| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
As with Epoch I usually get something like "Satisfied customer" or "No problem just moving on" which is my normal choice if I just wanted to have a quick view or as with some girls from Southern Charms just wanted to quickly download the newest sets.
|
05-25-08 04:06am
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Forgot to mention one thing and that is: sunglasses suck!
I hate to see models wearing sunglasses because you can't see their eyes. Normal glasses are 100% and can IMHO add a lot of attraction to a girl especially to one that has reached an age where we'd speak about the MILF thing.
|
05-23-08 12:30pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I hate those sets where the model has her eyes closed all the time. I love to see smiling faces and at least a few headshots in every set.
|
05-23-08 01:01am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Only certain sections, only pics but no vids or only lowres content. To me it doesn't make sense to support this and therefore I saw no to limited trials.
|
05-21-08 12:05pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
> I fell limited trial is a kind of a trap - and that seems like some
> kind of reason why these sites only have the limited...
Jep! Either you trust your content in means of quality and quantity which then results in a more than fair deal for those who are unsure or you only offer crap and then you'll also tend to offer limited trials. That's what I experienced.
> On the other hand I do join full trials quite a lot - at sites I never
> been before. If I like what I see, I normally go back for the full
> month deal.
I did that a few times and with sites that offer full trials I never went wrong.
|
05-21-08 09:19am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Well said and it's the same for me. It's nice to imagine to be able to see (good) porn all day and to write reviews about sites but first of all it's a very private and a fun thing for me.
If I like a site and want to criticize it I'm free to do as an amateur but when working for TBP or a similar site I'd have to even though it might not be fun to me ;-)
B.t.w. thanks again for giving us the opportunity to write our own reviews!
|
05-19-08 11:33am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
On the other hand who would be stupid enough to loose a box of high quality porn DVDs? I might return them but first of all I'd view this stuff that's for sure because having my hands on fresh porn makes me curious :-)
|
05-01-08 03:48am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Speaking about models that have been shot by Alex from ALS Scan one shouldn't forget Kat but as with Leah Luv I'd love to see them without braces because IMHO it looks a bit awkward.
|
04-01-08 08:44pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I might want to try that out when I'm away on a business trip for the next time. It's no good to watch porn on a laptop pc that is owned by your boss ;-)
Under normal circumstances I agree with you. My home is my castle and the always best place to enjoy porn!
|
03-24-08 04:36am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
And besides resizing down is no problem at all because you give away some or better say reduce the information but to sample a pic up to a larger size always gives a lousy quality. It's like trying to create matter from nothing which only works in SciFi stories.
ACDSee is quite cool and it supports ZIP-files internally which is working quite fast on old machines as well but if any of you knows a freeware program that can do the same please let me know. Thanks!
|
01-04-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
DivBZero's Reply
[quote]
This trend of more and more pixels for monitors will increase, it would be good to know that an invested collection will look good if not better in the future.
[/quote]
That's exactly the one point missing that I forgot to write down in my first reply *highfive*
Thanks,
Smut
|
01-04-08 11:06am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Then you should go for a better image viewer :-) Have you ever tried Irfanview? It's quite nice and allows to resize images to your current screen resolution.
http://www.irfanview.com/
The best of all is that it's freeware!
|
01-04-08 08:54am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
That's exactly why I voted yes and besides we are all old enough to read and understand a review written on TBP or PU.
|
12-29-07 12:43pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Hahaha... this sounds fantastic! To be honest I do love the petite girls being shown at ALS Scan and the ones with the smallest tits are always the best like Liv Wilder, Ashley, Kim, Noel, Kacey Jordan and Karina :-)
|
12-28-07 05:18am
|
Reply
40
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
I guess I have to re-adjust my rating and my point of view after having seen the new and updated 1by-day. Still I'd like to see the girls with less glamorous outfits and make-up but the site has improved in a few ways while it lots in some others. Stay tuned for a full review on 1by-day coming soon.
|
12-31-07 01:57am
|
Reply
41
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Reply
Oh yes that surely helps me a lot. Mmmmh, have to count my bucks and see if I'll re-join within the next few days. Pamela is absolutely crazy which I like a lot ;-)
|
12-28-07 05:22am
|
Reply
42
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Review
Hi s1vus1,
could you be so kind to let me know what resolution the pix now have? For the old content I downloaded the resolution was >1000 times >1600 pixels which was very got when they started to use this resolution sometime in 2004.
I'm not a 100% fan of this site but I'd like to see the new sets of Pamela and Blue Angel.
|
12-27-07 02:27pm
|
Reply
43
|
18 Pussy Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
After having read about all the trouble you had with this site it seems as if it's not really worth a recommendation. What a shame because some of the girls seem very inviting to me.
I can very much understand that the fact that you can still log in after cancellation leaves a foul taste. Take care!
|
01-03-08 09:54pm
|
Reply
44
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
When I log on to the new site I get the content of Lusty Grandmas which is not exactly what I want :-(. I verified about a minute ago that this is still the case.
Maybe I should try and contact their customer support but right now I'm not in the mood to do so.
|
05-24-10 09:06am
|
Reply
45
|
30 And 40 Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
This site remains dead maybe someone could be so kind to remove it from the list. Sadly enough this is another mature site that went down the digital sink. Well it wasn't a good one one but ...
|
12-01-09 12:09pm
|
Reply
46
|
30 And 40 Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Site is still down. Guess that's all folks this site no longer exists. I'm glad I grabbed all the updates of Andie before it vanished down the digital sink!
Cheers,
Smut
|
11-16-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
47
|
4 Women of the World
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
You are using MS Internet Explorer I guess :-) Using FireFox I get the follwoing warning issued by Google:
[QUOTE]
Reported Attack Site!
This web site at www.4womenoftheworld.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.
Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.
[/QUOTE]
|
11-19-09 08:23am
|
Reply
48
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I just checked some of the content I downloadaed while being a member there and besides of the fact that the pictures I grabbed are mostly nice I agree with Maggie and you.
A pic of my favourite model Andie shot in 2006 and 809x1200 pixel large has a watermark of 297x66 pixel with the padding to the top and left area added it takes up 306x74 pixel which is annoying. That's more than 1/3 of the horizontal image area.
I'd really like to go back to this site but as they still use such intrusive watermarks :-(
|
12-13-09 12:01am
|
Reply
49
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
chloebd's Reply
Hi there,
don't get me wrong ... but ... onlycuties has a concept totally different to abbywinters. To compare those sites with each other is like comparing apples and peaches. Oh, and b.t.w. why aren't you writing a full review about this site?
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-06-08 12:44am
|
Reply
50
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
chloebd's Comment
Have you ever had a look at girlsoutwest? This may be a site that I would expect to be more interesting for you :-)
|
12-04-08 02:19am
|
