| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Juliland
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from BradlyH:
Nice review as always Otoh, i think I'm going to put this one back on my list. Although i was a bit detoured by it before your views have changed my mind a little bit, It will be a nice change from the type i have been subscribing to lately. Although a woman fully covered in glitter kinda freaks me out :/
|
01-08-12 05:17pm
|
Reply
177
|
Juliland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
I remember being harangued at ATKNH for daring to suggest that 100 - 120 shots was quite sufficient for a comprehensive photoset! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-25-11 08:08am
|
Reply
178
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I just read your reply under PP, otoh, and things definitely look good for a join! Thanks.
|
01-21-11 06:23pm
|
Reply
179
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
Hey, otoh, I actually like the site and am not disappointed one bit for having subscribed for a month. I have found quite a few videos and picture sets already that appeal to me, even though it took some searching, so I'm a happy camper. My beef expressed above was that anything that contained a pair of panties, no matter how utilitarian, was put under "lingerie." To me lingerie and underwear are different categories. One means perfume, bedrooms, romance and seduction, the other means being comfortable at work. :-) But that's me!
And yes, I am definitely keeping your other site in mind. I just took another tour of it last night and certainly like the models. I am just a bit confused about the free pictures because not a single one shows lingerie even though the photographer professes to be a lingerie fetishist and this makes me wonder about the general content. I know some is nude, and that's okay, as long as the majority of the shoots are done in "lingerie"! Well, we'll see.
PS. Thanks for the names!
|
01-21-11 11:43am
|
Reply
180
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
Darn it, I've been on the fence about this site long enough. I'm gonna do it. Thanks, otoh and Cap'n (who encouraged me in another reply) for giving me a needed push. :-)
|
01-19-11 04:02pm
|
Reply
181
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from messmer:
As I've written in various comments, I am forever being tempted to subscribe to this site and invariably find a fly in the ointment that stops me from doing so. Thanks to your great and detailed review it is the "enhanced" business that's bothering me this time. In your estimation what percentage of the models would carry fake boobs around with them? Thanks, and a rough guess is all that's necessary when it comes to a site this large! :-)
|
01-19-11 12:49pm
|
Reply
182
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
I'll put my reply to that under AO30,it will be more relevant there.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-09-11 05:23am
|
Reply
183
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
from Capn:
A fair and comprehensive opinion there.
It is one that I have been meaning to revisit, but the memory of an excess of silicon & the widespread shaven look has meant I have left it a little longer than perhaps I should have.
Good to know they are still updating consistently.
Thanks for the review.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-08-11 05:56pm
|
Reply
184
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from graymane:
You're right on one count, otoh: I, an' a respectable number of other detractors of the poddy-mouth cuties who surprisinly draws a big audience, finds the whole thing of gloves-off, male-bashing sort of puzzling.
Be assured, thats not a dig, but simply my thoughts on on matter pertaining to your subject....assuming it peeks your interest.
If you don't already know, a thread I started months ago intitled: "Can you believe guys are paying for this stuff" has drawn over 3000 hits and a large number of responses.
|
02-21-11 05:21pm
|
Reply
185
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I can see what you are getting at, otoh! I can also see why tights would appeal to many because they indeed both hide and reveal what's underneath. I think my problem is that I like the contrast of white thigh and stocking top, and tights take that away from me! :-)
|
02-08-12 06:17pm
|
Reply
186
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(otoh's Reply)
I carry a huge grudge when it comes to pantyhose (tights), otoh. I rejoiced when the mini skirts came out: `wow, now it will be even easier to see the tops of the stockings and those lovely thighs above them, bisected by the straps of the garter belt (drool) .... and then some idiot decides to invent pantyhose in order to make the mini skirts look more modest and to make sure that nothing WOULD ever show.
It`s understandable, of course, after all who wants to go around with the tops of their nylons showing, but that man or woman who invented those abominations destroyed a dream. No, I will never forgive! :-)
|
02-07-12 12:19pm
|
Reply
187
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ergo Proxy:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks for this nice comment.
|
02-26-11 12:37am
|
Reply
188
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(otoh's Reply)
Yes, I am afraid 'Art Lingerie' doesn't work for me either.
