Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Ditto, Cap'n, ditto!!!
|
06-29-13 11:28am
|
Reply
27
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes, but it is far from cookie cutter porn. The use of the split screen is another thing that varies. I think it is used more now than it was a couple of years ago. It's effective at times, but sometimes imo it detracts from the action.
|
06-20-13 02:51pm
|
Reply
28
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks Capn, yes hardcore is a big part of this site, with the reaction of the girls having sex for the first time on camera quite a prominent part. There are some softcore pics, with stripping, some updates have no pics, some have softcore only, and some have hardcore.
|
06-20-13 02:20pm
|
Reply
29
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from messmer:
Just one more comment, I just went to the site and found that you had quoted their new tag line! I thought you were being sarcastic. I guess there goes our hope of the site ever going back to a more moderate format. This is their new niche and if they actually changed the description of what their site is all about then they must be successful enough with their new path to stick with it. I give up!! :-(
|
06-17-13 02:43pm
|
Reply
30
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Okay, let me re-phrase: I will wish them well again once they stop catering to the fringe and remember that they have customers whose taste does not go to the extreme. :-)
|
06-17-13 02:14pm
|
Reply
31
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from messmer:
There is a vociferous lobby group within the site who give exceedingly high marks to anything that is ultra-hairy, especially legs that cannot be told apart from those of a man. I think the site owners listened too much to this group because we normal hair lovers have been pushed aside in favor of the extreme. This is happening in "We Are Hairy" as well. Just take the tour and search under "hairy legs" ... utterly astounding how many sets you will find. I no longer wish either site well.
|
06-17-13 01:59pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Ditto, Cap'n. I haven't subscribed to a new site in months because I simply can't find one that would suit my taste. Most of my former regulars have become "ho-hum!"
|
06-17-13 10:24am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Cybertoad:
(Capn's Reply)
I am going to agree with Capn, Was quick and then just stalled sorta.
I love all the staff at TBP and PU but in all my years it has been rare to see anyone take a gamble in my opinion like I saw happen. Losing 200 Tuesdays meant little to many of us and was fun. But as I put in the forum I can see it has affected involvement and attendance.
I am going to say it and will probably get beat down for it. But If I go to a doctor they are good at what they do, they are smart and spent four years and then interned another four. Yet most could do not even know how to check the oil in their car, or balance a checkbook, and would not even know where to start to run a business.
Just my own opinion and I love you guys, but there is/was a slip that was not seen at the time and in my opinion should have been and was missed the fact this poll question is being asked says allot.
Everyone is supportive myself included, but the plan should have been in place before doing anything so it flowed naturally.
I do not think 200 Tuesdays affects the site being gone, I think leaving questions open is not good for any new comers. Especially since it is affecting the use of the site.
Like I said love all you guys, but concerned !
|
06-17-13 08:38am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from pat362:
(Capn's Reply)
I didn't mention it in my last post because I hope the trend is going to change but I'm finding that even my old faithful sites are making
less and less the kind of porn that I want to watch so even I may one day get to a point where I won't have any kind of porn that I want to see.
|
06-17-13 03:59am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
I agree that there seems to be a significant drop in activity. I hope that's only temporary.
|
06-16-13 05:30pm
|
Reply
36
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
My hope is that since this is a 'reputable' studio then the site might be okay. How's that for rationalization??? I usually find studio sites disappointing, with rare exceptions like Evil Angel and Elegant Angel.
|
05-26-13 10:18am
|
Reply
37
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes that's what I've been thinking. It's spreading like a disease. Not just cross selling but dirty tricks on the whole. Soon everyone will be doing it just to keep up with those who are. I am starting to hope all porn sites go broke and get what they deserve. Once that happens people will have to start actually warching all the stuff they've downloaded. Wont that be boring!?
|
05-23-13 12:29pm
|
Reply
38
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from zeomni:
(Capn's Reply)
Hi everyone,
There is now an offer at 29.90�, but this is still expensive.
Hope it helps someone.
