| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Mediaguy:
You have to understand that LiveCamNetwork is a community -oriented site and the members are extremely loyal. They also communicate as any community does so word of LiveCamNetwork's listing on PornUsers probably spread and a few of them came in with very enthusiastic comments and ratings (thanks guys!).
Now I don't approve of the schoolyard punk-ass name calling but hey what can you do lol.
But anyone who uses our site usually comes away with a very favorable opinion and pleasnt experiences.
Hope people keep it easy here and balance the enthusiasm with more objective reviews and ratings! Keep your eyes on our site news for some nifty new stuff coming up.
Thanks!!
|
09-21-07 02:34pm
|
Reply
402
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from LarryL:
(jd1961's Reply)
yeah.....you do that........Lemme know when ya find one
|
08-12-07 08:31pm
|
Reply
403
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from LarryL:
(jd1961's Reply)
I dont care what you think of me. And if I recall right, I wasn't asking your opinon to begin with. Go find something to do
|
08-12-07 05:19pm
|
Reply
404
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from LarryL:
JD1961,
If you didnt have your head so far up your ass, you would go to livecamnetwork.com and see that we are actually members there. Go to "community" once your there, which is the bulletin service of the site. So you, and anybody else, that thinks we are spammers, or shills, or whatever the fuck you call them.......Go pound sand up your ass. You are an idiot, pure plain and simple..........
|
08-12-07 04:24pm
|
Reply
405
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from LarryL:
(jd1961's Reply)
You aren't very smart are you? I am a member of that site, not a spammer. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer.....eh?
|
08-11-07 02:05am
|
Reply
406
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Rick:
It's definitely an issue lately!
We have ideas and plans to take the effect of possible shills. Stay tuned. :)
|
08-09-07 05:49pm
|
Reply
407
|
Live Cam Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LarryL:
(jd1961's Reply)
Nobody was asking you
|
08-08-07 07:25pm
|
Reply
408
|
Louis De Mirabert
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Denner:
Hey jd1961
The Drooler just made a comment for this site too - see that m'man.
But agree.
Maybe strangely enough I never had any serious problems with CCBill - always accurate at billing, always accurate at cancel - never got billed extra for anything - which in fact seems quite unique - or what.
I have my concern with most other billing-co. - especially Verotel.
So maybe....I'll repeat a question for TBP/PU about getting some kind of a special post for the users (PU) experience about billing-companies.
|
09-01-07 09:02am
|
Reply
409
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
You've got a point there. A shill is normally someone who is part of the group that wants its stuff promoted, but payola is received from an outsider, as is the case with DJ's getting perks from record companies for giving airtime to particular songs.
So for us, payola is free porn stuff.
But I want free sex. You could call it "layola."
|
09-03-07 08:03pm
|
Reply
410
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
to jd1961 and Drooler:
You guys make this place more fun.......
|
09-03-07 06:59am
|
Reply
411
|
LSG Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Not from me, anyway...
Like I said in the comment - if these guys give me a free access - nada about LSG on PU from this user.
|
08-30-07 12:30am
|
Reply
412
|
Mandingo X Rated
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from wiild1:
(jd1961's Reply)
OK, I might join and see if it's good or not, ut I am slightly sceptical....
|
05-02-08 05:02am
|
Reply
413
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yes, bro - it's "nice" without all that pseudo-interview-stuff. And sure, forgot that importend issue about the missing zip - was too busy browsing all those fine videos....
|
02-08-09 05:14am
|
Reply
414
|
Masturbation Page
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from YanksBillie:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, I respectfully disagree. As we all use high risk merchant accounts we are held to a chargeback standard much more conservative then a retail store. I don't know a company around who won't refund a LEGIT complaint rather then fight a chargeback. I do think that charging back has it's place, but it's certainly not the only form of customer service we understand.
Thanks
Billie.
|
10-12-07 12:22pm
|
Reply
415
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
Good point - High praise is due to Shap at Twisty's and the Captain at Nubiles as well.
|
09-24-07 08:28pm
|
Reply
416
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I read through that exchange with RagingBuddhist, too. Matt said that the problems RagingBuddhist was having should just have been communicated with the support at Matt's site, rather than the review statements (e.g., about slow navigation) being posted ahead of that.
Excuse me? It's like saying, "Don't you know that that's the only way it should be done?" I don't see it written anywhere at PornUsers that we're always supposed to contact support about problems before we write reviews. Like it or not, that's not the only way it IS done.
And Matt asserted, with a seemingly absolute conviction, that the navigation problems were user-related. How the hell would he know that? He didn't know what kind of system and internet connection RagingBuddhist had.
Anyway, all Matt had to do was say, in a friendly tone, "Please contact us about the problems you're describing and we'll work with you." Instead, he got very belligerent and badgered the shit out of, well, one of US!
