| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from atrapat:
(jd1961's Reply)
Since that Euro Cup took place more than a year ago, DDF's Sex Euro Cup may have some interest if your national team is the one that eventually won that trophy (their first one in the last 40 years) playing some of the best soccer ever seen.
In any other case, it's just a bunch of girls in funnier-than-usual body painting.
|
12-24-09 11:53am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from turboshaft:
(jd1961's Reply)
:0 Lol! Wasn't expecting anyone to say that, as we seem to only talk about the girls shaving and never the guys.
Not to sound weird, but I personally prefer them to be shaven since it's makes them less Hedgehog-ish and more porn star, and I figure if there's going to be a guy there he might as well not be sporting a full bear suit. Though it starts to get a little weird when he's more shaven than the girl -- legs, chest, everything -- as if he competing in the Olympics.
|
12-03-09 07:28pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from monty2222:
(jd1961's Reply)
Haha excellent reply. :D
IMO leave it up to the female, which also goes nicely hand-in-hand with my love for scenes where the female is the dominating one (not dominating as in fucking the guy's arse with a strap-on, dominating as in being the one instigating the sex and telling the guy what positions she wants to be fucked in etc.).
|
10-26-09 09:21am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(jd1961's Reply)
New review format is a big improvement over the old one. Much easier to read and understand, with more content.
|
08-19-09 06:09am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from lk2fireone:
(jd1961's Reply)
The people who make porn (the actors, models, cameramen, whoever) make up the porn industry.
The people who make cars (at GM, Ford, Toyota, etc.) are the car (auto) industry. But the people who sell cars and who service cars might also fit into the car industry. The people who drive cars or are passengers in cars are not considered part of the car industry.
The same for the software industry. The people who write software, or sell the software, make up the software industry. The people who use software are not usually considered part of the software industry.
But why do you say "the whole notion of a porno industry is ludicrous."
Apparently you enjoy porn. And you realize it's made by people, sold by people. So why is it strange or foolish to call porn an industry? Porn is a market/industry with billions of dollars in sales every year.
|
06-30-09 05:47pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from james4096:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, that confirms a suspicion I had about some of these guys.
I can understand not wanting some of the skanks you see out there in pr0n to touch you, but the chicks at ManoJob all look pretty damn good.
|
03-05-09 12:43pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
jd, this is just hillarious - the directors statement: that "most of these guys don't like being touched by girls"!!!
What are they doing there???
It's the whole deal.
They get a hard on, they get to climax - what do they not like?
Just watched the latest with this cute, petite brunette - the way she takes care of things does not strike me as a problem for the male part - weird...
|
03-05-09 06:57am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from JBDICK:
(jd1961's Reply)
hi jd1961
I heard Lea was an Olympic Athlete, diving? not speaking ill of those deceased I did see some statements that she had AIDS...
Another tragedy is Chloe Jones...
whilst AIDS is a risk in the industry, I'm sure drink drugs and depression are other contributors
|
05-04-08 03:31am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I suppose it's sleazy, but on the other hand, we don't complain about "Sam's Club," do we? Named after Sam Walton, the guy who started WalMart. He's been gone for 16 years ... And yet, you do have a point in that they probably don't have standup posters of him asking people to visit "my store." Whoa, that would be really eerie!
I wouldn't know who runs Chloe's site. Maybe it's part of her estate? Maybe the funds coming in help her children (assuming she had children)? Charities? I wouldn't know; just wondering aloud.
That could be true even though she died penniless, as you said.
One thing really caught my eye: Check out the page here at PU for the ChloeJones site and note that Maggie of TBP says that one con is "No interaction with Chloe" (!)
|
05-03-08 09:15am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from atrapat:
(jd1961's Reply)
Quite different to Anna Malle's site (site not listed at PU, btw). She died in a car accident in January 2006. The site still accepts new signups (45USD for 2 months recurring) but the homepage consists mainly of a note on her death and several condolence and remembrance texts from industry people. The note on her death was there almost from the day she died.
IMHO, that's the decent way to do things. Someone may still want to see the content but the site is also a tribute to her and her work.
|
05-03-08 08:40am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yeah, Lea DeMae I saw on Euro-pornstars, April 11 this year. And there was a bit of Sheridan coming out somewhere, I think, shortly after her fatal automobile accident one winter night on one of the Czech "D" roads that connect to Prague, back in I think it was 2006.
And you might even remember Elisa Bridges, a Playboy playmate who died at age 28 in February 2002. There's a Wikipedia page on her and about that, among other things. At the time, she had been showing up on Mac&Bumble.
My own poll response is that it bothers me somewhat, which is a sneekily inconclusive answer as far as whether one keeps the materials on the girl or not and whether one gets more recently posted stuff. (Of course, the allowed length of a poll response item is part of it. Not that I'm complaining -- I'm just pointing that out.)
