| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1326
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
hockeyman's Comment
I was offered what I thought was a good deal on the Evil Angel Premium Channel - having already done a test drive of VideoBox, I decided that it was worth it - I have no regrets at all. The DVD's posted on the Evil Angel channel have been quite good and the vid quality is quite high and Evil Angel is my favorite porn company these days, so... There you go
|
07-20-09 05:56pm
|
Reply
1327
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Hbe22bbm's Review
As others have said, this review is lacking anything that makes it a review
Definitely best bang for the buck - why? what makes it so good?
Great search engine - really? what about this search engine makes it so good?
Good video quality (premium) - good - not excellent? For a 98 score? Does it look good full-screen? Is it DVD quality?
Fleshing out the things that you do say, however minimal they are, would make your review more valuable to other people that read it.
|
05-22-09 06:16pm
|
Reply
1328
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yeah - it's lame. Now they've got the FAQ up and it still doesn't talk about what the pricing is or what it would be for someone who upgrades in the middle of their monthly membership.
And the owner is dismayed that members are negative about it all - what was he expecting?
|
03-27-09 10:11pm
|
Reply
1329
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
The VideoBox owner put a blog up yesterday that they haven't figured out their pricing on the premium upgrades yet and will put up an FAQ once they figure it out.
I thought that was rather ass-backwards of them - put up the upgrade with no roll-out, then, after their members get thoroughly inflamed, start figuring out what their pricing will be.
|
03-26-09 09:41pm
|
Reply
1330
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Skip's Reply
While I was filling out a feedback thing at VideoBox, asking them what the prices for the upgrades really are, since apparently you can't even tell if you're already a member of the site, the whole site went down for maintenance. So they might be making changes in reaction to this whole SNAFU.
|
03-23-09 10:26pm
|
Reply
1331
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Skip's Comment
That's really fucked - they might see their sky-high ratings around here start dropping if they keep up that crap.
|
03-23-09 10:09pm
|
Reply
1332
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I finally joined this site and they made me very happy I did when I downloaded the astounding Jake Malove POV Sharka Blue scene - one of the hottest scenes of all time, for my tastes - definitely in my top 50.
|
03-12-09 07:28pm
|
Reply
1333
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
For me it's all about the babes.
If it was hot babes, I'd download for sure - and the description doesn't even fit the vid, since I'm looking at the preview right now and all scenes start with the girl wearing clothes. There are scenes of Violet Blue, who is a must-download for me, so I'd download her scene for sure, and Cailey Taylor looks hot as well so I would definitely download her scene.
I guarantee you, this vid is 40000000% better than the vid the jokers at Videobox started things off with today - World's Oldest Gangbang - ha ha ha. I'm glad they're having a good time celebrating April Fools Day by posting that garbage. And if they made up for it with an extra posting today, then I would be sweet about it.
|
04-01-10 06:25pm
|
Reply
1334
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Agreed - this site is doing themselves a dis-service by this kind of false advertising.
If some material is "coming soon", advertise it as "coming soon" - as a prospective member, I would likely find that enticing.
Advertising material as currently posted is not a good thing - it's a bummer to join a site expecting to be able to download the material and find it to be not there.
And it's not necessary. This site has a ton of material - a ton of really good material - they would be wise to take a kick in the pants from this thread and be as honest as possible about what material is currently available and what material is "coming soon" if they even want to mention what is coming soon - to me, as I say, I would find it more enticing than a turn-off.
|
02-23-10 09:20pm
|
Reply
1335
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
xxrrtt's Reply
While a magic wizard is not likely to swoop down and solve your problem, in the age of the internet it is not at all difficult to find forums where tech-minded geeks (and I says this with complete affection) would be DELIGHTED to help you delve into your dilemma and offer myriad and sundry solutions until your problem is no more - or at least until you get sick and tired of trying different things.
Being someone that is not at all tech-minded, I have found such forums to be very helpful - just start googling and you'll find one that is discussing the products that you are using.
|
07-20-09 06:04pm
|
Reply
1336
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
xxrrtt's Review
I found that, even watching downloaded scenes on my computer, the quality that I got from VideoBox, having tried that for a month before trying Videosz for a month, was better - others have commented on having the opposite experience. Dunno why.
|
07-19-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
1337
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
It seems like this site is aiming to overtake VideoBox - that kind of competition is a great thing for porn fans. I'm still on a one-month join of this site and keep comparing the updates to this site as compared to the updates at VideoBox. This site wins the Update Challenge for my tastes every single day. They're making a run in quantity of DVD's too - they just announced that from May 25-May 29, they'll be uploading 6 DVD's a day.
