| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks again - still I come back (the models are just great):
So just this: what kind of files are the download-videos in now? (wmv or only .mov)
|
01-14-10 10:37am
|
Reply
127
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hello justme
Thanks for this update...are you a member at the moment?
If so, are those videos for download ok/crisp in quality - even if it's quicktime -(is it quicktime, only?)
I liked the content/models - AND if the quality has improved for full screen viewing of downloaded videos, this site could be great....
|
01-14-10 08:27am
|
Reply
128
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from babespotting:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for your feedback.. All the new videos are encoded at 720x576.. I will look into why they look stretched as all our footage is PAL
|
01-14-10 02:03am
|
Reply
129
|
Carmen Cocks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dubya:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the info.
|
01-13-10 04:53am
|
Reply
130
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
To each their own, which means personal tastes differ, I think.
My own preferences are softcore over hardcore, pix over vids.
But I will look at hardcore, and at vids, hoping to find something I like.
It's just that there's more softcore that appeals to me than hardcore.
Also, I think it's easier to make good photos than to make good videos, for a lot of different reasons, and it's easier (takes less effort) to search through pix than to search through vids (less time-consuming, and less expensive). And vids take up much more room on the hard drive than pix.
The important factors of a site to me are quality and quantity and price. I don't require a huge amount of material if the material is highly appealing. But based on the short preview of the site, and your review, this site appears to have little material that is extremely appealing to me, so I will give it a pass (a do-not-join). Someone else might find the models or photos or videos extremely attractive, but there are other sites that I think offer more value for the price (I'm not saying the site has no value, just that it doesn't appear to offer high value to me.).
Or to quote you, in a simple summary of what I've said: "To each their own =)"
|
01-05-10 06:12pm
|
Reply
131
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
from lk2fireone:
Good review. Gives overall site description. I also like the preview area of the site, which gives a good intro to the site itself. I'm into softcore pix, but the site seems too small to be worth even a 1-month membership. But that's just my personal taste, based on your review and what I see from the site preview.
|
01-05-10 04:36pm
|
Reply
132
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
from Denner:
Good to have a review of this site (none at TBP so far).
Fine review, justme - btw.
I dig posing-material, but one question:
Though it's primarily a photosite, they got videos, too - judging from the preview it looks like those videos are foremost done of photoshoots.
Is that it?
|
01-05-10 06:14am
|
Reply
133
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Victorycreed:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Really, even it only cost 9.95 a month?
|
12-27-09 02:32am
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Jay G:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I'll agree with you now. I respect your point of view.
|
12-24-09 04:32am
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Jay G:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I respectfully disagree. A "sex crime" (could be consensual sex between a 19 year old and a 16 year old) has a stronger penalty (including branding as a "registered sex offender") than murder.
I see TV shows all the time where vigilante justice (usually murder by Dexter-like characters)against sex offenders after they're released from prison is semi-condoned by the media. When I was very young, gay people were treated as deviants who deserved cruelty (and death threats) by the religionist members of society. The media almost never treats murderers (even serial killers) as cruelly as it treats pathetic/sick "sex offenders."
If I were ever accused of a sex offense (like looking at legal porn in a state where the same porn is illegal), I'd kill myself rather than be branded a "sex offender." Mere murder is nothing to our society. We look at murderers as "strong" characters to be almost respected and who should be able to rape weaker "sex offenders" in prison with immunity. I've heard lots of folks laugh about the rape of sex offenders in prison by our acceptable criminals, the murderers.
|
12-23-09 06:44am
|
Reply
136
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from turboshaft:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Really, it's not? Maybe you don't live in America--land of the free, home of the prudish--considering the way we demonize sex and defend things that do end lives like guns and the death penalty.
|
12-21-09 01:06pm
|
Reply
137
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Jay G:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Agreed, but a lot of us out here LIKE sex, including sexual penetration. The message being sent by society is that sex between consenting adults is more evil than murder, even the cruelest kind of murder. We let young people see the most horrible tortures on the screen (and yes, I realize they're not REAL) for entertainment, but get upset if they see Janice Jackson's breast (MY GOD! Women have breasts!).
My point is that we have taboos about what we can see, but so does every culture including the Taliban and radical religionists of all stripes. Do you think women should be forbidden from wearing revealing clothing (in some countries revealing clothing includes pants) or be covered with blanket-burkhas whenever they leave home?
