| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I hope so too. I did not notice the warning until after I join, stupid me. But I am glad people said something about i because I was begining to wonder about a few emails I had received, so this site gave confirmation to what I was suspecting.
I also hope that they had to pay a premium on the 150 GB I downloaded, maybe it put them over their usage for the month or something.
|
03-22-08 09:37pm
|
Reply
602
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I must say that it is not true anyway. I did not do my homework on this site before joining, though this site by the way. I was charged extra for joining this site, and that was this past Sunday night. The site is very large and runs very fast and easy, but I do agree with avoiding it based on principal. The do rip people off, and it is fraud. The only reason I download from the site was to at least make them pay for the bandwidth usage, I am sure that 150 GB in 6 hours is not cheap to maintain. I felt a need to rip them off just as they did to me and many others now. It is too bad this site could not be bought out by an honest porn lover, instead it is run by people as evil as the oil executives who rape us every time we drive to work.
They need to clean up their act. There are good things to say about this site, but I do not want to say them without saying "DONT JOIN!"
|
03-21-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
603
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Understandable, it is pretty easy to mix them up if you read through quickly. Besides, I was looking for an excuse to let that out because I know there are people who do not know the difference but do not want to be the person to ask. You know what they say about assumptions though!! :)
I certainly wish I could get those kind of speeds. It would make porn browsing much easier, but I dont think webmasters would approve of people being able to download their content in a matter of minutes, I have made enough of them mad the way it is!
The problem with standards is that not everyone uses the same standards, liters and gallons for example. So I find it best just to not be lazy and type the whole thing out. Just like "lol" means laugh out load to many people, but I might say lol thinking lesbians on lust. Okay, maybe that is stretching it, but you get the point.
|
03-20-08 08:55pm
|
Reply
604
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Read carefully everyone! It was 70 Mbit/s and I always spell it out for exactly this reason, not to pick on you JD1961. Perhaps you know this already, but for anyone who does not: there is a ratio of 8:1 between the two, so just under 10 MBytes/s if you prefer to see it that way. And yes that number is correct, I always run a program called Bandwidth Monitor at continuously displays the bandwidth in and out. Although, now the site is running at 60 MBit/s
I am always wondering if people get the too mixed up. I understand that many people do not know the relation between a bit and a byte. The simple way to put is that 1 byte equals 8 bits for almost any application. So the new videos people are talking about being shot in 8 MBit video is equal to 1 MByte/s
If someone tells you 70 MBytes/s they are more than likely stupid! My fastest hard drive can sustain writing 77 MByte/s using SATA 2. So a website outputting that much to one user would be insane!
I truly believe that people should not abbreviate Mbps and MBs, because it gets mixed up alot. It should be spelled out to avoid the mess.
|
03-20-08 10:00am
|
Reply
605
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
scanner's Comment
Sorry man! I have had the same issue. I was signed up for a 1 dollar trial to a site that was from a totally different company! I cancelled that, but I am waiting on my credit card statement to update and show these charges to make sure everything is right. I also unselected the optional sites and was still signed up for at least 1 other. This IS fraud and can and should be prosecuted!
Please be careful of this when joining this site. There is some decent content, but be very warned it is risky.
I hope things work out for you scanner! Keep use informed of how this turns out.
|
03-18-08 08:12pm
|
Reply
606
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
hla8002's Review
This is true! Right after joining I got a notice of a charge using the same username and password for a trial of another site with would rebill at $40 per month! The site was localnakedbabes.com. This site was a pain to cancel a well!
