| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from fortherecord777:
Its a step in the right direction but 2 steps back in execution. Very limited to the ability this feature has. I wish it was more like flickr so we can have our own sets and streams.
|
06-19-09 07:50am
|
Reply
427
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Mr Fountain:
(jd1961's Reply)
Glad to help you; I try to be honest as I can and include specifics and details to be helpful. I love beautiful women and am always joining sites. Hope you like Met Art...I'm a member of them this month too.
|
12-23-08 05:45pm
|
Reply
428
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment from jd1961:
Basically, Met wants us to create 5 20 photo galleries per month, and then share them with the internet world! Smart idea on their part.
|
12-20-08 08:47pm
|
Reply
429
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Mr Fountain:
You basically select pics that you like from anywhere in Met Art and compose them on your personal list. Then you can send them to Metarts profile site and have other users vote on your list.
|
12-20-08 08:35am
|
Reply
430
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Denner:
Thanks for this hint from jd....I've not been back lately, though..
But BTW: I think its funny how these well known sites seem to live up to their standards in quality and content - compared to a lot of - alas - new crap that keeps poping up.
That is probably the reason this user still go back to the "good ol' sites"!
|
12-17-08 08:46am
|
Reply
431
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from williamj:
(jd1961's Reply)
Same here with your comment. I found the girls in other xxx sites. Why they don't get more XXX I don't understand. The girls are all ready doing XXX solo, lezzie and even girl/guy for other xxx sites. I thought of joining a few times. They must be marketing to soft-core porn users is all I could come to a conclusion
|
12-09-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
432
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
I find pics and vids of women in water very erotic - makes me think how much fun it would be to play slip and slide with her.
|
01-12-08 08:30am
|
Reply
433
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I'd like to second this for the most part. I have seen a few outdoor sets that were good, but the problems in general are water and sand or mud or dark grit sticking to the girl's skin, or being clustered in tree branches and leaves, or an otherwise perfect shot but there's this tall grass blade upstaging her ass. (Man, how many times? I hate that!) And you may not see it unless you inspect at maximum size.
Add to that the uneven light, with the girl's face obscured in deep shadow, and usually her crack is, too.
Not to say that some of the indoor shoots aren't exactly peaking out the light meter. But at least the light can be controlled if the photographer cares to. Outside, it's a lot to schedule a model for a perfect day, for a shoot at high noon, with the grass mowed beforehand.
Oh, and then there is that fly alighted on the girl's butt, probably because it senses something nutritious in the vicinity. I'd rather not have to Photoshop out the little critter. There's going to be spot there that marks where it was. Anyway, that's another toughie for the photographer, getting those choice shots without uninvited guests from the Animal Kingdom.
|
01-10-08 11:54am
|
Reply
434
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yeah, jd - I have exactly the same thing with the water vids.....but a lot of the newer soft-girl-sites seems to have an urge for that kinds of shoots...alas.
By the way, our old mate, Drooler had a great line for this site:
Candy Land
|
01-10-08 11:38am
|
Reply
435
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from mr smut:
Hi jd1961,
that's true I remember to have gotten such an offer. Guess I'll re-sign for the newsletter using my new mail address.
Thanks,
Smut
|
12-28-07 04:41am
|
Reply
436
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from PosterDude:
Nice Review. I agree met-art is best glamore site, but sometimes want more explicit. Me and you have Met-art and alsscan reversed. For me alsscans have higher photo and video quality width better glamour plus hardcore. We agree both sites are top of class and I agree with your nice met-art review. Just not so high score.
|
12-15-07 06:31am
|
Reply
437
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
The name's funny. Makes me think of "Mr. Magoo" the cartooon character, but now instead of a steering wheel, he's got his hands on computer devices, Photoshop open, insisting on applying too much "image enhancement," making the women look really icky, and not even seeing what he's doing. Mr. Magoo in the Internet Age.
|
12-11-07 01:58am
|
Reply
438
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
They have a section, "Set Browser Options," where you can set the default size of the photos. It's a nice feature! I always have the default at 1024 (small) for quicker previewing of individual shots before I make the decision for a one of those at 43xx!
|
12-11-07 01:53am
|
Reply
439
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
I figure that I already was teased enough in my early 20s to pay someone to do it now! My first ever porn solo site was this extremely cute model named Sweet Dominique. I was so built up that I would see some nudity when I joined it. I did, of her taking a shower with soap covering all the good parts of her body. I'm also a big Aria Giovanni fan who for the most part is a tease model these days, but I at least have seen some content of everything she has.
