| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I've always figured that it's the studio that makes the demands for premium pricing and not the site. Which is why you'll see some studios use it for most of their movies, but others never use it at all.
|
02-03-13 12:43am
|
Reply
127
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Yeah, PPM/VOD sites are never going to be where I get the majority of my content, but I've found that they really are pretty great when it comes to watching that one scene or one DVD you want to see, especially if it comes from a company that doesn't have its own website (or doesn't have a good one). The channels could be great if they could get some of the bigger companies to offer their own channels (for example, I'd pay $20 a month right now for a Hustler channel here as opposed to having to join their website). Even though I prefer Hot Movies to AEBN primarily because they give you extra incentive for staying a member for an extended period of time, I can easily see myself spending some money here.
|
04-29-12 09:42pm
|
Reply
128
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Dirty is almost an understatement when it comes to Amy Brooke. She's only been around for like 6-8 months, and she's already filmed at least one double anal scene. She's really hardcore, and I'm kinda surprised they stopped at a BJ with her.
|
03-21-10 10:31am
|
Reply
129
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick C's Reply
It's refreshing to hear someone being this honest. I think I'll check your site out when I get the chance.
|
12-29-09 10:01am
|
Reply
130
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LePornoisseur's Reply
I actually already have (and have used) that Reality Kings link, but thanks for offering.
|
02-11-13 05:05pm
|
Reply
131
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
LePornoisseur's Comment
Do you at least get to stream all the scenes? Depending on how much it costs, I'd be willing to do that for a few dollars.
|
02-11-13 12:20am
|
Reply
132
|
Best Hard Hunks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Well, technically, since you aren't paying, they're not giving you bad customer service for your money.
But I do agree about there being a large amount of websites out there that need better previews.
|
12-17-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
133
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
She's done a little work for other sites, but not very much. For example, she shot a Brazzers scene a couple years ago, and I know that there are a few other vids for other companies out there.
|
07-22-12 10:41am
|
Reply
134
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Comment
They have more income than basically any other porn company right now. I don't think the added money from a video banner is going to make that much of a difference.
|
01-28-13 10:58pm
|
Reply
135
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They put out at least 2 scenes a month that were filmed in Europe (generally England, though not necessarily with English actresses), and have been since about the middle of last year. And while that isn't a huge percentage, it's enough that they could generally use it to film any girl they wanted to, which is kinda what I was getting at with my comment (that a girl being in Europe wouldn't stop them from shooting her).
Heck, a few months ago, they actually released an uncensored scene from Japan, which really surprised me.
|
09-27-12 09:42pm
|
Reply
136
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Brazzers has a production arm in Europe, so they can shoot any European girl that they want.
|
09-27-12 02:25pm
|
Reply
137
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
There scenes from the past few years, including some as new as the end of last year.
|
05-12-12 09:59pm
|
Reply
138
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Reply
I've found that, in general, it's much harder for someone to screw you over when they actually have to hear your voice when they do it (and even harder if they have to do it to your face). It's why whenever I have customer service issues, I always try to handle them in person or over the phone as opposed to through writing, and that has worked much more often than it hasn't.
|
12-09-11 08:51am
|
Reply
139
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
I think they have a customer service number you can call into. Yup, found it: http://www.brazzerssupport.com/
I'd call it and if the first person can't help you, ask to talk to a manager. That no refunds line is bullshit, especially if your login isn't working. And if all else fails, call your credit card company and dispute the charge.
|
12-08-11 04:30pm
|
Reply
140
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I have to disagree with you about the pool of available performers without implants being particularly small. I would say that because the other three major US based networks (Naughty America, Bangbros, and Reality Kings) are all drawing from the same talent pool and all feature more natural girls more often than Brazzers. The reason for Brazers overabundance of fake breasts, in my opinion, stems from the basic fact that they are a big tits focused site above anything else (and have been since they were first founded as Juggscash), and the majority of the big breasted women in porn weren't born that way.
|
11-28-11 06:44pm
|
Reply
141
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Review
And from what I can tell, you have to pay extra to access the mobile-formatted version of their website, which houses the exact same content. Really? I will also say that I had an extra 30 cent charge come from the same billing company (and the only other website I use doesn't use them). It's the only extra charge I've seen, and it's a very small amount (which is why I haven't gone through the hassle of finding out what happened), but it did happen for no apparent reason. Their forums are active, and I've seen people get service when something has gone wrong, but it's primarily only if you keep yelling about it and make them want to shut you up. And this is to say nothing about how other people/companies in the adult industry feel about the way Brazzers does business (look it up sometime, it's an interesting read).
