Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I answered 'No', but I suppose I'm biased in that I don't get turned on much by porn with cocks in it. I do understand the appeal of seeing a sexy girl give a BJ to a guy, but for me, it doesn't matter how hot the porn is with a girl and a guy - it's always ten times hotter to me if it's a girl and a GIRL!
Each to his own though, as they say. :)
|
01-22-08 03:47pm
|
Reply
127
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Most welcome indeed. Maybe you'll join and give your own review. You may find other aspects worthy of comment that I didn't, or just offer an alternative viewpoint (which is what user reviews are all about).
Regards.
|
01-21-08 02:34pm
|
Reply
128
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Interesting. In a way - looking at it from a business point of view - you can't blame sites for doing that. They've realised that there's a lot of business in the 'one month only' customers who never return. So it's probably cheaper to just recycle and rely on those one-monther customers coming along.
What large sites should do is offer a choice of deals. The more you pay, the further back into the archive you can access. Different passwords could give different levels of access. That way, if you want to join again after being away for, say, 8 weeks, you could buy an 8 week deal - just get the last 8 weeks of archive - and the next 30 days of updates. This would be better value for the customer because he only needs the last 2 months updates. But for the webmaster it would mean he might come back more often, so it's good business sense. Large sites could offer 4 week, 8 week, 16 week, 6 month, 12 months, whatever deals, up to the entire history of the archive at the top price.
Wonder if any site has considered this? I've been away from Club Sandy for about 3 months - I'd love to visit again, but I don't want to pay full price just to get the last 3 months of updates. I'll probably wait at least a year, and shop elsewhere in the meantime.
|
01-21-08 02:22pm
|
Reply
129
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Agreed about Club Sandy. But Pix And Video, whilst having excellently produced movies and tons of content just like CS, does have lower resolution than any other 21 Sextury site I've visited (e.g. Dirty 101, Lezbo Honeys, etc.). I'm not sure where the duplicate movies appear first - Pix & Vids or other 21 Sextury sites - but all the ones I saw were lower res on P&V.
Still, these are still in a small minority, so I don't see it as a major issue - just a disappointment as there should be no need for this at all.
|
01-21-08 02:09pm
|
Reply
130
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
hondaclf's Review
Hi Hondaclf
Just had to pick you up one of your comments: 'this site has something for everyone'. But nowhere in your review did you mention that this site is very softcore, from other reviews I've read (not visited yet myself). I've read it concentrates much more on gentleness, and girls prancing about in the nude, rather than real hard cunnilingus and analingus and girl on girl fucking.
Can you confirm if this is the case - or has it moved into harder territory lately?
Regards
Davit
|
01-20-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
131
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Hi Robare
OK, I'll try and answer your questions mate.
Firstly, yeah, *generally speaking* the updates come in pairs of updates for couples (each the reverse role of the other in terms of recipient) or if it's a threeway then there tends to be 3 updates, where each girl has her turn at being the recipient of the other two. They tend to be not very long - although there are some that go up as long as 11 minutes, but these are in the minority. The shortest one I have is 2mins 11 secs, again in the minority. I'll amend my average to maybe 8 minutes (but that's a best guess - don't expect me to go through my entire collection and work out the exact average, please, I don't want to get pedantic).
Bitrate seems to be mainly 521kbps/320x240. There are also a handful (on my hard drive at least) that are twice this (1060kbps/640x480). This surprised me when I checked this just now, so I played a couple to get a fresh idea of how they look, compared to the many other vids I have. And, very importantly, they *look* much lower res than the stats would suggest. One possible reason is that they've come from a lo-res source - or possibly that the conversion software is substandard. This, of course, is pure conjecture, I can only speak objectively about how they physically look when played. And they do look quite low res and grainy - although, as I said in my review - still watchable.
Your final question about orgasms - in all honesty, I'm not convinced that most of the orgasms portrayed here are genuine. As with most sites, there's little or no evidence of real white 'girl goo' to be seen (the only definitive proof of female orgasm really). But at the same time, the girls don't 'overact' and do seem to be really having a great time together, and most of the climaxes - whether real or not - are the result of anal stimulation principally, and sometimes, but not always, aided by vaginal stimulation simultaneously. The emphasis is definitely on tongue to ass. And the camera is good at getting that shot - after all, it's the whole point of the site.
Hope this helps, but if you have any more questions, or if I have been unclear, please ask away!
Regards
Davit
|
01-20-08 12:19pm
|
Reply
132
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
PosterDude, I don't think TBP take back handers from any porn company to give good reviews. But the bottom line is: don't trust those reviews, or any other professional review site's reviews. Only pay attention to independent user reviews. At least that's my motto.
