| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
This explains the idea pretty well. It has been a year since I read the terms, and yes I did actually read them. I truly can see what you mean. It is kinda like me eating hamloaf, it is only good when it is free. It is not something I would pay for. Free things always seem better, but unfortunately there are not many free porn sites that are worth the page space they would take to even type in here.
I was not trying to be argumentative, I just had not though this issue through as well as you guys apparently have. As I frequently say, you guys have thought of everything!
Simple solution. Next time time one of us asks something like this, instead of explaining it in length just say "because I fuckin said so!" It is so much more dramatic and would act as a reminder to read the terms and rule every now and then. Speaking of which... Seriously though, thanks for the explanation. Your philosophy on this makes perfect sense.
|
03-13-09 08:31pm
|
Reply
627
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan
Even to a site that normal does charge? I understand that there are no reviews to things such as TGPs. I only mention this as a special circumstance. The idea was to have a trust worthy, usual member here have a chance to poke around this site and construct a review of the actual content without having to fork over the membership money.
I can understand as well not wanting people to have free access in exchange for writing reviews. I had not thought of this before, you guys think o everything! I can see it being very hard to write an objective review for someone after they gave free access. Plus I would want to know that people were not being paid off for writing less than truthful reviews to boost the site.
Although I think in this special case it may be appropriate, I can certainly live with your decision after figuring out for myself why you do not want them. You should have explained why exactly you do not allow this in your reply, but that is okay I figured it out, I think. If I am wrong about why please let me know!
|
03-13-09 02:53pm
|
Reply
628
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I 100% agree with this. As I always say, you guys seem to get everything right around here when it comes to these decisions. I was hoping all of our work would not get deleted, there is some good stuff there.
|
03-12-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
629
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
That is what I am worried about. Sometimes it can be better to be known as a site that has fake reviews written by site operators or "end of the Earth" fans than to not be known at all. I just hope that people looking for this type of site take the time to look at all the comments and replies to the reviews.
The site might be good, I honestly can not comment there. And that is exactly the problem, after all these recent reviews I still can not even speculate on the quality of the site because the reviews are not usable. I was hoping out of al of this to at least have one good, solid review come from someone who has been there on their own accord and can give us some honest perspective. But I certainly would not ask any of our members to pay the site simply to have that review.
Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review. I say it would have to be someone that has been a member here for at least a few months and more than 20 positive trust votes. This way it would well established that these reviews would have the user's best interest in mind. If the site is not worth joining people need to know, and it very well could be that the site lives up to all the hype. I for one am not going to pay them just to satisfy my ever so slight curiosity.
As for PU getting abused. We can abuse them back. Besides I am sure if this abusive shill reviewing gets out of hand the staff will take addition measures. One perhaps being to mandate for this site the review must have a score of 5 or so and must fill out at least half of the personal question in their profile. This is just one idea, but I am sure they have their methods.
|
03-12-09 08:13pm
|
Reply
630
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
I was thinking about the same thing, but I do not think they deserve our money at this point.
|
03-12-09 02:07pm
|
Reply
631
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Reply
How long would it take to simply look for us? Also, there is no reason to jump all over us over typos. We can all appreciate getting you jollies from whatever does it for you, but a lot of us are collectors as much as we are pervs. So we really want to know that is on the site.
|
03-12-09 02:05pm
|
Reply
632
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
higgy's Review
Yup....going to have to do a lot better than that. Give us some actual information. You guys need to give up on this people, we are not buying into it.
|
03-12-09 01:55pm
|
Reply
633
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
This is yet another very subjective review to a site that has had a lot of attention because of these type of reviews. There is no fact in this, only personal opinion. It read the same as the other reviews that have been scrutinized and I again suspect it is the same person or someone from the same group being asked to write these and told what to say.
Everything in this review I could have wrote, and I have never subscribed to this site. If you read the first review written by JoeMushashi you can see that he complains about a lack of cum shots. And guess what, that is the only real con listed here. Image that, a site where a shemale wears boot and nylons, of course they do it is to make the performer appear more feminine.
The simple fact of the matter is that this review really did not tells us anything new and I must concur with Jeffrey with the conclusion that this is yet another ad. Seriously, we are not buying t and this is making the site look back, thus we will not buy a membership to the site and warn others against it.
|
03-12-09 10:29am
|
Reply
634
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Exactly, you do not think Videobox should get a 100 (you never have reviewed by they way) but you can see why I score it so highly based on my review and the replies to the review. I gave it a 100 with many reason that are very important to me. Since everyone is different we all rate things a little different but overall we are fairly consistent. If you reviewed and score them you would likely give them a high score, but if you did not I would suspect that you would give a number of valid reasons and why those reasons are important to you.
