| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
But the site "Midgets blowing horse cock" shows up all caps, bold, and in color!
By the way, I honestly have no idea if a site names that exists. And NO, it is tucked away in my porn library.
|
05-30-11 07:23am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"How many, many, feet I delete."
You all know how much I hate to delete, but all feet pictures and videos do have a tendency to find there way to cyber oblivion. They have to have something else about them to warrant keeping them, such as the girl has large breasts or is just drop-dead-gorgeous.
If they did not sell, they would not make them.
|
05-30-11 07:16am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
When all are focused on one person and there are more people than that person could normally handle. There needs to be a at leas a small line, taking turns. A girl with three guys, double penetration and oral would not count because there is no wait.
|
05-14-11 10:44am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
This is an absolute must for me. For me it is hands down the most incredibly hot act.
|
04-22-11 02:33pm
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Incredible Pass (Incredible Fraud) is the best site I have seen thus far for ethnic diversity. They have many Indian and Middle Eastern women. Unfortunately that site is run by thieves and they will try to steal hundreds of dollars from you. Should you decide you must have this porn, thus supporting thieves, use a prepaid CC. This way they can not take you for more than the card.
Last I had checked TBP/PU suspended referrals and links to them. I bring them up not to promote them, but to make you aware of them. If you are searching for ethnic porn you are likely to run into this network site.
|
04-05-11 01:58pm
|
Reply
81
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
Another thing about deleting the cookie is you can get different pricing options.
|
04-03-11 08:20am
|
Reply
82
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
I think you missed many of my points. I was not saying 100s of reviews, I as referring to reviews with scores of 100 or close too.
Everyone says they have "high res" photos and HD video but many people do not. You say that you have been around PU for a while, you should have noticed that many of us want the actual specs. Physical resolution, bit rate, photo dimensions and so on. That is what I am looking for.
HD in the past six months is well behind par. HD has been affordable for years now. You are going to get no sympathy there. No HD five years ago is to be expected. I would not expect an amateur site to front $100,000 for an HD camera that many computers would not be able to play. Not asking to be ahead of the curve, but certainly keep up with them.
Limited trials are limited robbery. Those are 99% of the time a rip off.
Something you need to consider is that when reviewing a site you compare it to similar sites for content alone. I would not go to your site and then complain that you do not fit into a size 2 dress. That simply would not make sense. Comparing content niche to niche is good. I think you understand that part. The other part is the more of the technical aspects. Video size and quality, photo sized and quality, navigation and on and on and on are comparable globally. Your product must look as good as the best otherwise it is not the best. Score of 100 indicate a site that is the best on the net, not just a single niche. Others have more content, Videobox, many have better HD, you may very well have the best niche content but that does not account for the other aspects.
"The member that posted, I will be honest is quite well a friend and perhaps was not fair for him to post." That was my initial point and is what I wanted to hear.
|
04-02-11 04:47pm
|
Reply
83
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
Well, I have been in the porn world for a good while as well and I had not known of your site. That in itself does not speak well for your exposure.
Frequently when someone is a member of a site for several years they do not get around the porn world much and do not have much to compare to. Reviews from fanatics do not do people much good. Only one of the reviews you have comes from a known member here at PU. All the rest come from people with a single review, yours. We have seen previously when a series of unknowns submits 100's and similar score and it turns out to be shilling.
It would not be a stretch to conclude, or at lest speculate, that you asked these people to write reviews for you. We a webmaster is in contact with their members it is very easy to get to that. That makes for bias reviews because they do no want to disappoint you.
The flip side of that is that you do have contact with members which is a good thing. Having not been to your site I can not say if it is good or not.
On that note, I will not join your site because there are no trust worthy reviews, my opinion, and I feel that you are trying to manipulate the system here. We have no information about your site, types of videos, media specs, cancellation policies, or any of the important stuff many of us here look for.
In reading other comments you have wrote to other members I have noticed you try to sneak out of people compared to other sites. You ask not to be compared to professional sites, skinny site, granny sites, and so on. The simple fact of the matter is that my money is equal no matter which site I subscribe to. You ask us to ignore obviously superior sites.
Being a solo site we would not expect for you to have as much content as the huge network site. Sites do get held to different standards based off of what they are, particularly when it comes to archive size and update size. What no one mentions is the physical quality of your videos and pictures. I would expect a 100 site to produce full HD no matter the niche, as an example.
Bottom line is I do not trust you or those who have reviewed your site.
|
04-01-11 07:52pm
|
Reply
84
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
turbo3052002's Review
If I didn't know better I would say that this is the beginning of a rerun. I am sure the PU staff will be watching this one as we have all seen the many 100s on an otherwise unheard of site.
|
03-30-11 06:08pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is on my regular email account, so several times a day. Not at work though. I get an incredible amount of spam in that account.
|
03-27-11 05:17pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I do not believe I have enough to qualify for this poll.
|
03-09-11 01:54pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Power=All
|
02-22-11 02:08pm
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
I like a little hair every here and there. I do not want to see it all the time. I would say 98% of the time cleanly shaved is the best way to go.
Hairy girls are a fetish now. It is a bit strange to think of it that way because it is natural. Hairy is no longer the norm in porn and in a large part of society, thus making it a fetish. Albeit a very light fetish.
The nice thing about this is that a woman can go back and forth depending on her circumstances with out much issue other than a little time. It is not like getting tattoos or breast implants that are obviously a little more permanent.
In case any of you hairy fans have not noticed, check out ITouchMyself, a fair amount of the girls in these solo scenes have at least a few weeks worth of growth.
