| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Kayla Cam
(0)
|
Reply of
norcalguy's Comment
Give us a full review, I've always been intrigued by this model.
|
04-20-08 12:27pm
|
Reply
177
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Reply
I just tried the link through this site, and it is indeed $19.99 per month. Make sure to clear your cache (delete temporary internet files). It should work for you. You can also try the link on Rabbitreviews.com the discount is the same.
I now notice they have added memberships to many of their individual model sites. I think this adds little to no value, as much (if not most) of the content on those sites can be found on Scoreland itself.
|
04-19-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
178
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
Bad news indeed, but I'm not surprised and can't much blame them. Before you could go in download all the movies you want in a day or so and be done with it. As I discussed with Drooler in another comment thread though, they still need to step up their game. At least their sites are discounted at 19.99 a month now (through the PU link). That is fair enough in my opinion
|
04-19-08 12:41pm
|
Reply
179
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
I haven't been a member of this site myself, but felt the need to comment. In my opinion you really can't go wrong with this site as long as you are willing to shell out that high $35 price tag. Their videos are of a pretty good quality and they have an absolute ton of content. The newest trailor they have up is smokin hot, and most guys that have been seem to think the old stuff is even better.
|
04-18-08 11:55pm
|
Reply
180
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Bottom line, all of their online properties are currently being seriously outflanked by sites that are simply better.
Scoreland- Brazzers: more pics (although lower quality). Tons more hardcore.
Legsex- HotLegsandFeet
XLGirls- Tough call here but I think BBWpornpass is slightly better
18Eighteen- Take your pic: Abbywinters, Karups, clubseventeen. Hell you might simply do better to just get Brazzers for the TeensLikeitBig site or RealityKings for Pure18; although these sites don't have any soft core content.
40somethingmag- Allover30, Karupsolderwomen
NaughtyMag- Again, take your pic, from basically the same list as 18eighteen but slightly larger.
Ridiculous considering the Score Group has way more resources than any of these companies. I totally simpithize with why you rejoined 18eighteen though. All of their sites have VERY intriguing content. But you get the feeling that they spread themselves too thin to be able to fully capitalize on it.
That's All I will say on this topic, for now. Perhaps I should have started a thread in forum.
|
04-18-08 11:09am
|
Reply
181
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
Probably the best site for the price, I agree. I would like to see them get some content from Extreme Associates from the 1990's. They revolutionized the gonzo market back then. Although they are a shell of their former selves after that lawsuit hit them.
|
04-18-08 10:33am
|
Reply
182
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Did they give you any reason for removing all of their discounts?
|
04-18-08 10:27am
|
Reply
183
|
Spear My Pussy
(0)
|
Reply of
Nikolas's Reply
You would be wise to simply offer a site discount, that will get you some traffic from here.
|
04-18-08 10:23am
|
Reply
184
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
It appears to me that the Score Group is a Company that has failed to make the transition to the online format. As a result they are dangerously close to going the way of Playboy and Penthouse. Both aforementioned companies live off their past glory, and the latter I hear is tens of millions of dollars in debt.
In my opinion they (Score) ought to just scrap all their mags and focus solely on their internet sites. Right now they have a bunch sites that have always had potential, but that are simply mediocre at best (with the possible exception of Scoreland) .
|
04-17-08 09:29pm
|
Reply
185
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
The fact is that the Score Group is really a Big Boob/Pornstar company. This site has always had potential, but in my opinion has been a bit of an after thought for them. Their hearts just aren't that much into it, yet they know the teen market is extremely lucrative (if not saturated).
Also for a company whose claim to fame is their magazines, they really need to get their online pic game up to snuff. At least on the Scoreland (their flagship) site they have made some improvements here, but it is still not good enough when many online companies have sets 300-400 pics large. This is a magazine company by the way.
On the positive side, I don't know if you have noticed this before, but if you join this site through the PU link the price is only 19.99 (listed at 29.99) as are all of the Score Group sites.
|
04-16-08 09:17pm
|
Reply
186
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
I have already taken advantage, coming back to lock it in after a very brief absence. I plan on probably keeping sticking around permanently, yet another of the dozens of sites I should have reviewed already.
|
04-16-08 08:56pm
|
Reply
187
|
Chubby Loving
(0)
|
Reply of
sniffer's Comment
This looks like more of a review than a comment. I have been a member here before; does a fairly good job for what it is. Although, if you like such content (particularly the hardcore) I would refer you to sites like, BBWsuperstars, BBWpornpass, and perhaps all kinds of girls.
|
04-16-08 08:52pm
|
Reply
188
|
Kick Ass Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornjackker's Reply
I had already tried that link (Rabbitsreviews.com) prior to writing my original comment. IT DOES NOT WORK, UNFORTUNATELY. I have even tried two different computers, clearing the cache, etc. Looks like RabbitsReviews has simply forgot to take it off their discount list.
