| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Writing a letter is not so bad, calling them on the phone is great fun. It is ALWAYS a woman when it has to do with porn, and it is NEVER about a site like Playboy or something that sounds fairly normal. And she always says it in the tone of voice my principal used back in 2nd grade when I did something wrong, bit with more of the "you are one sick bastard" inflection.
|
05-30-11 05:49pm
|
Reply
927
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
But the site "Midgets blowing horse cock" shows up all caps, bold, and in color!
By the way, I honestly have no idea if a site names that exists. And NO, it is tucked away in my porn library.
|
05-30-11 07:23am
|
Reply
928
|
Watch My GF
(0)
|
Reply of
dieingslowly's Comment
Did this site specifically rip you off?
|
04-15-10 06:06pm
|
Reply
929
|
We Live Together
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is a pretty good review Exotics! You give some pretty good insght.
By the way. I did download every single video, and damn glad I did! They certainly will not be in recycle bin.
|
07-21-08 05:40pm
|
Reply
930
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Usually you can figure it would from looking at replies to your reviews. The person that seems hostile towards your comments is usually the person it ends up being.
Without doing some creative digging, and a lot of it, I do not think even the staff can tell you who it was. If I recall correctly I believe they said some time ago that the anonymous ID is saved in a one way encryption to protect the privacy. I believe it was the trusts they were talking about.
In any event, it does not hurt to guess who it was and send a reply to them. Even if they have not been around for a while they could still get the notice email for receiving a reply. This might bring them back, you never know and it certainly does not hurt. Besides, who wants that one bad trust thing floating around.
|
07-11-09 11:12pm
|
Reply
931
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
Okay, I just really wanted to be sure about this. Thanks for the reply. Do you have any idea who the "NO' trust came from. One of the things a few of us have been trying to do lately is getting people who voted no a while back to reconsider in the even the user has improved reviews since the NO trust and is still around. Anyway, you may want to add an extra reply to that trust just to make it clear.
|
07-11-09 07:14pm
|
Reply
932
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
This may or may not pertain to this review, but I need to ask you something.
I was just looking around and for no reason clicked on your name. I noticed you had a single "NO" trust and I was curious as to what it was for. The person believed you did not join some of the sites you had reviewed. You replied saying "I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned for at least one month. No review based on a trial m'ship."
Is this statement implying that you had not joined them two of them, or simply that you joined and left before a second month. The distinction is very important. If you had not joined them how could you review them? Also, which of the nine sites DID you join? At this point I think it is just poor choice of wording, but it is unclear.
I am a little reluctant to throw out a "NO" trust on you because your more recent reviews seem much more in depth and honest. I would like some clarification on this just in case there is a misunderstanding. It was not that long ago a reviewer had all his review points removed and was semi-suspended for implying that he did not join sites he had reviewed. I do not want this to happen to you, but I (all of PU) need to know that you have actually joined all the sites you have reviewed.
|
07-11-09 12:45am
|
Reply
933
|
X Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
deadelvis's Comment
It would be nice to know that this is there, but most people that research a website through TBP or other review sites are usually willing and know to take their time when joining and check for these things.
We all get burned, at least once, on these things and we learn a lesson very quickly.
As for being "in pay" with the webmasters....of course they are. The guys here at PU and TBP have to get paid somehow, and it is by getting us to join websites. Every time i join a site though PU/TBP they get a small kickback. Now, I can not comment on the extra checkbox sites. i would assume though that TBP does not see that kickback, but rather the site you are signing up for, or the billing processor gets that money.
It would be hard for TBP to track all of these since they can change from day to day very quickly. Plus, most sites have more than one method of joining.
|
11-10-08 09:25pm
|
Reply
934
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
At this point I still avoid the 12,000 Mbit videos unless the scene is just amazing. I do not shy from large files but 10 GB for a video can not be justified when my monitor is 1080p anyway, so the 2 GB looks the same but plays better.
|
02-02-16 08:02pm
|
Reply
935
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
What you are seeing is the difference between a 12,000 kbit video vs a 8,500 kbit video.
Xart 610 MB for 9:42 at 1920x1088 (yes 1088)
Brazzers 3,220 MB for 36:36 at 1920x1080
In watching a very samples of each I can tell that Brazzers has some better looking videos in regards to sharpness. Xart does not look like SD, or what I would call low definition at this point.
|
01-17-16 05:58pm
|
Reply
936
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
See, that is just it. I can not tell you about new stuff yet. I will likely be joining them soon and I will be glad to let you know then.
Or if anyone reading this has been a recent member it would be really easy to figure out. All we need to do is list a few model names, find a few that are the same, and make a quick description of the beginning of a scene. If they match than we know something is not exclusive.
|
06-25-09 12:35am
|
Reply
937
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I do want to stress that this is for older content. I am not sure about newer content since I have not had a membership to Xisty in a while. The site still look to be worth joining and the new stuff could very well be exclusive since the site has had time to grow and become strong enough to produce.
|
06-24-09 09:06pm
|
Reply
938
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Glad to hear that you have no issues with most sites. I have heard of more people over seas from here having more issues with speed, but it does not seem to be everyone and it is not constantly the same sites they have issues with. Perhaps they are getting unlucky with a few sites and assuming it is because of location.
Either way, the videos on the sample page did not look like they were of that high of quality anyway! There were 1500 KBit/s which is "okay" but these did looked more like 500K videos than 1500K.
|
04-03-08 09:42am
|
Reply
939
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Oh no! I only looked at the site because you mentioned having issues with the preview videos, so i thought I would look at them to see if this was affecting everyone you just seemingly you. Plus, they are samples (FREE!) so it did not cost me anything to check.
