| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Nubiles Captain:
(sonofzog's Reply)
Thanks! I will look at those and see how they are rated upon other people and who is still working. I really wish more people would speak up, and speak up on our site. We recently added anonymous comments per girl and that has helped a bit but the more info we get the better. I noticed also that the more girls we add the less comments and favorites per girl. It seems that less people favorite the same girl, they all have their own favorites. But yes there are going to be some that everyone loves.
Let me ask this, we have always had this internal policy of adding 3 new girls a week which usually ends up to be 4-7 sets of content a day. I am wondering what people would think if 1 of those girls was not new from time to time, it would be a repeat. I say that because its getting so hard lately to find good girls and we could focus then repeating the good ones. So many girls are tattooed up, or fat. I think the average weight gain has gone up 20 pounds in the last 5 years. We are not trying to add less content. It would be the same amount of daily sets. I just know that if we focused some direction on girls who are really hot it would be better overall. It can take us sometimes 2 or 3 months once we shoot a girl to the time she goes on the site (if she is not rushed) because of overall production. A lot of girls quit in that time. Not an excuse, just the reality of it.
|
04-25-12 06:24am
|
Reply
27
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from Capn:
Well, it is good to know the boss is listening! ;0)
I agree, more material of each model would be welcome.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-23-12 11:34pm
|
Reply
28
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from Nubiles Captain:
We do when members speak up about which girls they want and there is enough demand for them, assuming the girls still are modeling and will come back. Got any girls in mind?
|
04-22-12 08:38pm
|
Reply
29
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from messmer:
I am not sure if this will be helpful but I never could get to Clubfilly.com directly myself, or to CoverMyFace. I had to do it the round about way and click on "advanced search" on the PSN page then when that one opened click on 1080p right beside the search box, go down to the bottom of the page and click "search" .. that would bring up all the 1080p HD Material offered by CLUBFILLY.COM, PORNSTARNETWORK.COM and COVERMYFACE.COM. There might very well be another way but I never found it.
|
12-23-12 06:36pm
|
Reply
30
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(sonofzog's Reply)
Thanks, it's definitely improved. I always kept holding out the hope that they would artsy it down a little and they've done a good job of that.
|
01-30-16 10:57pm
|
Reply
31
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Parsnip:
(sonofzog's Reply)
Sooner or later all these sites give up on the quality and beauty - it's just too much hard work when the majority of porn consumers only want to see brutality. Fortunately SexArt hasn't dropped its standards yet. I hope you like it!
|
02-22-14 04:27am
|
Reply
32
|
Sis Loves Me
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from Wraith0711:
Agreed. The team skeet members area has become so bloated and it is really annoying to click on a model to find GASP 12 scenes! But SURPRISE!!! With your membership you only can get 5 of those scenes!
|
06-19-19 08:33am
|
Reply
33
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I don't have VR equipment.
So I can watch VR videos without the equipment, for what that's worth.
I think that Teen Mega World has enough other content that it's worth a join.
How often you return to the site depends on your personal preferences and enjoyment of the site.
No site is perfect. There will always be quibbles or major problems to decrease your enjoyment.
If you think the site gives good value for your money, that's the main consideration. In my opinion.
Have a good day. Try to enjoy the holiday season.
|
12-16-16 11:52am
|
Reply
34
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I can't comment on what you are talking about because I've been a member at least three times including right now and I've never had an issue with the site. The download speeds are sometime a little slow but never horrible. The only issue and it's not something they can do much about is in the overall quality of the videos. They're using a version that is 10 plus years old and it shows on some of the videos.
|
11-08-14 10:03am
|
Reply
35
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(sonofzog's Reply)
The discount was gone yesterday when I checked but you'll be happy to hear our discount is back now.
|
11-02-14 07:08am
|
Reply
36
|
The White Boxxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(sonofzog's Reply)
USING CAPS BECAUSE OF POOR EYESIGHT, NOT TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
I ASSUME YOU WENT THROUGH THE EARLY 1970s WHEN MAINSTREAM MOVIE THEATERS WERE FIRST SHOWING SOFTCORE PORN.
