 07:50am
|
Reply
54
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
i did not think your reply was demeaning in any way.
Just a wish that the site/network hadn't deleted a lot of old content.
And, in my opinion, a lot of the old content still held value.
I think they deleted the old content for housekeeping reasons: less content means less to manage.
Stay well.
|
03-27-22 10:59am
|
Reply
55
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
I agree that they deleted a lot of content produced years ago.
And, depending on each person's tastes, some of it was worth keeping.
My best guess is they were trying to upgrade the network by dropping older content that they thought was of lower quality: lower definition or less popular or whatever.
But I still feel the network is worth joining, as one of the best hardcore teen networks, because of the attractiveness of the models.
That's my opinion, of course.
I'm impressed by the low membership price they've offered: $70/year for 4 sites.
I was paying $120/year for the 3 sites.
Plus, I forget the exact figure, but Ultra Films cost me around $90/year for when I joined.
And these porn companies don't reward you for loyalty.
If you are stupid enough to keep renewing at your join price, they will charge you that, even when they are offering new members a far lower price.
So I think I was paying over $200, for the 4 sites, when I read that you could get the 4 sites for $70/year.
Which made me realize how stupid I was by just renewing my membership automatically. How much money I was wasting.
But that was my fault. Other people will often take advantage of you, if you don't watch out. That's reality.
So I think that $70/year is a bargain.
A lot of great content has disappeared in internet heaven, by porn companies who've gone out of business.
Again, that's life. But there is also a lot of what I think is good to great content that is being produced today.
Some of these models are cute or attractive or lovely or gorgeous.
So if some older content is no longer available, you have to find newer content that you find appealing.
The internet is huge. There's a ton of content that should fit your tastes. Whatever your tastes.
|
03-27-22 08:00am
|
Reply
56
|
Black Valley Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Review
I'm not a big fan of the Team Skeet sites.
Normally it would seem like a no-brainer to choose $36 for a year instead of $18 for a month.
The only problem is: if the site is not updating, then download whatever you want for 1 month, and there's no reason to extend beyond the month.
|
03-26-22 11:39pm
|
Reply
57
|
All Fine Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I agree that the quality of the photos improved a lot starting many years ago.
Before then, the photo quality was nowhere near as good as it's been for years now.
But to a degree, I don't care if the photo quality is up to MetArt standards. If the girl is really cute, or I really like her, I'm willing the collect her photosets.
I do have some favorite models at MetArt.
But there are some adorable or lovely models at the Wow sites, that I really like the videos and/or photosets.
I also agree that Freya Mayer can be stunning.
But there are other models at MetArt or Wow sites that I enjoy even more.
Jerricka, Rinna Ly, and Avril A are some of my favorites at MetArt.
To name just a few.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I've bookmarked hundreds of models at Indexxx.com, because these girls can be cute, adorable, stunning, and even lovely or beautiful.
|
03-18-22 05:55pm
|
Reply
58
|
X Sensual
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
The tip works fine at this site.
Thanks for the help.
With cookies enabled, you can bypass the login completely, and go directly to the members area.
|
03-14-22 09:40am
|
Reply
59
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Wraith, good to hear from you.
If I had the extra money, I could build my personal harem of plastic women of different body types from the New Sensations sex store.
But since I'm on limited income, I'll have to wait until I get to the Pearly Gates.
LOL.
|
03-08-22 09:49am
|
Reply
60
|
Heavy Handfuls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I haven't checked thoroughly the entire network.
I have a slow wifi connection, and can't load pages fast or easily to check.
But for just the Heavy Handfuls site, I did just check now, you're right:
the oldest scenes only have 480p for streaming and downloading, with multiple bit rates for streaming and downloading.
They started offering some videos in 720p and 1080p, at the same time they were posting some videos that only had 480p. And the bit rates offered for each definition could vary for the different videos.
This started around 2008, and went on for years.
This is assuming the posting dates for the videos are accurate.
As far as I can tell, they started offering 4K definition in 2021 at this site.
The gap between the posting dates can be very large, sometimes years.
|
03-07-22 02:26pm
|
Reply
61
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
I don't know why, but I find the videos boring, non-erotic, in spite of the lovely models and the crisp lighting.
I highly recommend the Hegre site for viewing photos online.
And some of their models are freaking gorgeous.