Thank you for that warning, I will be keeping a close eye on my credit card for a while. I was suspicious after the automatic trial that was unsolicited and actually billed by a different company. LNB-Services.
|
03-17-08 09:38pm
|
Reply
607
|
Innocent Eve
(0)
|
Reply of
Chipster's Comment
Had not noticed this before. Nice catch there.
|
11-10-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
608
|
Irina 18
(0)
|
Reply of
OneMan's Comment
They do it because 100 sites sounds good. Also I would think the girls they have like the idea of having "their own" site. Of course no one really believes 3 videos and 2 picture galleries constitutes a site.
|
06-01-09 05:23pm
|
Reply
609
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nbaby8's Reply
I see. Then I am not sure I could call this a con for this site. This would seem like a con on the service provider for the area. The site can not push the data through any faster than the weakest point in the transmission line. The fastest site in the world will be just as slow as anything else if you are using dial up....just an example.
|
06-09-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
610
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
nbaby8's Review
Download speeds are always dependent on where you are. You can not expect 20 MBit off dialup, or somewhere that can not offer it. Or, are you trying to say they throttle bandwidth to people in certain locations? Please elaborate.
|
05-26-08 08:45am
|
Reply
611
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I just joined late last night. So I will be doing a full review shortly with actual statistics.
So far it is heavily photo based. Definitely a photo art site. Wll say now that the newer videos look really nice at 5000 KBit.
|
01-30-09 12:45pm
|
Reply
612
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Now this is a damn good review. Well done!
|
02-17-09 08:52pm
|
Reply
613
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
vavoyeur's Reply
Anything. I was a member about two years ago, but can not remember that much about it.
You need to give reasons for believing it is a good site. Check out some of the the other reviews here for this site and others and you will quickly see what I mean.
You can describe the site, the picture, and the videos. Tell us what it is you like about them. Tell us what improvements the site could make, all sites have a few things they could do. Besides, many site's webmaster check up on their reviews here.
|
01-22-09 02:34pm
|
Reply
614
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
vavoyeur's Review
So, is there anything you can say?
Four line reviews tend to get deleted since they do not tell anyone much of anything. So you may wish to add some detail or thought to this one.
|
01-22-09 02:12pm
|
Reply
615
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Let me know if you have nay questions about them, or many of the others on this forum could answer many of your questions. Once you start using them you will wonder how you every got by with out them, they make life so much easier, plus you will download more, faster!
|
04-04-08 09:44am
|
Reply
616
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Well there is a lot of things to choose from. It really would depend on if you are willing o pay for a program or want a freebie. My thinking is that if you are willing to pay $30 for a website you better be willing to pay that for a manager to download it. Also, it is sites like Karups that the managers are extremely useful, they can save you a lot of time and the need to babysit the computer while you are downloading. I let mine run 24/7 now! Using a manager it is possible for me download about 1 TB per month on a 3 MBit/s internet connection since they keep the downloads going all the time without me needing to be there.
What it breaks down to is personal preference. Go to download.com and look for a download manager. Try a few of them out, most let you try them out for free for a few weeks. Some will download and reconstruct entire website, scan for certain file types (videos, zips, etc.) and accelerate downloads by splitting downloads into several connects. Personal I use Internet Download Manager which has a free trial. I like it because it can schedule downloads. For example I am downloading from Bang Bros right now. It has been running with me watching it for more than a day, and downloading 4 videos at a time. When one is done it begins the next. I usually manually queue my downloads so that i get everything and do not end up missing things or downloading the same video twice. Some sites can be queued up in a matter of minutes, others take hours by manually grabbing the links, or I can let the program do all the work.
Keep in mind though that the managers are not intelligent. They will only do what you tell them to do. If you say download all the WMVs that is exactly what it will do. It will grab the full video and the chunks. Or can say all WMVs larger than say 300 MB, but if a video you want is 299.99 MB it will skip over it. So, they have their ups and downs. Another plus though is that most will allow you to pause the downloads and resume them later on, even days later.
If you have any specific questions please let me know. I would be glad to try to answer! :) Good luck!
|
04-01-08 04:52pm
|
Reply
617
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
Oh, and yes. I did post a comment based on the amount of content I had downloaded last August. They were 206 GB total by that point. So it is not a small site at all. I was just hoping you or someone reading this had a more current number to throw out.
|
03-18-08 11:02pm
|
Reply
618
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
I guess I have been sold then! I will have to rejoin the site soon. Webmaster should thank you for a sale you know. A discount of something would be in order :)
|
03-18-08 10:59pm
|
Reply
619
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
Okay. I can understand that! Then...how much has the content improved since last August? That is when I last was with them.
|
03-18-08 10:35pm
|
Reply
620
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
I must agree about the models here, they are pretty hot. Have you downloaded the whole site? If so, how large is it now, I am considering rejoining them in the near future.
|
03-18-08 08:06pm
|
Reply
621
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
Ricky D Product's Reply
"Better yet, maybe even sent to the company owner so he could fix your issues." Again read the transcript. I was dismissed right out of the gate. I practically had to break the guy's arm to get a refund that I should not have needed.
