| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Dont be greedy with porn. I would have no issue letting a my brother borrow some of my DVDs.
The trouble here is, is it okay/legal to allow someone to borrow porn downloaded from most porn sites?
|
06-15-09 01:56am
|
Reply
277
|
All Network Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
BigTool83's Comment
Sounds like you are having a lot of bad luck.
|
06-13-09 08:24pm
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I have always preferred shaven. I am so glad that hairy pussies where phasing out right as I began into porn.
Hair on a real woman can be interesting, but I prefer shaven in real life as well. But on pictures or video shaven is a must. Preferable completely shaven, I can live with a landing strip but would rather it not be there either.
To me shaven just seems much cleaner. I love to see the contours and believe they should not be hidden. Also, it is much more desirable to stick my face in! :P
|
06-13-09 12:31am
|
Reply
279
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
In my email to them I did not mention TBP. I pretty much never do mention TBP in correspondences with websites. I mentioned them here because they have the same price displayed as the sign up page did and it was on the same day that TBP posted that site.
You are correct about the length of the trial. I knew it was two days when going into this, and it does not change anything here. I did not check on the duration of the trial before responding since that is not the part in question.
I sent them one email with everything in it, including quotes of the pricing. Also a request for a refund of the difference. I have no issues with paying the $14.95, since that is what I had expected to pay anyway.
Hopefully they are decent about it, I am still sorting out my last credit card issue!
|
06-12-09 04:15pm
|
Reply
280
|
Naked Closet
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I mention TBP because that is where I first seen the price, and it was on their update for that day.
I signed up for a 3 day trial to see if I liked it or if they had anything good. TBP showed that the site would rebill at $14.95 and the site said the same thing on the sign up page. TBP is not to blame because I seen the same thing they did.
The deal here worked just like any other trial. After a few days access it recurs at what ever the recur amount should be. Since the sign up page stated that the 30 membership for $24.95 or the trial for $4.95 would recur at $14.95 I thought it seemed like a decent deal.
TBP got their information from the same place I did, the sign up page. The issue is that is not what they charge. They have another set for rules listed in the customer service page. Of course a person usually only goes to this page AFTER having a problem, not before.
The point is that they advertise one price up front, and they charge based off a price that is displayed somewhere other than the sign up page.
As for me, my trial rebilled at the higher amount. Not the amount shown on the sign up page. So in effect I was billed $10 more than I had expected for the additional 30 days.
|
06-12-09 11:31am
|
Reply
281
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
And WittyGuy's next raffle win gets him $45 instead of $50! Just kidding, but hopefully these deals you are finding end up here as well.
|
06-11-09 10:40pm
|
Reply
282
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Uh Oh! Sounds likes like the TBP guys need to give ALS Scans a call and see about getting us a better discount. We need people to join sites through TBP/PU so they can get their referral kickbacks. This site is free for us to use, but not free to operate. Plus for some reason the staff think they need to eat too. ;)
Nice catch WiittyGuy, hopefully this same deal will become available through here soon. I would hate to have to cheat on PU.
|
06-11-09 10:37pm
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Staying up a bit late are we lk2fireone? :) I guess I can not say much, it is 4:15 AM here. Boy do I need to get a life (job)!
I agree with you on that as well. Those are a little more prevalent than many of the fetish sites, but certainly can not touch hardcore.
I guess the point is that everyone needs to take it upon themselves to make their stuff better. I would not say that major niches like hardcore necessarily need more sites, but they like all others need to make what the have better.
|
06-11-09 01:16am
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Hardcore sites are a dime a dozen any more and there is a good amount of quality hardcore sites. Everyone wants to bang the women, so no worries there.
There really needs to be more quality in the fetish side. I do not mean S&M and all that exactly by fetish. What I mean would include that but also pretty much any fetish niche what ever it may be.
In the hardcore world there is so much competition that they know they must produce quality porn simply to survive. In the smaller fetish niches they do not feel as pressured to produce true quality porn because the competition simply is not there. So I believe it is these smaller very niche specific sites that need to step up and make their content better for the sake of the members. How many times have we found what seems to be a site that has exactly what we have been looking for only to find it was the same stuff we seen 3 years ago and looks just as bad.
|
06-11-09 01:10am
|
Reply
285
|
Guys For Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
Concept's Review
That really does suck, but this is more in line of a comment. Tell us a little about the site itself, assuming it is working.
|
06-10-09 07:17pm
|
Reply
286
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
Very good question, I am hoping for an answer as well.
|
06-09-09 11:15pm
|
Reply
287
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
There is some great lloking girls there. Their media quality has gone up a good bit not too long ago. You will find some nice looking pictures and videos there, and plenty of them. They also had a $10 retention offer when I was there, so something to keep in mind if you join but want to stick around longer than one month.
|
06-09-09 08:27pm
|
Reply
288
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
giggitygiggity's Comment
I cant say I noticed the 80's look, but they do use similar poses a lot. I would think they could use different poses, after all they have very small photosets. But I guess they have picked their favorites, or just feel they do a certain poses better than others.
|
06-09-09 02:44pm
|
Reply
289
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Exactly. I am not going to fight tooth and nail to be able to get to a site that is difficult to download anyway. So I guess I will have to let this one go and say "sucks to be me!"