I haven't thrown out anything of the girls that I know have died. I still marvel at how they were. Chloe Jones was a knockout, for instance. (And as you can see, her website lives on.) However, when I remember that they are no longer with us, and always cut off at such a young age, it just makes me sad. So I don't view them more than, say, once a year or less often.
But it's interesting how whether we know they're actually alive in real life or not matters. It makes the difference in my mind as to whether there is a living person to associate with the one I'm seeing in the videos and the photos.
Maybe it just matters if we think about it. Trite, but true. I can look at old glamour photos of Loretta Young and say, "Wow, what a beauty!" and leave it at that.
|
05-03-08 05:56am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Makes you wonder what Mom really wound up doing after you put it back. Did she grab your brother by the ear and give him what-for before making him incinerate it before her very eyes? Or did she just let it be?
Either way, she didn't involve the younger jd, so she wasn't making an example of the brother. That's the sign of a parent who's sensitive to the relationship and to the brother's feelings. (Applause)
|
05-02-08 11:41am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
I really liked this one from jd - his mother must be a decent human beeing.
|
05-02-08 06:12am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yeah, the MILF idea sounds like Oedipus Legit -- outwardly craving someone else's mother while secretly thinking naughty thoughts about one's own.
I'd never go for a woman just because she's someone's mom. And all of the poll options are non-sequitur in my case, so I my party affiliation doesn't allow me to vote on this one.
|
04-25-08 01:48am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yes, a TBP score of 87.6 for the Harris site is definitely putting the ratings into inflationary territory. The PU average score of 76.3 is closer to a real market correction. My experience there -- and I've been enough of a doof to join more than once -- kept bringing to mind the work "hack."
The PU reviews tend to reflect that, to which I may add or echo difficult navigation, broken links, hot babes but meager photo selections, and even the photography; though it qualifies as "glam," doesn't make it since there's blurriness, poor lighting, stupid crop jobs, and cookie-cutter aesthetics. No one in "Ron Land" seems to give a shit about making sure that their site is user friendly and free of obvious mistakes that rip off subscribers. The money's gonna come in, anyway, right?
Some folks do seem to like it, though. They probably eat out of microwaves.
|
04-23-08 12:25pm
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Now JD, that dont hold too good here! :) Seriously, people need to say everything they know about a site here. Holding back things that are less favorable only leaves the rest of us open to disappointment. If someone rates a site they should give a little reasoning to back there rating. Say everything nice or not....I guess I should write a review for the one rating I did with no review!
|
04-12-08 06:38pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I don't usually use them to join sites, either. If I find a new one, I check the review sites first for info. But I have stuck my neck out a few times and had the site listed at TBP/PU, joined (usually regetted it), and usually wrote a review. Bad little habit, that. Making a mental note to break that one.
I'd say it's time to let someone else be the "pioneer." I'm all covered in trail dust.
|
04-10-08 11:48am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yes, that's always a good idea. Just a speck of inconvenience for that "payback moment."
|
04-10-08 11:43am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
It can include redirects. By "referred" I mean that the portal (erohtica being one example), links to sites that visitors may go to, however the links may work (direct links in same window, in a new window, etc.).
The point is that these portals make money from visitor's clicks. I think they should be held accountable for some baseline of quality standards of the sites that they refer to. I think the referrals should be viewed as implicit recommendations.
If the portals are going to gain financially, then they do have a reciprocal responsibility. They shouldn't just be able to "plead ignorance" and claim that they have no control over it.
|
04-09-08 03:00am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Kevin:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hi jd,
Did the page actually seem to load all the way to the bottom, but the hourglass still stays for a bit? That's the issue we were having, so we removed a 3rd party stat tracking script which seemed to take ages to load.
As far as PornUsers.com and TheBestPorn.com, if you ever notice that certain pages often take longer than they should, hang half-way through, or even hang before they start loading then please send an e-mail to us, as detailed as you can, describing the issues. I'll personally look into every request.
|
03-28-08 12:52pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Khan:
(jd1961's Reply)
JD, there will be another announcement when the forum launches. I was just letting those (like yourself) who are following the subject know that, it's on track and that you can start getting your avatar ready.
No-doubt, some will miss the heads up but it doesn't really warrant a full on announcement.
|
03-25-08 05:20am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Ah yes! You got a computer and realized it only has one true function, the downloading of porn is mass quantities. After all the trading scans of nudy pictures was the first use of the internet. I know that sounds cool and all, but it is actually the truth! So when we are downloading porn we are actually using the internet for its true intention :)
|
03-19-08 08:47pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
Then what happened? You a pretty high in the standings here, so you must have heard your calling!
|
03-18-08 08:04pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(jd1961's Reply)
Indeed that is what I said: Being that the free stuff wasn't worth the time required to find anything of interest and I couldn't afford what I would be interested in, I didn't partake in porn for that period.
|
03-18-08 11:01am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#30
from Pinche Kankun:
(jd1961's Reply)
I'll make absolute sure I don't encounter that movie!!! >:(
|
03-13-08 11:36pm
|
