Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
On the contrary. I appreciate when someone points these errors in my review. This way I can correct them before others read it and think I'm an idiot.
IR stands for inrerracial so any performer that is dark skinned can fall under that category. I say can because these performers don't have to be African American to be classified as an IR performer.
|
08-26-11 09:59am
|
Reply
227
|
Redhead In Heat
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I've corrected my oversight about that mid-sentence.
|
08-26-11 05:59am
|
Reply
228
|
Mistress Kent
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mistresskent:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Hi Gaypornlover,
Thanks for your thoughtful reply, my site is pretty small but it is growing, only not as rapid as it was, updates have shifted to 1 day a week, I'm not making enough from the site to warrant uploading so many updates when I do all the work myself.
My site still is and always will be a labour of love, the lack of finance will never stop that x
Hope you enjoy the site as much as I do xx x
|
08-26-11 01:58am
|
Reply
229
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for your kind words about the review, appreciate it.
|
08-21-11 01:59am
|
Reply
230
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks and a quick correction: They update during weekends too. Must have been half asleep when writing...
|
08-21-11 01:32am
|
Reply
231
|
CMNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
When i was a member of First Auditions these videos were included, and I don't think it was a separate site then. Do you get anything else with membership to CMNM?
|
08-18-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
232
|
First Auditions
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
Sounds like an interesting twist to First Auditions. I was a member about a year ago and downloaded most of their stuff, which, although the concept was hot, I did find a bit monotonous. This sounds like a good idea and I await your review eagerly...
|
08-18-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
233
|
Christina Skye XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
It's possible that she wanted to do porn to earn a living but may have discovered that it's easier said than done these days. I'm sure that some girls are still making a decent living doing porn but the majority of porn girls aren't making enough to live on. Just look at the number of porn performers turning to prostitution. It's so high that it's less time consumming to write a list of which porn girl isn't escorting than the other way around.
|
08-18-11 06:09pm
|
Reply
234
|
Reluctant Young Men
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from manholelover:
Another great review. I really hate those sites where you have to keep logging in. Particularly those where you can't change the password and it's some strange number/letter concoction. And it does seem pricey.
|
08-18-11 12:39am
|
Reply
235
|
Parody Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I wasn't for sure I wanted Golden Girls to be too believable! I remember really liking the show, but don't remember too much arousal factor. The one I noticed most was That 70s Show since I always thought Mila Kunis was really sexy and it looks like they pulled it off pretty well. Really, I'm surprised more sites don't try the celebrity look-a-like sets more often.
|
08-08-11 04:20pm
|
Reply
236
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks! Let's just say I spent a lot of time there over the past couple of weeks. It's a huge site.
|
08-07-11 04:25pm
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from slutty:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
gaypornlover summed up my thoughts exactly.
|
08-07-11 12:03am
|
Reply
238
|
Homo Punk
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from manholelover:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I suppose the regional pricing thing is down to personal opinion. I'm not too sure. With price in Sterling at least you know how much you're paying, but then again, if it stays in dollars, say, we could benefit from the exchange rate if it's favourable (as it is at the moment I believe).
|
08-06-11 02:18pm
|
Reply
239
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from manholelover:
I can't imagine members actually asking them to stop doing videos. They probably can't afford the costs involved. As it's from the same company that makes StraightHell.com, and their weird insistence that the site remain banned in the UK to maintain the anonymity of the performers (still waiting for my reply from their editor), it does all seem a bit fishy. And yes, given that loads of their photos are seen on blogs such as Gay Demon and Queerclick.com, I doubt if it would be worth paying the subscription.
|
08-06-11 11:51am
|
Reply
240
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
If you don't do it now, I'd highly recommend going to the parent website of this one before joining any site. The Best Porn has a ton of good information so even if the site you wanted to join was hiding the fact that it was streaming only the staff at TBP would let you know that. Same with things like download limits and DRM. The reviews at PU usually don't go into the technical detail that they do at TBP. TBP and PU are the only source I use and trust on internet porn.
As for the gay site reviews, there are certainly several gay guys posting here now so maybe it will reach a critcal mass and really take off. Here's hoping. It will make this site more thorough.
|
08-01-11 05:13pm
|
Reply
241
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I'd guess that your thoughts about why the gay site is more tame is correct. People tend to be a bit more homophobic about male homosexuality so the people at Kink need to be more discrete.
Thanks for the comments on my review. There seem to be several big fans of Kink on this site.
|
08-01-11 05:08pm
|
Reply
242
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from rearadmiral:
It surprises me that there are sites that offer streaming only. I might be wrong, but I'd guess that most people want to have something to show for the money they spend. But maybe with the rise in things like iPhones, iPads, iPods, Playbooks, etc there is a market for people who only want to stream.
And not to sound patronizing or anything because I'm not meaning it that way, but it's good to see gay porn getting some attention from members. PU seems to have a pretty diverse membership but the gay community was definitely keeping a low profile for a long time.
|
08-01-11 01:22pm
|
Reply
243
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from manholelover:
Thanks for another great review! I've seen a couple of clips from these events downloaded onto Xtube, which seemed hot. Judging from the preview, this has a homemade feel, which is refreshing after all the glossy, gift wrapped sites we seem to see...
|
08-01-11 09:39am
|
Reply
244
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
FWIW, it's not at all unusual for us to see a quick succession of reviews on Mon and Tues in prep for the week's raffle drawing.
|
08-01-11 09:22am
|
Reply
245
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
No, gaypornlover - forget it (put on hold)......just take it in consideration in the future, please (had my review up in less than 30 minuttes.....it's easy: Look at the review line - here you get both date and time....it's just some thing about consideration for other reviews - but we've been through that
No problemas!!!
|
08-01-11 09:01am
|
Reply
246
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review from gaypornolover:
Really am sorry I was stupid not to check first still getting used to the site. I've e-mailed them and asked them to remove my review for a while.
|
08-01-11 09:00am
|
Reply
247
|
MaleJunction Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Denner:
BTW: Remember the words here at PU about letting new reviews stay up front for "just a little while"....before entering your own....?
|
08-01-11 08:51am
|
Reply
248
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from tangub:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks for the feedback gpl, appreciate your reply. Luckily they recently increased the charecter limit for the bottom line otherwise i would probably have been sat here for a couple of hours trying to edit the review and decide which bits to leave out. At one point i did start to wonder if i'm rambling on a bit too much lol.
|
07-29-11 02:06pm
|
Reply
249
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
"Awful customer service"... sadly that seems to be a very common thread among porn sites...
|
07-28-11 03:21am
|
Reply
250
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I know some people prefer photos over videos, but I highly doubt that there were any 'user requests' to stop shooting videos. That's pretty fishy...
|
07-26-11 04:09pm
|