Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Will P's Poll
Prefer laptop for searching, downloading, organizing; desktop for general watching; TV for special clips or high quality sources. Don't use my phone or tablet for ANYTHING porn-related.
|
07-29-20 12:18pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
From all porn users, no matter how extensive our interest, thank you for your well-thought out and sincere effort to craft a site where comments from informed people can help shape a higher quality and more responsive producer community. I'm personally not as active as many are, but I've always known I could go to The Best Porn for honest, balanced, and informative reviews on sites I was considering. I have similar hopes that your new site will represent another important reference point for navigating this often complex area of the web.
|
01-08-07 10:07pm
|
Reply
3
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Review
This is a very helpful and thorough review for anyone who doesn't understand the site is a gimmick.
I guess what I don't understand is knowing it is a fake cum site and then being off-put by the edit right before the massive "cum shot" happens. Guess I don't get why that should matter, unless one can somehow actually suspend disbelief in the first place.
Which I couldn't. Bottom line, the score is about right for what you get, regardless of how one arrives at it
|
06-14-21 05:10pm
|
Reply
4
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
As a fellow who has been a member for over three years continuously (and was a purchaser of their DVDs in the years before that; I joined because DVDs were no longer sold) I can safely assert that this review is well done and on the mark. I personally am pleased that FTV has moved away (at least to some degree) from the "extreme" insertion emphasis that took hold awhile back. I didn't find this content nearly as erotic or intimate or as interactive with the viewer as the flashing, teasing, posing, and explicit spread pussy and ass content that grew the company's fame in the first place. As far as I'm concerned, more girl and less plastic is always preferable. But I know that I'm in the minority in that view; most solo action at most sites is dildo-centric for a reason; it's simpler to script and it's what most guys want to see.
I also agree with the sentiment expressed in the review that dividing the video into clips can get wearisome; I wish there were an option to download everything joined together, but I suspect that would carry additional storage requirements and complexity. I suspect FTV is correct, however, that more people prefer choosing which scenes they want to download.
I see that FTV has added a new site FTV Milfs, which I think is a great idea. As a long-time member of FTV Girls I would have appreciated an opportunity to join the new site at a discounted rate...were any of the other FTV Girls members here afforded that opportunity? Just curious.
|
04-06-16 09:13am
|
Reply
5
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Review
Agree with rearadmiral that your review is quite representative of the content. Well done!
I've lamented only one thing in the FTVMilf site as well as the evolution of FTVGirls, and that's the considerable preoccupation with toys. I understand the masturbation angle is the draw, but I'm there for the women, not the various featured implements.
Greater interactivity with the viewer would be preferred, and that comes from explicit posing, something we saw more of in FTV's earlier days. That means fewer toys, more pussy spreads, more held open asses, more intimate views all around, not just as an occasional bone thrown to those of us who prefer seeing a model smile at us and show us what she's got.
Aside from that quibble, I find so much to like about both FTV sites and count me among those relieved that FTVX never materialized. Making that work--and its emphasis--might very well have undermined what made FTV so special to begin with.
|
06-14-21 01:06am
|
Reply
6
|
FTV MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Tremendous review (and follow-up comments) which comport almost exactly with my opinion of FTVMilfs and FTV's main site. Both are very high quality and well worth memberships if you are a fan of solo material. My one quibble with FTVMilfs vs. FTV is not the model selection, but the toy-centric presentations which are somewhat rote. FTVMilfs would have broader appeal, perhaps, were there more scenes featuring teasing and explicit spread posing than running the predictable gamut of toys. FTVGirls has stayed more true to the original concept, perhaps because of the "cutsie" factor of younger women vs. the "sophistication" of older women. But young or old, I like to see a lot of lingering held open pussy and ass posing, and that just doesn't happen very much at FTVMilfs. As times they succumb to the ease of just tossing a toy to the model and getting on with it. For me, posing is more interactive with the viewer than masturbation, and there's no reason you can't have more of the former given there's so much of the latter. But again, I recognize this is personal preference, and one can't argue with the overall (and deserved) popularity of the FTV sites.
|
07-29-20 11:57am
|
Reply
7
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Just an excellent review, and terrific explanation of the tiered pricing. I happen to think for quality content, their pricing isn't really that onerous. I'm glad I wouldn't have to cover those who want or need 4K content. 720p is good enough for me (but then, my TV isn't 60 inches!)
I was a bit confused by your comment that the site has gone away from gynecological content. Does this mean they don't show spread open pussy like they used to? Or that they don't use gynecological tools?
I'm one of those guys who loves to see models smile at the camera and hold themselves open in an explicit fashion, but I always disliked seeing speculums, medical devices or other weird tools (like ALScan often uses) so I would be pleased to hear ITC has stepped away from that circus-like kind of thing, but would be disappointed if they've swapped spread pussy posing for vibrator and dildo-centric masturbation.
I've always preferred to see the just the girl over the toy, but that's just me. There's plenty of masturbation-themed sites, but precious few which effectively harness the power of seductive teasing and highly explicit posing in the video format.
|
05-06-20 09:07pm
|
Reply
8
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
Thank you LKLK for your very fine review. I appreciate when reviewers comment not only on a site's offerings, but put them in the context of their own viewing habits. If they comport with our own (or differ) it helps the consumer decide whether or not that aspect of the site has might have similar applicability.
I particularly appreciated your description of your viewing habits and the need for greater resolution. Like you, the benefit of higher quality formats are way outweighed by the challenge of storing huge files. We elderly fans are probably more consumed by collecting than the younger generation, preferring to keep what we like rather than consume and toss aside. The latter is a more practical way to live, of course (and more sensible, given the immense amount of worthwhile porn out there) but I can't shake the need to preserve what successfully turns me on, so file size is important. And if you aren't blowing things up on a 65" screen, I fail to see the point of anything larger than 1080p, and in many cases well-produced 720p is fine for these eyes.
I might add, it appears that for at least a limited time, your suggestion to Ultra Films/Wow Girls for a combined membership has been taken. I received an email offering all four sites for $70 annually (recurring, no less!) This seems like a a stupendous deal, which should cause anyone who has been hemming and hawing about joining to take the plunge. I confess to enjoy leavening my porn consumption of young Eastern European hotties like those featured in this site by alternating with other sites which feature American gals and/or gals with a little maturity, but that can easily be done through other memberships when Wow Girls comes at this price. To be honest, my interest in the Wow Girls family largely comes from my exposure to some of their solo clips rather than the "glamcore." If you're a solo fan like I am who appreciates highly explicit views that aren't all toycentric--i.e. lots of leisurely spread pussy and spread ass views--Wow Girls has impressed me on that front in my limited experience. Hope the reality fits the impression.
|
11-23-20 08:11am
|
|
