| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
Heavy Handfuls
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I was a member there I while back, but I honestly can not remember too much about it.
|
10-06-08 06:14pm
|
Reply
577
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Mischif's Reply
It is pretty annoying. I have downloaded most of this network at this point. But the download limit have certainly done its job. It has cost me a lot more money to do so than would have been necessary.
|
10-05-08 11:52am
|
Reply
578
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
When I joined Hustler a while back, one of the very first site I joined, i got hit with this. It was just by chance that I found out that it had happened.
There really is no defense for this practice. It is just a to screw people over when they are all excited to join a site and do not read everything. Seriously though, if I wanted to join the other site they are offering wouldn't go to that site? Or, why not just give access to that site with the membership? Humm...I know....they get more money for nothing this way!
|
09-30-08 05:18pm
|
Reply
579
|
Cartoon 69
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
You do not seem to be having any luck with joining sites that you can download from lately!
How can a cartoon site, name cartoons, not have cartoons? Something seems seriously wrong here. Webmaster must have got his website names mixed up. He probably has a normal cartoon site named.... :)
|
09-29-08 10:14pm
|
Reply
580
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
First. It is likely that you can download the flash files, just have to know how.
Second. That is a simple way to make sure you have to keep paying for the site. It it is like renting a movie, and having to go back to the store every time you want to see the same movie.
Most of us want to download. It is so much easier to watch a movie from my hard drive than it is to stream it. Besides it looks better and frees up my bandwidth to download other things while watching. Being able to download is arguably the most important aspect of a website. I dont care how good it is if I cant get it.
Would you buy a DVD only to watch it right away and never watch it again? That is what streaming is to many of us. Plus, some people do not have connections capable of streaming HD, and most people have trouble if the are streaming and want to jump around a scene looking for what they like.
So you agree with restrictions of use? I suppose you agree with DRM as well? Perhaps censorship? With hard drives become more and more affordable it seems a waste to throw away download time to streaming. Do you use disposable plates every time you eat?
Maybe I going a little far with this, but one thing is clear. if a site does not feature things that 99.9% of site have, it should be known. Consider this. You bought a new cell phone and on the box it says "talk all day, never miss another call!" That would sound good, then you get it home ane realize it can only receive calls. The box said it can receive calls "never miss a call" but it can not send calls out. Now the box did not say it could send calls out, but why the hell would you look for that, every phone can do that!
|
09-29-08 06:46pm
|
Reply
581
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
Videobox and brazzers both offer Ipod and other portable media formats. The trick is that both of them also offer normal PC downloads. Site preview pages need to be clear. I understand what it is saying, but that may be because I already know before reading it. The site did not specifically say that it did not offer normal PC downloads and that is not normal for a website. Therefore, it needs to be made abundantly clear. They say what they are offering, but not what they are not. Normally this is not an issue, but this is not a normal site.
Again, I will have to back Cybertoad on this one. I am not saying that you are wrong for liking the site, I am just agreeing that his frustrations are valid and most PC users need to know of the issue.
FrancinedeeIpodPorn.com would be appropriate for this site. Then I would agree with you.
|
09-29-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
582
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Morphious's Reply
First. The review will not be pulled, in fact with will likely be rated as a 2 point.
Cybertoad is a fairly trust worthy guy here, I am sorry but I am going to take his word over yours.
How can a site claim it has HD video if it only runs at 320x112? That is clearly not HD. About any video would look sharp at that small of resolution, problem is that you would not sure if that was a dick or the leg of a table.
The site was not overly clear that there was on real PC downloads. This should be mentioned on an internet site.
|
09-29-08 03:56pm
|
Reply
583
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Sounds like you just got screwed by a bunch of cell phone geeks! :)
Sorry to hear it. Sounds like the site name should say MOBILE in it. I would be a ton of pissed off too.
