| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Nylon X Files
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, this is a long term gripe I have had.
See the Striptease thread & also here:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=1382
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-31-11 06:10am
|
Reply
302
|
Nylon X Files
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from Capn:
A very nice review,otoh.
It seems you have here a decent niche site starting on the slide.
A shame.
Oh, there really shouldn't be any doubt on the definition of nudity.
I even did a thread on it a while back onthe forum IIRC.
Nudity means no clothes. Simple.
Clothes pulled aside is flashing.
Partially clothed is partially clothed, regardless of whether naughty bits are on view. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-31-11 03:09am
|
Reply
303
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
That is what led to my situation.
'Oh I'll edit it later.'
Been doing that for about ten years.
Now I am actually tackling this mammoth task.
Been at it a few weeks now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-29-11 02:53am
|
Reply
304
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(otoh's Reply)
I wouldn't say that they're entirely going in that direction but it seems to me like they're "shading" more in that direction. I do wish they'd get back to more nylon related stuff though.
|
01-27-11 11:40am
|
Reply
305
|
Nylon X Files
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I'm certainly with you when it comes to stockings, otoh! :-)
|
01-27-11 09:32am
|
Reply
306
|
Nylon X Files
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from messmer:
This time our tastes really diverge, otoh. To this day I consider the invention of pantyhose to be one of the worst moments in erotic history!! :-)
|
01-26-11 01:32pm
|
Reply
307
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from mbaya:
(otoh's Reply)
That book cannot be for real. I thought I couldn't be grossed out by anything, but that really is too much.
|
01-26-11 01:19pm
|
Reply
308
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
Just a quick: no apologies necessary, otoh, ever! I enjoy trying new things and I also realise the fact that while our tastes may run parallel in certain respects, there also have to be differences. This was one of them. Keep recommending or condemning away, just keep telling it as you see it! That's what PU is all about. User's HONEST opinions about how they feel about a given site. It makes good reading, too. :-)
|
01-25-11 06:15pm
|
Reply
309
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
Isn't the quest nice? :-) And I just got finished checking Eva and Marlene's sleepwear (couldn't leave that one alone after your remark) and it is beautiful, as are the models. Trouble is the sets as well as the video (Eva's) still seem too soft and colorless to me. But as you said, it's a question of taste. I guess I am used to brighter lighting and color even though I hate the saturation of the true glamor sites.
Were you ever a subscriber to AllOver30? I got into an argument with the moderator because I kept complaining about their gray and washed out looking videos and she thought they were just fine and thought I was a bit of a s... disturber for whom one couldn't do anything right.
Somebody owes somebody an apology. Maybe we both owe each other an apology because we forgot that what's great for one is washed out for another. :-)
PPs style is definitely too "washed out" for me. I am used to brighter and crisper. But I am truly glad that the site gives you and thousands of others what you are looking for! Just one more curious question in parting, what did you think of the January 11th update of Anais?
|
01-24-11 06:48pm
|
Reply
310
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
LOL. I am glad you took things the right way, otoh. I was really upset that I had to write such a negative review, knowing how much you enjoyed the site, but on the other hand, when writing a review I had to be true to myself so I was in a bit of a quandary. And a special thanks for that last paragraph of yours. :-)
|
01-24-11 03:47pm
|
Reply
311
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I just read your reply under PP, otoh, and things definitely look good for a join! Thanks.
|
01-21-11 06:23pm
|
Reply
312
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review from otoh:
Messmer - I see your point about some of the daily free galleries - I think they are trying to play up the day-in-the-life/voyeuristic aspect of the site, which is also a part of it (albeit fairly untypical of my days).
Of about 55 models, each has approx 8 sets - on average, I'd say 2 are very lingerie focused, and another two feature it prominently, by way of getting dressed, waking up etc. And within that, a mix of coy teasing and strips, and more candid trying things on. A similar feel to the videos. (Alas for Cap'n, there aren't really many fully-clothed to stripped sets.)
One thing that stands out for me - although:
- I prefer girls at least mid 20s and there are some younger girls here
- I prefer at some pubic hair and there are quite a few shaved models
- I prefer a little curvy figures and there are some very slim girls
...there is a good mix, and so far as I look through each model's sets, I've found both pics and videos I've enjoyed from every one.