I agree. Keeping an eye on things is all of our jobs, not just the staff. Of course the staff is needs to keep things right here because they are financially invested in this site's success. We are invested by time and the fact we like being here doing our part to contribute to the porn world. So of course we must react when someone comes along to pee in our porn pool. This is why the PU staff gave us the option to of assigning "trust" to people, and this is especially effect I believe because we can say we do not trust people as well as trust them. The "NO" trusts are very important. They make ill-agenda people stick out. And since the staff have gone through the work of making this place for us we should help them out by stepping on bad people's balls!
|
03-11-09 07:32pm
|
Reply
635
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
There really is no need to insult users here. Insults tend to be a signal of impending defeat in discussion forums, as I am sure any of our several psychiatrists would concur. We try very hard to keep a decent, educated site. While I do not exactly like JoeMushashi's reply, you were definitely on the offensive with your first statement to him.
Yes "Kims Anal Heaven" does leave ample room for interpretation. Yes anyone could have deduced that the site would be about anal toying and such. But I also would believe there would be more than just large didlos. I would expect to see hardcore and likely a good number of cum shots. JoeMushashi's point was that he was disappointed with the site's content. He stated what he expected the site to be and why he expected that based on the trailer video.
What sets JoeMushashi apart from the many shill users that have come about due to this site is that he gave us his reason and his explanation for his reason. That is what we ask for, good or bad. He felt the trailer video was misleading and he warned fellow PUs about it.
So I would like to ask, are you affiliated with this site in some way, or are you just head over heels for it?
|
03-10-09 07:41pm
|
Reply
636
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I like that, it definitely has a nice ring to it. If I was not so used to my normal name I would do it.
When I was newbie I gave Videobox a 100 and people stepped on my balls about it. I had to justify that score and I believe I did through a long and at times a little heated discussion. So when a newbie comes along a posts extreme high scores I tend to jump at them a bit much the same way I was. I do not press as hard as I was about it, but I do like to see some genuine justification.
These reviews and comments about Kim's site read something like this "It is great because it is great" or "it is what it is because it is what it is." Neither of these really justify themselves but this really is the simplified summation of what they are doing.
I am hoping this people will see this as negative advertising and stop doing it. If I ran a site I would rather people not say much about it than say negative things about it. Perhaps they feel negative advertising is better than no advertising, at least people have heard of them. It is hard to say, but I do hope they let it go and try to get attention the honest way.
|
03-10-09 06:15pm
|
Reply
637
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You are absolutely correct. This is the reason why I have been stepping on their balls and Khan is keeping a close eye on how all this works out.
|
03-10-09 02:31pm
|
Reply
638
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Comment
That is not true either. We tend to ignore or question the extreme low scoring reviews when reasoning is not given in reasonable amounts. No site is perfect and no two people are the same, so of course there will be differences. However, most of us can agree on roughly how good a site is. If I give a site an 85, there is likely going to be someone else who gives it an 83 or 87 based on something they liked or disliked that I am impartial to. We usually stay in the same area though, and everyone who is trusted gives valid reasons and explains why those reasons are important to them.
I checked out the link you provided. Image this, a T-girl getting nice compliments from other T-girls and T-girl wannabes. That is about as useful as asking a chain smoker what they feel about raising the taxes on cigarettes. Of course the opinions will be biased! I believe you will have come up with a better argument than that.
I enjoy many sites, but do not give them 100's and at times not even in the 90's. This may be because they are lacking elsewhere. It looks as if the site we are discussing updates only weekly. The site I gave a 100 to updates five times per day! Perfection does not keep us waiting.
Had you come on here and given 85-90, I do not think anyone would have thought much of it. But 100's right out of signing up just do not float well. Particularly when Khan has already told us that there have been issues with people creating multiple accounts to artificially boost the site.
|
03-10-09 09:12am
|
Reply
639
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Reply
Where are these comments you say you posted, or are you talking about this reply? Just want to be sure because there are no other comments for this site posted.
There is obviously a real person behind the posts, but I do not believe that person has the general users best interests in mind. After all, all the recent reviews for this site have read just about the same. The seem as if they were written by the same person.
|
03-10-09 06:12am
|
Reply
640
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Review
Looks like we have another spoof here. This site is quickly hitting my Shit List! Something tells me that thee will be a few more before this all plays out.
|
03-10-09 12:54am
|
Reply
641
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Check the reply page. It seems we have yet another new member just raving about this site. KinkyKarl joined only a few hours ago and is continuing the advertising for them. Hell is profile does not even add up. He says he is 52, but it lists him as 49?
