Great review. But no matter how good the site contents, I could not put up with the password issues. You must have a ton of patience to deal with that.
My thought is that Drooler is basically right. Porn is more accepted today versus 50 years ago. But many people still think porn is evil, or at the very least, bad.
King James Bible
And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire:
And if you're not willing to pluck out your eye, there are plenty of good Christians and Muslims that will do if for you.
Collectors in some fields may trade or buy and sell, like comics or coins. But I think porn is much more private, and there is not a lot of sharing of porn collections. For example, I collect porn, but strictly for myself. And I don't advertise my porn collection, except here on PU.
Maybe that would make a good poll question: How often do you discuss, or trade, or share your porn collection with others?
You may not consider yourself a collector, because you don't share. But I would consider you a collector, based on my guess that you have porn photos and/or videos on your hard drives, or other medium.
Nice, basic review. I like the specific reasons you give for building the score. My only quibble would be the total score: since you think the site is probably worth a one-time membership, my guess would be a score of 70 would be more appropriate. Even though PU guidelines state that 60-69 is "low recommendation", and 70-79 is "might recommend", I believe that since 50 is the lowest score a site can be rated, most people would think that a score less than 70 means a site to be avoided.
That's my feeling/belief.
So many people, seeing your site score of 65, would think/conclude the site was a waste of money, and might not even bother to read your review.
Whereas you personally felt that the site was worth a one-time membership, and did not feel cheated.
And I definitely feel your review is worth reading, because it gives a very clear explanation/feeling of the site.
I read it back in the 1970s (and 1980s, maybe), before there was the Internet. But I stopped reading it in the 1980s, and then the Internet came along, with photos, and then later still, videos.
Considering that I've got more porn on my hard drives than anything else, I would say I'm a collector. What else would you call it? Now, be polite, people. :)
I prefer b/g or g/g, with vaginal. And i wonder how sanitary it is with all this ass-to-mouth action. State law usually requires employees at restaurants to wash their hands after visiting the rest room. Is state law outmoded, where you no longer have to worry about hygiene with this ass-to-mouth action? Or is that supposed to be part of the thrill, wondering how sick the girl will be later when she might be vomiting her guts out, with diarrhea as well.
I don't know how many bonus sites Spunky Bee is currently offering, if any.
If you are interested in joining this site, you could send an email to tech support at Spunky Bee asking how many bonus sites are included with a membership to Spunky Bee.
I do know that at least some of the other sites in the network are offering additional bonus sites with a regular membership. You can get an idea of what bonus sites each one offers by going to the signup/join page for each individual site.
But the best way to check would be to send an email. Hopefully they would respond quickly with the information you want.
A few of the videos at this network have subtitles. But once you read what the boys and girls are saying, you begin to think that the subtitles aren't really needed, because almost everything they say is really lame. Lol.
I've been a member at this network before, and you have already improved the navigation/design a lot in recent months. It's now much easier to go from one network site to a different network site, and to search for content of a single model.
Depends on the interview. On how well the model speaks. It can give added flavor, allowing you to see how well or how poorly the model handles the interview, maybe give you a little insight into how the girl thinks. Or it can be a complete waste of time. Whatever.
My guess would be that most webmasters would not pay much attention to these polls unless the number of responding members was at least 1,000 or more. You would need a really large number to command the attention of most webmasters.
To be more effective regarding a positive response from webmasters, you would need some program that targets specific webmasters with polls that address issues relating to their websites (general or specific, e.g., streaming only content, download limits, etc.).
Jay G, my suggestion is to take a video of yourself and post it on PU. Then our fellow PU experts could make suggestions on how to improve your performance.
My personal opinion is that some of us might be interested in how you achieve this "Put-put-put" orgasm. Something drawn out like this might be even better than the very strong but brief "Wow" climax of some members.
You expect porn networks to make it easy to find the best deals? One reason we use PU is so that we can read where other members have done the work and can point us to the sites with the best value, whether it's number of included sites, or great content, or easy navigation, or fast download speeds, or whatever.
Being a porn hound is not always the easy way out: it takes real effort, determination, and cash. Lol.
There are plenty of kinks I don't appreciate: vomiting, abuse (including slapping, spitting, name-calling, hair-pulling, making the female scream or cry from painful excess), peeing, etc.
