| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from Serious Partner:
Thank you for the feedback, we'll take it all into account and try to improve in future.
|
11-30-12 05:24am
|
Reply
52
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(xexbot's Reply)
They may link to plenty of legit movies that she was in but I think that you'll discover that her scenes have all been deleted from the movies. There truly is only one legal movie out there starring Tracy and it's the movie :Tracy I love You". Cynics claim that she did that movie under her production company just before admiting to being underage in all of the others so that this would be the only movie that anyone could legally own. She madea killing because of that.
Does the site have a download limit? I got royally burned with a site recently when they stopped me after I had downloaded 15 Gigs.
|
11-14-12 06:27pm
|
Reply
53
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thanks, xexbot. I didn't know that! I thought she had done them all while she was underage. So I probably got rid of my copy (those many years ago) for nothing!
|
11-13-12 10:20am
|
Reply
54
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(xexbot's Reply)
Thanks for the information. At least now I can join knowing the limitations.
|
11-13-12 08:38am
|
Reply
55
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from messmer:
Nice and thorough review, xexbot! The reason you only found one Traci Lords video was because it was discovered that she was underage at the time she made all those popular movies. I still remember the panic as people got rid of all the Traci Lords movies they had in their possession. I gave up my one and only one in an awful hurry! :-)
|
11-12-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
56
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from rearadmiral:
Interesting review. I love 'classic' porn from the late 80s through to the mid 90s and this site seems to have a lot to offer. I might give this site a try now that I know what the flaws are.
One question: the tour pages are arranged to suggest that the scenes are listed separately. Is there an option in the member pages to select a movie and see all the scenes in that movie (like they do at Videobox)?
|
11-12-12 11:27am
|
Reply
57
|
VCA XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(xexbot's Reply)
I can't figure out why this market hasn't been tapped. The production costs are long gone so all it would take is digitizing them. It would be great if a site like Videobox would create a 'classics' channel to give these older titles what they deserve.
|
05-06-12 11:58am
|
Reply
58
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from rearadmiral:
(xexbot's Reply)
I agree. I've recommended it to several people and know of at least one who tried it. He's a recurring member now too. It's like having access to a well-stocked adult video store.
|
07-20-12 08:52am
|
Reply
59
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Review
from BradlyH:
Another nice review, I find that a site with a lot of content better be Organized, if not it is one hell of a navigating nightmare !
You should elaborate a little bit more in your Bottom line section, maybe put things in there that you think other members would be interested in knowing with out actually visiting the site, such as: Pricing, the billing company, What players run the videos, How often is it updated, file sizes ect...
|
01-08-12 06:08pm
|
Reply
60
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from messmer:
Since reviews cannot be but subjective, here are my reasons for rating WAH higher than ATK:
Less emphasis on extreme hairiness (legs, arms, anus, belly etc.), something I dislike heartily, especially hairy legs.
ATK has become increasingly more extreme over the years.
No hardcore! Many of us prefer softcore solo models.
Material is better in quality because they only started a couple of years ago so most is in HD or, the few very earliest updates, in near HD quality.
Number of updates approaching those of ATK but of better quality, especially the pictures. Custom zip available.
Site makes it easy to browse.
Friendly and very responsive webmaster!
You on the other hand come at the judgment of the sites from a different angle. Every update containing hardcore always got the lowest marks from me in ATK while you bemoan the fact that WAH does not give you any hardcore. Nothing wrong with your preferences except when it comes to comparing the two sites. Just like apples and oranges, in my opinion.
In any case, welcome to Porn Users, xexbot, I don`t think I`ve seen your name before.
|
01-30-12 12:52pm
|
Reply
61
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I'll second Basil's attentiveness as a factor. As for WAH not running to "XXX", I think you should consider that not all porn is hardcore and that there are fans of the softer side of things. If the site's not your thing, it's just not your thing.
|
01-30-12 12:44pm
|
Reply
62
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
xexbot's Comment
from Capn:
Functionality is superior at WAH & the Webmanager is very responsive.
ATK is a much bigger outfit & therefore more ponderous in getting improvements implemented.
ATKNH have shedloads more content, WAH has only been going a couple of years.
Models & content is a very personal thing.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-30-12 12:32pm
|