They usually start partially clothed, from what I can gather.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-13-12 12:49am
|
Reply
189
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Capn:
To my knowledge all the 'Only' sites are to all intents & purposes 'non-nude', which is a great shame as they otherwise have some really nice material.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-12-12 04:01pm
|
Reply
190
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from tangub:
A shame there's no mention of it being part of the Only All Sites package. I've been very close to signing up to the OT network recently but can't decide if the Only All Sites deal is worth the extra expense than just signing up for Only Tease...the network just seems like more of the same that Only Tease already gives you.
|
05-12-12 12:35am
|
Reply
191
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from Monahan:
OK, I decided to take the plunge on the LSG Models site and will write a review when I've checked it out in detail. First impression is that it's somewhat similar to FTV with very fast download speeds.
If the update dating on the site is accurate, the last update was June 5, 2011. The next earlier update was April 17, 2011. A total of 7 updates in 2011.
|
08-06-11 08:37am
|
Reply
192
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(otoh's Reply)
I checked out the three sites owned by this company by using the TBP links. Based on the dates shown for updates it looks like the sites became dormant early this year and are now trying to gather a few extra bucks before shutting down their servers.
The content looks quite good. I'm more into beautiful babes doing midcore* scenes so I may just sign up for the 3 month deal to give me plenty of time to check out the content in detail.
*I define "softcore" as the stuff you see on MetArt and "midcore" as content that includes insertions of toys and such like this one seems to do.
|
08-05-11 09:06am
|
Reply
193
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from anyonebutme:
It's just a temporarily reduced subscription price that was not previously offered. Normally LSG Models is higher price than LSB Videos.
|
08-02-11 11:01am
|
Reply
194
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from tangub:
The videos were certainly included on LSG Models when i was there last year with the videos only site being a cheaper option if you didn't want the photos. Looks like they're focusing more on photo updates now as only 7 new videos this year according to the tour, last year the updates would alternate between a photo set and a video. Have to admit i didn't like this site as much as Breath Takers or Petites Parisiennes and found the quality a bit amateurish.
|
08-02-11 08:25am
|
Reply
195
|
Manhandled.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from gaypornolover:
(otoh's Reply)
Thanks both - so is DHD Media an independent biller then? I just assumed it was their own as it sounds like a studio...
|
09-14-12 01:38pm
|
Reply
196
|
Marie McCray
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(otoh's Reply)
Tori and Alexis are hot. I gotta look at this more.
Thanks for the help.
|
08-20-12 09:59am
|
Reply
197
|
Massage Parlor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Gasperdian:
(otoh's Reply)
Soapy Massage finished with it's last set of videos in April 2012. Since then only the other sites like Massage Parlor, Nuru Massage, & the more recent All Girl Massage. The reasons touted were that Soapy Massage was over 200+ episodes old (not too convincing a reason!). Soapy Massage was to be replaced with a site Morning Wood by the old Management [Atomic Business Solutions] but it never took off. The site is now suffering & the new management is satisfactory but nowhere nearly as convincing for the content part of it. Don't worry, you can still enjoy the old episodes of Soapy Massage as the videos would be available in HD
|
09-23-12 04:41am
|
Reply
198
|
Melina.com
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
from tangub:
Nice find....one to bookmark and wait for it to grow i think.
|
08-12-11 01:38am
|
Reply
199
|
Men At Play
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from gaypornolover:
(otoh's Reply)
Hey otoh just saw your reply! Thanks - I'll bear it in mind if I ever do go "back to Mac" - I haven't ruled out the possibility.
I was just using the standard Quicktime player, but where sites wanted me to use Windows Media Player seemed to be the problem - before there was a Mac version but ever since I had to use Flip4Mac some files wouldn't play.
It was mainly DRM stuff which I do avoid now anyway but it did put me off. Porn is important to me as I am sure it is for everyone on this site!
|
09-24-11 12:17pm
|
Reply
200
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(otoh's Reply)
Yeah you would be finding it impossible to get through metart alone in a month if you'd never been a member before, would be good I guess for someone with lots of spare time to download to their hearts content.
|
05-15-12 05:22am
|
