| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
Throat Jobs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from 2 Free K:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Very good point! I meant 'Creampie Surprise'. I have since corrected the mistake. Thanks.
|
04-11-10 11:07pm
|
Reply
327
|
Throated
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jberryl69:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Sorry and thanks for the follow-up.
Content goes back to 2004 with about 10 sites included under the XXXpass suite of sites. There are about 1 new addition a day under all of them.
Throated gets updated every two weeks. Models include favorites like Jesse Jordon, Rebecca Blue, Angelina Valentine, Nika Nior (3xs), Maya Hills, McKenzie Miles to name a few. If you take the tour, you should be able to find all model names across the XXXPass suite of sites.
There are Pics for just about any shoot that are taken before and after the actual shoot and the new content (since this summer I think) is done in 1080P. Big ass files though.
The content is exclusive the models are not. Most of the Throated stuff was shot by a guy named Scott Handcock in POV style. When I first went there a couple years before I got a bit bored with him. But now he is using other models (like Chris Strokes) and buy some outside content to fill the space so you see different models.
The rating was given a 90 since it had improved dramatically since I first went there. I would have probably given it a 75 if it was the same as last time.
Besides, these scores are so subjective. As far as blowjob sites and nothing but blow jobs, Throated lives up to it's name. I've been to two other ones, Throatjobs and DeepthroatLove, both of which I liked a lot, but as of this writing, Throatjobs has not updated with any new content in quite awhile. DeepthroatLove looks like they are starting to recycle some old content and recently had a director that did nothing but talk over the scene giving directions in the most annoying manner. Now this really pissed me off cause he had great models like Kathy Heaven and Gracie Glam paired with two actors, one I know (Chris the Boner Strokes) who knows how to work the scene. Stupid waste of throat.
Hope this helps further.
|
11-29-10 01:57pm
|
Reply
328
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from endlessporn:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
I've checked my archive of the girls (founf it not as complete as I would like it to be), and indeed I didn't find new girls in my archive, so it looks that you're right and they are not rotating content, but are updating the site. Thanks for pointing it out, I will update my review accordingly and will probably try this site again some day (or maybe I should try AssTeenMouth instead, did you try it yourself?)
|
04-19-11 10:00am
|
Reply
329
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from endlessporn:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
I am glad that you like my review, thanks :).
About updates - I do not have good memory for faces, but I will check what they have now against my several-months old archive, and if there are no matches, I will change review accordingly (and probably will try the site again some time later). Thanks for heads-up BTW, I've had a strong feeling they're just rotating stuff, like too many other sites :(.
|
04-19-11 05:40am
|
Reply
330
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from endlessporn:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
On the point of 960x540 - yes, you're right, it is my mistake (looked at properties of the wrong file), I will correct it. As it is described on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video, Wikipedia defines HD as 1280x720 or better, so 960x540 is still SD, but it is certainly better than 640x480.
On the point of updates, I strongly suspect they're merely rotating content, and trust statement from https://www.thebestporn.com/review/tryteens/ , where TBP says "No updates in at least a couple of months".
|
04-19-11 02:12am
|
Reply
331
|
Urban Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from Capn:
Hmmmm, in view of the fact they supposedly specialise in videos; apparently there aren't any photos; that is not good!
It doesn't really sound as if it has anything going for it really.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-26-10 11:52am
|
Reply
332
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
VB2 is the VB that you're familiar with if you've had a VB membership in the past couple of years. VB3 is a new, updated interface. The porn is still the same, it's just that the look is different. I really can't give you an opinion on it because I used the older interface because that's what I'm used to. VB3 does seem to be as easy to use though, so if it becomes the only interface I won't have a problem with that. Two of the 'premium' channels - Kink and Reality Kings - are only available by using VB3.