While I can live with hair now and then and even a landing strip, all assholes should be shaved clean! It is not that I am interested in see it, it just seems dirty when it is hairy as well. Perhaps this is just me...
|
02-01-11 05:30am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Two nipples are enough for me.
|
01-20-11 03:51am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Just sitting there in the living room. If she comes in during the "session" she gets the honors of finishing off! :)
|
01-19-11 02:13pm
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Cumming on her face is such a novelty. Not that many women are into the idea of letting you shoot uncontrollably onto their face and possibly into their hair. I think the idea was to show undeniably that the guy did get off, thus everything was real.
|
01-08-11 01:04am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No because so many have not concept of HD. I prefer to see the statistics. Also worth mentioning is that HD does not mean high quality. HD typically does not refer to the bit rate but rather only looks at the resolution which can give a false impression at times.
|
01-02-11 04:36am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I could break your jaw with the bones I wake up with! The trouble is I usually have to take a leak when I wake up and we all know how difficult that is.
|
12-21-10 02:03pm
|
Reply
94
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
Perhaps you missed my review of this site. I was a member very recently and it seemed as if the new stuff was all being posted as 6 MBit and 1280x720. I have a number of scenes that are at this quality and they look fairly decent. Now there is a lot of content that is at the specs you quoted. If you look for the larger file sizes of whatever you downloaded you should find some of their newer stuff.
|
12-19-10 09:48pm
|
Reply
95
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
Ricky D Product's Reply
"Better yet, maybe even sent to the company owner so he could fix your issues." Again read the transcript. I was dismissed right out of the gate. I practically had to break the guy's arm to get a refund that I should not have needed.
I never said that the girl's appearance was an issue. Correct, I am not a fan of tatoos but it is hard to avoid now with so many having them.
Yes, Twistys is ranked very high by me and for many reasons. One of which is their site is easy to get around. They also shoot quality and have been doing it longer.
As for the looks of the main girl herself no one can say anything about it other than a user should look at the main page before joining. That said I knew what she was going to look like before joining and decided $5 was worth a look. Yes, I prefer the "babe" look, but at times my mood is a little different and want something different. So while I may be a little bias I would spell out any bias I have that others may not share, but in this case I did not have bias toward the girl, just the site layout and quality.
I am typically not in your demographic, but then again most people are not. This is a smaller niche site and that is fine. Many of us here join those knowing they are small.
If it nothing you can get at bestbuy and yo have all this experience that speaks even worse for the site because it does not show! The pictures are small, and a lot of the videos are very sub par in quality. Some of the videos do look okay media wise, I will give the site that.
"Reviewers like you are the reason sites do limited trials and why the smaller producers are nearly gone." Why, do they feel they need to hide behind limited trials? Is it because they know they do not have much to offer and do not want to show their hand until after we pay the full price? Or is it something to do with the site being able to be downloaded in under two hours?
I have given good reviews to extremely small sites when they offer something unusual.
The trouble is that you are getting away from the main topic. I have a terrible time canceling this site. Perhaps that is what need to be addressed. I can see that you share the same style of customer service as the payment processor does.
|
12-19-10 10:56am
|
Reply
96
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
Ricky D Product's Reply
"...but with false reviews like these..."
So are you denying the transcript posted in the forum?
I did not put down the site for not being large like some of the other. I have been around the porn block a few time, I know what is out there. I did not go in expecting 5000 GB of HD stuff. I was looking for something other than a bunch of webcam recording and POV content. It comes off as very amateur, something anyone could do with a HD camera from bestbuy a guy and a girl.
I have done a number of reviews here so people have gotten to know my style and get a feel for what I look for. Those looking for the same thing will not like your site, thus should avoid it. Others look for different things and may like it, and since they know they feel differently about certain things it may not affect their decision to join. We are just trying to get the facts out and voice own own opinions whether others agree with them or not is up to them.
"We've never had any issues with members canceling their memberships..." we you have now had at least one. The link at the bottom of the pages directed me to epoch, not who I signed up through.
Lastly, those members who have been around since 2007 for this tiny site would likely not be taken too seriously. They obviously have an extreme bias and we strive for unbiased reviews here because those are the kind that help us.
|
12-18-10 09:39pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I do not have any porn, I swear!!!
|
12-11-10 08:13pm
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Lingerie, among many others. Uniforms are kinda the same thing, but I tend to like lingerie better. I love when it almost shows, but just barely forces my imagination.
|
12-09-10 10:31am
|
Reply
99
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
There are several forum threads about download managers. There are many free ones and many to pay for. I personally use Internet Download Manager, or IDM. If you notice on the newer reviews by the TBP staff they also use IDM and tell you if it will work on the sites. It works on most, but to differing degrees.
Try a couple free ones and I believe IDM has a trial period as well. Downloads.com is a good place to see what is out there. One thing is for sure, if you download more than a few files here and there a manager will save you a lot of time and headache.
|
12-02-10 12:26pm
|
Reply
100
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
They re not churning out updates like Twistys or Videobox, but it looked like a video per week. This is a good site to come back for periodic updates and allow to grow in between.
Do not get me wrong, if you have not joined the site in a year or so you will be pleasantly surprised with the new videos. They are definitely better than previous. Looking at the history of the site it is fair to assume they will be trying to make them better. The newer videos are certainly watchable, but it is so easy to be spoiled by the sites putting full HD scenes out at carry double the bitrate.
|
12-02-10 08:24am
|