I guess you got screwed over by Newbie reviews. Notice how all of them have 1 point at most? And to think some people say some of us review TOO much. At least your review should set things straight.
|
09-29-08 03:41pm
|
Reply
584
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
zachvenice's Reply
Not it is not! It requires that i be at my computer the whole time. I usually use the point click method of adding things to my download manager anyway. I find this to be a better was because I only get one copy of everything and do not end up skipping stuff.
Really need to work on the files names, they absolutely suck! I can deal with it though. The bad part is that I notice that the links us a sort of time stamp that makes them expire after an hour or so. So no queuing a handful of videos up in my manager. Having to do extra work to rename everything is bad enough, but to have to do it more than once because the links expire is absolutely frustrating.
When I was at MC-Nudes a while back I had the same problem, as well as FTV and several other sites. So it is not only this this that is making life harder for paying customer, but a good handful of them.
Brazzers, Reality Kings, Aziani, InFocuGirls all expire a little while later. VideoBox gives you about a week. BangBros was nice since theirs did not seem to expire, Hungarian Honeys does not seem to either.
|
09-29-08 03:13pm
|
Reply
585
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
See. There is some good that comes from cucumbers!
|
09-29-08 03:02pm
|
Reply
586
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
At this point I have not been a member long enough to tell if they would make the links expire before the manager could get to them, it does not look like it though.
I big problem I have noticed is a lack of names for the files. "110947_dsl.wmv" just is not descriptive enough. They could at least have the girls name in it!
I should be able to tell you a little more tomorrow though. I will make sure to get back to you though, I assume you would want to know before the $18 deal expires.
|
09-28-08 10:26pm
|
Reply
587
|
Big Tits In Sports
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I guess I never noticed it.
|
09-26-08 05:11pm
|
Reply
588
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Reply
Gotcha. The ones on the preview page did not look so good, she should put a HD sample out there.
Hey. We were all new at everything we have ever don at one point. So do not think much of it. We all do things that are easy to criticizes after the fact. It is just a matter of being man enough to say "oh, duh that makes sense!"
Anyway, welcome to PU and keep coming back.
|
09-25-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
589
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Comment
You kinda should have put this as a reply to the comment you are reply to. This way people do not wonder what you are talking about, or have to dig for the comment you are replying to.
I do have a question for you though. Is the quality in the site the same as seen in the preview videos?
|
09-25-08 09:04pm
|
Reply
590
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Haha. Dont worry, I am sure they will get it fixed for you. I am not a perfectionist, shown very easily by more porn collection organization. I have stuff scattered everywhere, although it is betting a little better. I guess I am usually more worried about getting my stuff to work right and when I see something little at a free site I do not put much worry on it. Of course if I had all my stuff in order I might be more willing to give others a hard time! :)
|
09-25-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
591
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I do not usually look to much at the scores. I feel that at times they are weighed one way or another too much by people who are biased either direction.
Hopefully he sees his name and says "hey thats me!" I guess it really is not a big deal though, I did not even know the feedback history page was there until you mentioned it.
Anyway, glad I could make it make sense for you.
|
09-25-08 02:33pm
|
Reply
592
|
School Girl Lapdance
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
WOW. Sounds like you go hosed on that one. When I looked at the preview page I though the site might command $10 and nearly shit myself when I seen $40. I think you wasted enough money to buy two memberships at better sites.
|
09-25-08 10:41am
|
Reply
593
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
This is something that perhaps you should talk to Khan about. The one review was a year old and thus does not count as much toward the final score. You are correct though, the feedback history page is not showing everything.
Here it is:
The old review is a year old, thus it counts as 25%
The newer review counts as 100% still
Newer review score times 4 plus the older review score and divide all by 5 since there is five parts to the score. Much like calculating a students GPA
95*4+90=470
470/5=94 ---the displayed score
I hope this helps a bit. They do need a line on the feedback page to count the number of older reviews.
|
09-25-08 10:37am
|
Reply
594
|
The Training Of O
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
A few weeks ago PU staff sent use a newsletter. The newsletter explained that as a review gets older it becomes less of an impact on the scoring of a site. So if a review was a year old it would not be weighted the same as a review that was three days old.
