| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
My Deep Dark Secret
(0)
|
Reply of
TangoMike's Comment
Sorry to hear about your experience, but this site is a bad choice to me anyway, it's like a poor man's version of blacksonblondes, and there are even other sites/networks that do a better job or simply have a greater archive.
|
05-29-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
127
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
Karasek's Review
I like the girl, and even kind of like the softcore. Problem is she only goes topless and that's it. Even though I like the model, that's not enough for me.
|
05-29-10 11:02pm
|
Reply
128
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I agree 100% with this review, I also bit on the whole 'combining of both sites' deal. Unfortunately quantity does not outweigh quality when it comes to porn.
The photographers on this site are the worst, they seem to have an obsession with close ups and gynecological lessons. As you say there are some diamonds in the ruff but you have to wade through so many poor and mediocre shoots to get to them.
Sites like allover30 blow auntjudy's away despite having less than half their archive.
|
05-29-10 10:44pm
|
Reply
129
|
Pornstars Punishment
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Facial Abuse.
|
05-21-10 04:30pm
|
Reply
130
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Comment
I already took advantage of this deal on another site a while back, I'd say it's worth it. RK's backlog and diversity is more than worth $10 a month. Not my favorite site by any means but certainly worth the price here.
|
05-21-10 04:28pm
|
Reply
131
|
Score HD
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I've personally never had a problem with any of the Score sites, and yes I was just recently a member of Score HD. I think the main reason they don't list the billing company on TBP is because they use so many different ones.
For instance, I think I've been a member of Score HD twice, the first time in December it was through Epoch, the second time earlier this year it was through Net billing. I've now canceled Score HD (not because it isn't good). However I still have a running membership to Scoreland which is billed through CCbill (from my checking account)
Score is a pretty reputable company, however you do need to be wary of the cross sells when signing up.
|
04-12-10 06:52pm
|
Reply
132
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
LOL, it's all good man, I just took as a friendly debate anyway. And there is no question you are the preeminent authority when it comes to TS sites. I joined Shemale Club based primarily on your review!! (I had been a member before but you influenced me to go back.
And no unfortunately Rodney doesn't do TS but it's clear just from the site design that he has some ownership of it since it's exactly the same as his network. Really if they would just combine the two networks under one umbrella I would join in heartbeat.
I still may get try that site, but probably my next shemale site will be Shemale Asia (again based off your review) or maybe Shemale Yum (I still haven't been a member their either.
As an aside- I replied to your thread regarding Brazzers and it would be cool to get your take on it. Plus there is a rare link for the site at $9.95 I know it's not your thing. but it's a pretty good value at that price even without the HD.
|
12-30-09 07:00pm
|
Reply
133
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Reply
Damn your the man for keeping that link, it's still advertising updates from 2008!!! That's like finding a four leaf clover! You better not let that out at too many places lest they take it down (which I'm sure they will at some point).
I've already been a member for like two years at that price but I'm still keeping that link just in case something goes wrong. I'm pretty sure they aren't offering that discount just for canceling anymore.
And for those not sure it is $9.95 recurring.
|
12-30-09 06:21pm
|
Reply
134
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I know Shemale Strokers is not really a hard core site (hence the name). And I'm not really arguing with you especially since you have much more expertise in this area.
I'm just saying that in general a $5.00 difference is nothing when considering the sheer volume of content that the premier sites have, plus the vid quality for the majority of scenes. Plus I'd still be willing to bet that even Shemale Club has more solo masturbation scenes that Shemale Strokers just by virtue of being around longer (especially in terms of HD). When I was there last it seemed the ratio of solo to hardcore was at least 50/50. Overall it's not a killer, but I think they are more competitive at $24.95.
Don't get me wrong I think Shemale Strokers is a good site as well. I've not been a member but I like the Rodney Moore sites (same webmaster and similar production), and I love their photography. (even more than the Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum. )
Anyway keep up the good work.
|
12-30-09 05:30pm
|
Reply
135
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
They're making a mistake at that price point. It puts them in direct competition with name sites like and shemaleclub, shemaleyum which are only $5.00 more, have higher vid quality and (especially in the case of shemaleclub) blows them away in terms of hard core.
Especially shemaleclub you can basically see alot of the same girls both stroke and fuck in separate scenes.
|
12-30-09 10:43am
|
Reply
136
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Oddly enough I've been a member at least 4 or 5 times on and off and never had a problem. Sorry man.
At least he uses CCBill who always seems to have their act together.
|
12-30-09 10:25am
|
Reply
137
|
Boys Fuck Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Most mature hardcore sites are like this, most of them being based out of Eastern Europe.
I swear the first group that comes out with mature north American based network with high production is going to make a ton of money. It's a very under-served market.
|
12-30-09 10:09am
|
Reply
138
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I agree some of them are borderline, I still may give a try some time in the future though. I like the camera angles they take pretty consistently
|
11-28-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
139
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hey Messmer did you ever join this site? I've been thinking about it since they seem to have more North American models it seems than All Over 30. Plus I may like some of the camera work a little better.
If so tell me what you thought.
|
11-22-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
140
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Indeed. They should have a sample up, but I think that would cause a near mutiny among those who do not have immediate access to it. However it is very impressive and even more so considering they are pumping out 2-3 a day. I would offer to upload the file where you could see it, but I know we can't do that.