So, in the end, would I recommend this site to another person? Yes, as long as you made sure to avoid any upsells and pre-checked cross-sales. But I honestly see no real reason to be a subscriber for more than a month at a time.
|
02-07-10 01:56am
|
Reply
142
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Reply
$9.95? Where? And I mean for one month, not 9.95 a month if you sign up for a year.
|
12-27-09 08:23pm
|
Reply
143
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
JamesDavid's Reply
I'm not really sure what you're saying is not correct? The feedback loop comment? I do agree with much of the other stuff you said here, though (except the HD thing. 720p is still HD by every definition of the phrase. Hell, technically, 721x481 would be HD). Especially the fact that the customer isn't always right. I've worked in retail for way too long to actually believe that. I think as long as it's fairly obvious that you're primarily a video site with photos also, you're not doing anything at all wrong.
Also, if you check my reviews, I'm a video guy. Always have been, always will be. So your sites lack of zip files wouldn't bother me at all. Without really knowing much about your sites/network, I don't' know whether I would join or not (I've never joined a single model site/network yet), but this wouldn't be an issue that persuades me either way.
|
04-16-13 12:34am
|
Reply
144
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
The point of taking photos doesn't really have to be to allow collectors to download them. If nothing else, photos make for much better promotional material than videos. They're much easier to distribute freely (a fact that pirates take advantage of), and you can use them as part of your website design (especially on the front page of the site). Not to mention the ability to use them to make advertisements with (from banner ads to preview pages). The truth is that the majority of video sites that make their own exclusive content (as opposed to licensing it from someone else) shoot at least some photos to go along with it, and there's a reason for that.
|
04-13-13 11:57am
|
Reply
145
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Makes perfect sense once you realize it's a self-fulfilling prophecy/feedback loop. The policy on photos means that people who prefer photos to videos aren't going to join in the first place, so when they survey their members on whether they prefer videos or photos, their members are going to overwhelming say videos.
Basically, it sounds like the photos on the site are more about people who like just looking at them as opposed to people who like collecting them. I don't really see a problem with that as long as you can know that ahead of time.
|
04-13-13 01:30am
|
Reply
146
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
As for reasons for segmented downloads even today:
Some people might only want to watch a certain part of the scene (i.e. just the blowjob, or just the popshot, or just one sex position), and if that's all you want to see you can save bandwidth by just downloading one part of the scene.
|
11-25-12 10:36pm
|
Reply
147
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
As far as I know (and I know a couple people that have paid for videos), they are trustworthy with your info.
As for the prices, this is what videos cost if you want something specific that isn't necessarily "mainstream".
|
11-28-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
148
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
To me, C4S is basically the beauty of the internet coming to online porn. You can find nearly anything you want, and if you can't find it, you can probably ask someone else to make it. The problem, of course, is that it comes with "custom video" pricing, which is really, really expensive.
Basically, I love the idea of it, but the execution just isn't for me.
|
08-01-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
149
|
College Sugarbabes
(0)
|
Reply of
Carue's Comment
The site also stopped updating like a year ago.
|
06-26-13 01:11am
|
Reply
150
|
College Sugarbabes
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
It's run by the same company, but it's not part of the network. It's one of the four sites that they run independent of each other and the Naughty America network (the others are Tonight's Girlfriend, MILF Sugarbabes, and Amateurs Raw [which stopped producing new updates near the end of last year]). If you want to access this content, you'll have to pay separately.
|
04-02-12 05:23pm
|
