| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Tom22:
(jd1961's Reply)
What do you suggest, their name, address, phone number and bank account numbers ? I would question someones maturity and intellect that would leave a great deal of information about themselves on a website without a truly good purpose and without being paid for the risk they are taking.
|
06-14-07 02:58pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Gazette Risque:
(jd1961's Reply)
Usually while kissing in the newer porn, the tongues just touch each other in the open air. The don't penetrate each others mouths anymore.
It's actually kinda gross in my opinion.
But indeed, it could sometimes be considered penetration, lol.
|
06-08-07 12:53am
|
Reply
78
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TrashMan:
(jd1961's Reply)
We can only hope.
|
01-24-09 11:36am
|
Reply
79
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from DivBZero:
(jd1961's Reply)
Indeed, Abby Winters is magical! explicite-art also has moments of magic.
RGB -- is red green blue
HSV -- is hue saturation value
These are colour spaces, i.e. a way to describe rendering of colour in a particular medium.
Your views on trollops need a much wider airing. Its clear to me that the very best fun is can be described as getting the girls that absolutely wouldn't be naughty - to be, well rather naughty.
Cheers DivB
|
02-11-08 08:58am
|
Reply
80
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from DivBZero:
(jd1961's Reply)
JD,
I trust your judgement in most things on this board.
However, when it comes to 1By-Day I think the original comment is valid.
I too like to see the models presentable. To me this means the sort of make-up they would wear to go out for dinner. I understand that there must be some compensation for the camera, but in the 1By-day case is veers too far towards the orange. Just out an image in photoshop and check the RGB values!
Every 10 sets or so they will do a set in natural colours, which I believe has a lot more erotic charge to it.
Thanks
DivB
|
02-06-08 04:51am
|
Reply
81
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Some months ago, a webmaster contacted me by e-mail and offered me a complimentary free month. He asked me, in a separate e-mail sent at nearly the same time, to change my score on the site. Even said he wasn't trying to bribe me. Ho ho. I went and changed my settings, so now webmasters can't contact me about matters PU except on the site, where all can see. Said webmaster had also promised changes to the site which as far as I've been able to tell have yet to take place.
On to a different subject: I agree that Bela is a great webmaster who has been good to communicate with. He, along with some of the others, are truly interested in our opinions and preferences. With this kind of communication channel open, positive improvements have been made to some of the sites.
I think this time around Bela put 2 and 2 together too quickly, but I've been guilty of that before myself. I feel for both Bela and Davit, but I'm sure everyone will get over it.
|
01-02-08 11:57pm
|
Reply
82
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Davit:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hi JD - hope you will see my further comments and maybe reconsider your suspicions of me. I am new to this, and have been a bit green. The only time I posted a specific link was when I considered it relevant to the subject. Yes, the 21 Sextury sites are my favourite at the moment (closely followed by Sapphic Erotica) but of course this is entirely subjective, and I will try to be a bit more objective in future and try and see more potential in sites for other users who may not share my opinions, even if I do not think the site is all that great.
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-02-08 01:29pm
|
Reply
83
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(jd1961's Reply)
Perhaps I'm missing something but the only hotlink I'm seeing here is the one our system automatically inserts any time there is a recognizable site name. This feature was mentioned in a past announcement (see #4) https://www.pornusers.com/announcements.html#9703
|
01-02-08 09:36am
|
Reply
84
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from s1vus1:
(jd1961's Reply)
Im new to the reviewing and your right about slaming the site for being something it is not trying to be. Also thanks for changing the trust rating that was nice of you. :)
|
12-27-07 12:12pm
|
Reply
85
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
A lack of amateurs would be a negative if the site were promoting itself as being an amateur site, but this site promotes itself as having the hottest pro models, which it does indeed have.
|
12-26-07 08:09pm
|
Reply
86
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from s1vus1:
(jd1961's Reply)
I will remove it from negative. But it would be a nice idea for you guys. Its becoming very popular. I hope everything else in the review was correct please let me know and thanks for the reply
|
12-26-07 05:44pm
|
Reply
87
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Nope - we still have our "royal" currency: Kroner
($1,- is around 5,50- kroner)
|
11-06-07 12:35am
|
Reply
88
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Bela:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hello,
Yes, you're right, I'm afraid we had to raise our prices not long ago.
As I'm sure you're aware the dollar has gone down about 40% against the Euro over the past 6 months and since we're based in Europe, that means 40% less income but the same expenses (not counting inflation).
