| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tboy:
(otoh's Reply)
Yeah actually both sites i've pondered in the past, £10 a month for PP looks pretty good and the lingerie tease looks pretty nice.
|
09-16-11 03:09am
|
Reply
202
|
GFF Members
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(otoh's Reply)
I've always felt that GF considered dialogue to be just as important as the sex scene and that's why it's not just a bunch of words that the performers recite to each other for a few minutes before they have sex. That's also why the acting is usually very good and helps the viewer get more interested in what's going to happen once they do star having sex. I've notice that the main theme for many of GF's movies is one woman initiating another women into lesbian sex.
I've never joined cinema erotique but I've parts of some of their movies on the streaming site hot movies. It might be worth taking a look at that site to see if you might like the movies. I think you get 15 free minutes when you sign up to hot movies but I'm not 100% sure. In any case hot movies has 41 cienam eriotique movies
|
09-10-11 06:11pm
|
Reply
203
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from bibo:
(otoh's Reply)
Otoh, I don't do reviews because I don't quite see the point of me giving a score. A clear list of facts and impressions is more important for interested users than a number that just reflects my personal and maybe temporary opinion. I think a review without a score is more reliable and credible.
As for abbywinters, I've been a member of AW some years ago and I must admit that I might not be up to date if the site has changed in the meantime.
AW did not offer 1080i videos, when I was a member, the highest resolution is/was 1280x1024. I prefer true HD videos, so that point goes to girlsoutwest.
The AW videos appeared to be a bit constrained to me, less playful than GOW. In addition, there were very few b/g scenes available.
|
09-05-11 02:31am
|
Reply
204
|
Action JAV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(otoh's Reply)
It's a good solid site - I should have read my post after I posted - I might have realized that I said "It's worth nothing" instead of "it's worth noting." I'm sure you'll find lots to like on this site.
|
09-04-11 08:49pm
|
Reply
205
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from tomjones:
(otoh's Reply)
I understand why you are making the "it's an industry standard" argument, although I don't believe re-billing should stand in the remaining places that it continues to be tolerated. I might be more flexible in my views and rate them more highly for their product if AW was willing to rectify omissions and misunderstandings they can easily verify after the fact. They (so far) exhibit zero regret and deny any scintilla of culpability while asserting thus: "...we can assure you that Abbywinters does not engage in or tolerate deceptive billing practices or unfair treatment of their members in any way, shape, or form."
Nonsense.
|
09-04-11 12:23pm
|
Reply
206
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tomjones:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, it is a standard practice with many second-rate sites who've failed to recognize its negative effects on their subscription rates and choose to boost profits with deception rather than effective promotion and customer service. I've subscribed to several more thoughtfully structured paysites that do not re-bill automatically. Most sensible pay-site webmasters have dropped automatic re-bill. If you read my review "pros" you'll see that I largely approve of AW's high-quality content, however its current billing scheme leaves me cold. AW could choose to bill users for services rendered, but has instead made a practice of denying responsibilities which I believe should be accepted by any merchant: payment in exchange for goods and services their patrons utilize, no more, no less. I would like to see such schemes disappear from an industry that needs to step out into the bright light of mainstream commerce.
|
09-04-11 09:54am
|
Reply
207
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, I have seen that, but as I know some softcore sites claim nudity when it isn't present, I thought it bore asking specific questions. ;0)
I am hoping for am - gnd rather than glam TBH.
Cap'n :0)
|
08-31-11 02:46pm
|
Reply
208
|
Pretty 4ever
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks otoh, signed up to W4B today so probably be 2 or 3 weeks getting a feel for the site and going through the content before i attempt the review.
|
08-31-11 02:04am
|
Reply
209
|
Nena Blue
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent, in-depth review - love their definition of a "trial" - hmmm! That's a new one on me! Seems pricey too.
|
08-28-11 11:57pm
|
Reply
210
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Drooler:
Ohhh! I was thinking about those videos in which the performers lose their balance and bang their heads and get pissed off and lose the mood.
(Sorry, and no offense, it's just my weird sense of humor.)
|
08-27-11 04:21pm
|
Reply
211
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BradlyH:
(otoh's Reply)
I was drawn to girls out west more the AW too, but those reviews did me in for AW. Now reading reviews on GOW I'm getting a bit skeptical. Apparently they go for a real natural touch, "Dirty underwear on some" and "some girls need to take a shower before the shoot, gross!" Is severely detouring me away !
