| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Personally I enjoy weird shit like panty and/or bra stuffing, fisting, bananas, hammers, screwdrivers, pencils, bottles, cell phone, beads, golf balls, you name it, stuffing.
Plastic dicks or strapons don't do it, just other objects that weren't intended for the way some of these babes use them.
And when a girlfriend pulls panties out of a girl's vagina slowly and erotically with her teeth, Little Richard magically becomes Big Dick.
That's my answer. Bring on the babes and their playthings. I much prefer that over some stunt cock's hairy ass placed in front of the camera.
|
12-05-09 01:52pm
|
Reply
952
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
FYI, Jana Jordan uses the name Yana on FTV.
Thanks for the Celine tip. That was one I missed.
|
12-03-09 11:55pm
|
Reply
953
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I aqree with the "con" about no full scene download option, but I have another that, being a long term subscriber, would really make the site better, IMHO.
Watching a gorgeous/pretty/sexy babe pleasuring herself with fingers, dildos and/or toys is always a good thing, there is something called "too much of a good thing." Some episodes have 8 to 10 minutes of the girl in the same basic position doing the same basic thing gets rather tedious and boring.
But there are other episodes where, because the babe really turns me on, the 8 to tem minutes seems too short.
I would like an additional option of being able to download an edited down 10 minute (or longer) "highlights" video so I can save space and stay interested.
BTW, There are other porn babes with stuff in their early years as well. Gianna Michaels, Phoenix Ray, Jana Jordan (aka Jana Foxy) and Andie Valentino, for example, show off their assets beautifully.
|
12-03-09 08:12am
|
Reply
954
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Denner, Almost all of their stuff since last year is in HD quality with some remastering of older material that improves the quality (not HD but far better than before). I say "almost" because there are a few (very few) clips thrown in on some sets that are not HD but they are short set up or close down scenes with no erotic material.
|
12-03-09 07:58am
|
Reply
955
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Reply
Agree with all of BabyGetReal's list....plus excessive time given to the guy's ass, dick and scrotum...plus the guy blocking the view of PTA.
PTA = Pussy tits and ass.
|
12-02-09 08:46pm
|
Reply
956
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Must have been a short time offer because the preview site linked from PU still says $29.95.
|
12-01-09 01:11pm
|
Reply
957
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Knoman's Review
Great site but it sure ain't perfect.
Some cons:
They have some total crap videos
Indexing is very sloppy
Misidentified models - way too many
Boolean logic is not used in the search function
Aspect ratio problems with streaming videos
Some "DVD quality" videos, esp. older ones, aren't
But the biggest pro:
I agree with all of your pros and would add the one incredible feature: at $14.95 a month and with 150 videos added per month, you pay only 10 cents per video. Now that's one helluva deal for first rate (for the most part) videos.
I gave it a 90 (see my review for the reasons), but no way could I ever give it 100 points.
|
11-30-09 06:27pm
|
Reply
958
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
wetandpuffy's Reply
The listing on this site (PornUsers) says the trial offers limited access only (11-12-09)
Is P.U. mistaken?
|
11-29-09 12:21pm
|
Reply
959
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Reply
Better yet, they've extended the 3 month option $74.95 ($25 per month) on a RE-BILLING basis as per the PU listing.
In my opinion, this guy Denys Defrancesco produces the best porn on the web.
That means he shoots nothing but incredibly gorgeous babes, uses HD, superlative camera work and perfect lighting.
And at $25 per month and with 20 updates per week, I have only one major gripe about the site. I am spending more on 1Tb hard drives to keep up with his output.
|
11-29-09 11:10am
|
Reply
960
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Ditto that. I'll look for as much as I can of one babe, but there are few that I will chase down to the point of joining a site just to get more content.
I keep a list of my favorites that I will look for when I join a new site, but that's about it.
|
11-28-09 12:10pm
|
Reply
961
|
N/A
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
That explains, at least in part, the pricing of the IOmega special deals; they're dumping the old guys.
Saw a 2 Tb (no-name) on sale today for $188.00. I remember in 2006 a good price was determined by it being under $1.00 per Gb. Now it's under $0.10 per Gb.
The solid state drives that haven't really been a big deal yet, will likely replace the current drives and, when an SSD price comes down more, it will probably bring the price of the current hardware down a whole lot more before they become dinosaurs.
Here's more: Review: Hard disk vs. solid-state drive -- is an SSD worth the money?
|
11-27-09 08:18pm
|
Reply
962
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
I agree.
