Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Fort Lauderdale Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah any site that does this is doing it for a reason, I stay away from all non previews, not worth the disappointment.
|
12-27-17 02:09am
|
Reply
77
|
Fort Lauderdale Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from mbaya:
This looks like a site that is presently an archive,but pre HD. For those reasons alone, I would not waste any time checking it out.
|
12-26-17 04:10pm
|
Reply
78
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from tangub:
(skippy's Reply)
Thanks for the info skippy, that's a big help.
|
12-20-17 05:24am
|
Reply
79
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from inthecrack:
Something is a bit off about this comment. The user was obviously experiencing an unexpected anomaly or else his account was hacked. The 3D videos average around 1.2 GB per file in the highest resolution, not 10 GB. The download limit will allow for about 25 of these videos per day.
As for the download limits, are they really that restrictive? The 4K plan allows for 2 full length 4K videos per hour which is faster than you can view them, and 7 full length 4K videos per day, and 70 full length 4K videos per month. If you exceed these limits you have bionic stamina. If you go for 1080 versions then these numbers go up immensely. We believe these limits are really quite generous.
The download limits are in place to defeat abusers from ripping the entire site and sharing it and to keep the site running for legitimate customers rather than choking under the load of abusers. Yes the price of the unlimited plan is crazy, and deliberately so. It's just there for abusers and to appease those who have a mental block about download limits. We see plenty of people buying the unlimited plan but almost none of them reach the limits they would have been subject to had they paid $30 less.
-ITC webmaster.
|
12-18-17 04:35pm
|
Reply
80
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from nineinch:
Agreed!
I didn't want to use a normal credit card to pay, so I was excited to see that they accept gift cards. Unfortunately, after signing on with my non-refundable gift card, I see that I have to use a real credit card to download files. So much for supporting gift cards! Especially, after that sleazy experience, I'll be damned if I'm going to give them real credit card info.
|
12-14-17 10:41am
|
Reply
81
|
Hegre
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from sonofzog:
(skippy's Reply)
So my take is completely different. As much as I appreciate full body shots, I prefer them in some sort of context (preferably a bed) for the fantasy aspect. Taking the model out of the framework of a room (not a big fan of outdoor shoots, especially not beaches) spoils the mood for me. I've had to adjust a few of Natasha's photos, true, because her experiments don't always work and I really do want to see the model but I find her images far more erotic than Herge's. Then again, I'm not a great fan of Stefan Grosjean, whose models are stunning but invariably surrounded by gilt and gaudy sets. It's a balancing act.
|
12-14-17 08:55am
|
Reply
82
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from rearadmiral:
(skippy's Reply)
I have to say that I am really surprised at the longevity of DVDs. Here at PU and on some other forums it seems that DVDs are still the 'go to' format for a lot of people. I don't get that. If my porn collection was on DVDs it would take up a warehouse. That's only a mild exaggeration. As it is, it's on 24 external drives and they fit in a briefcase.
|
12-13-17 01:49pm
|
Reply
83
|
Hegre
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from sonofzog:
(skippy's Reply)
She's Elin at MetArt and Aya Beshen at Hegre. I have to say, I'm disappointed with his shoots compared with Natasha Schon's (MetArt). She's pretty controversial there; people either love her more artful, less graphic photosets (that would be me) or they hate them because there are never any spread legs and Schon experiments with lighting quite a bit. I found Hegre's photos of Aya to be really pedestrian and unimaginative, although there is plenty of good stuff among the other models. And, yes, the models are insanely beautiful.
|
12-13-17 08:44am
|
Reply
84
|
Hegre
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Amanda:
(skippy's Reply)
;)
|
12-13-17 05:19am
|
Reply
85
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from sonofzog:
The PU price is said to be $19.95 recurring but CCBill reports that it goes up to $29.95 after the first month.
|
12-12-17 05:24pm
|
Reply
86
|
Hegre
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from sonofzog:
(skippy's Reply)
Thanks for writing the review, skippy, very helpful. By a coincidence I fell onto hegre while searching for a particular model I "discovered" on MetArt. Hegre has a huge number of galleries for her and I'm curious how his vision differs from the MetArt photographer. Your review was extremely encouraging.
|
12-12-17 05:14pm
|
Reply
87
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Onyx:
(skippy's Reply)
I assume by editing you mean you wish to cut out portions of the video leaving the original encoding intact.
What you want to do after installing aviDemux is:
1) Drag your video onto the program to load it.
2) Ensure video/audio dropdowns on the left are set to "Copy"
3) Ensure Output Format dropdown is set to MP4v2 Muxer
Now you want to position your cuts on I-Frames. The frame type of the current frame is displayed at the bottom. The up/down keys also automatically jump to I-frames. Just click the red A button to mark the start of the cut. Move to the end point of the cut and click the B button. You should now see the area marked. Press Ctl+X to cut out that section of video. Repeat this process until you are done making cuts.
Then just click save.
|
12-12-17 04:19pm
|
Reply
88
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Onyx:
(skippy's Reply)
I think you mean you reverted to 264. 265 is HEVC and very much like VP9.
I dismissed Whirligig early on because it takes a bit of time to learn to set it up correctly. I found DEO VR the simplest to get working right away. That said, Whirligig is the most advanced and best player I've come across. It's worth the learning curve for many scenarios.