It takes a real man to pee in a girl's mouth. Wow, what a stud. I've seen some videos where Pierre Woodman is doing that. I guess it's not enough for him to make a girl scream from rough sex: now he has to pee in their mouth for additional kicks. What's the next step: pulling out a gun and pulling the trigger as he cums? Or maybe he could use a knife instead. That would really show his power and domination.
The videos are short, 6-10 minutes. Very high quality: clear focus, sensuous, softcore erotic. I say softcore, because that is the overall feel, but there is female solo masturbation, girl-girl lesbian action, and boy-girl sex, but it's erotic or sensual, not gonzo hardcore.
Site used to be, years ago, very small photosets of models, no videos. But for last few years, they have been adding videos. The most recent videos are hardcore (with a softcore style, like I said). The earlier videos from a few years back were solo girl videos.
But they have been adding a lot more videos in last few years.
A very nice site, small compared to mega-sites like Met-art, but goes beyond Met-art in the explicitness of the sex they now show, in both the photosets and the videos.
I think it's a great site, well worth the price, as long as you are not expecting gonzo hardcore sex.
I wouldn't mind at all if the video runtime was longer, because you are left wanting to see more, or have the action last longer. With most softcore and hardcore videos, the videos last too long, and you skip over parts. But here, you wish the video would last longer, because they are really nicely done.
Never had a Mac. They are supposed to be easier to use, and less prone to malware. But I've already learned to use Windows, so learning to use a Mac would be like starting all over again, plus Macs are supposed to be more expensive.
Call porn access or devils film by telephone (there is a toll free number to call) immediately to cancel your trial subscription.
If you don't cancel, your trial subscription will normally convert to a monthly subscription at a much higher rate than what you would pay with a PU discount. You could easily pay $30 or even $40 a month when the trial subscription converts to a monthly subscription.
I got stung the same way, when I signed up for Devils Film the last time. I looked for the pre-checked offer, but did not see it, and was charged for the trial. I immediately called on the telephone to cancel the trial, within minutes of signing up, when I was notified I would be charged for a trial to porn access.
I could not get the telephone representative to cancel the charge for the trial sub, but she did cancel the trial subscription, so it would not turn into a monthly fee.
I never used my trial sub to porn access, but at least it did not turn into a monthly fee.
It depends on whether the URL is really from Brazzers or not.
If the URL is genuine, then it sounds like a mistake from Brazzers.
But if the URL is not genuine, then it could be a phishing attempt to get you to visit the site and then they will ask for confidential information from you, which you might give, thinking the site was genuinely from Brazzers.
I've gotten emails from fake Ebay addresses that told me my Ebay account had a problem. When I sent those emails to Ebay support, they almost always told me the emails were spam, or phishing attempts, and that I should never click on the URL link or give any confidential information to such a site.
I also got emails from fake Chase bank addresses that told me my Chase account had a problem. Since I didn't have a Chase bank account, I automatically knew those were spam, phishing attempts.
I would send an email to the genuine Brazzer support address, with the suspect email attached, asking if the suspect message is fake or real.
The "sending" email address is not really the one to check. You want to check if the URL in the email address is genuine. The "sending" email address can easily be faked. I get spam, fake emails, which sometimes have my own email address listed as the "sending" address.
Since I know that I didn't send these emails to myself with my own email address as the "sending" address, I automatically know these are spam emails.
Your review back in 2007 was accurate for the site back then.
The site photos are still not very good, in general.
The site videos are much improved. They still have the videos from years ago, but the newer videos are much better quality: crystal clear definition, good lighting, good camera work, in general. Solo teen, girl-girl lesbian, some boy-girl. This is not a gonzo-style site, but a more gentle sex style that I think of as softcore, even though it shows masturbation and lesbian and some boy-girl.
But if you want hard-edged fucking, you should look elsewhere.
This site and 18OnlyGirls are very similar: run by the same company (Diesel), same type of content, same models, same layout. The two sites also swap some content (videos, photosets). So if you join one, you will see, not exactly the same photosets and videos, but very similar ones, at both sites.
It's easy to get confused about the names of sites, because there are so many sites out there. Many of the sites have names that are very close to one another.
Sometimes I look at a site name, and I have to check PU to see if I've already written a review on it, or have even been a member at the site.
My memory is certainly not what it used to be. Lol.
Yes, it's the same site. Some of the videos/photosets are watermarked YoungPorn, some of the videos/photosets are watermarked YoungLegalPorn. And the site is named YoungPorn in the address bar, but the site advertising lists the site as YoungLegalPorn.
They changed the name, but still use the old name as well.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
