| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think they debuted a "Twisty's Hard" section a while back with your basic boy/girl videos, but I can't remember how long ago this was so I don't know how many total hardcore videos they have up. Looking at their preview, it looks like they do one a week.
|
09-01-12 12:00pm
|
Reply
277
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Breast implants. She hasn't shot any professional pictures or movies since she got them, but there are some pictures floating out there.
|
03-19-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
278
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
What I meant when I said that is that she's not "all natural" anymore, as of about two weeks ago.
|
03-18-12 02:33am
|
Reply
279
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
She's not "unspoiled" anymore.
|
03-09-12 10:47am
|
Reply
280
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Comment
Is it still only for people that subscribe for the full year, or are they allowing people who get shorter memberships to get one as well?
|
04-18-13 01:23pm
|
Reply
281
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think that when they decide to license, they probably don't get to choose whether or not they get HD, whomever they're licensing it from does. For example, it looks like they've just started uploading scenes from Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity, but all those scenes are in standard definition, even though at least some of them are available in high definition on that site.
|
03-09-13 11:19pm
|
Reply
282
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I agree that they'd probably be better off if they focused on 1-3 movies per day and just made them of "better quality" (i.e. HD, more well known actors/studios). That would probably buy them some more time before the content dried up entirely. About the only way I can see them being able to get back ahead of the curve now is if they were to attempt to buy content from websites that have stopped updating relatively recently. It would give them a ton of (probably) lightly seen content at a cheap price.
|
03-07-13 01:40pm
|
Reply
283
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I just don't see how they're going to fix their HD problem without raising the subscription price, to be honest. Because most of the companies that still exist and are shooting their content in HD already have their own websites and aren't going to sell/license that content to Videobox. So they're probably just going to shell out more money to different companies to get their not-new HD content. And as you noted, even the premium channels aren't doing it, since they still want to give you a reason to join their site instead of going through Videobox. This is just the danger of being a site that doesn't produce its own content. They're at the mercy of the market, and the market isn't going to be kind to them.
|
03-05-13 05:40pm
|
Reply
284
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the advice.
|
11-09-12 05:51pm
|
Reply
285
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm not worried as to whether or not it'll be a positive experience since I've never been a member here before. So without a doubt, there will be enough content there to keep me entertained for at least a month, but probably 2 or 3. That, and I tend not to care as much about things like breast size (or implants), age, or the type of scene it is (anal, vaginal, DP, etc). I just want to see a woman I find attractive having orgasms, which makes me pretty easy to please. I don't even mind lower quality (640x480 or so) if it's from a scene old enough that I know that there isn't any better quality of it out there/possible. I'm much more worried about the multiple comments about crappy navigation than I am about not liking the content. Because what good is having good content if it takes me forever to find it?
|
11-08-12 06:35pm
|
Reply
286
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mike11w's Comment
If there's one thing I've learned from joining sites for the past 3 or 4 years, it's that you should probably give them more than a day to fix things, because some sites just don't work that fast.
|
08-04-12 10:26pm
|
Reply
287
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I keep meaning to join this site, but never actually doing it, mostly because I know I'll probably be partially paralyzed by the choices and either not download anything for a few days or downloading so much that I need a brand new hard drive. But I think now is the time, especially so that I can see what the difference between the old and new versions of the site and see for myself if the new version is that bad.
|
07-15-12 10:49am
|
Reply
288
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Which is why I would love to find a way to access their video content without joining their site. The idea that this place might have been that, even if I had to pay an extra fee on top of the normal membership, might have been enough to get me to join.
|
03-16-13 09:36pm
|
Reply
289
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
benmar51's Reply
Thank you, that is what I was looking for. I might just join here instead of my next VB subscription, just to take a look at it.
|
03-16-13 08:58am
|
Reply
290
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Reply
The reason I'm asking is because I'm already a member at Videobox, and I wanted to know if VideosZ is worth a subscription in addition to/following that. I'm intrigued by the access to Hustler (which is a studio whose content I want, but whose website I do not want to join), but the idea of it being behind a three month paywall when I only wanted to join for a month is disappointing.
|
03-15-13 08:39pm
|
Reply
291
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
Dracula's Review
How much content would you say is here that isn't on Videobox?
|
03-15-13 03:53pm
|