I never said that the girl's appearance was an issue. Correct, I am not a fan of tatoos but it is hard to avoid now with so many having them.
Yes, Twistys is ranked very high by me and for many reasons. One of which is their site is easy to get around. They also shoot quality and have been doing it longer.
As for the looks of the main girl herself no one can say anything about it other than a user should look at the main page before joining. That said I knew what she was going to look like before joining and decided $5 was worth a look. Yes, I prefer the "babe" look, but at times my mood is a little different and want something different. So while I may be a little bias I would spell out any bias I have that others may not share, but in this case I did not have bias toward the girl, just the site layout and quality.
I am typically not in your demographic, but then again most people are not. This is a smaller niche site and that is fine. Many of us here join those knowing they are small.
If it nothing you can get at bestbuy and yo have all this experience that speaks even worse for the site because it does not show! The pictures are small, and a lot of the videos are very sub par in quality. Some of the videos do look okay media wise, I will give the site that.
"Reviewers like you are the reason sites do limited trials and why the smaller producers are nearly gone." Why, do they feel they need to hide behind limited trials? Is it because they know they do not have much to offer and do not want to show their hand until after we pay the full price? Or is it something to do with the site being able to be downloaded in under two hours?
I have given good reviews to extremely small sites when they offer something unusual.
The trouble is that you are getting away from the main topic. I have a terrible time canceling this site. Perhaps that is what need to be addressed. I can see that you share the same style of customer service as the payment processor does.
|
12-19-10 10:56am
|
Reply
622
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
Ricky D Product's Reply
"...but with false reviews like these..."
So are you denying the transcript posted in the forum?
I did not put down the site for not being large like some of the other. I have been around the porn block a few time, I know what is out there. I did not go in expecting 5000 GB of HD stuff. I was looking for something other than a bunch of webcam recording and POV content. It comes off as very amateur, something anyone could do with a HD camera from bestbuy a guy and a girl.
I have done a number of reviews here so people have gotten to know my style and get a feel for what I look for. Those looking for the same thing will not like your site, thus should avoid it. Others look for different things and may like it, and since they know they feel differently about certain things it may not affect their decision to join. We are just trying to get the facts out and voice own own opinions whether others agree with them or not is up to them.
"We've never had any issues with members canceling their memberships..." we you have now had at least one. The link at the bottom of the pages directed me to epoch, not who I signed up through.
Lastly, those members who have been around since 2007 for this tiny site would likely not be taken too seriously. They obviously have an extreme bias and we strive for unbiased reviews here because those are the kind that help us.
|
12-18-10 09:39pm
|
Reply
623
|
Kelle Marie
(0)
|
Reply of
autumnale's Review
Smells like a decent review for a first timer. Beef up the Bottom Line a little and PU staff will give you 2 point for this. You put some really good information in this one.
Nice job.
|
01-03-09 10:59pm
|
Reply
624
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Reply
Well then I guess I wont be joining, I us IDM too. At least they gave you a refund, I would have expected that especially after a few weeks. I was just wondering if anyone else ever had issues with this. Im sorry, I find this very hard not to laugh about, they actually kicked you out for good just for using a manager?!?! haha
Curious, did you queue the downloads manually or did you use the site grabber or batch downloader? These are the things they might be trying to prevent. Matts Models kicked me off (15 minutes) because I used the batch to grab the photo zips. They said I had an unrealistic number of page openings in a short period of time. These programs can make a server think an account has been hacked and being used by many people at one time...bad for business.
|
04-17-08 03:25pm
|
Reply
625
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
mistake62's Comment
Can anyone else confirm this??
|
04-08-08 04:58pm
|
