Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from rome476:
Follow- Up- In particular how new are the videos that are included?
|
07-09-09 08:19pm
|
Reply
527
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from mozzerellachick:
Hi guys
DRM has been removed from all movies inside the members area.
The only issue is if you are a memmber and downloaded movies before, the DRM was removed you will need to re down load them so they dont expire.
Mozzi chick
|
06-08-09 01:47am
|
Reply
528
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from rome476:
My guess is that if you join you get to download selected scenes without DRM but if you want a recent whole DVD you need to buy it seperately. Just a guess.
|
06-04-09 06:16pm
|
Reply
529
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from JBDICK:
Spot On jd1961, I agree with you.
Read my review if you wish. I feel totally ripped off having joined the site, and you are right, after finding some DVDs that looked interesting, I clicked on them only to find that I was redirected to their shop where I could spend more money on their merchandise if I'm stupid enough. The sad reality is that they do have the best girls on the Net, I guess their Boardroom & share holders have stopped loving Porn and are only interested in fleecing their members. I can't believe I'm reading rave reviews for the quality of their site content.
|
04-04-08 11:48am
|
Reply
530
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from elephant:
agree drm should never be seen these days, its a major downer and a rip off, never would either join such a site, its a shame here cause they look to have some good movies and models I like
|
12-14-07 03:16am
|
Reply
531
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks, jd - now I get the picture.
Still with you all the way about this item....Never again will I join a site with DRM.
|
12-09-07 01:00am
|
Reply
532
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Denner:
VERY interesting comment from jd.
From time to time I've been tempted by this site (they seem to have some exclusive Silvia Saint).
But it has always seemed somewhat "suspect" to me - and I have never checked it out seriously. (Origin states Spain, but that's an old, quite old Swedish company).
And this info from jd about having to install some kind of spyware to be able to download - EVEN - DRM protected videos is simply out of line.
Does that mean you pay 20 and still NOT get allround access to the DRM video-files, less you say yes to the spyware hassle?
If thats so, glad I haven't joined.
|
12-08-07 06:15am
|
Reply
533
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from OneMan:
Give the girls an earpiece and have a director off camera.....seriously !
The reason is that the girls are not very experienced like the Americans.
They should also speak more.....even Russian is better than silence, and some English would not be too difficult to master !
I am a huge fan of the new up and coming Eastern Euro Teen scene...such as TeenMegaWorld and other similar ones...but they don't speak at all....and I agree, that we do not want to hear the blokes speak at all !
It would be vastly improved if Sveta and Co., started to talk a little....and the bloke didn't !!
Whichever site starts doing this, will get very rich, very quickly !
I give English lessons......for nothing !!! Hehe !
|
11-11-09 09:52am
|
Reply
534
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Victorycreed:
I always believed that POV means first person point-of- view. Meaning thats you thats getting it with the girl. 2nd POV is someone talking about whats going on, narrative.
|
12-20-08 01:29am
|
Reply
535
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from NMC2008:
(jd1961's Reply)
Best POV site I have joined so far has been Sexy POV, they get the meaning of POV, but it also looks like Big Boob POV is the same way, I have yet to join though, but Sexy POV is a great site for your POV needs.
I was thinking of joining Pure POV in my venture of searching for a new POV site, but again, like with Onlyblowjob, I am not a big fan of unfamiliar girls, I may give it a shot after my JSexNetwork and 1,000 facials memberships expire.
Note: The worst POV site I have joined has been Big Girl Blowjobs, the guy talks through the entire damn scene......... for all of the scenes, extremely annoying and stupid.
|
07-11-08 11:01am
|
Reply
536
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from wally:
I agree with just about everything you say about the right way to do POV. Problem is, I haven't really found a website yet that does it (Dreamstash comes close - it probably violates your rules a bit since the operator uses a second tripod mounted camera for some non-POV angles, but at least he knows enough to stay quiet and anonymous). What website would you recommend?
|
04-24-08 09:21pm
|
Reply
537
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from PerfectGonzo:
The reason why the guy is talking is to get the girl more involved. The European chicks are not as outgoing and talkative as the American ones, so they need a little help. The guy has to ask questions and comment in order to get the girl talking a bit.
|
12-24-07 11:58am
|
Reply
538
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lespaul76:
(jd1961's Reply)
Definitely agree with that and I think that people trying to pull off the POV effect should take a look at some of the Red Light stuff that Vince Voyeur shoots. Too many guys ramble on and make annoying noises and grunts that totally ruin the videos. The quality does look good on the site though...