What you should use to edit your videos is aviDemux http://avidemux.sourceforge.net/
It's very simple and fast.
|
12-12-17 04:01pm
|
Reply
89
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(skippy's Reply)
Thanks for the comments and advice. i probably won't be taking the plunge in the next 12 months but I am confident that VR will have eventually be mainstream in porn and because of that I'll take the plunge sometime.
I hear you on the issue of porn driving so much technology. Hmmm... what on earth could the 4-head VCR be good for...?
|
12-12-17 03:41pm
|
Reply
90
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for posting this review. For a long time I always tried to be on the cutting edge of technology and a lot of that was driven by porn. I had the first VCR of all of my friends (back when they were top-loading and weighed 50 lbs.), I was a early adopter into DVDs. I skipped Blueray simply because online porn and external storage was becoming better and cheaper. But... I can't bring myself to take the plunge on VR yet and it isn't that I don't think it would be any good, but my worry is that it isn't plug-and-play and I'd never be able to figure out how to use it.
Someday though...
|
12-12-17 01:24pm
|
Reply
91
|
Virtual Real Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from Onyx:
Thanks for the review. I think you may be confused about the VP9 format though. There's nothing proprietary about it. It's an open royalty free format developed by Google. Not sure what settings they used, but VP9 is similar to x.265 in that it should produce better results even at smaller file sizes, not worse.
If for some reason you have trouble playing VP9 in your normal player I'd suggest ensuring you have the LAV filters installed https://github.com/Nevcairiel/LAVFilters/releases The LAV video configuration will allow you to use hardware acceleration for playback if your card supports it. I'd also recommend having your player play via Direct Show.
|
12-12-17 12:21pm
|
Reply
92
|
Hegre
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Amanda:
(skippy's Reply)
Hi skippy. Thanks for the reply. In our experience, it's quite rare for a site to rebrand after being so well-established, but I see where you're coming from. We deal with Hegre quite regularly and even we did not know that a rebranding was in the works. I can tell you that if we see a poor scoring site closing at one point only to reopen a while later with the same poor experience, we take this into account and it becomes a discussion as to whether to list it at all. We want our users to trust our reviews and know that we're working very hard to make sure they get the best paysite experience possible.
To touch on another point, the TBP infrastructure has not been updated in about 10 years, so this is also a question of making big changes to the architecture. Since taking over TBP in 2015, we've compiled a laundry list of back-end changes that we want to implement and will hopefully be able to tackle in 2018. This kind of change is most certainly on that list.
All that said, I am going to speak to our Lead Programmer to see if it's possible to make an exception for Hegre and somehow get them linked, as it is a popular site and a very good one. Stay tuned!
|
12-12-17 10:26am
|
Reply
93
|
Hegre
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi Skippy. When a site changes its name (In this case Hegre-Art to Hegre.com), it's our policy to close the older listing and post one for the new sitename. We know it's not new. There's just no way for us to post a new listing without our system seeing it as new. Does that make sense? I hope so. We'll get a new TBP review up for Hegre ASAP.
|
12-12-17 07:13am
|
Reply
94
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Onyx:
That is weird, as is their fondness of displaying prices in terms of cents per day instead of the monthly/yearly total cost. Still, this is a site I'm interested in trying out at some point. Some of the 3840p trailers I saw recently from here looked to match or honestly maybe surpass CzechVR in terms of visual clarity. I was quite impressed.
|
12-04-17 08:23pm
|
Reply
95
|
VR Hush
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Onyx:
Great. I'd be interested to know what you think. I understand they do 360 videos instead of 180. Not sure it's a great idea to spread the resolution out across such a large FOV, but I've not seen too many 360 videos to say.
|
11-29-17 07:15am
|
Reply
96
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from elephant:
I am often surprised how this site survives being one of the most expensive around, I guess it must have a loyal fanbase with deep pockets.
|
11-11-17 03:07am
|
Reply
97
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from tangub:
I would really like to join this size but it is a gamble trying to decide which membership option to choose. I'm not that interested in videos but if I joined I would most likely want to download every photo set in zips at the highest resolution and really don't have any idea if the 300 GB or 500 GB membership option would allow me to do that. If there is anyone out there who has downloaded every photo set and can tell me the total file size of all the sets it would be much appreciated.
|
11-09-17 06:43am
|
Reply
98
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi skippy. Thanks for the comments. Our TBP is pretty outdated, so I'm reaching out to get a new login so we can refresh it.
|
11-09-17 05:16am
|
Reply
99
|
Fever Models
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Amanda:
Thanks for the notice, skippy! We'll contact the site to see if it's temporary.
|
11-01-17 05:20am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(skippy's Reply)
I can't speak for your specific case but regularly interacting with a specific cam model or a stripper is going down a slippery road that can and may lead to infidelity if not physical than certainly mental.
I have worked with women my entire life and for the vast majority of that time I have being both friendly and on some occasions a little flirtatious but these woman were my coworkers and not a means to sexual gratification. I don't think you can say the same about cam models and in many ways about strippers because the relationship is one where you are sexually stimulated by the interaction and will in all likelihood lead to you masturbating to these women. I don't think you do that with the women at your gym, at the pool or at work.
That said this is your life so whatever opinion I offered should be taken with a box of salt because I don't know you and therefore I can only offer my point of view.
|
10-08-17 11:15am
|