| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Nice review roseman but I have to disagree with a few points that people are making.
People actually complain about 25 Gb a day limit? Who the hell can seriously hit that? That's pretty much impossible for 99% of people to hit.
As for the updates, do you guys realize he could do what sites like Nubiles does and seperate each gallery into seperate updates. Would that make you happier? He'd be updating the site daily but it'd just be galleries that are included in the big weekly update now.
How it's overrated in quality is beyond me. The videos can't get any better looking at 8000kbps. I'll give you that the pictures could stand to be bigger and the price for a single site is a bit steep these days.
I think FTV is a 85-90 rated site but again, good review Roseman. Nice and full review.
|
05-01-09 01:00pm
|
Reply
27
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
While I don't agree with all you said in your review and actually rated it 11 points higher, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I don't agree with your video quality remarks, as I think the 07 videos are good quality for their time.
However I will agree 100% on a few ponts: The lack of any search function at all is flat out ridiculous for a site in 2009. Especially compared to some sites who let you search everything from boob size, clothing or labia size.
The one other thing that bugs me about the site, is the fact that Rob (the guy doing the shooting and behind it) seems to always think he's ideas are the only ones that matter. For example I brought up the image resolution thing to him and he pretty much told me I was dumb and 90% of subscribers think the images are already too big. And that sites doing them that big are just gimmicky.
Overall good thought out review.
|
03-09-09 12:27pm
|
Reply
28
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Just wanted to comment on a few things:
I've been a member for about 2 months now. I never have had to login twice to access any content. Could that be something on your end? You could get on the forum, which is hidden on the voting page, and ask Rob about it. Seems strange.
I'm guessing it's just with Euro but US customers have a option for $99 for 150 days. Which comes out to $20 a month. Or US customers sometimes get a $20 a month deal when they go to cancel.
I believe the color bars are suppose to associate with hot the content is. But who decides that I don't know. Not sure if it's based off member reviews, Robs opinion or number of downloads.
But I do agree some things needs changed. Like a option to download a full movie, rather then 7-9 3-5min clips. This is the DSL age, no reason to not have a option like that.
And I also agree that in todays economical age, $30 for only one site is a bit overboard.
|
02-04-09 05:40am
|
Reply
29
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
The problem is FTV doesn't update 6-7 times a week, it averages out to 1-2 a week max.
As to Monahan, I never have understood how FTV ranks their models. For example if you go to the recent updates page, you'll see member choice under Ileana, Franziska & Miyu. However I've never seen a page to rank or vote for the models. So not sure if it's just off of downloads or how they figure it.
|
12-30-08 08:05pm
|
Reply
30
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Speaking of the gooey and messy orgasms, do they use lube to make the girls look wetter, kinda like ALS Scans does? I've seen a few preview videos and it doesn't look like they do. But was just wondering before I decide whether to join the site or not.
Thanks,
Jeffrey
|
08-18-09 01:57pm
|
Reply
31
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Just a update, not really sure what happened but I guess Firefox got corrupted or something. Tried downloading the photos and videos on another PC also using Firefox and they worked fine. So decided to come back to this one and update Firefox. Everything has worked fine since then.
The site is still a 1 month stay at best due to the price tag and the lack of ability to use download managers. Guess they must think everyone has a T1 connection.
|
03-22-10 07:47pm
|
Reply
32
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
wishdj's Reply
I can't download shit. Unless the video is one of the new ones that has the MP4 HD, WMV HD and Ipod selections, it won't download. Tried downloading a 2008 TannerMays clip, no go. Tried downloading a March 10th 2010 Kylie clip, no go. No matter what clip I chose, it saves it as a 3.8kb file that of course doesn't do shit.
Email already sent to them. If I get no response, may be the first time I have to try and get a refund and since they don't use a real billing company like CCBill, guessing that will be impossible.
|
03-21-10 03:11pm
|
Reply
33
|
Kaya Luv
(0)
|
Reply of
joexdoe's Review
Would have to agree, not really a good review. How do you figure it goes to criminal activity, if it can't be proven? As said above, whats wrong with working with children from a sick hospital? How's that a con?
To be your review comes off sounding more like a guy pissed off that she wouldn't date you, then a honest review of a site.
|
03-19-09 07:10am
|
Reply
34
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Reply
That's cool and all, unless you don't want your reviews taken seriously? If you do, then you need alot more detail. As for Bam it's in your face, that all has to do with what your desktop resolution is at. If it's at 640x480, then yeah anything image will be life size. If it's like most of us here and alot bigger, say 1440x900, then a 640x480 image is nothing more then a thumbnail.
