| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Stroking Queens
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Seems kinda cheap looking. I'd be wary.
|
10-07-10 08:46pm
|
Reply
102
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Understood. Never been a member at VideosZ.
|
10-07-10 08:37pm
|
Reply
103
|
Where Is Your Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
Chipster's Comment
Was a member here many years ago. Definitely a great site that has always been a bit under the radar, but then again, with most guys into petite teens it will probably stay that way. I actually like the sister site All Kinds of Girls a bit more(its one of the few sites I actually reviewed) but then again I like big girls from time to time.
|
10-06-10 08:58pm
|
Reply
104
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Messmer, am I to understand that you have subscriptions to both Videobox and VideoZ? Isn't that a bit redundant man?
|
10-06-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
105
|
Freaks Of Boobs
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
Last time I was a member -probably about 5 or 6 months ago-it seemed around once a month. The problem with the site inherently is finding models that fit the description. It's too bad since they have some episodes that are legendary. (Not sure why they haven't brought in Kayla Kleevage since I recently saw her at Naughty America.)
Anyway it's still worth it for the network on the whole and the archive (if you don't already have them all). You can do it on the cheap, just Google: Porn Pros $9.95.
|
10-05-10 11:50am
|
Reply
106
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
I think such a pricing model would be dead on arrival. It could only work if:
1. There were no pirating. The only advantage to the current model we have over is going completely pirate bulk and convenience. Individual pricing models takes this away, and forces consumers to constantly be thinking about there wallet-unlike now where it's a one time transaction and enjoy. This would only make the pirates more profitable as some file hosting sites are paying both for uploads and new subscribers. Once the typical pirate/"independent sales partner" were to purchase a movie one time he could still post it on the forums and reap even greater rewards. Plus the average Joe could still find the content via the tube sites.
2. All and I mean basically all the sites agreed on the same model. Otherwise the sites that use the current model would hold the advantage of both bulk and convenience.
Individual pricing models only work for the music industry because of the advent of the ipod, and peoples desire to listen to music 'on the go'. People don't watch porn 'on the go', they do so in front of their computers, or occasionally on their cell phone in a bathroom stall.
This discussion would be better taken back to the forum as it's gotten a bit off the topic of Reality Kings.
|
09-28-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
107
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Messmer do you say that they removed the complaints! I'll probably be back (at the $9.95 price) in a few months, but as I've said, RK to me is the most Corporate and insensitive of them all.
|
09-28-10 11:17am
|
Reply
108
|
Candy Monroe
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Too bad, I still plan on returning here in a couple of months and doing a "power download" of the content I like.
This site even at $29.99 was still too expensive for anything more 'one month every now and then' subscription anyway.
By the way, the $29.99 price also included all 19 sites, although I think they just added the "Watching my Daughter go Black site", so I'm not sure how many that is now. (18,19 or 20)
Nonetheless, too good to stay away, too expensive to stay.
|
09-27-10 10:21pm
|
Reply
109
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm no longer a member messmer,(although I may come back soon, using my $9.95 link I hope you were able to take advantage of.).Although it does not surprise me at all. Reality Kings to me is the most corporatized of all of the big name North American sites. (Brazzers at least has a forum where complaints are voiced and moderators often give the company's side).
Nonetheless it doesn't bode well when you have so many big names struggling (relates to the forum thread about Scoreland). Then again for a site like Reality Kings it's probably that some girl just missed a shoot and they had to fill in an update from somewhere out of there ass.
|
09-27-10 01:03pm
|
Reply
110
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
You think they are recycling content?
|
09-27-10 10:53am
|
Reply
111
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Your tastes confuse me messmer, you say you prefer niche content, but didn't you have just have a brief subsciption to Bangbros and RK? If those sights aren't mainstream I don't know what is.
My strategy is to spend what I need to get my niche needs met first (hence subscriptions to Foot Fetish Daily, and 50 plus milfs) , and then supplement it with some of the mainstream stuff which can be found much less expensive. For instance I have links for Brazzers, Bangbros and RK each for $9.95, and tend to rotate which ones I subscribe to (Brazzers is constant though). Videobox is my only yearly subscription mainly for the volume it gives access to.
I agree with you that I prefer my niche stuff to mainstream any day, but for me alot of the mainstream stuff is damn good, plus there are many strains of what you might call mainstream. I think you find that when you go only niche, that there are a ton of videos you see on the net that you wish you could download, and I'd say 85-90% of the DVD type content makes it's way to sites like videobox and/or videoz at some point or another.
I take it then that you subscribe to 21sextury for Lusty Grannies, I'm sure you've already thought of this, but wouldn't your money be better spent at a site like Mature.nl? (if it isn't already).
|
09-25-10 05:28pm
|
Reply
112
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes and no, for 99% of sites I agree but sites like this one and Video Box I think are worth it for a year just based on sheer volume. It's like a good fallback site to have in your back pocket.
In fact I actually don't think these sites because of their nature (updating like once every few hours with a new DVD) would really make sense as a monthly subscription.
Now I would say it only makes sense to have one like this, personally I subscribe to Videobox yearly and will probably re-up next year. Too much bang for your buck.
This would make a good thread for the forum
|
09-24-10 02:23pm
|
Reply
113
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Just now read your message. Only thing I'd caution you is if you go back to RK and use the link, make sure you are using internet explorer as your browser. I had problems getting the link to work in Firefox.
|
09-23-10 12:31pm
|
Reply
114
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Monahan just do a Google search for Bangbros $9.95, also works for RK, and Brazzers.
|
09-13-10 10:28pm
|
Reply
115
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
You may have to wait for the loyalty bonus, you get more sites the longer you stay a member.
|
08-18-10 12:43pm
|
Reply
116
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I ain't gonna lie it looks damn good, but I'm not really into socks like that. I wish a site like this would launch with a foot fetish focus that would be right up my alley
I like the fact they have North American models, if they had more foot fetish i'd drop my subscription to foot fetish daily (will anyway) and sign up here in a heartbeat despite the lack of an archive for now.