Just out of curiosity and not because I would invest that kind of money, I would like to see what's in a site that wants such an outrageous price and am happy that TBP actually reviewed it.
|
11-26-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
963
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
They all were FAT32 out of the box. Seagate and WD had software onboard that I copied off then reformatted to NTSF. No problem at all.
IOmega, however, had software that was copyright protected so I could not copy it. The software was not important to me because it was a basic automatic backup utility so I decided to just reformat the drive and lose the software.
But the copy protection apparently blocked the reformat
|
11-26-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
964
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I have 1 IOmega 1Tb, 1 Seagate 1.5Tb and 1 1Tb WD (plus a few 750's and 640's).
The IOmega works intermittently, and clicks a lot, a very bad sign. Neither IOmega nor the retailer will work with me because I, unfortunately, told the truth, that the drive worked sometimes and others just sat there doing nothing. It must be inoperative, and only during the warranty period.
The Seagate 1.5 Tb works fast, quietly and reliably and has a few nice software features as well. And, unlike the IOmega, but like the WD, I was able to reformat to NTSF for better performance before loading my stash. And at $119.00 the cost per Gig was the lowest.
The WD is fine. Slower at times and I can't play some HD vids without some stuttering on occasion, but it cost me only $89 so I can't complain.
My next one will probably be another Seagate. WD maybe. IOmega, never.
Somewhat off topic; with the lower cost of drives, likely to go even lower, I'm thinking about redundant backups so if I have a drive go bad, I won't lose my stash.
|
11-26-09 11:56am
|
Reply
965
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
If a PU review is lousy, that's the ballgame. I will not sign up for any site that PU members is unhappy with. Ever.
I also will not join a site that has not been reviewed by anyone on PU even if my libido is activated by the preview site.
Life is too short and there are so many superb sites out there it makes no sense to gamble even a few bucks on a site no one here has visited.
|
11-23-09 05:32pm
|
Reply
966
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
That says what I was about to say.
TBP was my go to site before PU came along anyway, so when I checked it out I really liked it.
I voted interaction, but the no bullshit reviews as well as the occasional posts by webmasters explaining why they do what they do is not available anywhere at all on the internet.
I said before and it bears repeating. PornUsers is the Consumers Reports of porn. The only source for unbiased, real people info and an opportunity to share with others infp about sites, downloading, organizing, etc.
|
11-22-09 10:10am
|
Reply
967
|
Big Tits At Work
(0)
|
Reply of
oxymoron's Review
I agree with the score of 80. My reason is that the babes on that site must have depleted the world's stockpile of silicone.
I favor natural titties but I am also turned on by aftermarket enhancements that are done well and improve the natural look of the boob.
But this site seems to use models with excessive implants that make the babes look more like blow-up dolls than real sexy ladies.
|
11-19-09 11:04am
|
Reply
968
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I chose bad management because that is the cause of all the others.
|
11-19-09 08:41am
|
Reply
969
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcopolo's Poll
Why isn't PUSSY a choice?
|
11-17-09 03:25pm
|
Reply
970
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
IMHO, a site should do everything it can to stop access by anyone under the legal age. But there really isn't very much they can do beyond the warnings because it's rather difficult for a site to check a photo i.d., isn't it?
|
11-14-09 09:38am
|
Reply
971
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Ditto that.
My issue is that, once I'm off line, I barely think about it, but when I'm on line, I seem to always go to my favorites to check out some site or other.
|
11-10-09 08:55am
|
Reply
972
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Reply
Yes, it is a brand new feature. The new functionality was added on Saturday, 11/7/09. And it's really great.
|
11-09-09 08:28am
|
Reply
973
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Reply
The clickable links are there. At least they are if you sign into DDF Prod as a paid member.
I no longer log into any of the 10 sites because they've re-engineered the DDF Prod site so that it is now a launch pad for everything in their catalog.
|
11-09-09 08:09am
|
Reply
974
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Reply
The answer has changed.
DDF Prod is the "parent" site for all ten of DDF's sites and now, effective last week, you can subscribe to all ten sites for $35 per month or $75 for three months.
Now you can log in on DDF Prod and ask for any model or search for a variety of special aspects (such as you want a scene with a gaping vagina, outdoors and peeing) it will find all scenes on all 10 sites that meet those criteria.
When you ask for a specific model, DDF Prod displays all scenes that model has on any site and, while they don't say "duplicate" it's usually easy to see from the graphic that it is a duplicate.
|
11-09-09 07:52am
|
Reply
975
|
N/A
|
Reply of
NMC2008's Reply
Another one that's good is DDF's Only BlowJob.
|
11-08-09 10:39pm
|