Professional reviews nearly always seem to be in the late 80s and upwards. They're just not truly reflective of the reality out there. Some sites barely merit more than 10/100. And these review sites often review many dozens of pay sites, so I'm suspicious that they have either the time or money to do this properly.
I reckon a good proportion of professional reviews out there are based solely on the free tours! So no wonder they're artificially high!
Not saying that's the case with TBP, but is just a general suspicion of mine.
Regards.
|
01-20-08 10:50am
|
Reply
133
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
studslut's Review
I don't get this review. You made this site out to be pretty horrible with fat, ugly, hairy women, and infrequent updates (although given your description of the site, I would regard that as a small mercy!) and yet you awarded it a massive 90 score! It doesn't add up!
|
01-20-08 09:26am
|
Reply
134
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
But I don't even want it, Drooler! It hasn't been updated since December, and I have really lost all interest in the site. If it were Club Sandy, or Sapphic Erotica, or a great lesbian site then that would be another matter - and I certainly wouldn't shout about it round here *wink*!
One advantage of the free membership is, I can keep checking back for updates, and keep Porn Users informed as to when it bothers to update.
Keep watching my Eve Angel review for updates!
|
01-20-08 04:08am
|
Reply
135
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I know, my friend. Actually, at this time (or at least last week when I left) Mya's was fully up to date. But Eve's and Lora's are appalling. At least Eve's seems to update *eventually* and backdate the uploads for the missing period.
Not sure if the Club Sandy vid is better quality or not - I didn't bother to re-download it. I doubt it though. Both sites seem to have identical movie quality (i.e. about average).
I'm about to write a review of Eve's site. You know, I actually left a couple of months ago after one month's membership, and got my email confirming I had left and would not be re-billed - and yet I still have full access! I only discovered this when I got an email from customer service saying someone had breached my login details, and sent me a new password!
I replied straight back to say I had cancelled my membership, so it should not be active - but got no reply. So I sent a second email. Still no reply, and the membership is still active! This would be a great thing, if it weren't for the fact that the site hardly updates anyway, and when it does it always seems to be yet another Eve solo set, which never seem as good as Eve's movies on other sites. So it just shows you how bad it is when ex-members don't even want it for free!
|
01-20-08 03:48am
|
Reply
136
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Re Mya Diamond.com. Yeah, I have just come across (no pun intended) a vid and pic set of Mya and Sandy, which I had already got from Club Sandy. So this is clearly not a 100% exclusive site.
So far it seems to be updating on time - unlike Eve Angel's or Lora Craft's sites, which nowadays seem to update when they feel like it, if at all.
|
01-20-08 02:51am
|
Reply
137
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
Have to agree about SE getting worse in recent months. Whilst the technical quality (resolution, picture quality) is better than the vast majority of sites out there (even better than many so-called HD sites), the content has become dull. I think the webmaster has taken his eye off the ball for a while.
Still, it's worth a month's fee to get all the archive, which is still mostly brilliant stuff, very reminiscent of what we see from Viv Thomas.
|
01-19-08 05:44pm
|
Reply
138
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Agree with much of your review of SE, Goldfish. This was my first pay site too. I would add though, that whilst many of the older movies are lower res, they are often some of the best quality action.
Probably my favourite movie from the whole site is the threeway between Johanna, Kellie and Nina (who I've discovered goes by the name of Lucy Lee elsewhere). This is quite low res by today's standards, but have you ever seen 3 babes so into each other's bodies as those three!
Conversely, I find some of the newer movies to be very decent res and widescreen, but the action is often dull by comparison.
Nevertheless, it's still one of my fave sites for hot yet sensual lesbo action. Hard to beat.
Regards. Davit.
|
01-19-08 05:38pm
|
Reply
139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
You get what you pay for. Trying to find worthwhile stuff for free is like searching for a needle in a haystack. And you're also risking all manner of viruses and spyware. The free sites also tend to be very dishonest. Links often will not lead you to where they claim to - often they just lead to more links, that open in more windows, and before you know it, you have about 10 windows open behind the one you are viewing.
The tube style sites are so rubbish that I'm sure the only people that get anything out of them are horny teenage lads that can't yet access the credit card authorisation sites.
There's enough pay sites that are utter rubbish, without me wasting more time with free ones!
|
01-19-08 04:22pm
|
Reply
140
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
Hi mate
You say 'Sandy doesn't do hardcore anymore'. I noticed many people regard any porn that doesn't include a guy to be somehow not hardcore.
Isn't this a little sexist? Surely if a girl indulges in cunnilingus, anilingus, tribbing, dildo fucking, etc etc, with another girl, this is hardcore too?
Maybe I have my definition wrong!
Still, great review man.
Regards
Davit
|
01-19-08 12:36pm
|
Reply
141
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
The context I was writing in, was one of someone who appreciates good porn (as I see it of course - we can only speak for ourselves). I like to review music also. The fact that I don't consider porn or music to have the same importance as world politics (and clearly they don't!) does not mean I therefore paid little care to my review.