If the exchange is going to be like that out in public, how would it be privately? Friendly? Supportive? Patient? Somehow, I have doubts.
|
09-22-07 07:16pm
|
Reply
417
|
Max Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(jd1961's Reply)
jd1961 - I wasn't just copying you, but like you I think that is the key to the pros and cons. Max isn't for everyone. Max isn't like anyone else on the 'net. If someone likes Max then that is probably the biggest 'pro' and if they hate him, that's probably the biggest 'con.' Because you reviewed the site favourably I'm assuming that like me, you're a Max fan. I find the contrast between his older stuff (like stuff with Tammi Ann, Vixxxen, Anastasia Blue) taped in the early to mid 1990s seems almost tame now compared to his newer stuff when in its day it was pretty extreme. I remember being blown away when I saw Tammi Ann gagging on Max's cock in Hitchhiker 1 when it came out in 1993. That was so much more extreme than anything else then. But now gagging is common and Max continues to push the envelope. I'm not sure how much more envelope-pushing I can take though. Or how much more envelope-pushing the US government will tolerate. But there is obviously a big market and fan base for Max because he's still in business and I assume he's pretty well off.
BTW - I liked your review a lot. It could stand as the only Max Hardcore review but i wanted to add in my 2 cents worth so any Max fans would know that at least two of us give it pretty similar reviews.
|
11-14-07 09:28am
|
Reply
418
|
Max Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from KodiakCS:
Because Max understands porn like very few do. These vids of his are all intense fantasies, even the photos show this with their unique posing. It's like watching a horrible car wreck, but an elegantly staged one! Repulsive, compelling, puzzling why all the girls allow him to piss in their mouths with disgusting pleasure--there is nothing like his twisted vision
This is what I meant in my profile (fav niches).
Inhibition and limits kill the scenes in most cases. Max makes no compromises.
Another guy who creates the same kind of atmosphere is Khan Tusion but he surrendered...
What I don't like about May is this silly school-girl attire, why do the girls all have to look like they are drawn from a seventeen-casting-parade?
|
11-08-07 01:27pm
|
Reply
419
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Mr Fountain:
thanks for the info; I was looking at this site but now I am glad that I passed on it. Bland is definately not what I am looking for.
|
01-02-09 08:34am
|
Reply
420
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from lk2fireone:
It doesn't make a lot of sense, but I've found that met-art, with its huge collection of models, photosets, and videos, is easier to search and find what you're looking for than sites that have far less content.
Met-art has the basic search engine, which lets you search by model name, photographer, etc.
And it also has a complete, alphabetical listing of the models, with a thumbnail of each model beside the name, that you can browse.
Simple tools, but really effective.
One quibble is that the same model can have different names for different photosets.
|
01-02-09 05:35am
|
Reply
421
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey JD,
Happy 2008!
The site is plagued with server problems, seems to me, and it's been that way for quite some time. I really wish they'd started their makeover a little further under the hood instead of doing this paint job first.
And who knows when, or if, those images (especially some earlier ones) marked as 4000px actually will be. Could it become another Superglamish fiasco? Let's hope not, but only time will tell. One thing's for sure, it's not good practice doing it the way they've done it.
With updates, EVERY damn web site in existence should do it from "the inside out" (bottom to top of the directory tree) but a lot of them do it bass-ackwards instead, announcing updates or changes that aren't online yet. MetArt and MetModels, two otherwise great sites, are among the guilty, although Met-Art has been updating a lot earlier in the day than they used to (Yay!).
|
01-01-08 01:09am
|
Reply
422
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, at least one of my suspicions has turned out to be groundless.
Every one of my use/passes is unique for each site, but the key thing I get from this is that using the same for a site for a long time is a bad idea.
I guess the hackers are pretty good at spoofing new IP addresses, too, in order to keep throwing logins at sites.
Well, thanks again, jd.
|
12-26-07 12:19pm
|
Reply
423
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks for the tip. I always use cryptic usernames and passwords (I never use "Drooler"), but I was near the end of the year of that subscription, so who knows?
And yes, hackers are constantly flailing away at our favorite candy shops. The sorry buggers.
Maybe I should ask you: Does having the browser remember the UN and PWD increase the risk, all other things (personal firewall on, etc.) being equal? 'Cause that's what I used to have with MC Nudes when the hacks hacked. These days, I always just type it in.
|
12-26-07 10:25am
|
Reply
424
|
Met Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Drooler:
Thanks, JD. I was really wondering about this site. In the previews I saw quite lot of familiar content. Your comment is what I needed to make sure of that regarding the inside content, which they so demurely omit from the visitor's area.
|
12-21-07 03:38am
|
Reply
425
|
Met Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yup, one thing we active porn-users are hassled with are all that licensend stuff. It's a mess and a jungle when looking for good new material.....
And well, that's why this place is so fine.
|
10-10-07 09:13am
|
