I am going to have disagree with you here, particularly your statement about the fans:
"...not only are they the ones who buy and know quality after seeing so much stuff, they definitly dictate rising stars careers and how long their career are. The demand from fans from certain stars is what keeps the business going. It's obvious the industry can get some average looking amateurs and make a film with plenty of audience willing to watch it but when it comes to the superstars of the industry; it's all about the fans."
I think it is the industry, not the fans, that ultimately decides who makes it and how much they make, as well as the stars in question. The companies write and offer the contracts, the girls sign them and, hopefully, fulfill them (some of these models have gotten huge contracts quite early on, and I just can't imagine any of them saying “no, thank you”).
Yes, we the fans dictate their popularity, but I think a lot of it has to do with how someone is presented and marketed. This is going to sound cruel and cold, but in porn the girl is the product, and therefore she has to sell herself, and I do not mean just her body, but her personality, her act -- the whole package. Some of my favorite models over the years never seem to have gotten it all right, no matter how obviously hot, or just generally appealing, they were -- and most of them are gone.
Personally, I am not a fan of the biggest names in porn; I just don't see the appeal (why exactly is Jenna Jameson the biggest name in porn?), and my preference is usually for the unknowns to the almost amateurs. Nothing I hate more than to see a girl I love plastered all over a dozen sites doing virtually the same thing, or appearing in scores of DVDs repeating the same set of acts. To me, there is something special about a more restrained girl who you have to seek out to find her work; then the catch is that much more fun. :)
I thought she was getting better, but according to her site I am wrong. :(
She shot with ALSScan last fall, after having first shot with them sometime around 1998-'99, and she had a clean bill of health and was in good spirits. Now, at age 30, she has had her second diagnosis of cancer! Due to her preexisting condition, she can't get health insurance (we really do have the best health care in the world, don't we?), and now needs donations (through her site) so she can have more surgery for the hysterectomy.
Hope she gets better -- she is one the sweetest girls in porn!
Wow, what is that, two or three redheads for one trip, depending on if you count Hailey and Anita? Sucks about Jayme's tattoo, and doesn't Amia Miley have a tattoo on her neck of all places?
Sounds like another great Caribbean trip as always, though who exactly did they bring along? All those models you listed have been there for a while -- at least a year it seems -- and I was curious if they brought any new girls for the trip.
I am thinking of rejoining for the umpteenth time this summer and can't wait to load up my hard drive again...the content always overwhelms me. :)
Interesting point, though I would not go so far as to say that by subscribing we are "helping financially to ruin someone else's future." I think the majority of us here prefer sites that are more than just video and photos submitted by amateurs, as the poll asks. Plus, all these amateurs have made that first step that most of those replying here have said they would not do; that is, actually submitting them in the first place.
Aside from the various celebrity sex tapes, which are released without the person's consent, the normal amateur stuff we drool over is done by people who agree to have the material released, and are probably at least somewhat aware that it will "forever be on the net," as Wittyguy put it. No, I don't think all these girls are really thinking of the long term consequences, or at least existence, of their work, but they do it anyway.
I think the bigger question is why do we put so much weight on something like nude modeling or porn work in someone's past? If you look at from the perspective that it was a way for someone to legally earn money, then what exactly is the problem? "I saw her nude online, so I can't trust her around the office anymore." It's bullshit, and very likely legally unsound as wll, but of course it happens anyway and people continue to just think from their guts instead of their heads.
By exclusive, I just meant that a lot of the models in the previews I have already seen on other sites, especially since so many love to shoot the same group of Eastern European ones. It probably wasn't the best word to use, since you guys do shoot and capture your own content, just probably not the first ones to do so for the majority of your models.
Looks like a great site for girls only content, though it appears that all the models are eastern European, which is not what I like to think of as "exclusive." Still, high resolution photography and videography are always nice to see. Can't wait to hear from members in the near future.
It sucks when such beautiful talent gets wasted on a site like this. While I can't blame him for getting all these girls, I would rather see a site that isn't another dude's self-congratulatory tribute to his conquest of a lot of hot women.
POV is nice every once in a while, but a whole site, with the same swordsman and setting, is like you are just getting access to his home video collection. There is no variety, in the action or girls, and it is boring and routine.
That tiny download limit, plus that awful sample video, will keep me far, far away from this site.
I still can't believe they see this site as explicit, since, at least as far as I know, they shoot girl-only content -- which technically isn't even hardcore -- and it is not exactly "hard" girl-girl or solo girl content at that.
I can't say I like coffee, but sex on the other hand...
Of course, porn and coffee (such as Starbucks) always seem to be doing good business, so I think people get over any initial bad tastes rather quickly.
By the way, where's the choice for tried it and enjoyed it, but am now single, so not currently doing it?
I say hand over with lots of blushing, but I am not sure what I would really do. Would anyone ever share with a parent? Say, a father-son bonding experience, like learning to shave, drive a car, use a download manager?