The point is that an old review may still hold some merit, but the newer review would be much more trustworthy (assuming all else equal) than the older one simply because the older one can not account for any changes over the last year or whatever.
This change was made at the same time as they began to allow us to update reviews. Which is nice because many of us like to revisit sites every six months or whatever. Now we can keep everything a little more up to date.
It was a good catch, so this proves that you are at least half paying attention. You can read about these changes on the bottom of the homepage in the news section. I believe it is the most current newsletter.
|
09-24-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
595
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
Well I say it is absolutely great. I like models to stick around as long as THEY care to. The more they put out there the more likely they will create something truly great.
Besides, if you think a model is getting too "used up" simply ignore them. There is no law stating that you must have every video on a website.
Personally I do not care if they are euro or not. If you do not like euro models than it is no harm to you anyway and you simply do not pay for those sites.
Like I said, keep the porn coming for those who do want it.
|
09-24-08 09:54am
|
Reply
596
|
Naughty Natalie XOXO
(0)
|
Reply of
ConkDaddy214's Comment
Wouldn't this be better to send to her email or say on her site?
At least give us a description of the show!
|
09-22-08 05:06pm
|
Reply
597
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I was always irritated that they made me pay more for the lesbian content. It is not like lesbian is an obscure niche. It would be like a teen site charging more for access to photos of girls that are blonde.
I definitely agree with the greed split. I was not overly impressed with the content and this split has ensured that I will not be a member in the future.
|
09-21-08 08:31pm
|
Reply
598
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
buckdaddy1's Reply
When I was a member back in December I noticed that the same videos and zip files where placed on update pages for the same scene. This made it a pain in the ass to download because you had to remember what you already got. So if you go a few days without looking at it it can be hard to remember if you seen a video on an update page from several weeks earlier. This is a definite flaw in the site!
This resulted in me downloading a few of the videos twice even though I was on a different page. When the site layout tricks me into downloading the same thing twice I say it has problems.
How often does the site update? A perfect site is one that should keep you busy for hours if you choose to. I do not remember the site having that extensive of an update schedule.
If I recall correctly, they split the site up several months back. Now you have to pay more to get everything. hell, I had to pay extra just to get the lesbian stuff. There is something wrong there.
By the way, your reply did not offer any facts supporting your claim. This would be like if you went to a car sales lot and you asked the salesman why you should buy a specific car and he says "just buy it." Then you ask why the car is so good and he replies "because....it just is." Do you see what I am trying to get at here?
We all have our differences yes, assuming for a moment that we have equal tastes in women, tell me why I or someone else should join the site.
|
09-21-08 08:27pm
|
Reply
599
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
buckdaddy1's Comment
Seriously, you need to tell us much more about the site. I was a member there in December last year as was not overly impressed. The site layout was terrible. I am not into girls that look like that either, but that is mute since it is only my opinion. The fact is there are good things and bad things that you need to tell us about.
I do not condemn giving 100s, so long as you only give one and you have an arsenal of reasons to provide. A few flaws does not mean a site is not a 100 either, so at least let us know what you think a few areas of possible improvement might be. Check out my review of VideoBox and see what I mean here.
Tell us about the site, facts not "it is the best things I have ever done!" like you did in the review you posted a while back. That just makes you sound like a social vegetable.
You say in your profile that you do not surf the web much, so does that really make you qualified, at least based on experience, to say a site is perfect anyway? What other sites are you comparing Abby Winters to?
|
09-20-08 11:02pm
|
Reply
600
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I like having water or a can of coke around, but that does not have anything to do with porn though.
At least TheRizzo is honest about it. I personally do not drink and do not go to places where there is alcohol. Perhaps this is hindering my getting layed chances, I avoid the places where easy going women are. Oh well, I would like to be able to remember the event anyway.
|
09-20-08 10:48pm
|