Your review has no facts, it's nothing more then opinion.
|
03-12-09 05:02pm
|
Reply
35
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
Could use alot more detail in your review. Example, what's the image resolution? How about the video resolution? How often is the site updated? As of know your review is more of a ad, then a review. You make your review sound fake.
|
03-12-09 09:53am
|
Reply
36
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
Dillon's Review
My problem isn't with the fact that he gave the site a 100, if you think it's that good so be it, however you went into no techincal detail on anything. For example, what size are those so called "Hi Res Photos"? What size are the videos? How often is it updated? What makes this site any different from the million other sites out there? You mentioned none of that in the review. Hell, even your cons are useless.
Maybe your a spammer, I don't know. But if you really wanna post reviews your have to get more in depth then that. That looks more like a forum post selling a site, then a review.
|
03-10-09 10:38am
|
Reply
37
|
LV Panty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I know this is late but just wanted to let you know I signed up about a month ago (posting a review soon) and no they still don't have zip downloads. I also think they quit updating the site, as I don't see any dates for updates and didn't notice any while I was there.
|
03-09-09 12:31pm
|
Reply
38
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Since I've have never seen this error on any other website before, while using the exact same setup on tons of them, that lead me to believe it is a error with the site.
|
06-08-09 03:10pm
|
Reply
39
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, Khan. That done the trick. I'm now seeing $14.95 again after clearing Firefoxs private data.
|
05-09-09 09:07am
|
Reply
40
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Reply
Thanks for the reply. It looks like Met Art is atop my list of sites to try soon.
|
05-11-09 05:51am
|
Reply
41
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Review
Nice review. I've always wanted to give this site a try but I'm just wondering, do they start the photo sets off already nude? Or are they clothed at the beginning and then strip to full nude?
That was one thing that killed me about FemJoy, was that 90% of the gallerys the model was already full nude at the start. To me just kinda makes all the photos run together. So was just wondering if that's the way it is here?
|
05-10-09 08:20pm
|
Reply
42
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I agree, I'd love to give the site a try but there is jut no way in todays market that I'm spending $34.95 for one site. Unfortunately, I have yet to be able to find a discount from anywhere.
|
05-14-09 09:21am
|
Reply
43
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Addict's Comment
Nice to now. I've always wanted to give this site a try, just for the price, never have yet. No download managers is becoming a huge pet peeve of mine.
|
04-16-09 05:23am
|
Reply
44
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Thanks. Ended up using a unused gift card to give us a short trial. A few things I wish they did was offer file sizes and what resolution it was shot at before downloading.
|
11-23-21 07:02am
|
Reply
45
|
Naughty America VR
(0)
|
Reply of
avgazn86's Reply
Thanks. I took a chance with a unused gift card as a trial run and am pretty impressed with the quality.
|
11-23-21 07:01am
|
Reply
46
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Nice review. Currently a member there now and have to agree that the bonus sites are complete crap. I love how they try to make it out that they are saving you like $50 on access to the bonus sites. However I think they all quit updating like 5 years ago.
|
05-01-09 01:03pm
|
Reply
47
|
Only Carla
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Review
Nice review. I was a member about a year ago. Unless something has changed, I think it'd be beneficial to point out that it's pretty much a topless only site. When I was a member, she never showed full frontal. I understand you said not for those that like hardcore but I'd consider her site very very softcore.
Other then that, great review.
|
08-22-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
48
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Nice review. I've always loved the style of the of OT, however I can't really handle non-nude or topless sites. To me, the tease should have always been the first 75% of the gallery. Would live if they'd created a site or to find a site just like OT outfit wise but where every women ended up with full frontal nudity. Not looking for spread eagle or masturbation, just full nude.
|
04-18-09 05:13am
|
Reply
49
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
That's good to see. As the videos were always pretty much useless before.
Is Only Tease still pretty much only a boob site? And not much full frontal nudity? I really like the site, clothing wise and shot wise but too many of the girls don't get full frontal for my tastes.
|
03-28-09 12:17pm
|
Reply
50
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I'd think the tease is the first 75-80% of the photos. Just to me there are too many sets that never get past the tease part.
But no there isn't any false advertising or anything going on. As they never do promise or say how nude the ladies get. To me OT is a jack of all trades and a master of none. It seems they can't make up their mind if they want to do full nudity, just topless or non-nude.
Guess I'm just not used to paying $25 for a non-nude site.
|
11-05-08 12:22pm
|