Generally no, but it's not "ordinary-looking" that is the problem, but "less creative." Hot looks don't guarantee hot sex, or anything else for that matter. Many of my favorite porn stars are not my favorites simply because of looks, but more of their onscreen personalities and open-mindedness.
It's not just the women, but many other elements of porn that are far from reality. The men, for example, are (often) in better shape than I am, with lots more tattoos and piercings, plus they act in a lot of ways that I could not see myself repeating.
If you go in with no extreme expectations -- that is, total slut or total prude -- you may be pleasantly surprised.
I always thought fluffers were pretty much nonexistent, especially today with the advent of Viagra, and I think they would fall more in the general category of the body fluid cleanup crew. It seems like most hardcore movies they tend to make quite a mess, so they have to have people to decontaminate the set afterward.
As enticing as fluffer sounds, I'd have to say director. I am sure it is a lot more frustration than fun, unless you are lucky and everything goes right and everyone is happy, but it would still be interesting to try.
I would actually love to edit porn movies, that way I could see all the raw footage and finally cut out all that extra shit they leave in that adds nothing to the videos we see.
Very unique looking site that doesn't seem to take itself too seriously, though I guess that's required given the genre. Actually looks quite similar to the little anime I have seen, except for all the western girls.
I would say musicians, but that's probably because I can't stand mainstream music, so to me all my favorite artists do not get enough recognition, or even enough money, especially when compared to most of those we like to consider "great."
Too many from the first five choices get weird crossover appeal that I hate. Actors and porn stars who think they are politicians; musicians gloating over their fleets of luxury cars and decadent homes; sports stars with their own clothing lines; and reality stars...well, their recognition is what is wrong with them.
I think I should have picked "Other" for none of the above, since I am only starting to rant on this one.
Yeah, the other "review" is extremely similar to this one, except the score is 95 instead of 100...
Didn't we just have this problem a few months ago? If peterhd (and/or caperuzo) is just spamming or promoting for this site, then just take this suggestion: don't! The members hate it, and the staff will just disable your accounts and restrict reviews for the site.
I am not a fan of seafood, and that's an understatement, but to each his own, especially if you thought the flavor was nice. : )
It only stands to reason that what we put into our bodies influences what comes out, right? All the times we (guys) have waxed endlessly, if never eloquently, about the diet-to-flavor relationship we have heard at least a little truth, just how much truth is anyone's guess.
The first three choices don't sound too appetizing for a flavor you might taste on a partner's most sought after parts. Chocolate sounds kind of good, but is probably too sweetened and processed to have much benefit. For me, fruits and vegetables are the only ones that naturally have a palatable flavor, or even smell, to them. Plus, with all the botanical flavors and scents added to many of the hygiene products that women buy, they must like them anyways.
I understand 4000 px is huge today...but in the future it could simply be standard, even if the displays really don't get any bigger. I am talking more from a collector's point of view, so I want my smut to age like a fine wine, except you get to drink it over and over again for as long as you have it!
As I said in my original reply, I remember a time when 800 x 600 was big, screen-filling beauty, but now it simply is not. I still have the majority of my '90s photos, they just have not withstood the test of time in terms of size as much as I would like them have to.
I sometimes get greedy about photo and monitor sizes -- especially when someone uses the term beast to describe either one -- so I can't wait for the day that a standard display will practically support 4000 px photos, I just may have to put some of my oldest photos out to pasture.
I wish webmasters would understand that many of their members download photos to keep. I remember back in the '90s when 800 x 600 was a big photo and it took up the entire screen, or most of it. Of course, with higher res monitors being offered with better quality at lower prices, this "Why would anyone want pictures that are bigger than the screen?" argument goes out the window (or out with the smaller monitor).
I love it when material is higher quality, not simply because of better details and it shows people care about what they create, but the material can have a much longer life, even with the inevitable introduction of newer equipment. I think the "Why would anyone want more?" question is always regretted given enough time, especially with technology.
Though I do wish quite a few sites would improve photos, as well as videos (and I am not talking purely about technical aspects or either category), I would like to see some more innovation. This partially crosses over with the exclusivity choice, but I am so tired of seeing the same models on multiple sites doing pretty much the same thing, in the same settings, and often captured with the same equipment. For me this leaves the first four choices properly satisfied to the point where I hope for some creativity and unique content on the part of the webmasters and producers -- and they don't even have to risk breaking the laws or hurting some poor model's feelings to do it.
Smell-o-vision or 3-D sound cool, but if you think about how they would apply to a lot of porn you might wish otherwise. There have been quite a few videos where I thought "it's probably good I can't smell the action, only see and hear it."
3D is making its way into some big Hollywood blockbusters but it is still a gimmick designed to generate a bigger profit with every ticket sold, not a genuine attempt to increase quality.
It would be nice if they tried to eventually increase quality beyond HD (higher definition? super high definition?) but people would probably have to own bigger displays and possess strong vision in order to even tell the difference.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