I have heard of many people having issues with many site when accessing from Europe. Most of that stuff is transmitted by satellite to get over seas. Downloads should still be okay unless they are throttling the connections, but that would give a minimum half a second delay on everything no matter what the connections are like. Speed of light governs this.
How is your connection to other US sites?
|
04-02-08 03:05pm
|
Reply
940
|
XVN.eu
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Denner, try the site again. I just downloaded a few of the sample videos and they came in quick. It "should" work fine for you, either you got there at a slow time or you are the unlucky one that their site will not send stuff too. It seems every site has an unlucky user! I downloaded 3 videos at once and it peaked off my 3 MBit connection here.
|
04-02-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
941
|
XXX Movie Online
(0)
|
Reply of
pornoman's Review
We all very fresh from jumping all over some other people giving 100's to a site with out giving justification. There is still blood in the water here and hungry PUs. So please do not feed us!
Give up a bunch of information about this one. It seems there are no reviews yet, so you get to set the bar on this site. Set it high. Answer all the questions that where asked and tell us even more than that. The review as written is meaningless. Take a few moments to look over a few reviews by several usually reviews and you will quickly see what I am talking about.
Welcome to PornUsers! I hope to hear more from you about this site and many more.
|
03-12-09 09:11pm
|
Reply
942
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
Perhaps you missed my review of this site. I was a member very recently and it seemed as if the new stuff was all being posted as 6 MBit and 1280x720. I have a number of scenes that are at this quality and they look fairly decent. Now there is a lot of content that is at the specs you quoted. If you look for the larger file sizes of whatever you downloaded you should find some of their newer stuff.
|
12-19-10 09:48pm
|
Reply
943
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
There are several forum threads about download managers. There are many free ones and many to pay for. I personally use Internet Download Manager, or IDM. If you notice on the newer reviews by the TBP staff they also use IDM and tell you if it will work on the sites. It works on most, but to differing degrees.
Try a couple free ones and I believe IDM has a trial period as well. Downloads.com is a good place to see what is out there. One thing is for sure, if you download more than a few files here and there a manager will save you a lot of time and headache.
|
12-02-10 12:26pm
|
Reply
944
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
They re not churning out updates like Twistys or Videobox, but it looked like a video per week. This is a good site to come back for periodic updates and allow to grow in between.
Do not get me wrong, if you have not joined the site in a year or so you will be pleasantly surprised with the new videos. They are definitely better than previous. Looking at the history of the site it is fair to assume they will be trying to make them better. The newer videos are certainly watchable, but it is so easy to be spoiled by the sites putting full HD scenes out at carry double the bitrate.
|
12-02-10 08:24am
|
Reply
945
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
To be fair I did not notice the zips until the last day or two in my membership. I downloaded what I could in that short time frame. I would say 85-90% of the them have zips. There does not seem to be an rhyme or reason to which do though. Some from 2007 have zips and a few from 2010 do not, and every where in between.
If you use IDM, and possible other download managers, the sets that do not have zips can be batch downloaded with a bit of creative thinking. Nothing too tough though.
|
12-02-10 08:14am
|
Reply
946
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
magrury's Reply
Alright. If you check my previous comment on this site you will find that I mentioned this several months ago.
This site only allows one connection at a time. If you use a download manager you can set it for one connection and queue up a few videos. The trouble with this is, if I recall correctly, the URLs expire.
Starting a new trial will not do you much good unless there is a few more videos you want. If you want the site just sign up for a month and get it all.
Another thing would mentioning is that if you log in using more than one computer you can download a little faster. I was able to sign in and download one video at a time with no issue. This is a little bit of cheating and still requires a lot of work. The advantage here is that you can download two at a time and use more of your internet connection for downloading from that site.
Bottom line:
It was the site, not you.
|
09-24-09 07:49pm
|
Reply
947
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Exactly. I am not going to fight tooth and nail to be able to get to a site that is difficult to download anyway. So I guess I will have to let this one go and say "sucks to be me!"
As long as other people are not having any issues with getting on I guess it is okay. The site has nice content, but I would highly recommend anyone considering joining to read my other comment first.
|
06-09-09 12:08pm
|
Reply
948
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I can not get any part of the site,homepage or previous areas browsed within the site. I have tried two different computer, I have tried two internet browsers, and deleting all internet related files. Still no success.
If it is working for you guy I am wondering if it is getting stuck somewhere along the way. I always get a network timed out message. I do not know of my ISP actually blocking any sites and I have not had this problem before. Oh well, trial is over now anyway. That is too bad though, I had finally figured a way to make downloading go a little smoother there.
|
06-09-09 11:53am
|
Reply
949
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Just wanted to add to this comment
The site logs you off a lot. I mean a lot! This also makes anything you had queued up in a download manager not run. Fortunately the links do not change and it does not forward to a "join" page like other sites do, plus the current download does not stop, it just does not allow the next to kick in.
All in all, this site is a total pain to download. So if you are a download whore like me you may want to consider what I have found. If you do not want to download a lot of content, just the personal gems then I am sure you would find some.
|
06-03-09 05:24pm
|
Reply
950
|
YouStrip
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I almost guarantee they are flash. They are just a bit difficult to detect. The membership is for a year so it is not that huge of a deal to download them, I just like having everything local so that I am not using my small bandwidth downloading the same thing more than once.
|
09-15-09 01:20pm
|
