| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
jbgild's Comment
With all the currency stuff going on it is getting to be more heard of to have sites charge differently depending on where you are. Be almost like a store having a sale that another identical store in another town does not have.
That said, it is a shame to see their prices raising so much for us in the States. Gee, gas price goes up and so does the price of porn?? Go figure.
I am afraid of people switching the currencies around that their sites use to take advantage of one doing better than another, then switching it again when another currency is having an up swing.
|
06-04-08 04:16pm
|
Reply
502
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
The DDF sites do have a large amount of overlap. This caused some trouble when downloading. For example, a big boob lesbian foot fetish scene would be seen on at least three of their sites.
|
01-31-10 10:27pm
|
Reply
503
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
His issue is likely something through an ISP somewhere along the way. I had no download issues with this site, and that was when they first announced their network special, so I am sure they pretty busy then.
|
01-25-10 09:49pm
|
Reply
504
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Okay, I found how to get to the scene index and it only lists one site for each scene. The trouble is that often times a scene is listed on more than one of the site and the index does not show this.
The index is still useful though, so thanks for mentioning.
|
09-17-09 05:12pm
|
Reply
505
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks E. It would actually be a little bit useful. I had not looked there before. One trouble though, I can see all the models but I can not see a scene index. Under each model's stats there is a link to a sign up page. I can not find any member log in for the DDFProd page either. So, how exactly did you get to this scene index? Thanks E.
|
09-16-09 03:17pm
|
Reply
506
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
giggitygiggity's Comment
I cant say I noticed the 80's look, but they do use similar poses a lot. I would think they could use different poses, after all they have very small photosets. But I guess they have picked their favorites, or just feel they do a certain poses better than others.
|
06-09-09 02:44pm
|
Reply
507
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
zachvenice's Reply
Not it is not! It requires that i be at my computer the whole time. I usually use the point click method of adding things to my download manager anyway. I find this to be a better was because I only get one copy of everything and do not end up skipping stuff.
Really need to work on the files names, they absolutely suck! I can deal with it though. The bad part is that I notice that the links us a sort of time stamp that makes them expire after an hour or so. So no queuing a handful of videos up in my manager. Having to do extra work to rename everything is bad enough, but to have to do it more than once because the links expire is absolutely frustrating.
When I was at MC-Nudes a while back I had the same problem, as well as FTV and several other sites. So it is not only this this that is making life harder for paying customer, but a good handful of them.
Brazzers, Reality Kings, Aziani, InFocuGirls all expire a little while later. VideoBox gives you about a week. BangBros was nice since theirs did not seem to expire, Hungarian Honeys does not seem to either.
|
09-29-08 03:13pm
|
Reply
508
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
At this point I have not been a member long enough to tell if they would make the links expire before the manager could get to them, it does not look like it though.
I big problem I have noticed is a lack of names for the files. "110947_dsl.wmv" just is not descriptive enough. They could at least have the girls name in it!
I should be able to tell you a little more tomorrow though. I will make sure to get back to you though, I assume you would want to know before the $18 deal expires.
|
09-28-08 10:26pm
|
Reply
509
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Gotcha! It has been a while since I read through all the rules, they are getting a bit rust to me again. Thanks for link, everything makes sense. I can see how it would be hard to allow everything to be changed all the time and removed and still represent the whole picture.
Thank you Khan for pointing these things out to me!
|
07-25-08 01:16pm
|
Reply
510
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Curious, are you still am member there? If so please tell me more about the site. I would love to join, but at this point I am having a hard time swallowing the idea of a 2 GB download limit. I really want to know what they are doing that keeps people there so I know if it is worth me trying out.
|
07-24-08 07:25pm
|
Reply
511
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Wow. That would be kinda nice! Sorry, I do not mean to be making any stink here. I thought a user was able to redo a review or change a score anytime, obviously I could be mistaken as it would not be the first time. I know a review can be edited up to a month later, I just thought it could be overwritten by a more current review from the same user. Can we currently do that? I have never tried it, but it would seem logical since sites change.
Again, I apologize to you, Khan, and Toadmix if I am causing any headache.
|
07-24-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
512
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Can you post a new review and have it overwrite that one? I cant believe they will not take it down though? Oh well.
I agree completely though. My first several reviews sucked ass! I left out good information and made them pretty short. I was able to change them though because it was in the first month.
Your reviews now days are pretty good. I especial like the Rachel Aziani review, I think it is better than mine. You have my trust vote! I was just hoping you would be willing to update the review since it was from when you first started and bring it up to par with your newer ones, but I am now not sure if you are able to.
|
07-24-08 04:58pm
|
Reply
513
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Truthfully I did keep that in mind. I did not realize is was his first day, but I figured it was close to the beginning. Actually I did the about the same thing when I first began posting! Haha! I guess my point was we need more details, granted it is an older review now, more detail would be great and is needed to support such a score even if the information comes months later.
