| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
KodiakCS's Comment
> The update frequency seems to be 1/week, so it's like S&S
You're right, I've corrected my review, thanks.
> Wait a few months and we'll see, which site gets the crown...
I don't think there will be a single crown, I think both will shine to the benefit of the surfers :-). Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part though.
|
11-06-07 03:43am
|
Reply
202
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
It doesn't really matter. My point is that I'm not a lawyer and I definitely don't want to hire one because of this issue :-), so I tend to trust that major US companies do their legal research themselves (and kink.com IS a major US company without much doubt). After all, it will be them who prosecution will come after.
|
11-02-07 04:46am
|
Reply
203
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I was under the impression that bondage with intercourse on video was illegal in the US? Maybe this has changed without me looking.
I looks that site producers were under such impression too :-). There weren't such such sites in US until about the time when kink.com made their SexAndSubmission (about 2005). As kink.com is an US company, and pretty solid one, I don't think they're playing games with law, so most likely they've got legal opinion on it, which says it's ok. And as long as there wasn't any case law (which seems most likely), legal opinion is the best thing you can get to see if it is legal or not.
So I would rely on ability of kink.com to analyze it properly (at least until I'll try to shoot such a thing myself :-)). Just speculation on my part though.
|
11-01-07 01:26pm
|
Reply
204
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
> Can you also download the video in 1 piece?
Yes you can.
|
10-31-07 02:32pm
|
Reply
205
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
FWIW, here goes my report. I've downloaded all three of their samples (200M to 900M in size), and burned them on my external LG Blu-ray burner to BD-RE disc (burning took like three clicks on my Windows 7 after downloading). All three played on my Sony player without problems, menus worked and so on. I felt that quality of the smallest sample was similar to DVD, medium one felt better than DVD, and largest one was almost like medium one, better than DVDs, but a bit worse than high-end Hollywood Blu-ray movies (it is apples and oranges, but I think it still cannot compete with titles like Sherlock).
I've decided that medium quality is the best for me (almost the same quality as high-end one but much smaller), and downloaded the whole Game 26. It took 8G for a 3 hour movie, and I think it was well worth waiting. I indeed enjoyed watching it not in front of monitor, but on a large TV screen in my bedroom (BTW, my g/f liked it too, and I will not elaborate on what happened during watching ;) ).
Pros: can watch on TV, high quality, funny menu, convenient menu structure, "Action Only" option is interesting
Cons: relatively large (medium quality is comparable to 6MBit/s clips), extras are rather basic
Things I'd like to be added/improved: printable label, quality to beat Hollywood while keeping the size (I know it is not realistic, but can't I dream a bit? ;) ), "behind the scenes" stuff and model bios in extras
Bottom line: for me, "Medium Quality Blu-ray ISO" is a clear winner over 6MBit/s and 12MBit/s clips: it is the same quality as 12MBit/s at size of 6Mbit/s, can be watched on TV, and has funny menus. If you guys will add more extra features - it will be even better, but even now it is certainly the best adult movie I've ever seen (even before taking into account the price).
|
04-28-11 09:21pm
|
Reply
206
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Not really, thanks for heads-up (for some reason VirtualFem is not in 'sex games' niche).
|
02-02-10 06:36pm
|
Reply
207
|
Fucking Machine 1000
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> but i don`t think that my given information are wrong......
I didn't mean it; what I've actually meant is that I'd like to see more site-specific information which would show why your ratings are different.
> they took another which didn`t accept credit cards or something like
> this. i also think there was no possibility to dl in one part,
> and the older videos had weak quality (wasn`t it dl as a zip?!) you
> are a member of that side right now? does anything changed?
I'm/was a member of a few other kink.com sites (see my reviews of UltimateSurrender and SexAndSubmission), and yes, their billing/authentication system is still a pain in the neck (they do provide alternative billing though, so occasionally it does work :-) ). As for DL as a zip - they usually do have it (you can get whole single episode as a zip, which is enough for me). Cannot be 100% sure about fuckingmachines.com without being their member, but usually such things are quite consistent across different kink.com sites.
|
10-28-07 03:10pm
|
Reply
208
|
Fucking Machine 1000
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Just in case if you do care (if not, please ignore):
What I think is the biggest problem with your reviews, is lack of specific information about the sites - all reviews are quite similar to each other, and it is very difficult to understand why do you rate site higher or lower. I was going to put 'no' trust rating exactly because of 2 your reviews: this one and 'Obscene machines'. Reviews are very similar to each other, and it is not clear why one of the sites got much higher rating (14 point higher - that's quite a lot). Then I went to site home pages and was able to guess what's the difference between them, so your ratings are likely to be consistent (so I didn't put any trust rating for now), but IMHO it should be obvious from reviews too.
Also a side note: as you're into this niche, did you try fuckingmachines.com? It would be nice to see your review/rating of them too (so it will be possible to compare it with other 2 sites you already reviewed).
|
10-27-07 02:56pm
|
Reply
209
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
> in my opinon one single clip is the best possibility even
> if it takes to much space on the computer...
I see; well, I'd prefer it too but I don't mind having single big ZIP either.
> anyway the login was only working after i wrote to the discounter
You're right, login is a well-known problem of all kink.com sites :-( (see my reviews of their other sites - all of them seem to have the same problems with billing/login).
|
11-07-07 11:39am
|
Reply
210
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Huh, it seems that you did follow my advice on this site - and liked it :-).