Oh, and the lingerie is all *really* nice. Right, now everyone knows this site really works for me, I'll stop harping on about it for now!
|
01-21-11 04:04pm
|
Reply
313
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
Hey, otoh, I actually like the site and am not disappointed one bit for having subscribed for a month. I have found quite a few videos and picture sets already that appeal to me, even though it took some searching, so I'm a happy camper. My beef expressed above was that anything that contained a pair of panties, no matter how utilitarian, was put under "lingerie." To me lingerie and underwear are different categories. One means perfume, bedrooms, romance and seduction, the other means being comfortable at work. :-) But that's me!
And yes, I am definitely keeping your other site in mind. I just took another tour of it last night and certainly like the models. I am just a bit confused about the free pictures because not a single one shows lingerie even though the photographer professes to be a lingerie fetishist and this makes me wonder about the general content. I know some is nude, and that's okay, as long as the majority of the shoots are done in "lingerie"! Well, we'll see.
PS. Thanks for the names!
|
01-21-11 11:43am
|
Reply
314
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Weird, but the novelty would soon be lost.
Actually, back when I read porn, pre-internet, I remember there was sometimes used as a device, a girl would be naked in some kind of basket that could spin, and she could be fucked from below. I think the origin of that device was supposed to be in Asia.
So the spinning basket seems like an earlier variation of this spinning table.
|
01-21-11 05:01am
|
Reply
315
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from RustyJ:
I sure hope they remember proper lubrication ;)
|
01-21-11 03:47am
|
Reply
316
|
Pantyhosed Fetish
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Xtiaan:
well, good to know you like the design, video and photography then :)
|
01-20-11 01:04am
|
Reply
317
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
Darn it, I've been on the fence about this site long enough. I'm gonna do it. Thanks, otoh and Cap'n (who encouraged me in another reply) for giving me a needed push. :-)
|
01-19-11 04:02pm
|
Reply
318
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from messmer:
As I've written in various comments, I am forever being tempted to subscribe to this site and invariably find a fly in the ointment that stops me from doing so. Thanks to your great and detailed review it is the "enhanced" business that's bothering me this time. In your estimation what percentage of the models would carry fake boobs around with them? Thanks, and a rough guess is all that's necessary when it comes to a site this large! :-)
|
01-19-11 12:49pm
|
Reply
319
|
Pantyhosed Fetish
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Xtiaan:
Hi,
I am the webmaster, some of the sets are nude, most are non nude. My take on the pantyhose and nylon fetish is that it is more about the foot, rather than the legs. Save 2 or 3 models, all of the models are exclusive to me. It is also much more of a video site. If you have any further questions, feel free to email me directly. The address is on the site. The style is POV, tops, soles and flexing and toe spreading.
~hope that helped!
~Christiaan
|
01-19-11 09:06am
|
Reply
320
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(otoh's Reply)
I'm an early "riser" too!!! :)
|
01-19-11 08:12am
|
Reply
321
|
Girls I Met At
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
I was intrigued & wandered cautiously around the free area, prodding here & there....
My first impression is that it is a sort of a more cerebral version of Youtube where you upload a video showing whatever your particularly kink is..
I think... :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-18-11 04:40pm
|
Reply
322
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from graymane:
(otoh's Reply)
Dreadful? A really clever and a fit application would better discribe it. "early riser".......GROOOAN! ingenious.
|
01-18-11 04:08pm
|
Reply
323
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks, otoh. Things look promising. I love scenes shot by lingerie fetishists, the rest of the photographers seem to have a fetish for little girls in striped cotton panties .. aarrgghh! Usually I ignore shower scenes because the models are basically nude from the beginning but sheer and clingy sounds good! :-) I'll be at this site the moment some of my other subscriptions lapse.
|
01-17-11 09:49am
|
Reply
324
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from messmer:
Nice review, otoh. The Cap'n is right this site sounds intriguing and I will put it under favorites. The lingerie part gets me every time and knowing the French there will be very few little girl's cotton panties! So, thanks to your review, this has become a site for serious consideration. :-)
|
01-16-11 10:12am
|
Reply
325
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Jayz:
By my count there are a total of 76 sets shot by the Roy Stuart currently on MetArt. The most recent was posted today, the earliest dated set by the legendary erotic artist was posted on January 1, 2004, and there are 17 undated sets from deep in the MetArt archives. If you’re interested in seeing a wide range of work from this internationally revered photographer, MetArt is the place to find it.
|
01-10-11 09:32am
|
