| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Better be able to get 1 MByte per connection to keep me happy. I have seen 19 MBytes/second on my connection
|
03-05-08 01:51pm
|
Reply
327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
DUDE!! 10 GB per month? Maybe 20 GB/hour, that is my rate it this moment, at home I am at 30 G/day. So about 1 TB per month sounds about right. And 70 GB per day when I am the University! ME love me porno!
|
03-05-08 01:48pm
|
Reply
328
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I have shown a few of my buddies a small portion of my collection. They gawk at the shear size of it! I do not have time to show them everything. 8 TB is a lot to go through, and I am very proud of it, but I still want more.
|
03-05-08 01:38pm
|
Reply
329
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I do not delete anything. It take time to delete the ones you dont like, and takes from time to enjoy the ones you do like. Besides you never know when you might wish you still had that picture, and hard drives are not THAT expensive anymore!
|
03-05-08 01:32pm
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
This is a bad question. What about those of use that look at porn at all times on different days. Or those you download 24/7? :)
|
03-05-08 01:01pm
|
Reply
331
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Poll
Hard drives are the most important part. You can add ram and monitors as it become possible, but you have to have room to keep downloading! I am currently at 24 HDDs. Most over 300 GB and a few 750s. You have to save ALL of your work...you never know when you will want to see that messed up scene again.
|
03-05-08 12:57pm
|
Reply
332
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
There actually is a good deal of women who watch porn, but they do not publicly speak of it. It is a social normality that has been viewed for centuries. Women are raised to think it is taboo, but men are not raised in such a way. I think it has a lot to do with the fact that most men do not want to see there wife or daughter getting her faced cummed on by three fat guys. Many people would view a woman you was open about her interest in porn a whore, even though she just bought the same video as the guy next to her and no one thinks too much about him.
I do not believe porn should be made specifically with what we believe a woman would want to see. It would be pointless because they will look at whatever they like, and that market will grow. Odds are it is the same thing that most guys like too. Some women like lesbians because they are softer and not thrashing about. Others like traditional porn. And others might like all male or gay porn simply because there is no woman, or they do not want to see a woman be dominated. So I believe it would be just as hard to say what a woman would want as it is to say what a guy would want. We enjoy verity and specific fetishes, just as women would.
It is just like in high school when I guy got layed he was the envy of his friends and everyone else. But the girl was considered a whore suddenly. There is a clear dual standard.
|
03-04-08 10:41am
|
Reply
333
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
Overall I liked the sites, but you are completely correct on the cross site doubles. They really need to let us know when a scene is posted more than one place.
|
10-25-09 01:13pm
|
Reply
334
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Review
"Get yourself a 1TB HD if you want to join this site. You'll need it unless you are very fussy about the amount you download." I am guessing you are not directing this comment towards me!?!? :)
It is good to hear the customer service is good here.
|
09-24-09 08:40pm
|
Reply
335
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I have not had much trouble with DDFBusty loading pages. I did have issue the other day with the video downloads having a 10 second latency when queuing up. I am assuming that DDFBusty comes from the same place as 1 By Day. I have not had this problem since.
I will not condemn you for getting mad about long page loadings. To me 8 seconds is only manageable when I am loading a very large page while I am running my downloads full speed. So by all means chuck a brick at them.
Hopefully this issue gets beaten to death before too long, 1 by day is my next site after I finish DDFBusty.
|
08-24-09 10:57pm
|
Reply
336
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
kocken87's Review
Dude. They are just going to keep deleting these worthless reviews and eventually boot your ass off here. Seriously what is the point in your posts?
|
01-25-09 04:17pm
|
Reply
337
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
See. There is some good that comes from cucumbers!
|
09-29-08 03:02pm
|
Reply
338
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
We all love those scenes...lucky cucumbers! I think veggies get more action than we do, there is something just plain wrong about that.
|
09-16-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
339
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Stop it Ace! I have been thinking about joining this site for a while now and you are not making it any easier to hold back. Site sounds pretty good. Just wish it did not cost so much!
|
09-03-08 04:52pm
|
Reply
340
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I am sure sure there are some that must be paid for. But if you google them yo can find them. Most of the time there is not any decent sites on these listing anyway, most of the higher grade sites have ways of preventing numerous IPs from signing in under the same user name
|
05-08-08 10:11am
|
Reply
341
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well yes certainly. That works a lot like the Thumbnail Galleries. But I have also seen a good bit of exclusive content their as well.
Yup, password sites exist! This is why there is many sites that have download limits and make you sigh in ever hour or so.
|
05-08-08 09:11am
|
Reply
342
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Well. That could be a little of both. many people put stuff on there just to share with others and other people put stuff on their that they download. There is a good amount of content that is okay to be there, but there is also a lot of content that was bought by someone then posted for others to download for free, thus screwing the site owners and the rest of us who are paying the premium price. Usenet offers a way to steal content from websites with out ever touching the site.