As a side note - what kind of dl options would you like to see in addition to single clip and full episode? ZIP from randomly selected clips? (personally I've never needed anything but 2 options above, and not sure I've seen anything else anywhere, but not sure as I've never paid attention to it :-)).
|
11-07-07 08:25am
|
Reply
211
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
monty2222's Reply
> Funny how it has been categorized as a 'bizarre fetish' by TBP/PU, sex with clothes on doesn't strike me as that outlandish. :-)
:-)). It just proves that bizarre is in the eye of the beholder too :-).
|
05-21-09 10:17pm
|
Reply
212
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
> Thanks for the technical specs too (sorry if I was giving you a hard time in the forum about that stuff). 05-21-09 12:22pm
As you see, I don't mind providing SOME technical details (though don't expect me to make ALL details from your cheatsheet - I'm too lazy for it :-)). On the other hand, I'm sure that it is MUCH MORE important to provide information like types of actions involved or subjective feelings about the technical stuff (like "pictures are 1024, but VERY clear" or "HD vids are 3MBit/s, but blurry").
|
05-21-09 10:14pm
|
Reply
213
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
> The price has kept me away.
I'm not surprised; $50/month is really outrageous.
> for such a determinedly rough sex site.
I don't think it's really "rough", there are much rougher sites out there (such as SadoSlaves). Personally I'm not a big fan of rough SM (and especially don't like "abuse" theme), so what turned me on about FunnyBDSM was it's funny part.
|
01-29-08 07:06am
|
Reply
214
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
> how it compares to Sex & Submission or Chanta's Bitches or Fucked and
> Bound, all sites that I really enjoy.
Depends on your preferences (see my reviews of SexAndSumbission, FuckedAndBound and FunnyBDSM). For "Real BDSM" stories SexAndSumbission IMHO wins hands down, with FuckedAndBound going close second (can't comment on ChantasBitches).
> is the action "fakey?"
For stories NOT labeled as "Real BDSM" - yes, definitely; for "Real BDSM" ones - probably not.
> Interesting stories or just silly stuff?
Depends on your point of view: for me they're interesting, but I won't make any representations :-) - for some they can easily be "silly stuff". Take a look at descriptions of "Heil Dickler" and "Court of Justice" series in public area of the site - they're pretty much accurate.
|
01-28-08 07:30am
|
Reply
215
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
Well, everybody here has some fetish; I admit I have plenty of them :-).
|
01-20-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
216
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
> I guess the TBP plan was a success.
You mean not counting newbies ratings? Yes, I agree, it was definitely a success (easily visible even now).
|
11-02-07 06:48am
|
Reply
217
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
> I'll report any sketchy ones I see
Thanks in advance; this is what this site is for :-).
|
01-08-08 03:19pm
|
Reply
218
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I see, thanks. Things are much worse than, with CCBill probably being the only trustworthy processor to date (at least it wasn't caught doing it - I think they're doing almost the same thing but with checkbox unchecked, and it IMHO changes things dramatically from swindling to not so annoying upsell) :-(.
> generally the trial sites seem to be owned by the same owner of the sites that I'm subscribing too
I used to think so too until I've run into Epoch using the same technique on purchase of Diabolic site selling PornStarsTop, and these 2 sites don't seem to be related (I'd even say they're from very different leagues).
|
01-08-08 03:08pm
|
Reply
219
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Thanks for warning.
Do you remember what was their credit card processor? Wasn't it Epoch by any chance? I've seen such thing (which I think is nothing short of swindling) a few times recently, and I think it was Epoch all (or at least most of) the time.
Moreover, I'm not even sure if webmasters of original sites get anything from such "trials"; it would be very interesting to see a comment from one of them here (and if Epoch is doing it without consent of webmasters, it can easily find themselves in a DEEP TROUBLE; such company as Diabolic won't hesitate to sue Epoch in such case).
|
01-08-08 02:04pm
|
Reply
220
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
Good hint, thanks :-).
|
12-19-07 12:39am
|
Reply
221
|
Hentai Key
(0)
|
Reply of
Scifighter's Reply
Ok, you do sound convincing enough to throw away my prior suspicions about you being a shill :-). Sorry about it and take care.
|
11-11-07 10:33am
|
Reply
222
|
Hentai Key
(0)
|
Reply of
Scifighter's Reply
> My company does buissnes in japan with japanese distributors of anime and hentai...
... and your company is somehow affiliated with HentaiKey, isn't it?
|
11-10-07 10:02am
|
Reply
223
|
Hentai Key
(0)
|
Reply of
Scifighter's Comment
> hentaiboss dont own no license to any movie period, 100% stolen content.
How can you know it for sure (unless you're working for HentaiBoss)?
> hentaikey is the only site that has legal weblicenses to hentai movies
Again, how did you get this kind of information?
|
11-09-07 02:47pm
|
Reply
224
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
Reply of
submale2's Reply
Well, most of us here are "losers with nothing better to do". Except, of course, certain smart guys who're trying to make money out of PU by putting ridiculous ratings for certain websites, and even not bothering to write more then a few lines to justify it.
Sincerely Yours,
Loser with Nothing Better to do
|
12-04-09 11:20pm
|
Reply
225
|
I Am Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
nige1960's Comment
And what billing company it was? We need to know not only Bad Guys, but Good Guys too :-).
|
12-03-07 09:46am
|