They've got better girls, plus no arbitrary ban on breast implants.
|
08-18-10 12:40pm
|
Reply
117
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
It's a good network, I'm basically off/on again from time to time. Currently I'm on it primarily for nudefightclub and footsiebabes.
|
08-04-10 10:15am
|
Reply
118
|
Ghetto Gaggers
(0)
|
Reply of
vouivre62's Comment
That's a damn shame
|
08-03-10 08:37pm
|
Reply
119
|
Nicoletta Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I could understand this better if there was not both a Mature and Milf designation. In my opinion Milf really should mean 28-35 yrs old, basically motherhood age (at least in the modern era or last 40 yrs).
Mature out to mean anything past 36 yrs old, or beyond normal childbearing age. Now I could see this site being under the Milf category-although I still think she's a bit too young for that-but no way is she mature.
If she's now mature, when was she a "Milf", at 23?
This matters, because when I go searching for new "mature" sites I don't feel like wading through a bunch of 25-26yr olds to get to what I'm looking for.
It's almost like saying a chic like Melissa Midwest is "mature", I'd bet anything she's around the same age by now.
|
07-31-10 10:22pm
|
Reply
120
|
All Reality Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Comment
I made a comment about this earlier. You say 6 years behind. You are being far too kind. Take a look at Bangbros, or Brazzers videos from 2004-2005,there is no comparison, the video quality here is stuck at 2002-2003 levels.
I know the site launched in 2004 but they started out as a streaming only site, and therefore I think in order to cater to the online speeds of most people around that time had to downgrade their content. In other words good quality video would have been too much for most people to stream effectively.
They (reluctantly) made the switch to allow downloads only a few years ago. However they have never made anything except for very modest upgrades to the video quality. They also still seem to have that archaic download (with serious difficulties downloading even one video).
Like you said though the actual content is quite hot, these guys actually have a knack for producing compelling videos, especially with their teen sites, but they do a good job across the board in terms of site concepts, direction, camera work, models etc. I even love the hell out of their pic sets.
If these guys had 720hd or even high quality wmv downloads they would be mentioned in the same breath as Brazzers, Bangbros, RK, ect. Yet they refuse to change with the times.
It just makes you kinda scratch your head, because they while keep falling farther and farther behind, they still through out a few updates a month and have been operating this way for a least a couple of years. You'd think they'd just throw in the towel.
My theory is they get a lot of mileage out their excellent photography (although the pics still aren't big enough), which they can still throw up on free tpg sites and get enough guys who don't know any better to sign up for a month.
|
07-31-10 06:38pm
|
Reply
121
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I don't think you'll get anyone that's been a member yet since they just launched this month.
|
07-31-10 06:04pm
|
Reply
122
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I've been a member here many times, last time was early this year. I can't really speak to the negative reviews, but I've never had any problems personally with them.
Also I'm not sure why people have said they are no longer updating, my experience has been they have always updated every day or at least several times a week. They have never hid their update schedules and the dates are openly visible.
Also never had any problems with billing, they've used Epoch for at least the past year who is reputable biller. When I wanted to quit it was just like any other site.
Finally to the poster who mentioned that they get rid of certain sites completely that is a legitimate gripe. Although let's face it these guys basically are about taking chances as far as site concepts are concerned and there should be at least some recognition of that. When you take chances as they have done it's possible that you will sometimes fail miserably as perhaps a site like sleep creep had done.
Porn is a business at the end of the day and perhaps sleep creep had such little interest that it didn't make sense to keep even the archive intact. However it's not like they advertise sleep creep on their front page and when you get in it is not there (at least not when I checked).
I actually still have a link for this site at $9.95 a month to anyone interested (among a few others) send me an email.
|
07-31-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
123
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Shasta90418's Comment
I have also had major problems with their biller. I also disagree about customer service, my experience has been hit or miss with them.
|
07-21-10 01:29pm
|
Reply
124
|
Black Ice Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
All of the Zero Tolerance sites are high up on my radar as far as new sites to try, I just simply haven't gotten around to it.
|
06-02-10 07:05pm
|
Reply
125
|
Foot Fetish Daily
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
This is a good review, you make a lot of good points. However, in comparing Foot Fetish Daily to Hot Legs and Feet, I personally prefer Foot Fetish Daily.
If your were to compare the two sites on paper there is no question Hot Legs and Feet is superior and from that standpoint I see where you are coming from. The models are hotter, more HD, more content overall.
However for me two things, first there is no question that European models are hotter on-the-whole, but I prefer North American models, and finding North American models in high quality Foot Fetish stuff is somewhat rare, even these days. (I mean if you think about it most of the high quality foot related sites are European based.) I like the idea of taking the same girls you see on other more mainstream sites and putting them in foot related scenes.
Second, Foot Fetish Daily just has more personality and fun, it has an informal 'round the house' type feel to it, plus the interaction between the members and webmasters/directors is unparalleled, at least in my experience.
Don't get me wrong, I like Hot Legs and Feet and will probably return to it some time soon, however Foot Fetish Daily for me is a permanent fixture in my porn budget. I came to the conclusion that if I had money for only one site, Foot Fetish Daily would be it.
|
05-30-10 09:41am
|