Prices for a 30-day membership used to be $29.95 for the first month, then $24.95 recurring, they are now Euro24.95 then Euro19.95 recurring, which is the equivalent of $34.95 for the first month and then $29.95 recurring (depending on the daily exchange rate of course). That's an increase of 16-17%, which considering the fact that we haven't raised our prices for years and are now providing TWO exclusive updates every single day - twice the number as before - is still a very good deal and our members definitely agree that we're still excellent value for money! :)
Just as a note - the prices on our join pages are all shown in Euros - no dollar signs out there, no "misrepresentation" Our billers will generally show the dollar equivalent though, so there definitely shouldn't be any misunderstandings.
Privately, I agree about the Euro and the European Union of course, but that's a different story...
We are in the process of informing review sites etc. about our new prices (which were only finalised this week), if there are any outdated prices out there (and for the moment, they practically still all are), then it isn't the reviewer's fault - I'm sure they'll all get around to updating their info reasonably quickly.
Keep enjoying the site and I hope you agree that we are still well worth the money! :)
Bela
DDF Productions
|
11-06-07 12:20am
|
Reply
89
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Bela:
Hello!
A little update for you:
We've decided to allow Sweet-Models to continue as an archive site, so anyone who wants to can join the site to get all of that content (in the knowledge that there will be no further updates).
So, new members will know that they are joining and archive site and will not get free access to 1by-day of course, whereas old members will not only get free access to 1by-day for as long as their membership to Sweet-Models remains active (a pretty nice deal I think ;)), but will also have continued access to the Sweet-Models archive too.
|
10-09-07 05:53am
|
Reply
90
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Great deal for Sweet-Models members. Sweet-Models was my first introduction to DDF, so it served it's purpose. The new site blows away anything that they had in the past - it's nice to see a long-established site do that.
|
10-03-07 07:17pm
|
Reply
91
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
It's just that I hate when server "filth" gets in the way of enjoying the content "filth."
|
10-02-07 02:36pm
|
Reply
92
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Drooler:
Actually, I'm glad that they've come to their senses and stopped this business of having gobs of sites, probably just to rake in cash. The only one that I ever liked at all was 1byDay; the others were too kinky for me, with slow updates and lousy, filthy lousy server response. (1byDay went through several months of terrible servers, too.)
The new 1byDay/1byNight is a huge improvement over that earlier, and obviously ill-fated, business plan. It's fast, it's vast, and it's hot.
|
10-02-07 02:11am
|
Reply
93
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
I agree, but my guess is they could have taken the money they paid Aria Giovanni to tease us with and rounded up 10-12 programmers to get it done. I may have just been frustrated with the Aria videos when I typed that complaint!
|
09-10-07 12:24am
|
Reply
94
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from PinkPanther:
The re-designed site is a real pleasure. I had found the old site to be frustrating. Great stuff to be found here, their models are top notch, the photos are high quality.
My biggest complaint: lay off the pancake make-up. They lather it on thick on all their models, most of whom would look great without it.
But when that's your biggest complaint, you know you're at a great site.
|
08-27-07 05:51pm
|
Reply
95
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from King:
I confirm your thoughts as I re-joined recently. Great site to visit.
|
08-26-07 02:47pm
|
Reply
96
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Agreed. And without Hungarian names like Zsuzsanna and such, my hard drive would have even longer lists of Susanna's, making it even harder to keep track of who's who -- just to give one example.
Pier999 does this mudane "Playmate of the Month" kind of naming somewhat, and it's really silly. Marina/Euphrat is "Patty Gower." Zuzana Zeleznovova is "Sharon Star." Lucie Horinkova is "Victorie Kay." Of course, these are all Czech models, who can't always escape the confining forces of Anglicization, either.
|
08-26-07 07:02am
|
Reply
97
|
18 Pussy Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey jd
I'll enjoy it - if it's free - still I hate those missing responses from webmasters...
|
01-03-08 09:54am
|
Reply
98
|
18 Pussy Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey jd
Well, yeah, they got back with excuses - and I got inside - even without having to use the PU/TBP-thing.
But, man - what a disapointment - especially with navigation - and a very strange phenomenon:
If you remember - every girl has her own "page" (or wharever) - but for a lot of the best ones the site is blank - even if they state for exampel:
Vanessa - 10 picture sets and 4 video sets. But Vanessas site is plain empty. Nada there - that sucks.
I'll be back with a review.
|
11-26-07 06:36am
|
Reply
99
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(jd1961's Reply)
Did that ever get the job done?
|
07-31-12 01:19pm
|
Reply
100
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from ControllingMind:
Thats porn pros network crossed off my list then.
Some sites might offer a refund, but have no real intention of authorizing it.
Their partner company are called 'Fuck You Cash'. I think that Says it all.
Make sure you never return and give them a good slagging off on here. It wil cost them more than a refund in the long run.
|
10-15-09 06:53am
|