Makes no sense, the whole reason for offering discounts to review site users is that we are the kind of guys that shop around, for a good site at a good price. Does this network consider their product to better than Brazzers, Bang Bros, Reality Kings etc.. Other than the leg/foot content, I don't think so.
The site you referred to is offering Bang Bros. at $14.95 a month!!!
|
04-16-08 08:45pm
|
Reply
189
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I'm personally not a fan of sites like this simply because of what you point out. Too much airbrushing of an already gorgeous model. The content here is somewhat overly processed, but I understand that's what most guy's like.
I certainly cannot argue with the gargantuan amount of content that is available here though.
|
04-13-08 10:45am
|
Reply
190
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
Your review is well thought out, but I would suggest bullet points to make it easier on the eyes to read.
Keep the paragraphs for the bottom line statement.
|
04-05-08 01:56am
|
Reply
191
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I appreciate your reasoned response. Yes, I meant that NA has more content that CougarsinHeat (CIH). Also remember that in the comment I did agree with you that the content on CIH is slightly better (more and better pics, very slightly higher vid quality etc.). However I still don't think these differences are significant enough to justify the price. Remember this site charges MORE than NA does for a pretty massive network. The only way it could offset that imo was if it was bringing a particular niche to the table that is unique, or hard to find, but the premise of the site is pretty much the same as NA, many of the models are also the same.
I had no problem at all with your review though, as a standalone sight it more than holds it's own, and many of your points are justifiable.
|
03-19-08 11:28pm
|
Reply
192
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I think there absolutely is and probably most of the guys on this site are on the borderline (including me), oh well.
|
03-15-08 03:00am
|
Reply
193
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
This price decrease seems to only work if you click on the TBP/Pu link, yet for some reason it is not listed as an offical discount here, not sure why.
Maybe they saw my favorable review and decided to cut us a break (lol).
|
03-13-08 10:48am
|
Reply
194
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Not to beat a dead horse, but you know what the funny thing is, the most recent poll running the the Brazzerspass site asks: Which possible site improvement would most influence you to keep your membership? Among the choices are, higher quality video (my choice), more sites (I'm like hell no enough already), and others.
Lo and behold boneheaded users of the site have chosen OVERWHELMINGLY that adding yet more sites would help to keep them a member. Mind you this a network with about 20 sites already, many of which have long since been abandoned, go figure.
|
03-12-08 12:53am
|
Reply
195
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I just checked out your review of Brazzers Pass, and I have to admit that you aren't completeley off the mark. For a site that robust both the picture and video content could be better. In comparison, Reality Kings has far superior pic quality, (not quite sure about the vids).
That said I would have given the site a higher rating than a 70, if for no other reason than the sheer volume of content (and most of it at least watchable). I myself am still a member, basically for the loyalty discount of 9.99 a month I can't see quitting. Too many hot pornstars, even if the content IS a bit repetitive and cliche.
|
03-09-08 04:55pm
|
Reply
196
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
That is good news, this site is being done the right way. Thanks Rick
|
03-04-08 01:25pm
|
Reply
197
|
Playful Coeds
(0)
|
Reply of
imagexxx's Reply
Would have to side with the webmaster here; I thing you are missing the point of the site. If you were looking for a site with a bunch of hot porn chicks, you probably should have gone elsewhere. When judging an amateur site you should usually base it on how it compares with it's peers or other amateur sites. The strength of a good amateur site should be that it provides access to a particular niche, or to girls that can't be found elewhere. When I had a look over PlayfulCoeds; I have to admit, I hadn't seen any of these girls elsewhere (and they looked alright for amateurs).And they are providing a particular voyeuristic niche that you aren't going to get elsewhere. As far as the video quality, that is fair game enough, while many amateur sites do not have the resources to provide the vid quality of high powered network sites, the vids should at least be passable. As far as that is concerned, looking at the trailers, the vid quality could be a bit better. It's not horrible for an amateur site, but I've seen better even from others.
At the same time these guys are only asking 14.95 a month with a full access trial. I thought you could have given them some more points for that. All in all I see the webmasters vision here and if the vids improve like he says it will, they may have a winner.
|
02-28-08 10:50am
|
Reply
198
|
Solo Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
porngoblin's Review
I think you are right about this site, even the trailers made me want to yawn. Real easy paycheck for the gals here. I would have rather seen them give a table dance, or on a pole or something.
|
02-26-08 11:34pm
|
Reply
199
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
I look forward to seeing your review(if you joined).
|
02-21-08 08:45am
|
Reply
200
|
Plumper Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jonesyboy's Review
These sites have decent content, but they are just another porn company that failed to keep up with the times in terms of quality. I've never been a member to any of these sites, but I was considering it strongly some years back, too bad to see they failed to evolve. Their price now is actually an increase; go figure. I guess their strategy now is to lure some fools in with the full access trial, then hope they forget to cancel so they can hit them with that ridiculous 35.00 charge. I guess desperate times call for desperate measures.
|
02-19-08 10:38pm
|