BUT THE EXPERIENCE AT THE TIME SEEMED NEW AND EXCITING: WATCHING A MOVIE LIKE EMMANUELLE (WITH SYLVIA KRISTEL) OR STORY OF O. THE IMAGES WERE CRISP, THE COLORS VIBRANT, THE PLOT WAS INTERESTING, AND IT JUST SEEMED LIKE A NEW AGE.
ANYWAY, WATCHING THE LENA REIF VIDEO AT WHITE BOXXX, WHICH WAS THE FIRST VIDEO I SAW AT THE SITE, BROUGHT BACK A LITTLE OF HOW SENSUOUS PORN COULD BE.
"Sexy Shona River and Lena Reif enjoy hot threesome".
I DON'T KNOW WHY THE VIDEO LACKS THE HEAT IT SHOULD HAVE (MAYBE I'M JUST GETTING OLD AND MY BODY DOESN'T RESPOND LIKE IT USED TO WHEN I WAS YOUNGER), BUT THE IMAGES ARE CRISP AND CLEAR AND LENA IS PRESENTED LIKE A GODDESS, AND WHEN HER BREASTS SWAY SO NATURALLY, IT SEEMS LIKE A WET DREAM IN ACTION.
IF YOU STILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE VIDEO (DOWNLOADED, OR STILL A MEMBER OF THE SITE), I RECOMMEND WATCHING THE VIDEO AGAIN.
EXCELLENT GLAM HARDCORE OF A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN.
BUT LIKE YOU SAY, PORN IS AN INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE: TASTES DIFFER.
|
01-13-19 05:25pm
|
Reply
37
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi sonofzog,
Oops! Looks like we have a problem with our link. Thank you for the head's up. I'll post here once we have it fixed! :)
|
12-08-15 12:02pm
|
Reply
38
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(sonofzog's Reply)
Are you still having that problem?
I ask because I just tried visiting from pour link and it worked ok. All I can suggest is clearing your cache (Temporary Internet files) and any cookies associated with the site, then trying again from our link.
Sorry I can't help further.
|
11-30-14 06:39pm
|
Reply
39
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from noche:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I rarely find anything worth downloading anymore. For a while this site was good. But I feel like most of their updates are now marginal and they have begun passing of dvd content as HD content every few days. Plus, they have been having site issues with the last few updates. Sad to see them tank, they were good.
|
06-13-12 09:35pm
|
Reply
40
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from exotics4me:
I too like some older porn, just not too old, but the 90s, especially late 90s that Vivid did so well. The channel is worth the price easily. I would even say the Vivid channel on VB is as good or better than the Vivid website. Also note that the price of it should be prorated. I think it's $15 if you add it on the first day of your VB membership, but if you wait until say the 15th day of your membership to VB to add Vivid, it should only be $7.50.
When you say an entire film do you mean an entire scene or entire DVD? I have complained about them not having a full DVD download link, but I don't think they ever will. Sadly, there was a DVD site, American Vice, that did allow full DVD downloads, but they disappeared a year or so ago.
|
04-22-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
41
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from PinkPanther:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I don't believe that she's gotten a boob job. She frequently has new stuff on Watch4Beauty and her body hasn't changed, and she frequently posts on twitter @MelenaMariaRya_ and her body hasn't changed. On June 7, Vixen tweeted a picture of her in a Vixen swimsuit and her body looks the same too. Looks like she might have done a solo vid for them. No indication of any boy/girl vid on her twitter feed.
|
06-10-19 07:41pm
|
Reply
42
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from skippy:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I recall reading that he passed away but thought somebody else had taken over at the site. His stuff was amazing, though.
|
02-26-18 11:46am
|
Reply
43
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from skippy:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I'll add that I've never seen a site that only provides images in landscape-only or portrait-only format. And if you want some GREAT wallpapers, go check out Digital Desire. J. Stephen Hicks is an awesome photographer and, in addition to regular photo shoots, he provides one nude and one beautiful landscape scene a day (often it is a great landscape with an ungodly beautiful girl someplace in the image, often clothing optional.)
