You're right that the price differential needs to be reasonable. I know this sounds self-serving, but maybe the streaming-only price needs to be lowered and the download premium kept reasonable. Maybe, just maybe, more people would join if the streaming price was reasonable.
I once was making love to a woman, and found out through the course of events that she had shaven pubes. I couldn't make love to her, and ended up leaving. I don't find pubic hair not just pleasing, but really a necessity.
What sites do you recommend for French and German porn?
And are they in English, or in their native language?
The site, I mean, not the videos (not what the models speak in their videos).
Thanks in advance.
I'd check out the sites, if they are in English (with instructions for English-speaking people).
Less important is what the models say in their videos.
I think his chances of appearing in front of a camera are next to impossible and he deserves it. I'm a pro-condom guy so seeing them in porn doesn't bother me but I think that I'm in the minority on this one.
I don't know if you heard about the US outbreak but there was a much bigger one in Europe. Depending on who you believe then as many as 100 performers were infected in Europe. No one knows fr sure the exact number for the US because only 1 case was named and 9 others were identified.
Let's just say that it seriously crippled porn production in Europe for most of the summer. No one is quite sure if the US patient zero is also responsible for all of the following infections in the US and Europe but if he isn't then it was a strange coincidence that a performer infected with syphilis in the US and who faked his test to work and was only discovered a couple of months after the fact did so at the same time as an outbreak was starting in Europe.
Since I don't download a lot anymore, download speeds don't bother me as much as for most people.
But, if I did download a lot, and the streaming speed for videos was affected, I would lower the site score significantly.
Actually, I probably rated the site score too high, because I was basing it on my personal satisfaction, instead of trying for a more objective rating.
But that is why I made a point of showing the complaints by other PU members, who certainly deserve to be mentioned.
There are some networks that seem to have real problems with download speeds. Team Skeet got a lot of complaints by PU members a while back about slow download speeds.
But when I posted that as a member of Team Skeet, I hadn't experienced slow download speeds, I was called a shill or a liar because I posted my experience at Team Skeet was different.
Sometimes PU members can be quick to criticize.
LOL.
(After the sting of criticism wears off.)
I agree that the quality of the photos improved a lot starting many years ago.
Before then, the photo quality was nowhere near as good as it's been for years now.
But to a degree, I don't care if the photo quality is up to MetArt standards. If the girl is really cute, or I really like her, I'm willing the collect her photosets.
I do have some favorite models at MetArt.
But there are some adorable or lovely models at the Wow sites, that I really like the videos and/or photosets.
I also agree that Freya Mayer can be stunning.
But there are other models at MetArt or Wow sites that I enjoy even more.
Jerricka, Rinna Ly, and Avril A are some of my favorites at MetArt.
To name just a few.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, I've bookmarked hundreds of models at Indexxx.com, because these girls can be cute, adorable, stunning, and even lovely or beautiful.
I have checked on Firefox, Edge and Chrome using our TBP link without getting any warning.
I do know that in the past there were some outdated unsecured links to ATK sites that gave warnings. This error was because the URL started with HTTP:// instead of HTTPS:// - the S means the connection is secure.
In Edge and Chrome, there is an icon that looks like a padlock and it should appear closed if the site is secure. In Firefox, the icon looks like a shield.
But again, using our ATK Petites link should be taking you to the secure site.
Thanks for the tip here - this site has been on my list, being a growing fan of the soft-hardcore genre. I found DD a bit too formulaic, but it sounds like this may be worth a join.
I agree 100% with your thoughts.
Except that most hardcore porn requires a suspension of disbelief, if you're to get any satisfaction or enjoyment from it.
Maybe I'm being too broad.
Some hardcore porn is less stupid, but it's usually better to turn off your brain and enjoy the show: too much thinking or disbelief reduces the impact of porn.
And I do enjoy looking at pretty or beautiful girls and women. And the network has a ton of them. That's one thing I find amazing about porn: how many pretty or lovely women go into it, even if it's for a very limited time.
The average career of most models seems to be around 2 years or less.
That's just a guess. Some models can last for many years, but most are very short term.
If the plot or action is too stupid, or extreme, then I just move on.
Actually, your reply could be turned into a review, if you care to add a few details.
I think it makes a lot of sense.
Looks like they are going for the multiple month sign-ups. 3 months for $39.99 is $13.33 per month which is a darn good price (3 months for just $10 more than one month. The one year price is even better, under $8 per month.
Being my first shot at this site, I'm gonna start with the 3 month deal and will re-up for a year if it's a good as I think it is.
Agree.
If you've never been a member of the site, it's worth a one-month join for $9.95, and downloading everything that you can find and think worthwhile.
But I'm very lazy. Just the thought of all the time spent looking for photo sets of my favorite models tires me out.
Maybe old age is creeping up on me.
Or---has it already arrived?
LOL.