I think this site would be great for those like my wife. She really enjoys the pictures and says things like, "Look at how her shadow cascades over those rocks!" WHAT? I don't want to see her shadow! The thing I agree the most with you about on this site, the damn pouty poses. Smile! You're making money off showing your body, I would be smiling if someone paid me money to pose naked! And really, if I walked up to a gorgeous model, and I was single, and she was pouting I would just walk on by.
Thanks for commenting.
|
07-29-07 01:15am
|
Reply
440
|
Milton Twins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dracken:
(jd1961's Reply)
Paypal offers a great service which lets you make up a mastercard number linked to your paypal for limited time use. Basically you use it once to pay for a site then you can cancel the card and you are certain that next month you won't get a bill for hundreds of dollars. I always use it for new sites.
http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd...kedQuestions-outside
There are other similar services around the net but trust me this is really easy and convienent.
|
01-14-10 10:47am
|
Reply
441
|
Miss Laura Lee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from JBDICK:
(jd1961's Reply)
hi jd1961
sometimes you get get lucky with the local internet cache where they still download but disable your GUI...
I use to use this method on some older sites and when I didn't have a downloader, and the sites had the auto slideshow, start at image 1 then let it roll on to the end, then go and collect the images from the cache...talk about hard work, but they say, desperate men do desperate things...only thing is that the files use to end up with [1].jpg at the end of the name...
I don't recommend this, I'm just identfying the fact that PornUsers are quite resourceful, like thieves they will find a way...
Having demonstrated how sad I use to be in the past, I only download photos now when they offer the zip sets...otherwise I'm video download only, no DRM, no streaming...
|
04-27-08 01:20pm
|
Reply
442
|
Miss Laura Lee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(jd1961's Reply)
I used to do what you suggest in the past but, that way, you don't get the original file: possible quality loss, different file name, etc.
I don't know if what this site does with the galleries qualifies as a "legitimate security feature" so I'll just say that an image can be legitimately saved to disk by several means (I used one of the less usual ones in order to get image specs without losing a lot of time with screen captures).
Whoever invented zip file gallery download should be inducted to webmaster hall of fame.
|
04-27-08 03:03am
|
Reply
443
|
Miss Youth
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from MissYouth:
Hi jd1961
We are always looking to improve our tour page. Thank You for your feedback we have just added preview pages with samples of our content. Hope to see you soon = )
|
09-17-09 01:46am
|
Reply
444
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from elephant:
(jd1961's Reply)
Do you mean Irina, that looks like her now as Irina, so very cute
|
01-19-08 09:36am
|
Reply
445
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey, thanks. Can't remember if I saw her there but passed over the stuff or if I just missed it. Made note.
|
01-06-08 01:32pm
|
Reply
446
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
JD, you're a tech phenomenon. I'm not, but since you and I have been getting MPL differently, it might be both a hosting and routing difference of some kind. Just my feeble guess, really.
That storm out in the west has been awful, and another big nasty one is headed for So Cal, the Porn Capital of the US!
|
01-06-08 12:48am
|
Reply
447
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey JD,
I'm a member, too, and I haven't had any particular trouble (certainly nothing that slow). Hopefully it will blow over. Yes, I just revisited and things are snappy.
An ice storm in the midwestern US 3 weeks ago? Sounds like someone there's been reading too much chaos theory, in Russian, of course. It probably led to that ice storm, yuk-yuk.
Hey, how about that Anya? My, isn't she something!
|
01-05-08 01:23pm
|
Reply
448
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from ace of aces:
it`s enourmous! how pays more then 29,99 $ for a monthly sitesub?
and even that is expansive!
|
12-01-07 03:49am
|
Reply
449
|
My Angel Funs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yes, jd - I've heard that too. But I have some older stuff from Teenfuns - and as far as this user can judge: all the girls are of legal age. Not yuonger than you can find on a lot of other sites, anyway.
|
12-02-08 01:54pm
|
Reply
450
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from dalars:
My biggest issue with this site would be editing on the videos.
Very high quality, technically, but give me a break. They dissolve to black or white every 2 seconds and it's WAY annoying. I'm trying to concentrate here! This site is for you only if you like it super "Artsy Fartsy". I have downloaded dozens of videos and seriously, there is not one shot in any video thats over 4 seconds. I would put the average shot lenght at 2 seconds along with a few hundred disolve to black in a 5 min video.
|
11-03-10 07:54pm
|
