| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Now if they would only get back to regular updating.
|
04-20-10 11:39am
|
Reply
77
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
JDuB's Review
I've been following Brandi's site for a few years. Everyone makes that same point - she seems bored in her videos. To tell the truth, I think it's part of the show. She started off as a solo site and it looks like they found a niche where she finds random scenarios (the sperm challenge, little dick vs. big dick, watching movie and jizz in the popcorn, etc etc etc) and just "finds out the results". To me, the niche is less a sexaholic enjoying scenes and more a girl doing sex studies. I actually like the newer content a lot better now.
That said, great review
|
07-12-09 06:41pm
|
Reply
78
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Unfortunately, I've never been able to have access to both, and I've followed brandi for a couple of years. I only joined her site once and haven't since because these days people are used to a network of sites for the price.
|
02-25-09 10:32am
|
Reply
79
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Brazzers is another one of those companies that has gotten so big that they add content to their members page without making it 100% obvious that if you click it you will be charged a membership for it. For them, a few complaints isn't a big deal in the grand scheme of things.
I still have Brazzers and am just wary of what I click. Haven't had a problem yet, but I can see how some may end up clicking the wrong thing.
|
01-03-14 08:06am
|
Reply
80
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
chancler's Review
I agree, this describes most sites on the web - "do you like to see popular pornstars get fucked" and "updates daily, great quality, quick downloads, good price". That's not a review, it's a note. What makes this particular site stand out/different is what comprises a review.
|
04-15-10 11:58am
|
Reply
81
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
big johnny's Review
Is it possible your credit card information was stolen by some other means, because them just giving away your information seems highly unlikely given the amount of people (myself included) that have been members of Brazzers and never had any of this happen.
Also, the score isn't in line with standards. Your review makes it seem like Brazzers does some things right (amount of content, different niches, price, easy navigation). Your main gripes seem to be 1) older video quality and 2) you believe they sold your credit card info and spam your email. With the one fact (#1) I can see you putting your number in the 70 range. With the one opinion (#2), even I if this happened to me would chalk it up to something different happened to me since no one in 23 reviews on this site alone have had anything remotely resemble these problems.
I'm not a big Brazzers fan to tell the truth, I find their content to be high quality but boring. But even I can see this probably is a problem that didn't originate with your subscription to their site.
|
12-14-09 10:21am
|
Reply
82
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
rome476's Comment
I just always feel fortunate that I've never had a problem with Brazzers or Bang Bros. Don't know how I got so lucky. Reality Kings gave me a problem though.
|
10-14-09 09:49am
|
Reply
83
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Reply
Who knows, maybe it's my computer. But yeah, my downloads at Brazzers are higher quality than my downloads at BBros. My downloads at Bbros *sometimes* get grainy, but they're still good. If most people have it the other way then it's probably my computer or something. I couldn't tell if you were asking me though.
|
04-06-09 10:12am
|
Reply
84
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I've been a brazzers member for a while, but I also am a VideoBox, Bang Bros, Innocent High and Reality Kings member so I have a nice variety to compare. I have never had a billing problem with any of these 5 (Brazzers included) and I'd rate the video quality better than the other networks. I don't value it as high as the other networks because of the variety issues (all big tits or big butts...I'm not a "fake" fan but I like big butts so they get me there). I do like the download options and the "Save" feature that works (compared to Bang Bros save feature). Daily updates are consistent and never miss.
My only real problem with Brazzers is variety. They are kind of all the same, but when you have "contract" models like Rachel Starr, Ricki White, Gina Lynn or Carmella Bing that always put out good scenes, it keeps me a member to see everyone's new material.
|
03-12-09 10:44am
|
Reply
85
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Reply
OH I didn't realize you were in the UK. It must be they way they converted for some reason. I just typed both websites into different browsers and went to the join pages and got the same price for both: $24.95.
Looks like you're getting the wrong end of the stick somehow.
|
01-12-09 11:26am
|
Reply
86
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
largeun's Comment
I don't see the price difference but it's the same network. Luckily the PU crew puts the "Site Clone" stamp on those so you know and don't have to worry about which one to join when they're the same.
I'm a Brazzers member...thoroughly enjoy it.
|
01-12-09 08:35am
|
Reply
87
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
I just went there...did not find that 7.50 anywhere
|
12-02-08 07:37pm
|
Reply
88
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Cathy still updates content as she meets fans pretty regularly to film shoots. She keeps the schedule of where she will be and how you can meet her for the shoot on her website, and it stays current which tells me they're still filming content.
|
01-03-14 08:10am
|
Reply
89
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
As a longtime member of Cathy's, I can't say for a fact if a lot of the scenes on her site are "hired guns", but I can say that I've talked to Cathy both via email and phone and was invited for a party to be filmed on the website. I could not make it (I watch my porn, not star in it) but the experience leads me to remain confident that it's all real. Most men are probably like me - they don't want to actually film a scene for various reasons (anyone can see you, they like to watch not star in it, fear of diseases despite tests, etc.). The recurring men in the videos are probably the ones that constantly showed up so now they're comfortable shooting with those guys because they're reliable and there hasn't been any new & serious guys.