Might make a good topic for the forum for members to simply compare various sites. The other topics related to bitrate seemed to speak mainly of the technical aspects.
|
11-18-09 09:08pm
|
Reply
141
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
I've just recently gone back to this network recently mainly for Footsiebabes. I didn't seem to care much for the new design, but now that you have pointed out the strengths of it I may try it out again.
This is one of those networks I plan on keeping for a while, it might well be the best value as far as networks.
|
11-17-09 01:49pm
|
Reply
142
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan for the insight, although I couldn't make much sense of it from the various forum threads. I looked it up on Wikipedia which basically stated:
"The size of a multimedia file in bytes is the product of the bit rate (in bit/s) and the length of the recording (in seconds), divided by eight."
According to my calculation then that would put the bitrate (for that file) at about 12.16 Mbit/s, hopefully that's right. Although I'm still not sure how that sizes up to other kinds of HD vids. I guess maybe the forum would be good for that plus I can compare some of the videos I have.
|
11-17-09 12:43pm
|
Reply
143
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
In truth looking now having looked over the site a bit more it looks as though I may have exaggerated the file sizes a bit. Most of the 1080p are around 2.5-3.5 GB's with only a few being over 4GB. That goes to show I really haven't downloaded very many. Still they are best I have seen, at least imho.
|
11-17-09 07:59am
|
Reply
144
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
The only scene I have currently is:
Site: Big Wet Butts
Scene: Triple Butt Pump
Size: 4.35 GB (4,675,992,829 bytes)
Length: 51 minutes 16 seconds (fairly long)
What is the bitrate then, and how does it compare?
Also how do you calculate it?
|
11-17-09 07:40am
|
Reply
145
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I don't know how to find the bitrate on the video, but if you tell me how to find it I will look it up and tell you.
|
11-16-09 10:14pm
|
Reply
146
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Just as a heads up if you are looking for an HD experience that is closer to what Brazzers has, I looked around and the Zero Tolerance site comes a bit closer. Although it still is not quite Brazzers quality (as far as the 1080p) it comes a bit closer than Ass Traffic. Plus the file sizes are a bit more reasonable (than Brazzers).
I've been thinking about giving it try myself.
|
11-16-09 12:28am
|
Reply
147
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I didn't mean that it was an advantage, it is in fact a drawback, but I don't consider it a major one since it does play smoothly on my computer, I just can't go jumping around as far as fast forwarding and rewinding. I can still pause it start it back fine, and I'm sure there are computers more powerful than mine that can handle ff and rr. I don't mind just watching a video and letting the plot play out without skipping all over the place, at least once in a while. If I want to ff and rr I have the option to download the 720 hd and do that.
I hope you are not under the impression that I am a big time Brazzers guy. I just think they have gotten a bit of a bum rap although I have tried to be fair and see both sides. To tell you the truth it is only one of a number of sites I am member of (mainly since I still have the $9.99 discount) and I probably have only downloaded maybe two of the HD scenes in question. They do take up alot of space 4-5 GBs, plus it takes me at least a full day to download just one. I am saying BECAUSE of those attributes it is unreasonable to let everyone download them due to server demand and the lag it would cause for everyone.
Really if I didn't have the discount I would have already moved on from this site, I've mainly kept it for the value.
|
11-16-09 12:05am
|
Reply
148
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
I've been commenting that while I do think it is fair to charge extra, particularly for the 1080p, they should definitely let people know up front, even if they have to fine print it.
What they should do is simply allow new member to download the lower quality 720p up front, since this is what is made available on just about every other site now with no wait.
As far as the 1080p stuff though, I can somewhat understand them charging the premium. I think it may well be of a higher quality than any HD on the net; certainly it's the best I've seen and I've been around. Even some other sites that advertise 1080p don't really compare to the kind that Brazzers is putting out right now. I know that's a bold statement and I could be wrong since I haven't seen every site, but you'd have to see it to know what I'm talking about. In addition to the fact they are putting out 2-3 of these per day.
We are also talking about massive file sizes for the 1080p, like between 4-5 GBs for a 30 minute scene. They can't be expected to make that available to everyone right off that bat. They've got so many members it would quickly overload the servers; even guys trying to download regular wmv files would be impacted. This would cause them to institute some kind of download limitation which would turn off many long time members such as myself. (luckily I'm still only paying the $9.99 loyalty discount).
|
11-15-09 01:39pm
|
Reply
149
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I just downloaded the AssTraffic HD Sample. While it is not far from the Brazzers quality it does not quite match it. Brazzers if brighter with much richer color textures. The difference is not huge but substantial, and definetly noticeable immediately.
Put it this way, I have a very powerful computer that plays the Brazzers HD smoothly with no problem at all, but if I try to fast forward a scene it will not let me do it, the video freezes. No other HD porn has ever given me that problem. I may start a forum thread to see if anyone else knows of a site with HD of the same quality.
As well though the other concerns about AssTraffic still stands, namely a lack of updates (according to the TBP review), and no network access.
|
11-14-09 11:59pm
|
Reply
150
|
Brand New Faces
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
This and their parent Vivid site are really still trying to go after the couples DVD market. That's where I bet they make most of their money. obviously there are almost no hardcore porn connoisseurs who go shopping at video stores anymore. The websites they have are really just something to give them a bit of a foothold in the market until they figure out whether the DVD market is sustainable long term.
That is questionable but they'll probably get away with it, most towns have at least one adult book/video store from which couples shop from time to time.
Obviously if they were just relying on the websites they wouldn't be going about it like this.
|
11-14-09 11:30pm
|