I happily corrected the mistake that you quite rightly pointed out. But everyone makes mistakes. Don't use my honesty in admitting that one error as a stick to beat me with, regarding my reviews in general!
As for that voice - I didn't say it was yours. Are you saying that you are the guy whose voice is on there? Why is it relevant whether I would consider it to be alto or bass or whatever? The only issue I had was that it *sounds* gay. I know the guy (you?) is NOT gay. I didn't use the term 'gay' as an insult either (I have no interest in homophobia, and find homophobics to be pathetic) - and I know you didn't accuse me of that, but I think it's important to clarify the point. But I still don't like to hear male voices - or worse still, gay-sounding male voices - in my porn videos.
I think it was valid to mention this in my review - I know from reading many other porn reviews in the past, that a dislike of male voices in all-girl porn films is not unique to me, so is a point of interest to potential subscribers.
Kind regards.
|
01-19-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
142
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PosterDude's Reply
Hi Posterdude
I appreciate your opinion, but I can only speak from my own. We're all different, and will all have varying opinions. That's what makes user review sites like this so good.
There's no need for personal insults if you disagree - just say why you disagree (which is fair enough), and leave it at that!
Regards
Davit
|
01-19-08 12:08pm
|
Reply
143
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
You're entitled to your view, Robare, I'm entitled to mine. I'm not sure how you got onto 'faking urination'. I didn't think that existed! Relax - you sound very angry, and there's really no need - it was just one opinion! (And I'll let you into a secret - we're only discussing porn here, not world politics - you don't need to get so worked up about it!)
|
01-17-08 10:28am
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
We all know what the word 'amateur' literally means - but I think what the term means when applied to porn is 'amateur *looking*' - in other words, 'girl next door' image, simple but effective production/direction (often one or two cameramen filming in a bedroom) and a generally unpretentious look. That's my take anyway - I'm probably completely wrong!
|
01-17-08 10:21am
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
1 inch in diameter? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ;)
|
01-14-08 01:49pm
|
Reply
146
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Forgot to mention, PP - I know they are clearly labelled as to whether they are photo shoots or whatever - that wasn't the point of my comment.
And the talking thing - he definitely talks in most non-photo shoot vids. I know it's generally not much - but just the occasional sound of his voice is still surely not a pleasant experience for the vast majority of viewers. Does anyone actually think it's a good thing? I suspect that most people who sign up to an all-girl site are people who really *really* would not want to hear a male voice in their porn vids at all, never mind occasionally. I reckon that's fair to say.
|
01-13-08 12:45pm
|
Reply
147
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Robare's Reply
Hi Robare - your point about me not mentioning American girls is valid - I'm about to amend my review. I didn't mean to mislead - it was an oversight, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. And while I find most American sites to feature annoyingly badly acting girls who can't shut up (!) I did actually find the Americans in this site to be generally much more natural.
If you think this was a negative review - you should hear my opinion on many sites that Porn Users don't feature. There are some dreadful ripoffs out there that I would struggle to give much more than zero, they're that bad, i.e. not delivering any of what is promised in the tour screens - just excuses to get an email address to send junk to!
So on balance, I reckon I gave Alsscan an above-average score.
One final point - you said you only saw one scene where the fluid 'might have been pee' - well, I can tell the difference, there's no 'might' about it! I know which hole pee comes out of, and what pee looks like, as opposed to girl cum. No offence intended.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
|
01-13-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
148
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Hi Pink Pantha, thanks for your reply mate. But I didn't think I was being inaccurate - if you notice I never suggested Alex actually was gay - I personally couldn't care less about someone's sexuality (I have gay friends like most people these days). I only said he *sounded* gay, which I think is fair to say - because he really does! Any male voice is not nice to hear on a site aimed at lesbian-loving hetro guys - but a gay-sounding one is even worse! Just my take on it.
|
01-13-08 12:18pm
|
Reply
149
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Review
Agree totally about the director talking to much, and the annoying voice. In fact, he sounds like a gay friend of mine (not what I need to hear in a lesbian porn movie).
And I agree the video content doesn't make it worth joining really. Many of the videos are not even proper porn movies - they are either filmed photo shoots are movies of the girls acting goofy on the beach or in the street, with that annoying guy shouting things to them.
Wish I'd taken more notice of your review before I joined.
Regards
Davit
|
01-12-08 06:51am
|
Reply
150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
And another thing. Most talking in porn is just relentless and boring: "Oh yeah, just like that, just like that, right there, right there, spit on it, oh yeah I'm cumming, right there, just like that. Oooh, look at that. Right there".
Who the hell enjoys listening to that crap?!
|
01-12-08 05:41am
|
|
