I mainly look at pictures, which are silent. But I guess that reading a blog would be silent as well. Never thought much about looking for blogs on these models. Certainly was not interested enough to follow a blog any of these models might have written,
Maybe if I was a really big fan of one of these adult actresses I might read her blog once in a while. But I've never been on Twitter, or Facebook. And I've never really been a big fan of any adult actress.
Unless he's been badly beaten by his male opponent, maybe he could turn around and fuck the girl giving the titty fuck. I don't think I've seen a titty fuck before now. How much does it hurt?
I said the same thing, basically, that I liked the old home page better, because it was easier for me to use, and more useful, because I really liked the simplicity of a large number of the most recent updates with a thumbnail that, with simple click, brought up a full-page version of the cover sheet.
But the new home page design is a better advertisement for newbies and casual browsers, in that it shows more of what the site offers.
I've said it before, but Met-art is my favorite porn site. They have an incredible number of attractive models, an incredible amount of good-to-great looking photosets, and the site is, in spite of massive content, easy to use and easy to navigate. They also have an update rate of photosets and new models that is incredible.
If they wanted to improve the site, I think they should stop making/posting new videos, and spend the money on even more photosets. Because I can't remember if I ever saw more than a tiny number of videos I liked at this site. All the time and effort and money put into videos that I think are boring.
But the number of photosets they post, on a daily basis, blows away any other photo site I've ever joined.
Nice review that gives the flavor of the site.
I like Russian and East European porn. And I like attractive models, which this site has.
But I prefer one-on-one. Also, I like videos to be edited. I would like a build-up to the sex, but a lot of aimless chatter in Russian (even with subtitles) can get boring fast.
And I appreciate your comments on the sound track being poor to miserable.
And I guess the lighting could be much improved (strictly a guess, as I haven't seen any of the videos).
I prefer good lighting and good editing over the "reality" flavored porn. And good camera work. And good sound would be a bonus.
So I will pass on this site.
I didn't know what a glory hole was until I just looked it up. Looking at the name, I thought it meant something else.
I've seen some sites that have glory hole pictures/videos, but never went inside the sites. This isn't my area of kink.
So my response to the poll would be, "Not interested". If the poll had that choice.
Based on the current poll answers, I don't think any of them fit my position. I don't hate glory hole, but I don't love it. I guess I feel a mild dislike of it, even though I haven't seen any examples (pictures or vids). Why waste my time looking at what will almost certainly be crap?
When I had dial-up, which I had for many years, I was lucky to see download speeds of 3-4 KB/s, which showed in the Windows system tray when downloading a file.
I switched to DSL, and then got 150-160 KB/s download speeds (again, from what appeared in the Windows system tray area when downloading a file).
I recently switched to a faster DSL, and now get up to 630 KB/s download speeds, which is a huge improvement.
I knew there was a difference between bits and bytes (8 bits per byte), but it was still confusing when I looked at speed ratings because I didn't know which were being used or referred to.
But if everyone follows the simple rule that "b" stands for bits, and "B" stands for bytes, then I hope to remember that.
But I ignore the difference between "K" and 1,000 (K = 1,024), because my brain can only hold so much. :)
I go along with otoh. If the photos in a gallery have a watermark, you can't get rid of the watermark, unless you use photoshop or some editing software. And I don't photoshop or edit my photos. I leave them the way they were downloaded, except I might delete a few photos from a set if the photos are really poor. Or I might just delete the set if most of the photos are poor.
Starting in the days when it first became legal to show pubic hair in the magazines (Playboy and Penthouse) back in the 1970s, the pubic hair was not "natural", but trimmed. Today, looking at the old photos from back then, you might think it was natural or bushy or whatever you want to call it, but most models back then were trimmed before their photoshoots.
I'm not sure exactly what the poll question is asking.