I can't handle stuff like that. Not clean ass makes me sterile for days on end. I stumbled upon a set on my last site Little mutt with that and i was actually grossed out. Deleted the zip set of it and all.
If you try it first make sure to get a review up, Ill be interested in your findings, Messmer is wondering about it too. I want to know if it is actually only a 77. Would be good to get a trusted guy's rating for it.
|
08-22-11 07:29pm
|
Reply
212
|
Nena Blue
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from BradlyH:
I was waiting for you to do a review on this one ! In depth by the way, nicely done.
Disappointing to learn it has only 1280px, that's one of my biggest complaints for any site. I'm not blind or anything but i like big pics ! it's all in the details if you know what i mean... hah. That's why i Love petites-parisiennes, Jam throws the choices around for you. 1000 To 4000, a lot of sites i have been to would benefit so much from Jam's set up *cough* little mutt *cough*
I think Nena is going to have to stay on the bottom of my "to subscribe to list" No zips and that picture size along with the price and your score.... i just cant bring myself to subscribe.
Is it CC billed ?
|
08-22-11 07:18pm
|
Reply
213
|
Fried Rice Fuckers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(otoh's Reply)
Aside from the offensive name of the site. It doesn't fit with the site because the bulk of the content is solo so very little actual f..king to be found.
|
08-22-11 05:05am
|
Reply
214
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BradlyH:
(otoh's Reply)
Like we talked about Otoh, ill be defiantly going back to this site. ESPECIALLY since i lost all those folders! :( I have two more reviews to write out on the current sites I'm subscribed to then BT's bandwidth better pucker up because there will be some sever zipping.
|
08-20-11 02:52pm
|
Reply
215
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, I was rather hoping there was something more substantial, in the way of outfits, hidden beyond the preview area.
It sounds like, as I thought, there isn't. :0/
Thanks for the additional info though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-18-11 08:54am
|
Reply
216
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from Capn:
An interesting review.
Combining this with tangub's recent efforts, I get the impression that the main downfall of this site is more related to website / housekeeping rather than the quality of the material itself?
Would I be correct in that assumption?
Whilst I am here, looking at the preview area the outfits all look to be glamour wear.
Is this representative, or are there casual & formal outfits too?
Many thanks,
Cap'n. :0/
|
08-17-11 11:13pm
|
Reply
217
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from turboshaft:
(otoh's Reply)
"Sometimes Chrome for either - it's good, but I'm inherently suspicious of Google :|"
I'm suspicious too. :-)
They probably have an exhaustive record of every move I've ever made on the web, but I'd at least like to think they don't know everything about me!
|
08-13-11 06:58pm
|
Reply
218
|
Melina.com
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from tangub:
Nice find....one to bookmark and wait for it to grow i think.
|
08-12-11 01:38am
|
Reply
219
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from Denner:
Fine review of this old site....
Some really nice models here - but I agree with otoh:
"Possibly too slick"!
Well said.
|
08-11-11 02:47am
|
Reply
220
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from tangub:
An excellent well written review as always otoh capturing the mood of the site perfectly.
|
08-11-11 01:28am
|
Reply
221
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Monahan:
OK, I decided to take the plunge on the LSG Models site and will write a review when I've checked it out in detail. First impression is that it's somewhat similar to FTV with very fast download speeds.
If the update dating on the site is accurate, the last update was June 5, 2011. The next earlier update was April 17, 2011. A total of 7 updates in 2011.
|
08-06-11 08:37am
|
Reply
222
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
I checked out the three sites owned by this company by using the TBP links. Based on the dates shown for updates it looks like the sites became dormant early this year and are now trying to gather a few extra bucks before shutting down their servers.
The content looks quite good. I'm more into beautiful babes doing midcore* scenes so I may just sign up for the 3 month deal to give me plenty of time to check out the content in detail.
*I define "softcore" as the stuff you see on MetArt and "midcore" as content that includes insertions of toys and such like this one seems to do.
|
08-05-11 09:06am
|
Reply
223
|
Girl Folio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
I would be interested to know your findings, if you do.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-05-11 06:06am
|
Reply
224
|
Girl Folio
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
I tried Breathtakers & I'm afraid I wasn't that impressed.
I would be interested in the answer to your question too, though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-04-11 09:13am
|
Reply
225
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from anyonebutme:
It's just a temporarily reduced subscription price that was not previously offered. Normally LSG Models is higher price than LSB Videos.
|
08-02-11 11:01am
|