They need to fine-tune the quality of the vids, in my opinion. They need to add some kind of voting or comment area. VideoBox will still have their clip feature - and I'm not recommending that this site copy-cat VideoBox to that extent, but they probably ought to think about what fun proprietary feature they could develop to take them out of the real of just another DVD site - or they could just concentrate on having the very best DVD's available and leave the other stuff alone.
They're doing a lot right.
|
05-23-09 10:13am
|
Reply
1338
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I did a month join a few days ago. I'm unimpressed. I thought that the vids downloaded at Videobox looked better - that ought to be the only reason needed for being unimpressed.
But I'll go on:
Download speeds aren't all that for me - I'm getting slower d/l speeds than I did at VideoBox, which I had tried for a month.
They don't have the "make your own clip" feature, which was rather fun to play with at VideoBox - especially if you had a great scene of Jenavieve Jolie walking away from the camera and you could find other ass clips of her - mmmmm!!
They don't have the reviews as VideoBox does, which are entertaining - sometimes annoying - sometimes helpful.
They don't have as large a selection as VideoBox, though with over 5,000 DVD's, there's no doubt that there is more than you can gather in a single month.
|
05-05-09 06:07pm
|
Reply
1339
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
Man, the classic stuff is the only reason I would even CONSIDER joining this relic of a site. Thanks for letting me know about the disappearing content.
|
09-24-17 10:27am
|
Reply
1340
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
They've got such a big name in the industry because of their stars - they've shelled out to have the hottest contract girls - and wasted the opportunity by churning out crap so they could have a constant stream of stuff out there for business people to rent in hotel rooms - at least that's my theory. It's amazing to think what people with talent could have done with their contract girls. Such a waste.
|
01-11-09 09:24pm
|
Reply
1341
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I'm a pic fan and this site will drive you bat-shit if you're a pic fan.
Why?
Well, the resolution on their pics has improved over the past few years, but get this - the pics on Vivid's site are smaller than the pics that you'll find that purport to be samples of the pics on Vivid's site - that's a flat-out rip-off, in my book.
The pics on the site are very poorly organized.
Think of what they could be doing - they've got their stars. They're doing promo photo-shoots. They're doing shoots at events.
They're doing "action" pics during filming. They're doing BTS shots.
They could be organizing things in various category by star by movie name and by event. But instead everything is a freaking mish-mash.
You can find galleries by star name that are a mish-mash of stuff, mainly action pics from filming, many of them very repetitive, poorly shot crap.
You can find galleries by movie name that are a mish-mash of stuff, mainly action pics from filming, many of them very repetitive, poorly shot crap.
I've joined for a month at a time a few times over the last few years. They wore me down with the frustration level. I seriously doubt that I'll be joining again ever.
|
01-05-09 05:50am
|
Reply
1342
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Would Vivid still exist if it weren't for the cable market? I rather doubt it. The director that was actually talented (Robbie D) went to work for Digital Playground and Vivid was left to try to cash in on the alt-porn thing - talk about Morbid - Ucccccchhhhh!!
Still the last time I had a one-month membership I thought that they had made some significant improvements to the site - larger, save-able pics and better-looking streaming vid than when I had a trial membership previously.
Still, Vivid's main skill has always been that no company has ever been better at wasting opportunities than Vivid has. They have had many of the hottest women ever to have done porn as their contract stars, including Chasey Lain, Racquel Darrian, Asia Carrera, Kobe Tai, Lanny Barbie, Jenteal, Sunny Leone and they have not done shit with them as compared to what would have been possible if they were contract stars for a company with some imagination.
|
02-06-08 11:29pm
|
Reply
1343
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
I was feeling some major lust for Lanny Barbie, saw that Vivd was advertising lots of photo galleries of this incredibly hot fuck bunnie. I'd been terribly disappointed at the quality of Vivid's pics before but the site was advertising high-res, so I hoped that they had increased the size of their pics and figures - what the hell, I'm only risking $10
Good news for me - the pics are quite a bit larger than the last time I was in this site - still not what I would call high-res, but compared to the last time I was a member they certainly are - and I can save them this time. So I'm happy, despite all of the limitations of this site as described by NY Giants and others.
