| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from elephant:
(xexbot's Reply)
Yeah this is a very good point and I've never understood why some of the sickest things imaginable in films like hostel 2 or the hannibal lector one with the brains can be accepted and go through censorships and allowed for people to watch but showing anything like a revealing sex scene, a natural human act is seen as the sick one and not allowed.
|
08-31-12 08:41am
|
Reply
2
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(xexbot's Reply)
I prefer WMV because I've yet to find a player that I like better than WM Player. I find the Apple player to be less useful and I find that VMC tends to pixilate a bit when you move the slider. But it does seem that more sites only offer HD is formats other than WMV.
I'm okay with the size - for now. My ISP doesn't have a download cap yet. I'm hoping that as time goes on and more and more users have increased downloads due to movies and TV that there will be pushback against download caps. But, ISP download caps appear to be only a Canadian problem.
|
07-31-12 04:18am
|
Reply
3
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review. I'm an active porn downloader and I've never joined this site. My reason was usually the fact that the membership was confusing but they've fixed that. Now I don't have a good reason to join. And learning from your review that the offer HD in WMV format makes it more likely that I'll join soon. So many sites seem to offer HD in mp4 format. Thanks for the information.
|
07-29-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
4
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Monahan:
Good review and xexbot's comments about navigation and quality match mine. My only beef, and, in my case, it was a deal killer, is their unethical behaviour in regards to their membership deals.
A CAUTION NOTE TO ANYONE WHO SIGNS UP FOR THE OPPORTUNITY FOR FULL ACCESS.
I signed up on 10 August 2010 and was promised full access to all sites after 4 months, which I received. I was very happy with the deal, the content and the quality.
Then in January, 2012, I began being denied access to the 21Sextury site immediately after the automatic monthly renewal. The access denial started at the same time they split the site into two sites, 21Sextury and 21Sextreme. At first they blamed my access problem on their biller (EPOCH)and corrected it 48-72 hours after a trouble ticket was submitted. Later they said that my "lifetime" full access deal was expiring in June 2012.
Because my original membership was through Zoliboy, I would be permitted the $9.95 price only for 21Sextreme. I would have to purchase a new membership in 21Sextury to get the combination deal with 21Sextury. As you might guess, that price was considerably higher than the $9.95 I was paying.
If they could do that (change the rules) once, it's easy to see how they could do it again by splitting the network site again and again until each site becomes independent of the others requiring separate memberships for each site.
I cancelled my membership for that reason and really miss the high quality, but I don't miss their lack of ethics.
|
07-29-12 11:51am
|
Reply
5
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from graymane:
Commendable, and certainly a colorful review, vexbot. Twas One of those that did its job well without a lot of technical jargon.
Can't say, however, even with your towering score, whether it's swaying me in either direction; and maybe that's because I joined this site a long time ago and it had pretty much then of what you've cleverly described in this review.
It may be enough, though, to tilt my decision toward another shot.
Good job!
|
02-12-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
6
|
Alternadudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from gaypornolover:
(xexbot's Reply)
Cool, you can tri me anytime! x
|
08-09-12 03:22pm
|
Reply
7
|
Alternadudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gaypornolover:
(xexbot's Reply)
Hey thanks mate! I have reviewed lots of gay sites if you check out my others. Are you bi then? Nice to see someone interested in a gay review!
|
08-08-12 01:24pm
|
Reply
8
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Claypaws:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thanks xexbot. Now I understand what you're saying. I didn't think I was describing a problem though, unless you mean that links timing out is the problem.
I don't think they actually move the files around. I think the file stays where it is and they generate an alias for it which depends on only-they-know-what and is unique to you. It includes a 32 byte hash key if you look at the URL. Then they make that alias expire after a certain time. Certainly does prevent site raping. Evas Garden's links expire after about two minutes. Preventing browsing while downloading is a mean trick. It's a long time since I've seen that one.
I think that links expiring after a few hours is reasonable though. Or were you saying that your ATK links do not expire for days?
|
06-22-12 11:50am
|
Reply
9
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Claypaws:
(xexbot's Reply)
xexbot - I do not understand this comment about videos and new days and stuff. I have no idea what you are referring to. It does not appear to relate to my reply #1, about download managers. Please enlighten me :-)
|
06-21-12 04:51pm
|
Reply
10
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Claypaws:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thank you xexbot. I had to look up Taekwondo, not being a follower of any sport at all. I see what you mean about a dyslexic, or reversed, KTA. I bet ATK did not realise it.
The repeat modelling is a distinct feature and they do take it to extremes. Marie McCray has 96 photo sets and 20 videos at Galleria and also very many sets at Hairy, Petites, Premium and Archives - they have been shooting her for 7 years.
Some sites have one or two models with a lot of sets - Anya on MPLStudios, for example, with 165 photo sets and 13 videos but I know of no other site that does it for so many models. If ATK had a search that allowed me to identify all models with more than 20 sets, I would give the statistic - but it hasn't. I think that their own statistics, which I quoted, for number of models and number of photosets, must include the models whose videos stay on Galleria but whose photosets are moved off to Archives, giving them zero photosets at Galleria. For 2500 models and 25000 photosets can only give a lot of models more than 10 sets each if some have none. Hmmm. I do not feel like going manually through every model counting up her sets.
You mention Sativa Verde.I also participated in an ATKHairy cam show from Ely Dean. She was pretty effusive about how much fun it is modelling for them and she has at least one series on Hairy as a photographer too. And Alicia S runs a photo studio and also models for them.