I was mostly referring to websites that post hacked user names and password for everyone to use. Unlike usenet, this method still required the owners to pay for the bandwidth with out being able to collect any membership fees.
|
05-07-08 09:38pm
|
Reply
343
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes how true, many men do not. On the other hand, does a map company "own" directions? Of course not because you could also go to Burger King and ask someone that is eating and get the same directions. It really comes down to would you have bought the map if the clerk could not answer you, or would you have simply ask someone else. However, the store clerk could have simply said to buy a map, but he chose not to. Cup half full or empty I guess.
If you look at a picture that you NEVER had the intention to buy than the photographer really has lost nothing if you look at it at your friends house because you were not going to buy it regardless. It does not cost the photographer money for each time a friend looks at another friends collection. Of course, a person should not copy their friend's collection, unless of course they want to pay a membership fee at least.
On that, it can be seen that password cracking sites are counterproductive to the porn community because even though a person may never had intended to pay for the pictures he is looking at, the owner still had to pay the bandwidth usage it took to download them. This means that the owner would never had mad any money off of you but he still had to pay for you to be able to look at them.
Gee, now I feel bad myself for using that password crack site while back. Kicking my own ass!
|
05-05-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
344
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I wouldn't accuse you either way, but we will not get into my views on the laws of piracy. Most of us have used something to see pictures without paying for them. No different than going to a friend's house and looking through their collection. Can be a good way to see who you want to subscribe to. No different than flipping through a magazine at the store before deciding to buy it.
Here is one for you. If a person goes into a store that sells road maps and get directions from the clerk, did the person steal from the store?
|
05-05-08 12:14pm
|
Reply
345
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
InFocus Girls, Nubiles, Zexy Teens, Xisty, Twistys, and others seem to have pretty small markings too.
I just checked out 40 somethings homepage, they dont even let you see a sample photo anywhere! From the outside of the site a person would never know that the watermarks are an issue.
|
05-04-08 04:59pm
|
Reply
346
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I must agree with this. I have seen this in too many other places too. A small make can actually be nice so you can tell where the pictures, or videos even go. I like to keep things sorted by site and some have no markings and a year after downloading the video I usually do not have the slightest clue where it goes. But, they should be small.
Many of the nicer sites have a very small marking that must be looked for at times. I really do not like the large ones either, they really should blend into the picture. Every one will know who's it was since it is still there, but should not take away from the picture. Too many times have we seen the best part covered by these marking!
|
05-04-08 02:56pm
|
Reply
347
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Reply
I hate when that happens. Redownloading everything is a shame. My ISP has no cap that I know of, they are Embarq DSL which I believe is a nationwide company. AbbyWInters has a download cap or at least used to. The way it was set up is it did not limit daily access or anything but rather total bandwidth usage of a user. They did not want your usage to exceed the size of the site. Mine did not but they for some reason were worried it would.
What they do not want is people downloading the site more than once because they are using site cloners, which would grab all the video options and grab the reposts in later updates. Also, this happens when people share or hack user names.
I was not kicked off or anything, I was more or less just asked to "slow down and stay a while" I believe was their exact words.
|
07-16-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
348
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
dingle's Reply
Hum....the only email I ever got from them was them crying about how fast I was downloading everything. This was about 2 years ago though and I have never intended on rejoining this site. I did not look but I do not remember rating it all that high either.
|
07-16-09 12:30pm
|
Reply
349
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
drummstikk's Reply
When money is involved it becomes a large risk, especially now. My feeling is that those who have not been through dozens of site are the ones you need the good reviews. There are those of us who have seen a good number of sites and have learned what to look for before joining, but we also know better than to jump in blindly. People with little experience are always recommended to check reviews first. They can be given heads up on things that they otherwise would not have thought of until it is too late. how many stories have we heard of people new to paid internet porn that get screwed with cross selling check boxes and other things. Also, check out the reviews of Incredible Pass, here you will find the true risk of internet porn!
I do not remember the videos being as good as Sapphic Erotica, but I have not joined since Abby split the site up. But I did join the two sites at about the same time and at that time Sapphic was much better. But again this could have change. Can you tell use the current specs of the videos?
Also, I do have a girlfriend. July will be 6 years, same one through my whole college career.
|
04-29-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
350
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
drummstikk's Reply
That is not point I was trying to make. Being able to see a great deal of the site is extremely useful, but it does not tell the whole story. We want to hear first hand account of the site. Tell us about the video quality. We want updates about these sort of things that preview pages just can not tell us. Are the any more clear than a review 6 months ago may have stated? This sort of information is very useful and there are many similar topics that only members who have downloaded and viewed a good deal of content can enlighten us on.
Not reading reviews before joining a site is generally careless and puts you at risk of losing your money, or at least being disappointed over something that would have been obvious had you taken a few minutes to read up on the site first. This is a sure sign of lake of experience. Which begs the question, honestly how many sites have you joined other than AbbyWinters?
I am not going to say that your opinion is wrong, after all it is yours and it certainly does not change the site. I ask because opinions usually change after someone has seen a a moderate number of sites. Twistys was the first site I ever joined and thought it was the best thing in the world. While Twistys is a great site my opinion has changed a bit and gained perspective after having been through dozens of sites.
|
04-29-09 07:49pm
|
