| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
926
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
I joined in August when they offered three months access to the full network for $75 for 3 months. That expired in November but then I found out they made the deal permanent so I signed up for another 3 months.
I was starting to compile my notes to draft up a review, but exotics4me beat me to the punch.
I will say that DDF Prod is among the best sites, if not the best site, I've joined for all the reasons he stated.
A few observations.
- They have some updates that are photo only updates. Not a problem, just a point.
- They have "Casting" videos show up occasionally. They appear to be short audition type videos when the babe first walked in. The Casting videos disappear rather than being added to the archive so they need to be snagged and downloaded quickly.
- Some updates are posted but nothing is available for download. Don't understand why they do that because they are dated when the update first appears but a member has to wait until the video is actually loaded. That means keeping track, offline, of updates that need to be checked out and downloaded.
- The quality of the videos is beyond superb. I have finally decided that it's time to get me a 1.5 Tb external dedicated to just DDF Prod stuff.
- The search engine that exotics4me mentions is one of the best in the business. If you want to see just blond, big titted babes pissing for example, it returns a collection for your viewing pleasure. If you also decided that you want the result limited to shaved pussies, no sweat. It's done fast. And it's accurate, unlike many other sites.
I have some other observations that I'll save for later, but I'm down with the 96 score. Mine would be a 93-94 just because they do need to either load the videos when they do the update or just hold the update until its ready to fly.
|
12-30-09 06:02pm
|
Reply
927
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Only once on an American Airlines flight.
I was seated in seat 19D and a guy who was seated in 18C was watching a porno on his big screen laptop...with the sound on.
Surprisingly the flight attendants saw and heard it and said nothing.
The worst part is that he had a smoking hot looking babe with him but from my angle I couldn't tell if it was her in the porno.
|
12-26-09 10:40am
|
Reply
928
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Good point. The expertise of the photographer (lighting, angles, etc.) is far more important than the costume. A sexy Santa outfit works if the photog knows what he/she is doing, and doesn't if it's a hack behind the camera.
|
12-25-09 11:45am
|
Reply
929
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
True, but I hear that some European sites do have some of her stuff.
|
12-24-09 08:43pm
|
Reply
930
|
Vintage Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Just curious whether this site has any stuff by Candy Barr (1950's era), Virginia Bell (1950's & 60's), Nancy Suiter (1970's) and/or Traci Lords (1980's & 90's)
Also, one of my favorites is the porn musical version of Alice in Wonderland.
I'm thinking about signing up for the 3day trial but thought I'd ask first.
Thanks.
|
12-24-09 02:43pm
|
Reply
931
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Good review. The search process, as Denner says, is virtually useless. name searches return totally random results. If (a big IF) a model is correctly identified with a correctly spelled name in a scene, you have a better chance finding more of that model's stuff by clicking on the cast name in the scene than if you type the name in the search box.
With their huge inventory that grows at the rate of over 1,800 new DVD's per year, it's a real shame that they've failed so badly in the indexing process.
The price is right (esp. for the 1 year membership that I purchased), but the frustration I experience in trying to find scenes with specific babes makes the 85 score posted by Denner a bit high. I am more like an 82 myself.
|
12-21-09 11:25pm
|
Reply
932
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
jimmy71's Comment
Happened to me too. The security (or detection) problem is at the source, not with you.
I've had it with these jerks.
I'm a proud to join the swelling ranks of EX members of Brazzers and their sister site, MoFos.
|
12-20-09 11:35am
|
Reply
933
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Not interested.
I like some porn, not other porn.
Example, I get bored with a BJ when the cameraman fixes his/her closeup on just the schlong and the babe's mouth. I also get tired of shots that focus on a guy's asshole while he's porking a gorgeous, but impossible to see babe. I love the female body, not the guy's man meat.
In a theatre I would need a good book to read when the 10-15 minute BJ scenes or the lousy camera angles come on. There isn't any fast forward in a theatre.
And the price would probably stop me as well. For $10+/- to sit in a dark theatre waiting for the "good stuff" to show up is better spent on a porn site where I pick what I get to see and when.
Finally, with the large screen TV sets these days, if you want to see the angel hair in the anal cavity of a babe, the HD stuff will give you just what you want...and the ability to see it over again to make sure you don't miss anything.
|
12-20-09 10:18am
|
Reply
934
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Exactly!
It would be interesting to know what it was that generated your decision in this case, but it's not important enough to create a possible legal or other issue for PU/TBP.
What would be useful, though, is a listing of all sites that are on your suspended list. Another interesting, but not essential list would be a summary of the criteria that can result in a site joining the list.
|
12-18-09 06:51pm
|
Reply
935
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Nope. I've wondered how many people actually go into those sites just like I used to wonder how many people actually called those phone sex numbers that ran in front of the old VHS porn videotapes.
Based on the PU poll, not very many.
|
12-18-09 02:41pm
|
Reply
936
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler said:To a point anyway. When the girl's been so overly, Tweedlely-dum done, and she looks like something that could be hanging around in the older woman's room in that "rape with the precious work of art" scene in Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, well, it might be worth considering that things have been taken a little too far.
My term is "Twistied," not "Tweedlely-dum" -a take on the Twistys site's over use of photoshop on its photos and why I am a member of the site just for the videos that cannot be photoshopped. So many of the Twistys babes look almost like they were computer simulations rather than real naked girls.
My response to the poll is no photoshop. If she can't pass muster without photoshop, does she really belong on a porn site in the first place?
|
12-16-09 03:03pm
|
Reply
937
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
My point was that the site itself is part of the Twistys site, a fact not mentioned in your review.