Actually I find Toadmix to be fairly trustworthy, his new stuff is pretty good. Many of us have gotten a little better after a few. The recent review of Rachel Aziani was pretty good! Sorry if it seems like I am picking on him, he just seems like the type of person that if you told him his review was junk he would actually go back and make it better and more inclusive. Forgetting to mention a very stringent download limit of 2 GB is pretty important in my opinion and worth fixing in a review. It is the only thing keeping me from joining this site honestly! But it could very well be a difference of opinion or priorities, we are all a little different and not everyone is a download hog like me. :)
I would just like to see the review revisited and updated to show more information. He might have a damn good reason for a 100, but at this point I do not know what it is. I am not being mean to him, I just really want to know what made this site so great in his eyes since I have never been there.
|
07-23-08 07:22pm
|
Reply
514
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Toadmix
Come one man, you can't give a site a 100 when it has a download limit, especially one so low as 2 GB. I am really surprised you have not caught a bunch of hell around here for this review score.
Granted it is a site I would love to join, but not for 2 GB a day. It is a simply scam to force people to stay members for a very long time.
I know some people cry about 100s and say they should never be given. Personally I have no issue with them so long as the reviewer can give some very good reasons. So please tell us a bunch more about this place, and be very specific on my it deserves such a high mark. Many say a site can have no cons period to be a 100, I do not subscribe to that completely. However, I believe download limits are a major con that can not be overlooked.
|
07-23-08 04:01pm
|
Reply
515
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
zachvenice's Reply
Well that sucks! I was very tempted to join your site but a 2 GB per day is very harsh. I am glad, once again, that I check the reviews first. I would have been plenty pissed off if I had joined only the be kicked out an hour later! Besides I dont care so much about being able to download 50% faster when there are limits anyway. That would mean I could reach the limit in 20 minutes instead of 30. Not a lot being said here.
On the tour pages the content looks like it would be great, but I do not want to have to take 6 months to download it all. A decent number of other sites have been removing or upping the limit lately, perhaps you should consider doing the same. At least go to 10 or 15 GB, or some other compromise point as to not offend the potential customers such as myself.
|
05-07-08 11:10am
|
Reply
516
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
500 megs a day might as well wipe my ass with my $20 bills. This download limit might have been appropriate 15 years ago whe a large site was 10 GB and that was huge. Any more it pisses me off when a single video is less than 500 megs. Thanks for the warning on this RB
|
03-20-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
517
|
Download Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
chockfullogeek's Comment
Thanks for the warning. Always comb over the whole join page or pages before clicking GO. I had this happen to me with Hustler's site several years ago. I had never seen this done before then so I did not know to look for it.
I would recommend doing your homework on this site before joining sites, it really can save headaches!
|
06-02-08 05:59pm
|
Reply
518
|
Eve Angel Official
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I really do not like it when sites do this. It makes me feel like there is too much possibility of the cancellation not going through and getting billed again. I much prefer the direct cancel link method.
|
10-05-09 04:37pm
|
Reply
519
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
Well some people tend to believe that everyone is still on dial up.
|
06-28-09 06:48pm
|
Reply
520
|
Extreme Holly
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I sent you an email as well. My listed email here is still correct and I do use it a lot. I will do what I can to help out a fellow yellow fan. Ha (actually I prefer clear)
|
04-29-14 03:41pm
|
Reply
521
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick4's Comment
I certainly hope the discounted price is reinstated. I was thinking of rejoining that network of sites in the near future.
|
08-03-09 06:04pm
|
Reply
522
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Really'
Sounds like they are growing significantly faster than the last time I was a member a few months ago. Thanks for this update.
|
01-29-09 11:40am
|
Reply
523
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Agreed, their stuff is pretty rough. A lot of slapping and other degrading acts.
The video quality is very good, as you mentioned. This is a group of sites that would be worth frequently joining if only they would follow an update schedule. I went about a year without being a member and returned only to find a handful of updates.
|
01-29-09 08:49am
|
Reply
524
|
Femanic
(0)
|
Reply of
ryno's Comment
I received an email from them today, and apparently an ice storm took out their power for a week. They explained to me when I asked them about the sign up and cancellation that this is a temporary process. When I joined late one evening I received my password middle of the next day.
In case anyone is wondering, Lezpoo is a SCAT site that comes with Femanic. So you likely will not see any reviews for it on this site. Over all it is about the same, a very simple design. Lezpoo seems to update weekly, but SCAT is not my thing.
|
01-19-09 01:16am
|
Reply
525
|
Femanic
(0)
|
Reply of
ryno's Comment
I had no issues signing up. But you are probably better off. Although they have good material, they do not seem to keep up their promised update schedule.
I have sent their customer service emails as well, and they have not responded.
|
01-15-09 11:31am
|
