The problem is that their software team has problems updating the site software.
That's why any problems at the site that are software related can't be fixed, usually.
For example, all users are now newbies. The site software no longer recognizes how many reviews a user has written, to change their status from newbie to "whatever the term was for a higher level".
And for years, it now takes 1 year before you can do a re-review of a site, even though the rules say a site can be re-reviewed after 6 months.
I think the site software was written in a computer language that the current software team does not understand, so making changes to the software is difficult.
Excellent review.
Covers an excellent site very nicely.
I always liked MPL Studios a lot, but haven't joined them for a long time, because there are too many other sites taking my time and money.
But I agree the MPL Studio models are almost uniformly gorgeous, and beautifully photographed.
Also agree that Metart is not as exciting as it used to be. But it still is the biggest softcore photosite on the internet, with a huge backlog of very attractive models.
But I agree that some Metart photographers like to twist their models into pretzels, so you can examine their pussies and anus more closely. Which doesn't appeal to me.
LOL.
I can't believe this is your first review. You've been a member since the dinosaurs were roaming.
I agree that the quality of the photos improved a lot starting many years ago.
Before then, the photo quality was nowhere near as good as it's been for years now.
But to a degree, I don't care if the photo quality is up to MetArt standards. If the girl is really cute, or I really like her, I'm willing the collect her photosets.
I do have some favorite models at MetArt.
But there are some adorable or lovely models at the Wow sites, that I really like the videos and/or photosets.
I also agree that Freya Mayer can be stunning.
But there are other models at MetArt or Wow sites that I enjoy even more.
Jerricka, Rinna Ly, and Avril A are some of my favorites at MetArt.
To name just a few.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I've bookmarked hundreds of models at Indexxx.com, because these girls can be cute, adorable, stunning, and even lovely or beautiful.
Agree.
If you've never been a member of the site, it's worth a one-month join for $9.95, and downloading everything that you can find and think worthwhile.
But I'm very lazy. Just the thought of all the time spent looking for photo sets of my favorite models tires me out.
Maybe old age is creeping up on me.
Or---has it already arrived?
LOL.
I have checked on Firefox, Edge and Chrome using our TBP link without getting any warning.
I do know that in the past there were some outdated unsecured links to ATK sites that gave warnings. This error was because the URL started with HTTP:// instead of HTTPS:// - the S means the connection is secure.
In Edge and Chrome, there is an icon that looks like a padlock and it should appear closed if the site is secure. In Firefox, the icon looks like a shield.
But again, using our ATK Petites link should be taking you to the secure site.
Since I don't download a lot anymore, download speeds don't bother me as much as for most people.
But, if I did download a lot, and the streaming speed for videos was affected, I would lower the site score significantly.
Actually, I probably rated the site score too high, because I was basing it on my personal satisfaction, instead of trying for a more objective rating.
But that is why I made a point of showing the complaints by other PU members, who certainly deserve to be mentioned.
There are some networks that seem to have real problems with download speeds. Team Skeet got a lot of complaints by PU members a while back about slow download speeds.
But when I posted that as a member of Team Skeet, I hadn't experienced slow download speeds, I was called a shill or a liar because I posted my experience at Team Skeet was different.
Sometimes PU members can be quick to criticize.
LOL.
(After the sting of criticism wears off.)
I'm a current member of the Lets Doe It network.
Agree that the girls are mainly gorgeous. One of the main benefits of the site.
But if you're having log-in and page loading and download problems, that will ruin the value of the network.
I personally don't have those problems.
I hope that customer support was able to respond to fix your problems.
Some sites have great support, others are hit-and-miss, and other sites seem to ignore requests.
My download speeds from the network average around 2-5 Mbps, which is because I use my WiFi connection, which is on a 200 Mbps hardwired connection from Spectrum.
A WiFi connection is much slower than a hardwired connection.
But if you are able to get good download speeds from other paysites, and from a different computer, as well, I have no idea what is causing the problem.
Just random thoughts: are you using a VPN? That can cause slower download speeds, or even failure to communicate (if their server detects the use of a VPN).
Can you check your firewall to see if that is causing problems?
Can you check your connection to the internet?
If you're using WiFi, a slow or weak signal can interfere with downloads, or you can be disconnected without even realizing it sometimes. That was a common problem for me on my previous WiFi connection.
I'm not very tech savvy, but I do know there can be very many problems that reduce the effectiveness of a computer.
Hopefully, the paysite support team can check what's wrong.
If not, you should demand a refund of your membership payment.
I don't know if you can contact technical support through the live chat option, but that's the fastest way to contact them, instead of an email.