But I think that when PU members spend money on a porn paysite, they are hoping for, or expecting, that they will get at least reasonable value for that money. That means the site should be easily accessible, easy to navigate, with contents that have both quantity and quality.
If the site contents (the videos and photos) are crap, or it is difficult to access the contents because of poor download speeds, or lousy navigation or other problems, then the PU member will feel he has wasted his money.
I am still trying to feel my way to what the poll question means: "Do you feel some users overthink thier porn?"
I doubt that many of us try to study porn like some people study the bible. But we certainly spend time trying to organize our porn collection. Which can take a bit of thought. That would be well spent, because a disorganized mess of a collection is extremely difficult to search through after the collection becomes large. And it's very easy for a porn collection to keep growing over time. You have to prune and weed out the junk, and organize what you have. Which takes time and thought.
Some of the more intelligent and thoughtful and organized PU members should take pity on the rest of us and create a software program that will let us organize our porn collection more easily. That way, we could spend less time trying to keep the files organized and more time enjoying the contents.
But, in general, I do not believe most PU members overthink their porn. They spend a lot of time trying to collect it, and some time trying to organize it, and maybe some time trying to enjoy it. And where is the time left to think about it, after all those other activities take up what is, after all, only a hobby?
I don't know anyone who really studies their porn like people who study great literature or great art.
Porn is more for enjoyment, rather than for study, I believe. Like popcorn movies are made for enjoyment, rather than for study.
I get the same "Server not found" error message when trying to load the site page. Temporary problem, or site gone out of business? Probably better to wait before joining until you have a better idea of what is happening at the site (except, how you could join when the site does not have a working page might be a problem).
The members at PU are looking out for you, Denner.
There is one stunt cock at Teen Mega World that seems to be in a huge amount of their videos. I can't stand the guy, he really irritates me and detracts from the value of the videos he appears in. For some reason he appears in more of their videos than any other stunt cock. You have also seen him in many other networks or sites, although he is not featured in quite as large a percentage of most other site videos.
"-EACH ZIP is of the TEN PICS in a gallery you’re viewing"
From your review, it almost sounds like this site is trying to create their version of the custom zipfile.
It also sounds like a lot of work to download a full zipfile of the photoset.
Glad to see you back with a new review. Actually, checking your review history, it's been about 3 months since your last review. But it just seems longer, somehow.
It's easier and simpler for me to download the entire photoset as a zip. Then, if I want to, I can delete any individual photos from the set that I really dislike.
But I almost never delete or change any of the photos in a set. I am not a purist. I'm more like BadMrFrosty, a hoarder. Or perhaps a kinder explanation would be that I am a purist, who admires the purity of the original artform, the original photoset as selected by the photographer or whoever edited the photoset in the first place.
I did not say the older material has been re-edited.
What I meant was that, if they would re-edit the material and give it the higher resolution of what some sites provide, that the value of the contents would be much improved.
What I meant to say was that I understand your disappointment with the site because of the better, clearer, higher definition videos that can be found at some other sites.
But for people who have not seen the material at the Devils Film network, because of the low price, large amount of content, and variety of content, it's worth checking the site out in spite of the lower resolution of the videos.
Sorry you were so disappointed on your last join. I agree the video quality is not the higher resolution you can find at some sites, and it would be great if they could remaster or increase the quality of the videos. What they do offer is a large collection of many DVD video categories, almost all of which you have seen with your prior memberships. And the PU discounted price of $9.95 is a very low price if you haven't seen these videos before.
But at least you have Teen Mega World and some other sites to fall back on. Wouldn't want to quit cold turkey on your porno addiction. :)
Interesting, informative review. I enjoy the British/Old English writing style, which adds a personal flavor to the review. Really, a lovely review of a very nice site.
Khan, I took advantage of your added option, and voted for "None of the above."
But I wasn't really being serious with the gay suggestion. I was also kidding when I said that "Semen is the nectar of the gods." Sometimes my jokes don't translate well, and people might think I was being serious.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