Taboos are cultural traditions that have roots in the deepest part of our history, but can also be used to oppress the powerless.
|
12-21-09 05:56am
|
Reply
138
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Now another person, alanralph, has come on as a member and has given us more info.
|
12-20-09 01:56pm
|
Reply
139
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Ah, yes. The tgp sites. I don't know why we even bother with TBP/PU.
|
12-20-09 11:09am
|
Reply
140
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Some site owners lie, but certainly not everyone. But I think you know that already.
|
12-20-09 01:38am
|
Reply
141
|
Fully Clothed Pissing
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Well that makes sense then. Thanks for clearing this up! : - )
|
12-19-09 10:01pm
|
Reply
142
|
I Know That Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
from Spencer:
Hi there,
We signed up to Brazzers today to check out what you were talking about. After joining (with two pre-checked boxes to undo as you mentioned), we weren't able to get into the member's area or the cancellation page for 10 minutes or so. However, I had seen a small note somewhere that it could take up to 15 minutes to get into their system, so I waited, and everything fixed itself.
We were able to cancel about 15 minutes after joining. The process was a bit long, with many pages trying to get you to stay, but nothing too tricky at least.
While you have to be careful for sure, everything seems to be okay at least on our end. Perhaps your delay in cancellation took longer than ours, who knows. But I'm glad to see it's not totally busted at least.
|
12-17-09 12:51pm
|
Reply
143
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the detailed info! It sounds like a real bummer, which is nothing new in the world of solo model sites. And I thought they really meant that access to the other "showcase" sites was included, because that's what they say! (Well, actually they say access to the other girlfriends.) Deceptive practice! (wags finger)
|
12-12-09 08:30pm
|
Reply
144
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
"The recent photos at 1000px, might be that's the only resolution they got from the photographer who sold them the sets. Who knows?"
Check out the photoset posted at SexyBabes.tv yesterday - posted in a larger size 2 days earlier by Twisty's
So the people that SexyBabes.tv had only 1 resolution available to them but they made a higher resolution set available to Twisty's?
I doubt it.
I think that the people that run these sites just don't care to spend the extra money to make sets available in multiple resolutions anymore. I don't think they care about much at all in regard to these sites anymore.
|
12-12-09 05:42pm
|
Reply
145
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the head-ups...
Well, I know DDF have had this 'more-sites-deal' going on since last summer - BUT, still:
With the different design it sure looks like a whole new ballgame - and oh, yes - even if it's not.
The reason I put this up was the new design-style and the new marketing - it really looks to this user as they've have noticed how progressvie 21Sextury is doing things now - and man, 'we have to follow'!!!
And oh, by the way: Agree: Too bad that the newer Eve Angel-official site is not included.
And, oh yes - the main cons at 1ByDay/DDF for the last year or so has been the vast reediting of older material - let's hope they will deal with that - or they could be in trouble - it's though competition out there..
Cheers!
and thanks again...
|
12-12-09 06:22am
|
Reply
146
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
from williamj:
The previews look boring
|
12-08-09 03:31am
|
Reply
147
|
I Know That Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
from duc0n:
It's the truth, you can't cancel the subcription. You always have this message "invalid username/password". The support doesn't reply. I had to make an opposition of my CC...
|
11-08-09 07:31am
|
Reply
148
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from dracken:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Ouch...6 scenes in a day sounds rather extreme. How do you know this?
|
10-30-09 04:11pm
|
Reply
149
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from asmith12:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for warning, I need to double-check my credit card bill (they didn't overcharge me for 1100, but a few bucks could have slipped without me noticing it). But if they DID charge for something which didn't happen, I really think it will be THEM who will be in trouble, not ME. My bank is usually pretty customer-friendly when disputing credit card charges (yes, they ask lots of questions, especially "Did you already try to contact the merchant?"), but after all they are doing their job pretty good.
|
10-26-09 01:57am
|
Reply
150
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Reg Berkeley:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
We can't make our encodes better than DVD quality. That's impossible. And our maximized encoding parameters are achieving lossless DVD quality, ie. it's identical to the original content. It's the best that can be done.
|
10-14-09 04:58am
|