Hoping they can fix your problem.
If not, demand a refund, because you paid for a service, and you're not getting it.
(I know life isn't always fair. But you have a strong case for a refund, if the service is unsatisfactory. Or maybe an extension of your membership--if they fix the problem.)
You're right that the price differential needs to be reasonable. I know this sounds self-serving, but maybe the streaming-only price needs to be lowered and the download premium kept reasonable. Maybe, just maybe, more people would join if the streaming price was reasonable.
I agree 100% with your thoughts.
Except that most hardcore porn requires a suspension of disbelief, if you're to get any satisfaction or enjoyment from it.
Maybe I'm being too broad.
Some hardcore porn is less stupid, but it's usually better to turn off your brain and enjoy the show: too much thinking or disbelief reduces the impact of porn.
And I do enjoy looking at pretty or beautiful girls and women. And the network has a ton of them. That's one thing I find amazing about porn: how many pretty or lovely women go into it, even if it's for a very limited time.
The average career of most models seems to be around 2 years or less.
That's just a guess. Some models can last for many years, but most are very short term.
If the plot or action is too stupid, or extreme, then I just move on.
Actually, your reply could be turned into a review, if you care to add a few details.
I think it makes a lot of sense.
Agreed. The team skeet members area has become so bloated and it is really annoying to click on a model to find GASP 12 scenes! But SURPRISE!!! With your membership you only can get 5 of those scenes!
I don't believe that she's gotten a boob job. She frequently has new stuff on Watch4Beauty and her body hasn't changed, and she frequently posts on twitter @MelenaMariaRya_ and her body hasn't changed. On June 7, Vixen tweeted a picture of her in a Vixen swimsuit and her body looks the same too. Looks like she might have done a solo vid for them. No indication of any boy/girl vid on her twitter feed.
USING CAPS BECAUSE OF POOR EYESIGHT, NOT TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
I ASSUME YOU WENT THROUGH THE EARLY 1970s WHEN MAINSTREAM MOVIE THEATERS WERE FIRST SHOWING SOFTCORE PORN.
BUT THE EXPERIENCE AT THE TIME SEEMED NEW AND EXCITING: WATCHING A MOVIE LIKE EMMANUELLE (WITH SYLVIA KRISTEL) OR STORY OF O. THE IMAGES WERE CRISP, THE COLORS VIBRANT, THE PLOT WAS INTERESTING, AND IT JUST SEEMED LIKE A NEW AGE.
ANYWAY, WATCHING THE LENA REIF VIDEO AT WHITE BOXXX, WHICH WAS THE FIRST VIDEO I SAW AT THE SITE, BROUGHT BACK A LITTLE OF HOW SENSUOUS PORN COULD BE.
"Sexy Shona River and Lena Reif enjoy hot threesome".
I DON'T KNOW WHY THE VIDEO LACKS THE HEAT IT SHOULD HAVE (MAYBE I'M JUST GETTING OLD AND MY BODY DOESN'T RESPOND LIKE IT USED TO WHEN I WAS YOUNGER), BUT THE IMAGES ARE CRISP AND CLEAR AND LENA IS PRESENTED LIKE A GODDESS, AND WHEN HER BREASTS SWAY SO NATURALLY, IT SEEMS LIKE A WET DREAM IN ACTION.
IF YOU STILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE VIDEO (DOWNLOADED, OR STILL A MEMBER OF THE SITE), I RECOMMEND WATCHING THE VIDEO AGAIN.
EXCELLENT GLAM HARDCORE OF A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN.
BUT LIKE YOU SAY, PORN IS AN INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE: TASTES DIFFER.
I'm glad you found that you have access to All Fine Girls.
That just confirms the TBP reviews that state you get all 3 sites with a membership to any one of the sites.
(TBP reviews sometimes have errors, and they don't bother to read the PU reviews that point out those errors.)
But your quote is probably the best quote, and the funniest, I've read this week:
"As to the quality of the models, I should note that a number of them will be familiar to fans of the Met Art sites, although you may not have previously seen them with a semen mustache."
It's true that some of the MetArt models do hardcore porn at other sites.
Kind of makes you realize that they are real girls, not just fantasy pinups.
Years ago, there were several individual sites that they either dropped or partially combined into the new "All Fine Girls" site.
But I think that most of the models at all 3 sites have content at all 3 sites. The main exception to that would be the cross-advertising videos, where they feature a video from some outside site as a form of advertising for that outside site, so the featured model would be less likely to appear at the other 2 sites in what used to be called the Diesel Network.