I was last a member of Digital Desire in 2017 and and can say it is medium-core old-school glamour. Good stuff if you haven't been there before.
|
02-25-18 07:43pm
|
Reply
44
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from skippy:
(sonofzog's Reply)
Sonofzog,
OK, first off, About half of the images are landscape. I prefer landscape images and I can tell you that there are some mind-blowing ones here.
Second, Amour Angels is not affiliated with W4B or any other popular site that I know of. I was a last a member of that site in 2014 or 2015, although for some reason it looks like I did not write a review for it. The site uses several of the same models that Met Art, Fem Joy and W4B uses, (Like Emily Bloom and Serena Wood) but they also have several models that I have not seen elsewhere. I would define Amour Angels as a professional site, but with more of a buble-gum kind of flavor. (Big flowers, hats, lots of props, etc.) Almost all solo and girl-girl posing, strictly softcore. Videos are just posing, laying around, female form stuff with some close-ups. The models are mostly cute, young, slender, petite...really young. (All ofthe girls are 18+.) The sets I have of popular models are from when thyey were just starting out. I just looked and I saved 229 sets and 29 videos, mostly because of the exclusive models not seen elsewhere. To answer your orientation question, there is also a good balance of landscape and portrait images here. The site may have changed a little since 2014-15, but this is what I have from then.
Hope that helps.
...Now I have to go back and join Amour Angels again. This time, I'll write a review!
|
02-25-18 07:34pm
|
Reply
45
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I was recently a member of the Diesel network.
I joined 18 Only Girls, and since I remained a member, I gained access to the other two sites over time.
But my experience was different from yours.
It took at least 60 days, maybe more, before I gained access to the other sites. And when I did gain access, it was to both of the other sites at once.
|
06-26-15 11:58am
|
Reply
46
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(sonofzog's Reply)
I'm glad you found that you have access to All Fine Girls.
That just confirms the TBP reviews that state you get all 3 sites with a membership to any one of the sites.
(TBP reviews sometimes have errors, and they don't bother to read the PU reviews that point out those errors.)
But your quote is probably the best quote, and the funniest, I've read this week:
"As to the quality of the models, I should note that a number of them will be familiar to fans of the Met Art sites, although you may not have previously seen them with a semen mustache."
It's true that some of the MetArt models do hardcore porn at other sites.
Kind of makes you realize that they are real girls, not just fantasy pinups.
Years ago, there were several individual sites that they either dropped or partially combined into the new "All Fine Girls" site.
But I think that most of the models at all 3 sites have content at all 3 sites. The main exception to that would be the cross-advertising videos, where they feature a video from some outside site as a form of advertising for that outside site, so the featured model would be less likely to appear at the other 2 sites in what used to be called the Diesel Network.
As far as I know, they currently have no formal name for the 3 sites as a group, even though a membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the other 2 sites.
|
11-24-18 06:23pm
|
Reply
47
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(sonofzog's Reply)
The two reasons why I think cum shots came to be was because old time directors needed to prove that the guy had an orgasm and since men can't really fake it then showing a cum shot was the only way. The other reason is a little weird but it would appear that it's not that unusual for female porn performers to be less than wise when it comes to birth control so an internal cum shot is a little dangerous for these women.
I'd be just as happy if the guys wore a condom and made an internal cum shot or if they just faked it. After all we don't pretend to have an orgasm and then take out our dicks to shoot cum near the vagina or ass of our significant other so why does porn have to do that?
|
03-14-14 09:57am
|
Reply
48
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from jullie958:
It is OK
|
05-07-13 07:12am
|
Reply
49
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from brig:
(sonofzog's Reply)
Thanks to both of you for your comments. As I mentioned before we certainly value the feedback. Glad you're on the same page with us on model selection Son :)
Keep an eye on the site throughout December and January as we have some excellent group scenes coming up that might pique your interest.
|
11-28-12 08:43am
|
Reply
50
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Comment
from elephant:
Hi Brig
Yeah it is hard to try and please all us porn lovers cause we all like different things. Me personally I would love to see more GG/B and G/G scenes. I've seen so many G/B scenes everywhere else that when I'm a member of a site it is group and lesbian scenes I prefer, but I know other will different lol.
|
11-26-12 02:53am
|