Hegre is a fine site, offering lovely young models in clear, crisp images and videos.
But it was a mistake for me to join for a year, in spite of the $75 price.
|
03-04-22 12:34pm
|
Reply
62
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
I should add that I'm no longer blocked.
The block was removed automatically, after a few days.
No reason why I was blocked, but it can happen.
Happy I can access the site.
I have a lifetime membership, that I bought for around $100 years ago.
So I visit the site every so often.
|
01-25-22 08:01am
|
Reply
63
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
The only thing I disagree with, I think the score should be higher.
That is personal opinion, of course.
Lovely, beautiful girls. Well photographed and videotaped.
For a very low membership price.
The site (and Adult Time access) are a bargain.
I can stare at these lovely young models for hours.
|
01-25-22 07:51am
|
Reply
64
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Thanks.
I didn't take your reply as an accusation, or anything negative.
I took it as indication you were interested in possible problems about a listed site. So your first reply was completely positive, in my eyes.
I don't know why, but sometimes I can post a reply, and people can see negative elements, even when I have no negative intent.
Maybe I should cover any posts with lots of smiley icons.
But that would be overdoing it.
Best wishes, for a happy new year.
|
01-25-22 07:17am
|
Reply
65
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Tom D,
I haven't used a download manager at this site in many months.
Probably in years, actually.
Also, I haven't downloaded any files from the site in many months.
I might have opened 2 tabs for the site, possibly, at the same time.
I can't recall.
I rarely use the site. I was using it lately to do a possible site review.
Guess I will have to wait to do a site review for now.
LOL.
|
01-22-22 12:06am
|
Reply
66
|
18 Videoz
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Tom D Admin,
Thanks again for taking the time to understand my problem.
The problem is a minor annoyance, because for some reason, as a member I have to change my password every so often.
And sometimes their password reset system does not work.
But that's my problem.
Thanks again for helping.
I still like the cute models at their site, when I can get in.
LOL.
(Grin and Bear It is the older form of: What you can't change, you have to accept.)
|
01-18-22 08:21am
|
Reply
67
|
Club Sweethearts
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Excellent review.
Great overview of the site, with lots of details.
Good to see your reviews again.
I think Club Sweethearts and Adult Prime are both first-rate teen sites, with lots of attractive teen models.
|
01-18-22 06:22am
|
Reply
68
|
18 Videoz
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Tom D Admin,
Thanks for checking.
I want to be clear about what you did.
When you entered an email address in the form provided (along with entering the captcha required):
You were sent an email with a link that states:
You will get your new password right after clicking on the following link:
http://18videoz.com/en/support/recovery-successful/9631be963ea92e3ec18d14c71c75458e
When you clicked on the link, did it open a page where you could reset your password?
When I click on the link to reset my password, it does not open a page where I can reset my password.
Instead, I get a 404 web page that states:
Not Found
The requested URL /en/support/recovery-successful/9631be963ea92e3ec18d14c71c75458e was not found on this server.
Just to be clear:
I am not asking you to reset your password.
But are you able to reset your password, if you use the link to open the password resetting page?
Or do you get a 404 error page, when you use the link to reset your password?
When I hit the link you posted, it opens a form that asks for your email, along with a captcha. Entering your email, and the captcha, will send you a email with a link that is supposed to reset your password; But the link does not work properly: the link opens a 404 web page.
Sorry to keep repeating myself: but the process does not work, to reset my password.
|
01-14-22 08:15am
|
Reply
69
|
Teenrs
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
exotics4me, thanks for the response.
I was trying to tell anyone reading my review that if you have a sub to Adult Prime or one of its sites, there is no reason to have a separate sub to Teenrs.
Since Teenrs is a site in the Adult Prime network.
|
12-18-21 01:34am
|
Reply
70
|
18 Virgin Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
Erika Korti teases her pink clit and juicy pussy and even uses a sex toy to get total satisfaction."
The tags for the video are as follows:
"Hardcore, Teen, Masturbation, Blowjob, Toys, Brunette, Shaved, Assfingering".
Problem: there is no phone in the video.
Problem: there is no boy in the video.
The girl is not shown talking on the phone, since there is no phone.
The boy only exists in the imagination of the person who wrote the text description.
And there is no blowjob, since the video is a solo masturbation by the female model.
Aside from these inaccuracies, the text description is serviceable.