As far as I know, they currently have no formal name for the 3 sites as a group, even though a membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the other 2 sites.
I once was making love to a woman, and found out through the course of events that she had shaven pubes. I couldn't make love to her, and ended up leaving. I don't find pubic hair not just pleasing, but really a necessity.
What sites do you recommend for French and German porn?
And are they in English, or in their native language?
The site, I mean, not the videos (not what the models speak in their videos).
Thanks in advance.
I'd check out the sites, if they are in English (with instructions for English-speaking people).
Less important is what the models say in their videos.
I'll add that I've never seen a site that only provides images in landscape-only or portrait-only format. And if you want some GREAT wallpapers, go check out Digital Desire. J. Stephen Hicks is an awesome photographer and, in addition to regular photo shoots, he provides one nude and one beautiful landscape scene a day (often it is a great landscape with an ungodly beautiful girl someplace in the image, often clothing optional.)
I was last a member of Digital Desire in 2017 and and can say it is medium-core old-school glamour. Good stuff if you haven't been there before.
OK, first off, About half of the images are landscape. I prefer landscape images and I can tell you that there are some mind-blowing ones here.
Second, Amour Angels is not affiliated with W4B or any other popular site that I know of. I was a last a member of that site in 2014 or 2015, although for some reason it looks like I did not write a review for it. The site uses several of the same models that Met Art, Fem Joy and W4B uses, (Like Emily Bloom and Serena Wood) but they also have several models that I have not seen elsewhere. I would define Amour Angels as a professional site, but with more of a buble-gum kind of flavor. (Big flowers, hats, lots of props, etc.) Almost all solo and girl-girl posing, strictly softcore. Videos are just posing, laying around, female form stuff with some close-ups. The models are mostly cute, young, slender, petite...really young. (All ofthe girls are 18+.) The sets I have of popular models are from when thyey were just starting out. I just looked and I saved 229 sets and 29 videos, mostly because of the exclusive models not seen elsewhere. To answer your orientation question, there is also a good balance of landscape and portrait images here. The site may have changed a little since 2014-15, but this is what I have from then.
Hope that helps.
...Now I have to go back and join Amour Angels again. This time, I'll write a review!
Ah. OK. Natasha Schon is kind of a mixed bag for me, I've commented on MA many times and these shots of Elin/Aya are a good example. All 3 of the Schon MA sets are fairly dark, stylized and possibly highly altered images that attempt to shroud the model in mood and mystery. We have no idea what else Schon is altering in the name of artistic expression. I can appreciate the effort but prefer a little less alteration. The Hegre shots are mostly exactly the opposite and mostly just show the model in her true and unaltered form. Now, I also notice that Hegre has 35 galleries of this model dating back to 2013 (First set is called 18th Birthday so that says a lot....), so this model is younger and less experienced in the Hegre sets. The Schon sets are all dated 2017, so at this point the model has been working for 4 or 5 years. One huge change? The model's teeth. They are decidedly "European" in all if the Hegre sets including the ones published in 2017. (We have no idea when they were shot and every set could have been from the same 2-3 day shoot many years ago.) In the Schon shots, she's either gotten crowns or Schon has done a lot of editing. Either way, the difference is significant.
In the end, none of this matters. It is all in the eye of the beholder. I like this model's body on both sites. Please hold it against me. :-)
I don't have VR equipment.
So I can watch VR videos without the equipment, for what that's worth.
I think that Teen Mega World has enough other content that it's worth a join.
How often you return to the site depends on your personal preferences and enjoyment of the site.
No site is perfect. There will always be quibbles or major problems to decrease your enjoyment.
If you think the site gives good value for your money, that's the main consideration. In my opinion.
I've never been a member of MetArtX, and don't plan on being one any time soon.
I've been a member of MetArt for many years, on the monthly, yearly and finally a lifetime subscription.
MetArtX is a newish site, and I would suspect that you would get a lot more content from one of the other sites in the MA network that features harder content than what MA features.
Actually, since you are a MA member already, I suggest you log in to the MA site itself.
Once you log in, I assume you will see the "free access" advertisement, that gives you access to one or more of the MA sites as a trial offer.
I am doing that right now, and I am being offered 2 free days to three sites:
MetArtX Viv Thomas
Love Hairy
So I assume you should have the same opportunity to explore MetArtX for free for 2 days.
If you don't see that offer when logging in, I suggest you send an email to MetArt support, asking if they will give you 2 free days to MetArtX to sample their wares.
I see no reason they would deny this request.
And maybe you can post your experience with MetArtX in a comment at PU: whether you liked what you found.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