ZeO
|
05-21-13 09:01am
|
Reply
39
|
1,000 Facials
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Roberto281:
(Capn's Reply)
Correctamundo Capn
|
05-18-13 11:15pm
|
Reply
40
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Tree Rodent:
(Capn's Reply)
Agreed about CCBill. Rates are getting very close to being regional discrimination, which we both hate. I mostly stay away from CCBIll nowadays for that reason. I go with Epoch whenever I can,
|
05-16-13 04:35pm
|
Reply
41
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from otoh:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks for the reply, Cap'n. I agree the regional pricing is a scam! But I am pragmatic and if I can get around it, I will do to join a site I am interested in. I would not have joined the site if I had to pay the full � price, though.
|
05-11-13 11:47pm
|
Reply
42
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from tangub:
Thanks for the warning Cap'n. I received that promo email too and was tempted to join again at that price but the billing company just looked too dubious. If it ain't CCBill or Epoch i'm not interested.
|
05-02-13 08:26am
|
Reply
43
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#40
from slutty:
(Capn's Reply)
I understood that from the beginning, my point was your comments to the initial reviewer and subsequent responses seemed a bit too forceful in my opinion.
My only point, as it has always been, is that location based pricing is common, particularly in the entertainment industry. I am not really trying to defend it. Do you also boycott amazon.uk since they charge more than the American version for many items, including downloaded items such as music and movies (this was, after all, one of the main reasons for regions on DVDs)? Retailers everywhere will charge as much as they can get away with, and if for whatever reason they think $30 to an American is equivalent to $40 to a European or whatever, that is their choice. It sucks I agree, but such is life.
If regional pricing had always existed, as it has with other areas of entertainment, would you still feel as ripped off as you do?
|
04-16-13 07:34pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
I think we are talking about different things, Cap'n. I was wondering why anyone would worry about the size of the picture if the whole can be seen by default on a monitor screen. I only zoom occasionally but will always take the highest resolution because it will look good longer as more and more pixels are "added" to the display.
|
04-16-13 03:26pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
I am always a bit puzzled when others make the same remark: that the good high-resolution pictures tend to be too big. Are there not options in your viewer to reduce the picture to screen size? Or am I misunderstanding you and others, Cap'n?
|
04-16-13 11:27am
|
Reply
46
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#32
from slutty:
(Capn's Reply)
Cap'n,
I know regional pricing is something that really sticks in your craw, but I think it is fair to let the reviewer point it out and draw the conclusions they wish from it, you sometimes sound a bit overly forceful in this regard to me. I agree regional pricing is unfair (and not to start another debate on this), but lots of things probably cost more depending on where you are (including DVDs, magazines, etc) and these increased costs are not due entirely to shipping and other costs, they are due to a perceived value of money in your country.
|
04-15-13 09:07pm
|
Reply
47
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from JamesDavid:
(Capn's Reply)
Call any bank. Any. single. bank.
Market flux happens daily. Why should I pay again if someone's dollar is failing on the world economy? The site, not the economy, is the bad guy here? Yes, this makes perfect sense.
Rates are set based on averages and these are adjusted throughout the week based on bank rates. Again, call any single bank.
How are you not aware of market fluctuations in banking/global economies? It's not like this is a new thing. We didn't invent something, it's been there all along and as a webmaster, we have a choice - get hit with the extra fees when a dollar dips, or a chargeback comes in, fraud comes etc (5-10 times daily) or, chose the average rate so we're protected. The only difference here is we tell you about it ahead of time. Most sites just work it into the cost on the merchant end.
Sorry it's upsetting to you.
|
04-13-13 02:14pm
|
Reply
48
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from JamesDavid:
(Capn's Reply)
No, actually that's not why. Thanks again for your positivity. :/
Bank rates fluctuate, they always have, they always will. Feel free to call your bank and ask them about market flux. :)
|
04-13-13 12:36pm
|
Reply
49
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from JamesDavid:
Weird getting a negative post from you Cap'n - you seemed to positive in the replies you left earlier in Marcus' thread. (sarcasm, you said nothing positive to be honest - you merely complained about something you disagreed with, even after it was explained in that thread and had previously been explained in other threads as to why. Maybe you were having a bad day, not sure - if yes - I hope it got better.)
So you don't get you way regarding zip sets, you come and try a smear campaign with misleading information? Do you not read things or are you in the practice of misquoting?
"Advertised price $16.62 = �10.79"
Actually the exact wording says "Membership prices from $17.83 per month!"
If you buy a one year membership ($213.95), divide that by 12, you get $17.829 - which when rounded up is $17.83. Exactly what the page says. :)
So while you don't need to say anymore, you might consider reading. :)
|
04-13-13 12:22pm
|
Reply
50
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from bibo:
(Capn's Reply)
Do you mena TBP pricing in general, or for this particular site?
I'm using TBP pricing quite a lot and it always works, although I'm from EU.
|
04-13-13 12:55am
|