This is not the only site or company that has happy models, of course. But I always think that it is nice to have some examples one could show to porn persecutors who think that porn consists entirely of miserable women forced to do things against their will.
|
06-21-12 04:47pm
|
Reply
11
|
Bianca's Latex Lair
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LatexRyan:
(xexbot's Reply)
I've actually found that most Latex/Fetish sites are actually quite competitively priced and often you don't pay much more than you would for a standard porn site.
I think that part of the reason for the high prices at Latex Lair are due in part to the fact that Bianca is one of the most well known fetish models. Whilst it's a very good site and the production values are fantastic, I think that paying nearly $40 as an initial price is a bit steep, but I can understand as to why they would put it so high.
As I've said in the review, there are often periods where membership prices are reduced and that it's far better value for money when you join during these periods.
I will admit that it can be rather hard to be subjective when you really enjoy a site or really like a model but of course sometimes it's by not being subjective that we learn the most about a site.
|
05-20-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
12
|
Chaturbate
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(xexbot's Reply)
I can take creepy porn or I can leave it but possibly illegal stuff is a very different thing. I'd hate to be one of those guys caught with stuff that I assumed was legal but is in fact illegal.
|
06-11-12 06:53am
|
Reply
13
|
Chaturbate
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from pat362:
If you assessement of the situation in regards to possible underage models should make anyone weary of joining this site. I'd hate to be one of the people who unknowignly saved a video of an underage girl. Of course that preculdes that this can be done. My knowledge of cam sites is very limited.
|
06-10-12 12:34pm
|
Reply
14
|
College Fuck Parties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thanks for the comments. I think it is supposed to look like amateurs doing a porn home movie for fun. Trouble is, it does. But even on the supposedly professional sites in the network, they often have horrible lighting.
When it's good it is worth viewing, but it takes so long to find the worthy stuff that I gave up just over half way through my membership. There is undoubtedly great stuff on that network, and a lot that I have missed because I couldn't be bothered to wade through it all. It could do with some professional edtiting, lighting and camerawork, then it could be something worth recommending.
|
05-20-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
15
|
Cuckold Cream
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Uh-oh - the second I hear of the slightest problem with cancellation that's enough to put me off a site, so reviews like this are especially helpful. Sites have to be 100% hot on cancellations in a business like this where trust is low!
|
02-13-12 08:12pm
|
Reply
16
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Denner:
Fine warning and sincere review.....
|
06-26-12 09:51am
|
Reply
17
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Just a quick question; When looking at the preview area, they mention "Full length movies" of about 70-75 minutes.
Surely these must be better quality than what you have mentioned in your review? They seem pretty new.
I'm not questioning your review, don't get me wrong, it just seems like false advertising if the above stated is true.
|
06-26-12 08:28am
|
Reply
18
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Wow sounds an awful site! I do think a lot of sites are stuck in the 1990s - wake up and smell the coffee folks! Most people have a half-decent broadband connection now and those that don't probably aren't going to pay to download porn anyway - it just isn't worth it at the speeds you get on dial-up.
|
06-25-12 11:14am
|
Reply
19
|
Cum Eating Cuckolds
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Sounds like an interesting site which could hold some appeal for me... excellent review, thank you.
|
04-14-12 11:09am
|
Reply
20
|
Cum Eating Cuckolds
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from BradlyH:
I can't say this is something that would be my niche but i saw your review on the front page and was curious to what this is all about. Great review by the way, I have been reading a lot of reviews mentioning bad navigation lately.
|
01-08-12 05:57pm
|
Reply
21
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Homegirl:
(xexbot's Reply)
I find the concept of dominating a gay man to be oddly fascinating.
|
05-23-20 03:28am
|
Reply
22
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review as always, but I found this one particularly well-written and interesting as you've really managed to give me a flavour of the site.
I have been a member of a kink.com site and I agree with you about the cross-promotions. The prices they charge are fair for the quality and they do offer discounts and 2-for-1 deals but even so, I could never afford to join all of their sites so the indexing to them all is a bit frustrating.
This is actually one of the "straight" sites I could enjoy as I like femdom stuff - I guess because the focus is on the male, unusual for straight porn, and I love domination and BDSM - and if a woman is doing it, it has a slightly different dynamic and of course the men are convincingly heterosexual - often claimed but rarely true on a gay sites!
|
06-25-12 04:02pm
|
Reply
23
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from otoh:
This is a network I've been tempted by, since I'm quite keen on nylons - but it is, as pat362 mentioned, very expensive. It also looks a bit samey, perhaps? I like something a bit different - perhaps something a bit artsy... but not at the expense of explicitness.
|
06-12-12 11:17am
|
Reply
24
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from pat362:
The site is by far the most expensive on the net. They do update with a lot of content on a monthly basis but it's spread out among all their different sites so unless you love everything they offer then you aren't necessarily getting all that much for you 90$.
Some of their content is for the gay market so there aren't too many hetero guys interested in those updates, it's very common for the same performers to have multiple scenes with similar content on their sites and I notice that a bunch of their sites don't update very often ir at all. I guess there is still a market for their brand of porn because they are still in business but their price has put them out of my pocket book. Not to mention that I don't think I kept a single video from when I last joined.
I'm glad you enjoy their network because they still hire girls to shoot porn and that's good for the porn economy.
|
06-10-12 12:54pm
|
Reply
25
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(xexbot's Reply)
You are blessed, xexbot, to have been granted a disposition like that. The logos drove me batty. I didn't keep a single video because of them. You are so fortunate that it's only a minor nuisance to you!
Oh, yeah, I already mentioned that, didn't I? :-)
|
02-12-12 06:38pm
|