As well as the tags, apart from the blowjob tag.
The last 11 updates for the site have been female solo masturbation videos. My guess is they didn't want to hire any boys or extra girls because of the Covid virus. This saves money because you're only using one model, and is also a safety measure, because they were only filming one model.
The search engine is basic. You enter a model's name, it brings up her her content at the network, or at the sites you have selected to be searched. But the hot links don't show what site each video is posted at. You have to hit each video link, and this brings up a page that tell you what site the video is posted at. There's no way to tell when these videos were posted at the site, except for a few recent videos, which do show a posting date.
-The real nitty gritty:
-The girls at 18 Virgin Sex are almost uniformly cute, even gorgeous. That is the main draw at the site.
-Plus, some of these girls put on a great show.
Cute to attractive girls plus a great show means this site is worth joining. It will put some lead into your pencils (ha-ha).
And due to a holiday discount, the first month is only $9.95.
|
12-07-21 12:11am
|
Reply
71
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
Agree.
If you've never been a member of the site, it's worth a one-month join for $9.95, and downloading everything that you can find and think worthwhile.
But I'm very lazy. Just the thought of all the time spent looking for photo sets of my favorite models tires me out.
Maybe old age is creeping up on me.
Or---has it already arrived?
LOL.
Best wishes for the holiday season.
|
11-22-21 07:00am
|
Reply
72
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Reply
Thanks for the positive note.
Feeling much stronger, since I got out of the hospital.
So I've got the time and energy to review porn sites.
LOL.
Stay well, buddy.
PS: I think there are two sites that feature the same kind of POV shots as this site, at the Adult Time network.
Jay's POV and another site that's very similar, but I can't recall the title.
The main value of the videos is how cute the models are.
But that's my niche: cute teen models.
|
10-09-21 08:01am
|
Reply
73
|
Porn Box
(0)
|
Reply of
Otrivine's Comment
If Tom D (PU staff) sees this comment,he should be able to help.
PU staff have greater weight than a regular site member, so sites are more willing to work with them to fix any issues.
|
08-23-21 07:05am
|
Reply
74
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
I am a member of several Metart sites, so if I click on the link of a model's content at a Metart site I am a member of, it opens a page at that site with the model's video or photoset displayed. Which is a convenient feature, since I don't have to open a new page manually, go to the paysite, login, and then search for that particular video or photoset to bring it up.
The Metart team is really trying to make their network user friendly.
-This is a personal issue: I transferred from Spectrum to T-Mobile home internet this month. I was paying $80/month for Spectrum internet access, but was getting a 400 Mbps connection. Using WiFi off that connection dropped the speeds down to 100 to 170 Mbps.
T-Mobile Home Internet is cheaper. $50/month. With T-Mobile, you're running off the WiFi connection, which varies wildly. I can get anywhere from 2 Mbps to 90 Mbps, without moving my device or the T-Mobile Gateway. There can be problems with the slower, T-Mobile connection. Browser pages won't load sometimes, videos buffer and stop playing.
If I had known the drop in service from Spectrum to T-Mobile, I would have remained with Spectrum, even at the higher price.
-With a faster connection, I wouldn't have as many problems with navigation at Adult Time and other sites.
However, I only switched internet providers this month. So I've had well over 2 years of Adult Time at the faster 100-170 Mbps wifi connection, and the Adult Time navigation is clunky even with a faster connection: because the links are slow to respond, or fail to respond.
I'm giving Sexart.com a score of 90. It's an excellent addition to the MetArt network, which is one the premier networks of glam-style porn.
I'm giving the Sexart channel of Adult Time a score of 88. The main defect is the poor navigation.
The Sexart channel is a fine addition to the Adult Time network, but instead of constantly adding new content, the site operators should focus on making the content already posted more easily found.
|
08-22-21 06:17am
|
Reply
75
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Not sure why you have stopped leaving reviews.
Your reviews were worthwhile because they gave your own thoughts on sites, which could be useful or informative.
As a bonus, your reviews could earn you tickets for the monthly raffle.
A review takes more time to write than a comment, but you might want to re-think your position about writing reviews.
Just my opinion, of course. You're the one who decides about writing reviews.
Whether it's worth the time and effort.
wishing you well,whatever you decide.
|
08-21-21 07:00am
|
|