At least they're going in the right direction!
|
09-22-07 04:05pm
|
Reply
1344
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
DigglerFL's Review
I totally agree - and at the time I was a member - a year or more ago - you weren't even able to save pics. That's a complete deal-killer to me - and the pics available through Freeones are better quality than the pics on Vivid's site. I don't get it! I truly don't get it!
|
06-06-07 11:11pm
|
Reply
1345
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I don't believe that she's gotten a boob job. She frequently has new stuff on Watch4Beauty and her body hasn't changed, and she frequently posts on twitter @MelenaMariaRya_ and her body hasn't changed. On June 7, Vixen tweeted a picture of her in a Vixen swimsuit and her body looks the same too. Looks like she might have done a solo vid for them. No indication of any boy/girl vid on her twitter feed.
|
06-10-19 07:41pm
|
Reply
1346
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
I see that Maria Ryabushkina, aka Maria Melena, is posting pics of herself in a Vixen bathing suit, not so subtly implying that she'll be a featured model on the site soon - her first non-webcam non-massage boy/girl perhaps?
|
05-09-19 09:23pm
|
Reply
1347
|
VSex
(0)
|
Reply of
drewdarko's Review
A few comments - no mention of price in this review. While you can watch and chat with the performers between privates - and some of them will dance or do sexy stuff - it's all about the private sessions where the customers get to use the remote-controlled fucking machine on the performers.
The cost for that ranges from $7.00/minute (most of the performers) to $10/minute (that's Amy Brooke's price) and I believe they require a minimum of 5 minute private shows so the performers aren't going to the trouble of getting on the fucking machine and having the customers come at the sight of a bare pussy and end the show after 2 minutes.
They also have a voyeur option where you can watch a private show, but have no control over the fucking machine, for $2.50-$3/minute depending on the performer.
My biggest gripe in checking out this site a number of times is the inaccuracy of "Online" being noted. I've seen "Online" being noted when a performer is saying on her twitter that she'll be there in a few hours. "I'll be there in 3 hours" and "Online" are not the same thing to me - but they are to this site. I've seen performers say "Good night" to everyone in the room and then seen them continue to be listed as "Online" long after that point.
This is a factor of them needing more performers and filling out the list with performers that will be there and performers that were there earlier. But that doesn't help customers know who is actually there now. Unless you're following multiple twitter accounts, it's difficult to get that information, the way they currently operate this site.
|
09-18-10 09:13am
|
Reply
1348
|
VSex
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
Here's what's fucked up about this site. You never know which performers are really there. I suspect that they inflate the "Online" numbers by having extra performers that left long ago as still "online" where you click on them and get that "This performer just finished a private show and will be right back" message. I was just cruising over there because the gorgeous Addison O'Reilly was listed as being online and I wanted to check her out, kept getting that message.
So I checked out Darcy something-or-other for a few minutes. She was chatting with the guys in the free chat, said her "goodnight"s and "have a good weekend" and "I'm taking off now". When she immediately signed off, the message was "This session has ended". As soon as I went to the home page and clicked again on her "online" button, the message was "This performer just finished a private show and will be right back".
Who is REALLY online on this site? I don't think there's really a way to tell unless you catch the babe there.
|
09-09-10 08:05pm
|
Reply
1349
|
VSex
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Models seem to know their schedules in advance? Which models are those?
SOME models might know their schedules in advance. Many are rather flighty and are always looking for the most fun thing they can do - so if a better offer comes up, off they go - like strip club dancers and other performers with a fair amount of flexibility to their profession.
That's why Naughty America has had such problems with their daily live shows - several times a week, they have to do last-minute phoning around for replacements, sometimes daily.
|
08-31-10 06:05pm
|
Reply
1350
|
VSex
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
I saw this mentioned on Chastity Lynne's twitter. I would love to play with her little pussy for a while, see what kind of sounds I could get out of her. I love that girl!
|
08-30-10 05:50pm
|