As long as other people are not having any issues with getting on I guess it is okay. The site has nice content, but I would highly recommend anyone considering joining to read my other comment first.
|
06-09-09 12:08pm
|
Reply
290
|
Contortionist
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
Considering all the crazy positions pornstars have to get into it is not surprising that sites like this would pop up. I bet a lot more girls could do this than we may think. Granted these woman may be able to go a little farther, but with a little work I believe many of the usually pornstars could do this.
If you want to see this taken farther check out cl-bikini. The girls can really stretch there, but it is all extreme softcore and very little nude.
|
06-09-09 12:01pm
|
Reply
291
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I can not get any part of the site,homepage or previous areas browsed within the site. I have tried two different computer, I have tried two internet browsers, and deleting all internet related files. Still no success.
If it is working for you guy I am wondering if it is getting stuck somewhere along the way. I always get a network timed out message. I do not know of my ISP actually blocking any sites and I have not had this problem before. Oh well, trial is over now anyway. That is too bad though, I had finally figured a way to make downloading go a little smoother there.
|
06-09-09 11:53am
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I said yes, but the real answer is somewhere between yes and no. Watching porn has given me a load of ideas for sex, not all of which just anyone is willing to do.
At the same time no because I realize that porn is a fantasy and that is the point of porn. Not every woman has natural 32 G's of a rock hard body and plastic surgery face.
|
06-09-09 01:13am
|
Reply
293
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
linzi1's Review
Hello Linzi, welcome to PU. It is great to have new reviews, especially females.
What needs to be remembered about Only Tease is that it is a tease site after all. The fact the girls do not engage in anything too sexual and keep the cloths on more is the point of the site. I agree with you in wishing there was more, but the simple fact is they do deliver what they promise.
Another thing worth mentioning is that the pricing for this site sucks. Since they separated their sites it has gotten very expensive for anyone looking to see all their material.
|
06-08-09 06:54pm
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I would jump all over the idea of directing. I can not say I would want to be a fluffer, that would be pretty gay.
|
06-07-09 02:04pm
|
Reply
295
|
Mobile Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I had not thought of the cell phone download legal age issues. I do agree though that cell porn will be a short lived fad. At least I hope it is!
|
06-04-09 11:19pm
|
Reply
296
|
Pinky Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Damn Im good! Seriously though, great work investigating this one. Somehow it just seemed fishy too me. Think maybe someday these people will figure out that we do look at these reviews critically? Or that spam reviews end up making users worrisome about joining a particular site?
Edit:
Khan, I did not make any connection with guhe, but you have the records. I was actually suspecting that peterhd and caperuzo might be the same person or group. I was basing this off the similarity in the review, style, and grammar. Please take a moment to look into any correlation between these two users. Thanks!
|
06-04-09 11:10pm
|
Reply
297
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Just wanted to add to this comment
The site logs you off a lot. I mean a lot! This also makes anything you had queued up in a download manager not run. Fortunately the links do not change and it does not forward to a "join" page like other sites do, plus the current download does not stop, it just does not allow the next to kick in.
All in all, this site is a total pain to download. So if you are a download whore like me you may want to consider what I have found. If you do not want to download a lot of content, just the personal gems then I am sure you would find some.
|
06-03-09 05:24pm
|
Reply
298
|
Pinky Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I do not think we will get much in response here.
|
06-03-09 05:15pm
|
Reply
299
|
Pinky Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
peterhd's Review
Perhaps this is just me, but this review sounds a lot like the other review for this site. I mean it sounds like the same person, just in the way it reads. Both make specific mentions to exactly the same things, Lola, camera guy and so on.
That aside, 100 a reserved for "perfect" sites, at least as perfect as they come in your eyes. ANY site that does not update has a severe knock against it.
When did they stop updating? How do the videos and pictures look? The tour page looks interesting, but it makes not mention to what to expect in quality. TBP does have some facts listed from only about 2 months ago. They list the videos at 2000 kbit but we have all seen this bit rate on really crappy videos and videos that look like DVD quality. It is up to you to make these distinctions for us so we know what we are getting into in the event we decide to join.
|
06-02-09 07:15pm
|
Reply
300
|
Irina 18
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
They do it because 100 sites sounds good. Also I would think the girls they have like the idea of having "their own" site. Of course no one really believes 3 videos and 2 picture galleries constitutes a site.
|
06-01-09 05:23pm
|