Hope that sort of clarifies in case anyone was hoping to join and meet her. Based on phone chats and email chats, she is extremely nice and I love that accent.
|
03-10-09 01:13pm
|
Reply
90
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
That's weird, I've never had that happen before with Cathy. Good luck getting it fixed.
|
12-28-08 05:25pm
|
Reply
91
|
Celebrity-Worship
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
That's why I'm so surprised people don't think about the options when they make sites. Simple marketing -- a 1 day, limited trial will give you less return on investment than a 1 day, full trial which gives you less ROI than a three day trial (standard length). Three days is long enough to determine if you like a site -- and if you make a site I would hope you think people would like it enough to become full members.
If you don't think people will like your site too much, I'd go the route of the one week trial, for the reason you stated. After a week, many people would probably forget to cancel. Sneaky? Yes. But there's nothing unethical about giving someone a cheap, one week access. It's the consumer's fault if they forget to cancel a trial.
In essence, all you websites out there just go ahead and give us one week trials!
|
04-19-10 12:01pm
|
Reply
92
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
Ston Nerd's Reply
Thanks I might give it another try. Looks like Viva la Bus doesn't update weekly (unless I missed something), but I might try it out and see. Preston & Shaggy or JT, JMac, Ugly and the crew...gotta figure out which is better. Might wait to see a few more reviews from users I know.
|
06-08-09 09:36am
|
Reply
93
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
|
Reply of
qualsite34's Reply
I tried the trial maybe a month ago, maybe longer. The trial was almost completely worthless, nothing like a Reality Kings or Bang Bros or Brazzers trial. Couldn't download on the trial either. I don't know if you have the full or trial membership though. But either way, it was a bad first impression for me, don't know if I'll go back.
Also missing a few updates that I saw on the tour.
|
03-12-09 10:39am
|
Reply
94
|
Club Sophie Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
I would agree with this assessment. Definitely a good way to have a solo site for a individual model if the point is to not have hardcore videos. With someone with as much stuff as she's done, I would like for their to be a way to come to her site and download her scenes in one place without searching all over for them, but coming here for the blog and pictures is a good touch too. Different than the norm.
|
08-05-08 09:38am
|
Reply
95
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
Cooter37's Review
With negatives like that, score seems kind of high
|
04-21-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
96
|
Cream Pimps
(0)
|
Reply of
MinNiche's Review
Good first review, I like creampie sites too. Keep them coming, I'd like to see your take on other sites in this niche. I would say next time to give another thought at the rating. Anything above 90 should be best of the class/flawless. The 80-89 range should be where this falls in your review. Difficulty cancelling a subscription is a major flaw in that customer service should be the most important thing with companies you trust with a lot of money. Having to do more than just click "unsubscribe" to a site is a major problem and not fitting of a 90-99 range site.
|
06-29-10 08:54am
|
Reply
97
|
Cream Pimps
(0)
|
Reply of
wiild1's Comment
Same problem most PU users have had with this network.
|
07-05-09 04:34pm
|
Reply
98
|
Cream Pimps
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
Phone call did the trick, although I never got the email confirmation that the person told me so I called back the next day to double check. Finally got the email confirmation that I cancelled after the scheduled re-bill date but I am happy to say that I wasn't rebilled. Why wait so long to send the confirmation email and make me sweat it out?
Regardless, never doing business with this company again. Hey TBP, maybe you can start including in your reviews the ease/difficulties of cancellation with sites. If they visit and start seeing that your reviews warn customers about their practice, maybe they'll all make it easier. Never any problems with Ccbill or epoch companies though.
|
01-14-09 08:26am
|
Reply
99
|
Cream Pimps
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Hi Rick,
I just tried that site but no luck. I actually called the number on their website and the customer service rep told me that she cancelled my account and I should get a confirmation email, but that was seven hours ago and I still haven't gotten the confirmation email so I'm guessing that didn't happen. I'm going to call again tomorrow and record the conversation because this is just ridiculous. I've never had a problem like this in the 30 or so sites I've ever been a member to.
Obviously you all have to look into it and see what happens when you work with them, but I honestly believe this network has intentions to cheat people out of their money. Why else is it so difficult to try to cancel a membership? And why else does their cancellation page not work?
|
01-08-09 08:13pm
|
Reply
100
|
Cuckold Cream
(0)
|
Reply of
wankaddict40's Comment
You have to call the number on their so-called "help" page for any chance at making sure everything is OK. It's the same network I signed up for...definitely suspect.
|
01-15-09 12:07pm
|