My biggest complaint with VB3 is that it 'fixes' something that wasn't broken. I suspect that it was a change made by marketing, not the webmaster.
|
05-06-11 04:21pm
|
Reply
333
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from nostromo:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Thanks a bunch! I'm gonna join.
|
06-17-10 08:22am
|
Reply
334
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nostromo:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
BadMrFrosty,
The image i see when i try to join is a stack of DVD's with a Platinum X pictures DVD called Teen fuck holes # 7 and a big 8.000 DVD's title in the foreground? Is that the image you are referring to? Sorry for being such a drag.
|
06-17-10 07:59am
|
Reply
335
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nostromo:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Thanks a lot BadMrFrosty.
I can't see the image, it's not that i can't make it out, the problem is that all i see is a blank. i'm going to try with Mozilla.
But, you think that everything is in order, right?
Thanks again.
|
06-17-10 07:05am
|
Reply
336
|
VSex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from drewdarko:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Sorry, I figured one look at the site or it's trailer/video pretty much says it all. It's the only site I've ever seen that allows you to have virtual relations with a girl/pornstar "live" by controlling a sex machine over the internet. It's acually quite amazing. I just took Amy Brooke into a private last night and did her up the booty just by using my mouse and from the comfort of my living room. Check it out. This is definitely one of a kind entertainment!
|
09-23-10 04:43pm
|
Reply
337
|
Wendy 4
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from james4096:
It looks to me like she doesn't do nudes.
Just like that Denise Miliani or whatever, huge jugs but doesn't want to share them with the world.
|
10-19-10 12:09pm
|
Reply
338
|
WTF Hot Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Xororos:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Yeah, they do say that. To me, however, that doesn't translate into "some of these models are not naked at all." Anytime where I have to dig through a long statement of purpose and parse a sentence, I think it should be clearer and more direct.
The secretive nature of the site (making you sign up for a free account before you can see anything) just doesn't agree with me.
|
04-25-10 03:29pm
|
Reply
339
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Tree Rodent:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Yes I agree there Frosty, the massage porn one is not so bad, although that maybe because there is one setting and one couple.
Possibly I am just being too negative (as usual), but we all know these are professional models. Even when photographing amateur models, I prefer to see directors and cameramen who are professionals, shooting in a professional way. But I do take your point. It does make it look more amateurish, which may appeal to some.
|
03-08-12 10:01am
|
Reply
340
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from elephant:
wow thanks for the info, I joined the 35 dollar network not so long ago and noticed lots of the WTF watermarks and wondered what all this was about, this muct explain it, maybe they are rebranding or going to have the 2 networks for good under different names to earn more money.
|
03-04-12 03:38am
|
Reply
341
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Nice one Frosty. Thanks for the info.
|
02-29-12 06:38am
|
Reply
342
|
XXX Adult Centro
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Special Ed:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
Again...this site was trial and error. We had no idea that someone was going to download 500gig of content in a single month. At a cost of $.75 cents per gig, you do the math.
WE JUST CHANGED our download limitations on Monday Oct 13, 2010. We have not had the chance to change the front end of the free tour.
This site is not hosted by us so we have to go through a ticket system for everything. It takes time to make changes.
Nevertheless...this site has an absolute ton of content. All exclusive and once we make some changes we can have a re-review of the site.
Sincerely,
Ed Dooge
|
10-13-10 06:54am
|
Reply
343
|
XXX Gianna
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from ace of aces:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
a shame that the inside is so lame ^^...i want an exclusive gianna site! NOW !! :)
|
05-28-10 08:54am
|
Reply
344
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from bibo:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
ok, I concede.
I'll post this as a review. Maybe a mod can delete this comment then, so we don't have it twice.
|
05-28-12 10:01am
|
Reply
345
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from hugow:
(BadMrFrosty's Reply)
That's your opinion, and that's fine. We're not talking slow here, we're talking sllllooooowwww. And it was consistently slow across a two week period and two different browsers. I don't care how good the content is, and it's good, if it's not delivered it's not worth a thing.
|
01-04-11 01:32pm
|