So by our count that is four account created to place this site up into the heavens! This makes me not trust the site either.
|
03-09-09 11:53pm
|
Reply
642
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Yes. I believe I remember that one too. Seems something a bit fishy is going on here.
|
03-09-09 09:00pm
|
Reply
643
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Alex2222's Review
Um...This is the second extreme high score for this otherwise unheard of site this week. Makes me suspect of any one-review-wonder.
Alex. Please give us much more detail. This sounds more like an advertisement than a review.
|
03-09-09 07:42pm
|
Reply
644
|
LBFM
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Reply
If you look at the logo for this site is states "porn reviews by the people." Point being that it is by the people and not by professionals. Of course there will be some lame reviews and some others who take more pride in it and do a much better job.
As for where to find shaved Japanese girls, I really could not say because it is not something I have gone after. The point being that shaved girls is not an unusual niche American, European, Oriental or otherwise. Getting a Japanese shaved girl would be no more difficult to get an American shaved girl and does not warrant such costs.
A recent posting was about Ass Smoothies. That is unique, I have not seen that done in many places. It does not command $50 even though if that is something you truly wanted you would have to pay that.
I honestly do not know how many shaved Japanese sites are out there, but it is certainly more than the amount that feature ass smoothies.
I might suggest looking for this niche from sites that actually are Japanese. It would look a little strange and perhaps be strange to read if translation does not work correctly, but I am sure you can find many sites that way.
I just do not feel that this site has the niche cornered to the point that it can charge whatever it wants.
|
10-26-08 06:22pm
|
Reply
645
|
LBFM
(0)
|
Reply of
lurifax's Comment
Well, one things worth mention is that the site you recommend is a $50 per month site. That price is absolutely absurd considering the content. $50 for 1.5 MBit video of something that is not truly unique will not sit well with most of us. Many of use have been feeling it when we pay $30 for a site!
I understand the download limit, and split site issues though. Those are two of my largest NO-NOs for websites.
A review of the site would be nice, but TBP may not jump on that simply because the cost makes it a site that the majority is less likely to join and they need to focus on sites that are most likely to help people.
On that note. Why not simply write a review yourself. You already know the ups and downs of both sites so why suggest that someone else spends their time and money when you already have.
|
10-25-08 08:07pm
|
Reply
646
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I see what you are saying. Where the reviews done at a similar time? Also worth noting is that one is a full review and the other is an express review. I do not know if that makes any difference though.
I am interested to here a response from Spencer. But then again, this is why we are given a site for our reviews and they have a site for theirs.
|
05-01-09 02:01pm
|
Reply
647
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Mbaya. Check out the numbers he lists for how he rates each site. He actually lists Lietuva Girls as having better quality. Nudesportvideos seems to gain some ground back by updating more and being more unique.
If the sites are not all that similar then why the fuss? Maybe I am missing something here. We all tend to review sites little differently base on what the site is. I guess I just do not see your point yet, please fill us in with your thinking on this topic?
|
04-30-09 10:05pm
|
Reply
648
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
Lisa Sparks's Reply
Sounds like we are on our way to a happy ending! I am glad you come back to clarify everything, and you have reason to be happy too. I, if no one else, have put your site on the "join pretty soon" list.
Thanks for the many replies and your patience with Exotics and myself.
|
08-29-08 09:00pm
|
Reply
649
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
Lisa Sparks's Reply
Gotcha. So if I am correct you were trying to say that a trial membership does give access to everything you have ever put on the site up to date. Of course a trial does not give access to future updates, so am I safe to assume that is what you whee talking about?
I mght question the bad publicity though, check out what we say about Incredible Pass sometime.
|
08-29-08 06:22pm
|
Reply
650
|
Lisa Sparxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
We are starting to think alike Exotics. It really does sound like content rotation, which is a huge turn away for me. They would have had my attention with the original comment. $5 would sound like a good deal and the model is something I would be interested in.
My best guess is that when movie is a month old it goes to the end of the update line that would be 2 or 3 months long so that many of us would not realize that there is a rotation and believe they are genuine updates.
My question for the webmaster would have to be: is there any actual new updates or is it just recycled content? Also, I would like to see a reply to Exotics, it seems like he has you by the balls at this point.
|
08-29-08 02:20pm
|