|
08-03-07 02:04am
|
Reply
539
|
Purrfect Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(jd1961's Reply)
I agree Eva is very nice-looking, but on a cost-value basis, I think I'll go for a teen mega-site, like mypreciousvirgins or something similar. Solo teen sites are tempting, but too expensive, unless I'm ready to marry the girl inside. :)
|
06-25-09 01:26pm
|
Reply
540
|
Rascal Dog
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Actually this small country - Denmark - still has our own money:
Kroner (crowns)
The exchange rate here:
1 Euro is 7,50 kroner
1 Dollar is 4,95 kroner
|
11-29-09 12:22am
|
Reply
541
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Did I put 3/29? If so, sorry about my morning clumsiness. I meant 4/29. It has shut down. Just tried the link at PU and that's what it says. My review and comments have been magically wiped away ... along with the replies.
|
05-01-08 11:18am
|
Reply
542
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
I joined yesterday. Hoping the server problem will be fixed soon, but I'm not going to wait too long before I post a review.
The way I see it, once a site is online and collecting subscription money, and for that matter getting referrals (this one was referred by erohtica), business is business. Any site with the shop door open is subject to review as it is, whatever warts there may be.
I think some people disagree with what I've just said and would say that we should give the site a chance to fix its problems first.
I've gone middle-of-the-road this time by posting the comment about the server speed, as a warning to other PornUsers. It was me that asked TBP and PU to list the site, once I'd found it through ehrotica, so I feel kind of responsible, though certainly not culpable.
All I wanted was a nice batch of quality content. What a pain in the ass this thing is!
|
03-27-08 08:18pm
|
Reply
543
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, jd, it's a blip that keeps fading into oblivion. I've had the site open most of today. I had a brief run of just OK performance a few hours ago, but most of the time the server just keeps crappin' out.
Also have a partial early draft of a review in the works, but I'll give you some inside skinny by saying that while there are no zips (a big minus, but of course!) all of the material looks exclusive/different from what Mr. Rigin has on other sites like MetArt and MetModels.
I did manage to finally send a message to them, and I got a prompt answer from Mr. Rigin himself. Apparently, they have some new programmers that have "altered" the site. Maybe it's just a co-incidence of bad timing! I hope it doesn't involve asteroids. ;)
Will have more to say once new developments appear sustainable.
|
03-27-08 03:14pm
|
Reply
544
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from malikstarks:
Oddly enough I've been a member at least 4 or 5 times on and off and never had a problem. Sorry man.
At least he uses CCBill who always seems to have their act together.
|
12-30-09 10:25am
|
Reply
545
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(jd1961's Reply)
that`s the reason why i made a ";)"
|
12-04-09 08:46am
|
Reply
546
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from ace of aces:
thanks for warning. you should makea review or give a rating for that site ;)
|
12-03-09 08:39am
|
Reply
547
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(jd1961's Reply)
hmmmm ... not really sure what to say. I rechecked it and had one of the TBP Editors check it and the link takes us directly to the site. Odd that you're getting redirected to a parked domain.
On the outside chance it'll help, try dumping your temporary Internet files and revisiting the link. Some times that'll clear up a cached page problem.
Again, sorry I don't have anything better to suggest. If you continue to have problems using our link, see if going directly to the site's domain works. ... rodneymoore [ dot] com
|
05-29-09 04:53am
|
Reply
548
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment from jd1961:
I'm getting this site from clicking the icon:
http://www.yourworstenemy.com/
it's one of those generic sites??
|
05-28-09 02:40pm
|
Reply
549
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Khan:
Must have been temporary because it's working fine for me now.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
|
05-28-09 02:38pm
|
Reply
550
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(jd1961's Reply)
Indeed, and I hardly think a site can request that of its users. You can also just click "View Source" and that combined with the Page Properties will give you the URL your Download Manager needs. Still it is an awful pain-in-the-ass for a what should be a simple matter.
I would love for them to buy a ready-made site design that handles video & photo content, sit down and convert all the DVDs to high-resolution WMVs and be done with it. I would easily give this site a glowing 95 (about as high as I'm willing to go for any site) if they could just make the site user friendly. It is bloody rat maze in there! Plus, my luck as usual, most of the content I want is older content, meaning the video quality is near terrible and downloading is a hair-pulling experience.
Oh well - hopefully sometime in the foreseeable future they will be enlightened and invest the money in a proper website.
Cheers.
|
03-06-08 02:43am
|