Yeah a few girls have returned for a second appearance and some girls I think do double sets which are released quite close together. But yeah most are just the once, don't expect multiple sets for many, only certain ones have returned.
Ah. OK. Natasha Schon is kind of a mixed bag for me, I've commented on MA many times and these shots of Elin/Aya are a good example. All 3 of the Schon MA sets are fairly dark, stylized and possibly highly altered images that attempt to shroud the model in mood and mystery. We have no idea what else Schon is altering in the name of artistic expression. I can appreciate the effort but prefer a little less alteration. The Hegre shots are mostly exactly the opposite and mostly just show the model in her true and unaltered form. Now, I also notice that Hegre has 35 galleries of this model dating back to 2013 (First set is called 18th Birthday so that says a lot....), so this model is younger and less experienced in the Hegre sets. The Schon sets are all dated 2017, so at this point the model has been working for 4 or 5 years. One huge change? The model's teeth. They are decidedly "European" in all if the Hegre sets including the ones published in 2017. (We have no idea when they were shot and every set could have been from the same 2-3 day shoot many years ago.) In the Schon shots, she's either gotten crowns or Schon has done a lot of editing. Either way, the difference is significant.
In the end, none of this matters. It is all in the eye of the beholder. I like this model's body on both sites. Please hold it against me. :-)
I'm a current member of the Lets Doe It network.
Agree that the girls are mainly gorgeous. One of the main benefits of the site.
But if you're having log-in and page loading and download problems, that will ruin the value of the network.
I personally don't have those problems.
I hope that customer support was able to respond to fix your problems.
Some sites have great support, others are hit-and-miss, and other sites seem to ignore requests.
My download speeds from the network average around 2-5 Mbps, which is because I use my WiFi connection, which is on a 200 Mbps hardwired connection from Spectrum.
A WiFi connection is much slower than a hardwired connection.
But if you are able to get good download speeds from other paysites, and from a different computer, as well, I have no idea what is causing the problem.
Just random thoughts: are you using a VPN? That can cause slower download speeds, or even failure to communicate (if their server detects the use of a VPN).
Can you check your firewall to see if that is causing problems?
Can you check your connection to the internet?
If you're using WiFi, a slow or weak signal can interfere with downloads, or you can be disconnected without even realizing it sometimes. That was a common problem for me on my previous WiFi connection.
I'm not very tech savvy, but I do know there can be very many problems that reduce the effectiveness of a computer.
Hopefully, the paysite support team can check what's wrong.
If not, you should demand a refund of your membership payment.
I don't know if you can contact technical support through the live chat option, but that's the fastest way to contact them, instead of an email.
Hoping they can fix your problem.
If not, demand a refund, because you paid for a service, and you're not getting it.
(I know life isn't always fair. But you have a strong case for a refund, if the service is unsatisfactory. Or maybe an extension of your membership--if they fix the problem.)
I've never been a member of MetArtX, and don't plan on being one any time soon.
I've been a member of MetArt for many years, on the monthly, yearly and finally a lifetime subscription.
MetArtX is a newish site, and I would suspect that you would get a lot more content from one of the other sites in the MA network that features harder content than what MA features.
Actually, since you are a MA member already, I suggest you log in to the MA site itself.
Once you log in, I assume you will see the "free access" advertisement, that gives you access to one or more of the MA sites as a trial offer.
I am doing that right now, and I am being offered 2 free days to three sites:
MetArtX Viv Thomas
Love Hairy
So I assume you should have the same opportunity to explore MetArtX for free for 2 days.
If you don't see that offer when logging in, I suggest you send an email to MetArt support, asking if they will give you 2 free days to MetArtX to sample their wares.
I see no reason they would deny this request.
And maybe you can post your experience with MetArtX in a comment at PU: whether you liked what you found.
The problem is that their software team has problems updating the site software.
That's why any problems at the site that are software related can't be fixed, usually.
For example, all users are now newbies. The site software no longer recognizes how many reviews a user has written, to change their status from newbie to "whatever the term was for a higher level".
And for years, it now takes 1 year before you can do a re-review of a site, even though the rules say a site can be re-reviewed after 6 months.
I think the site software was written in a computer language that the current software team does not understand, so making changes to the software is difficult.
Excellent review.
Covers an excellent site very nicely.
I always liked MPL Studios a lot, but haven't joined them for a long time, because there are too many other sites taking my time and money.
But I agree the MPL Studio models are almost uniformly gorgeous, and beautifully photographed.
Also agree that Metart is not as exciting as it used to be. But it still is the biggest softcore photosite on the internet, with a huge backlog of very attractive models.
But I agree that some Metart photographers like to twist their models into pretzels, so you can examine their pussies and anus more closely. Which doesn't appeal to me.
LOL.
I can't believe this is your first review. You've been a member since the dinosaurs were roaming.
Since this was posted we shot some reruns of some hot girls. Some of hit the site. For example last week we added new sets of Grace Hartley who is super popular right now!
09-07-1210:23am
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