Apart from that, I agree completely with your comment about the point score. If this site was a stand alone site and not part of Twistys, a 69 is too high for the reasons you stated.
Also, if you go to the preview site there is no mention made that it is a part of Twistys, so I'm not even sure that, if you sign up for Naughty Office from the preview site, you are also getting Twistys.
The best thing Twistys could do is to move the 15 videos over to Twistys and shut down the Naughty Office site altogether.
|
12-16-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
938
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Naughty Staff is a part of the Twistys site and is not an independent site. Twistys announced last year that it was discontinuing the site and the content being created for it would appear on the primary Twistys site instead of the "Naughty Staff" site.
|
12-15-09 05:55pm
|
Reply
939
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Simple.
If the reviews of a $9.99 site are lousy, I use the money to supersize my Big Mac meal instead.
If the reviews of a $34.95 are great, (DDF for example), I will spring for it.
Don't get me wrong. price will always be a factor; the higher the price, the more I will study the reviews and the preview site before making the plunge. But the reviews are always the deciding factor.
And frankly, since joining PU, the only clunker sites I've joined were those where the site had not been reviewed at all on PU or TBP. Lesson learned. If a site has not been reviewed by PU or TBP, it's probably too new or too lousy to warrant the effort.
|
12-14-09 08:09am
|
Reply
940
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfart's Review
Excellent review.
An earlier review listed three sites in the network:
TeenSexMania.com
TeenSexMovs.com
PrivateTeenVideo.com
Are the three sites you listed the only ones in the network as of today or have they expanded?
Are the girls indexed to all three sites or is each site independent of the others?
|
12-13-09 09:36pm
|
Reply
941
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
To be sure, one must go through the full credit card process to sign up, they make it way too easy to join an unwanted site.
|
12-13-09 11:27am
|
Reply
942
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
big johnny's Review
Just an observation. I've been a member of Brazzers for at least a year and have not experienced any customer service issues. But if I remember correctly, they have a pre-ticked cross-sell box for additional site sign-ups that any porn user MUST watch for and uncheck when signing up.
These site count on the male libido getting a prospect to do whatever it takes to get into that Members Area and get their rocks off so the prospect will skip past the boxes and terms of service details to their peril.
And Brazzers also has cross-selling adds that look a lot like just content boxes so it's possible you thought you were clicking on a babe's latest update but were really clicking on a link to another site.
|
12-13-09 07:45am
|
Reply
943
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I said softcore, but the problem is the choices are not mutually exclusive.
I like FTV a lot, for example. Is that softcore or teen? I also like DDF a lot which has a lot of solo girl stuff but also does some b/g as well.
I am losing interest in Brazzers, mainly because the majority of models are excessively siliconed these days, but where a natural babe is doing it I like it as well.
So just because my preference is a gorgeous natural babe showing off her assets whether or not there's a penis, a toy, another babe, bondage, whatever, in the scene, I would have voted "all the above" if that was a choice. It wasn't a choice so I went with softcore.
|
12-10-09 04:48pm
|
Reply
944
|
Cum In My Wife Please
(0)
|
Reply of
Jimmi's Reply
What about his points about the discount and the technique of splitting videos into small segments?
|
12-09-09 08:02am
|
Reply
945
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I'm still pissed about the misleading (fraudulent?) Danni's Pledge and how they totally misrepresented their DRM policy when they had it.
They promised that anything downloaded would continue to be accessible even after a member resigned so long as it was not moved to another drive.
I loaded up some external hard drives based on that promise, only to find out they lied. Even after signing up again my entire stash remained inaccessible.
That experience left a very bad taste in my mouth and should be a warning to others who believe the site actually cares about its customers.
|
12-08-09 11:58pm
|
Reply
946
|
For The Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Denner says: A serious welcome to maki from Spain....hope everybody will make her feel good here..."
I will.
I know here in the west San Fernando Valley (Calif) there are a lot of babes who are porn users but I don't know any who are PU members.
A BIG WELCOME Maki, and I'm looking forward to seeing more of your thoughts and ideas on PU.
Jack
|
12-07-09 11:54am
|
Reply
947
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
Cumming on a belly or back was, in the earlier days of Porn, a contribution to the notion of avoiding pregnancy rather than the characteristic now known as "the money shot."
Back in the 70's it was not uncommon to hear the guy saying "I'm coming" followed by the babe pleading with the stud to "pull it out. I don't want a baby."
|
12-06-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
948
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ditto that. I signed up for a full year that gave me an additional 6 free months. Not that sorry I did because the price per posted DVD is $.0367 (less than 4 US cents per video) which is pretty damned cheap. If I catch one video in 100 that is worth downloading my cost is $3.67, which is about the cost of a video rental these days.
But I am finding an average of 2 or 3 DVD's a week that have some good stuff so I've got no price complaints.
The only complaint is that I've got to weed through the crap to find the few good ones.
|
12-06-09 09:14pm
|
Reply
949
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
I agree with the comments about the navigation and site design, but one thing I'd like to see added is a posting history with dates PLUS a preview of upcoming material. A calendar would work fine.
By the way, I really enjoyed your review and suggest you not try to condense your writing. Rather do as others have done...continue your review in a reply.
Keep 'em coming. Good stuff, friend.
|
12-06-09 10:25am
|
Reply
950
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Also missing as a choice: "Smoker" movies.
At 14. It was a 16mm "smoker" movie purloined by a friend from his dad's stash.
|
12-06-09 08:17am
|
